PDA

View Full Version : Vietnam Marine Captain earns 2 Navy Crosses in 8 days-MC Times



KB
01-30-2007, 08:58 PM
IIRC LtGen Brandtner was Sen. James Webb's company commander in D/1/5.


Lore of the Corps

Vietnam captain earned 2 Navy Crosses in 8 days
By Keith A. Milks - Special to the Times
Posted : February 05, 2007

Marine recruits learn that Lewis B. “Chesty” Puller is the only Marine in the Corps’ history to have earned five Navy Crosses, the nation’s second-highest award for battlefield valor.

Lesser known are the dozens of Marines who earned the Navy Cross not just once, but twice or more. One such Marine was Martin Brandtner, whose battlefield prowess in Vietnam produced two Navy Crosses for separate actions within an eight-day period in the fall of 1968.

Brandtner, a native of Minneapolis, entered the Corps in 1961. He had already served a yearlong tour in country when he received orders to return to South Vietnam in July 1968 as a company commander with 1st Battalion, 5th Marines, in volatile Quang Nam Province.
On Sept. 3, 1968, then-Capt. Brandtner’s Company D was on a reconnaissance mission in force near Lan Phouc village when his lead platoon triggered an ambush by North Vietnamese army troops.

As Brandtner moved forward to join the fight, an enemy grenade peppered him with shrapnel. Ignoring his injuries, Brandtner tossed his own grenade and killed the enemy grenadier.

The fight became a short-range grenade duel between the Marines and North Vietnamese troops. While directing his men’s fire, Brandtner sprinted through their positions, scooping up enemy grenades and hurling them back toward the North Vietnamese.

When a grenade landed in one fire team’s position, Brandtner plucked up the explosive and tossed it away. He pushed two of the men to the ground and flung himself atop them, absorbing the grenade’s shrapnel in his own flak vest. He then turned his attention back to the growing firefight and consolidated his unit’s position even as he coordinated artillery strikes against the enemy force.

Eventually, the enemy melted away and Brandtner allowed corpsmen to tend his wounds.
Eight days later, on Sept. 11, Brandtner and his company were settling into nighttime defensive and ambush positions near the village of My Binh when they were attacked by a battalion-sized force.

Enemy mortar, machine-gun and rocket fire slammed the Marines, and Brandtner moved to an exposed position to better direct the defense.

Brandtner moved from position to position, directing his Marines’ fire, reorganizing the defense and inspiring his men. Seeing the enemy gather for a second push, Brandtner called artillery onto the North Vietnamese, the shells landing as close as 200 meters from his own lines.

Over the next two hours, the enemy launched three more attacks and was thrown back with severe losses each time. Eventually, the North Vietnamese withdrew, leaving 67 dead behind and evacuating an indeterminable number of dead and wounded.

Brandtner’s quick thinking and decisive action led to the enemy’s defeat and kept his own company’s losses down to one dead and 14 wounded.

These two actions resulted in Brandtner receiving two Navy Crosses and the distinction of being one of only two Marines in Vietnam to earn the medal twice.

Brandtner remained in the Corps for 24 more years, eventually rising to the rank of lieutenant general before his retirement June 1, 1993.

The writer is a gunnery sergeant. He can be reached at kambtp@aol.com.

digrar
01-30-2007, 11:58 PM
Great effort.
I quite often see in Australian citations, medals are awarded to a soldier for deeds done over an extended period of time (maybe several days or even two or three weeks) but only the one medal is awarded (Ray Simpsons Victoria Cross is one example). Would that normally be the case in the US, or is the awarding of two medals more common?

James
01-31-2007, 12:33 AM
Great effort.
I quite often see in Australian citations, medals are awarded to a soldier for deeds done over an extended period of time (maybe several days or even two or three weeks) but only the one medal is awarded (Ray Simpsons Victoria Cross is one example). Would that normally be the case in the US, or is the awarding of two medals more common?

I believe in the U.S. our awards are awarded for a "single" act, though it might last a few hours.

I just read about Ray Simpson - had he been American I think he would have been awarded a Bronze Star and a Silver Star, or a Silver Star and a Distinguished Service Cross/Navy Cross for his bravery.

