PDA

View Full Version : American in Iraq detained in raid on firm he informed US on



Willy
12-18-2006, 07:50 AM
One night in mid-April, the steel door clanked shut on detainee No. 200343 at Camp Cropper, the United States military’s maximum-security detention site in Baghdad.

American guards arrived at the man’s cell periodically over the next several days, shackled his hands and feet, blindfolded him and took him to a padded room for interrogation, the detainee said. After an hour or two, he was returned to his cell, fatigued but unable to sleep

The fluorescent lights in his cell were never turned off, he said. At most hours, heavy metal or country music blared in the corridor. He said he was rousted at random times without explanation and made to stand in his cell. Even lying down, he said, he was kept from covering his face to block out the light, noise and cold. And when he was released after 97 days he was exhausted, depressed and scared.

Detainee 200343 was among thousands of people who have been held and released by the American military in Iraq, and his account of his ordeal has provided one of the few detailed views of the Pentagon’s detention operations since the abuse scandals at Abu Ghraib. Yet in many respects his case is unusual.

The detainee was Donald Vance, a 29-year-old Navy veteran from Chicago who went to Iraq as a security contractor. He wound up as a whistle-blower, passing information to the F.B.I. about suspicious activities at the Iraqi security firm where he worked, including what he said was possible illegal weapons trading.


Continues on several pages : http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/18/world/middleeast/18justice.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

gaijinsamurai
12-18-2006, 08:28 AM
Interesting. Clearly, someone dropped the ball on this, and should suffer the consequences.
One thing though, why didn't the guy just quit and head back to the US? That's what I would have done.

Argyll
12-18-2006, 08:47 AM
Somethings not right with this story,the FBI connection sounds Bullshyt, and it should have taken 30 mins to coroborate.
Why did he not resign the minute he thought he was in the wrong outfit,and make his way to the BIAP, then ask to see MI/MP's and the relevant agencies......what Juarasdiction does the FBI have over an Iraqi Security company?........none that I know of, as they're not an authority in Iraq,unless it's a purely US Investigation done on an American Company, maybe I'm not picking up on something.


On a visit to Chicago in October 2005, Mr. Vance met twice with an F.B.I. agent who set up a reporting system. Weekly, Mr. Vance phoned the agent from Iraq and sent him e-mail messages. “It was like, ‘Hey, I heard this and I saw this.’ I wanted to help,” Mr. Vance said. A government official familiar with the arrangement confirmed Mr. Vance’s account.

He stayed for 6 months until he was arrested?....Yeah ok sure,you thought you were working for a shady company 6 months prior, but you decided to stay and profit, instead of doing the right thing, and going right to the IZ and resigning, and then explaining the goings on the minute you became suspicious?.....you decided to report this to someone in the FBI in Chicago?......this is fcuking bizarre,I'm not surprised he was detained for any length of time and treated harshly, he had plenty of opportunity to leave in my own opinion,nobody was holding him against his will in the Security company,and it's bullshyt if he said they held his passport, right off the Bat, that's a no-no, and he should have known this, he's talking pure shyte on this,something is not right with this whole story.

He witnessed another colleague giving "alcahol" to the GI's in return for munitions and the repair of weapons?
Fcuking hell, that's called "networking", and I've done it dozens of times,you do what you can to get the kit that you need, and if that means bending the rules, it happens.....

Large cache of weapons?.......hello, it's a security company,I'd be gutted if they didn't have a significant cache of weapons, you need to equip the guys out, you need to have a supply incase you land a larger contract,and you need to arm your men, you need spares..........

I'm not buying a lot of this story.......

bluffcove
12-18-2006, 08:57 AM
If the security company is based in the US then the FBI would have responsibility / duty to investigate the actions of the business regardless of its international area of influence.