PDA

View Full Version : China, Russia oppose Darfur-abuse report



Jeremiah
03-17-2007, 10:32 PM
GENEVA -- China and Russia joined with Arab and Muslim states yesterday in urging the U.N.'s human rights watchdog to ignore a report from a mission to Darfur that blamed Sudan for continuing war crimes against civilians there.
The two permanent Security Council members argued that the mission, led last month by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jody Williams, failed to gain access to the vast western region of Sudan and had not fulfilled its mandate.
Despite warnings from Western and some African states that failure to act would undermine the credibility of the newly formed Human Rights Council, Muslim and Arab states and their allies backed Sudan's assertion that the report had no legal basis.
"The so-called mission failed to make an on-site visit. The report cannot be considered objective ... and has no legal basis," China said in a statement to the 47-state council, which was echoed by Russia.
After initially agreeing to the mission, the government of Sudan refused to grant visas to the five-member team because the country objected to one of the mission members. It said the member had previously spoken of genocide in Darfur, thus could not be objective.
The U.N. investigators, asked by the council in December to examine reports of massive abuse in Darfur, were forced to conduct their work from neighboring Chad and in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa, headquarters of the African Union.
Observers estimate 200,000 people have been killed and more than 2 million driven from their homes since fighting broke out between rebels and government-backed Arab militias four years ago in Darfur.
The Sudanese government denies responsibility for abuses and blames rebel groups that have refused to sign a peace deal.
"This faulty report should not be discussed," Sudan Justice Minister Mohamed Ali Elmardi told the council.
The situation in Darfur is seen by many as a test for the Human Rights Council. The U.N. Commission on Human Rights was disbanded by the United Nations in March 2006, because it had been rendered ineffective and meaningless by political bickering and the membership of so many known human rights abusers.
The U.N. General Assembly chose 47 new members of the new Human Rights Council in May 2006, including China, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Cuba, all members that the United States singles out in its annual human rights report. The United States did not apply for membership in the current body. Human rights advocates are watching to see whether the latest incarnation is any more effective than the old commission.
Earlier, Mrs. Williams had urged the council to act on her team's recommendations, saying: "Innocent civilians continue to suffer and die. They do not need more reports. They are pleading for protection."
Western members of the council supported the findings of the report, the latest international probe to point the finger at Khartoum over the violence in Darfur, and a number of African states, including Zambia, Nigeria and Senegal, joined them.
The report declared that the government had "manifestly failed to protect the population ... from large-scale international crimes and has itself orchestrated and participated in these crimes."
Rebels were also guilty of crimes against civilians, it said.
"I urge the members of the Human Rights Council to act on the relevant recommendations ... with the aim of improving the situation of human rights in Darfur," the European's Union foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, said.

www.washtimes.com . . .

KingoftheHill
03-17-2007, 11:12 PM
..All because China wants that black gold.

'Damn Chinks :fork:

sferrin
03-18-2007, 01:46 AM
GENEVA -- China and Russia joined with Arab and Muslim states yesterday in urging the U.N.'s human rights watchdog to ignore a report from a mission to Darfur that blamed Sudan for continuing war crimes against civilians there.

Birds of a feather. . .

msnger
03-18-2007, 02:49 AM
..All because China wants that black gold.

'Damn Chinks :fork:

what does Russians want ?

no need for that kind of language.

KingoftheHill
03-18-2007, 02:56 AM
what does Russians want ?

no need for that kind of language.

70% of Russia's exports are oil/natural gas related. Maybe arms (they sold them BTR-80s) or political/strategic influence?

Regarding the language, I was being sarcastic.

msnger
03-18-2007, 02:58 AM
70% of Russia's exports are oil/natural gas related. Maybe arms (they sold them BTR-80s) or political/strategic influence?

Regarding the language, I was being sarcastic.

I'm sure Russians wants gold too :P who doesn't love gold!

Freedom-Fries
03-18-2007, 05:07 AM
Money talks - Russia and China fueld by a goldlust want the U.N to shut up about Sudan. It happens more often than not, I recall the US standing up for our allies 'the Saudis' even though a few weeks ago they were gouging some poor woman's eye out with a rusty spoon for the sake of islamic justice.

Lerclair
03-18-2007, 08:02 AM
..All because China wants that black gold.

'Damn Chinks :fork:China already has the largest oil concession in Dafur.. of course.. they would support the Sudanese Army to protect their investment. What advantage would they gain from violence there ?

That said, the UN report was investigated in Chad.. even stated that the Rebels were also guilty of crimes.. and even able to interviewed the rebels in Chad. While the whole report, just like most western media reports, focused on the Sudanese Govt.. it is often one-sided and seldom mention the actions of the Rebels.

If I recalled correctly, in 2002, it was the rebels who attacked the Sudanese Govt first. Not only were the Rebels better armed and better trained than the Army, which the army were routed in almost every battle.. The rebel even recieved air supplies from Chad.

So, Who is training and arming the Rebels, that started it all ?.. Why no one questioned along this line. Why are the Rebels based in Chad ? If the Sudanese are guilty of 'genocide' by supporting the Janjaweed.. then what can be said of the support from Chad and Uganda supporting the Rebels ?