Opening Batsman
01-31-2007, 02:05 AM
I seem to recall that the pommy VC winner, Pvt. Beharry was it (?) was awarded the medal for two incidents spanning a week or so.

digrar
01-31-2007, 02:39 AM
That was another that came to mind.

James
01-31-2007, 03:24 AM
This thread makes me wonder about how medals seem to be awarded more these days, at least for the U.S. I think my grand dad came home from WWII (bomber pilot in Europe) with 8 or 9 ribbons on his chest. He'd been away for 3 years. When I was in the USMC a decade ago, I remember guys who spent half a week in Somalia walked away with 6 or 7 ribbons.
Maybe it was just being in the damned Clinton Corps.

Opening Batsman
01-31-2007, 03:28 AM
This thread makes me wonder about how medals seem to be awarded more these days, at least for the U.S. I think my grand dad came home from WWII (bomber pilot in Europe) with 8 or 9 ribbons on his chest. He'd been away for 3 years. When I was in the USMC a decade ago, I remember guys who spent half a week in Somalia walked away with 6 or 7 ribbons.
Maybe it was just being in the damned Clinton Corps.

My great grandfather came back from a couple of years Infantry soldiering on the Western Front in WW1 with two medals, one of my grandfathers has 4 from WW2, not sure about the other. And you think 8 or 9 is bad.p-)

KB
01-31-2007, 02:16 PM
Great effort.
I quite often see in Australian citations, medals are awarded to a soldier for deeds done over an extended period of time (maybe several days or even two or three weeks) but only the one medal is awarded (Ray Simpsons Victoria Cross is one example). Would that normally be the case in the US, or is the awarding of two medals more common?

There are cases where that has happened; hear is the MOH citation for Sgt Alfredo Gonzalez, USMC who was KIA in Hue in 1968.

The President of the United States in the name of the Congress takes pride in presenting the MEDAL OF HONOR posthumously to


SERGEANT ALFREDO GONZALEZ
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
for service as set forth in the following

CITATION:

For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty while serving as Platoon Commander, Third Platoon, Company A, First Battalion, First Marines, First Marine Division, in the Republic of Vietnam. On 31 January 1968, during the initial phase of Operation HUE CITY Sergeant Gonzalez' unit was formed as a reaction force and deployed to Hue to relieve the pressure on the beleaguered city. While moving by truck convoy along Route #1, near the village of Lang Van Lrong, the Marines received a heavy volume of enemy fire. Sergeant Gonzalez aggressively maneuvered the Marines in his platoon, and directed their fire until the area was cleared of snipers. Immediately after crossing a river south of Hue, the column was again hit by intense enemy fire. One of the Marines on top of a tank was wounded and fell to the ground in an exposed position. With complete disregard for his own safety, Sergeant Gonzalez ran through the fire-swept area to the assistance of his injured comrade. He lifted him up and though receiving fragmentation wounds during the rescue, he carried the wounded Marine to a covered position for treatment. Due to the increased volume and accuracy of enemy fire from a fortified machine gun bunker on the side of the road, the company was temporarily halted. Realizing the gravity of the situation, Sergeant Gonzalez exposed himself to the enemy fire and moved his platoon along the east side of a bordering rice paddy to a dike directly across from the bunker. Though fully aware of the danger involved, he moved to the fire-swept road and destroyed the hostile position with hand grenades. Although seriously wounded again on 3 February, he steadfastly refused medical treatment and continued to supervise his men and lead the attack. On 4 February, the enemy had again pinned the company down, inflicting heavy casualties with automatic weapons and rocket fire. Sergeant Gonzalez, utilizing a number of light antitank assault weapons, fearlessly moved from position to position firing numerous rounds at the heavily fortified enemy emplacements. He successfully knocked out a rocket position and suppressed much of the enemy fire before falling mortally wounded. The heroism, courage, and dynamic leadership displayed by Sergeant Gonzalez reflected great credit upon himself and the Marine Corps and were in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval Service. He gallantly gave his life for his country.



/S/RICHARD M. NIXON

Con-man
02-01-2007, 05:56 AM
Alot of good stories here, thanks for posting guys :)