PDA

View Full Version : Foreign Policy Worries Americans



Ordie
04-04-2007, 03:33 AM
Sadly, the survey confirms my feelings about the lack of a comprehensive foriegn policy we have in the US.


Survey: Foreign Policy Worries Americans
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: April 4, 2007
Filed at 3:10 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Americans are expressing growing nervousness about their country's foreign policy, according to a survey, with about two-thirds saying relations with the rest of the world are on the wrong track.
The poll, completed in March, found that public pessimism extends beyond the war in Iraq. More than eight in 10 respondents said they were worried about the way things are going for the United States in world affairs.
Three quarters of Americans also said they worry about global warming (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/globalwarming/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier), up from two-thirds percent in September 2006.
The poll included an ''anxiety indicator'' that calculates the level of angst in the country based on answers to five questions. The indicator registered 137 on a scale of zero to 200, with zero being the most secure and 200 the most anxious. The figure registered in the latest survey moved up seven points since a similar survey in September.
''The Anxiety Indicator is moving closer to the 150 mark, the `red zone' that to me would signal a full-blown crisis of public confidence,'' said survey researcher Daniel Yankelovich, chairman of Public Agenda, the nonpartisan public policy institute that released the study Wednesday along with the publication Foreign Affairs.
The indicator reflects data from individual polls about whether respondents worry about the nation's position in the world, whether they think the country faces increasing dangers abroad, whether U.S. policy is on the wrong track and whether they believe the United States is viewed negatively abroad.
This was the fourth Public Agenda Confidence in U.S. Foreign Policy Index. The first was in June 2005, the second in January 2006, the third in September.
Here are some of the other findings:
--82 percent say the world is becoming more dangerous for the United States and its people, with 48 percent saying ''much more dangerous.''
--73 percent say the United States is not doing a good job as a leader in creating a more peaceful and prosperous world, with 34 percent saying it has done a ''poor'' job.
--68 percent believe the rest of the world sees the United States negatively, with 34 percent saying ''very negatively.''
--61 percent say America's safety from terrorism does not depend on success in Iraq, and 70 percent say its troops should leave within the next 12 months (19 percent say immediately).
--84 percent say ''initiating military force only when we have the support of our allies'' should be important to our foreign policy, with 51 percent saying ''very important.''
The survey was based on telephone interviews with 1,013 adults between Feb. 21 and March 4. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.


Source:http://www.confidenceinforeignpolicy.org/

a_very_ex_STAB
04-04-2007, 03:43 AM
Do the septics actually have a foreign policy? They seem to be just making it up as they go along.

gaijinsamurai
04-04-2007, 06:36 AM
IMO, George HW Bush was the last president we had who really understood the importance of foreign policy and working with other countries. Clinton learned the importance early on in his career, and had some successes and some failures. Our current president has shown himself to be incompetent, and unfortunately, the American people have learned this too late.
The best we can hope for is that in the upcoming elections, the voters will better scrutinize the candidates, and focus on issues which are important.

XShipRider
04-04-2007, 06:52 AM
One of the few times you'll see me bash my own country. I'm surprised they could find enough Americans with the attention span to answer five or more questions.



...Public Agenda, the nonpartisan public policy institute...

Though the claim of non-partisanship above is completely bogus. There is no such thing as a "non-partisan" institute in America. They all lean either liberal or conservative.

Breakfast in Vegas
04-04-2007, 07:18 AM
I think the main problem really is that we don't have a foreign policy, at least not a consistent and well thought out one. You can't radically change a country's policy every 4-8 years and expect to be understood...

shocker1
04-04-2007, 08:50 AM
Well, I am so sorry to disappoint the world. Lord knows that everyone else but America is on moral high ground. While the current Pres has been less than I expected, the rest of the world disqusts me even more. Turning blind eyes to real trouble to highlite America's faults to hide their own problems. As far as Americans troubled by our current foreign policy, most Americans can't name all 50 States and Capitals so the public poll machines are the last thing we should take stock in. Here lately who knows what policy we have.

Then we have Pelosi flaunting way to much skin in front of an Arab leader. Them legs could cause peace to break out just to get her out of there. Now Assad will have dirty thoughts and feel guilty, who knows she may be on to something.p-)
http://www.foxnews.com/images/274680/1_63_040407_pelosi_assad.jpg

Atlantic Friend
04-04-2007, 09:00 AM
Then we have Pelosi flaunting way to much skin in front of an Arab leader. Them legs could cause peace to break out just to get her out of there. Now Assad will have dirty thoughts and feel guilty, who knows she may be on to something.p-)
http://www.foxnews.com/images/274680/1_63_040407_pelosi_assad.jpg

I'm afraid Baathists have no qualms with women flaunting their skin, for they are not so much influenced by Islam as they are by Stalinism. If anything, Young Assad probably fantasized about going Stakhanovist on her...

shocker1
04-04-2007, 09:04 AM
I'm afraid Baathists have no qualms with women flaunting their skin, for they are not so much influenced by Islam as they are by Stalinism. If anything, Young Assad probably fantasized about going Stakhanovist on her...
Like I said she could be on to something here. Who knows some legs may soften him up a bit. Your right though Syria is more secular than not, just thought all that skin on Arab TV could raise some eyebrows and other things.

Atlantic Friend
04-04-2007, 10:25 AM
Like I said she could be on to something here. Who knows some legs may soften him up a bit. Your right though Syria is more secular than not, just thought all that skin on Arab TV could raise some eyebrows and other things.

Soften Assad up ? You'd get either bland jello or thick soup, I guess ! p-)

I keep wondering how much he really is his own man, and how much he's just a pawn used by his late dad's old guard.

Hollis
04-04-2007, 11:01 AM
Soften Assad up ? You'd get either bland jello or thick soup, I guess ! p-)

I keep wondering how much he really is his own man, and how much he's just a pawn used by his late dad's old guard.


I think that sums up the problem in Syria.

Assad have dreams about Pelosi... for me that would be a nightmare, I think she would look better in a burqa, heck even a Coleman Tent.

signatory
04-04-2007, 11:15 AM
I'd like to know how many answered the poll with "WHAT?! Foreign policy? Dat be what now?! eh.. dont no bother me while me watch American idol mkay !"

vryhpyammoadded
04-04-2007, 11:25 AM
I think some time in the future, after the big war, Americans will either look back at the Bush administration as having brilliantly called out and exposed the worlds socialist collective (for lack of a better label) over Iraq and the “axis of evil” or, despise him for falling for the collectives draw play and resultant handing over of the American hegemony, trading it in to be humanities new biggest pariah.
Iraq is nothing, Iraq is everything. The real war is being fought over the hearts and minds of the worlds remaining free republics, driving in wedges, dividing up power and collecting who’s lost in the split.
All those listed statistics tell me people are ignorant and lazy, susceptible to spin, overly emotional and that P.T. Barnum was absolutely correct. They got what they demanded; now they’ve lost the stomach for war. I’m not sure if I blame Bush at all for taking them anymore.

Blah, or maybe It’s this headache that’s making feel so contemptuous today…

XIE
04-04-2007, 10:34 PM
it is not just Americans worried by it.

PPSH41
04-04-2007, 10:42 PM
I'd like to know how many answered the poll with "WHAT?! Foreign policy? Dat be what now?! eh.. dont no bother me while me watch American idol mkay !"

Thats about it. I could go into details about trying to discuss anything other than American Idol with my friends...but it would be too embarrassing. I will give one example, one of my friends is a teacher, their answer to "Name a Year during WW2" was "1927" :-(

ViktorNavorski
04-04-2007, 11:00 PM
Oh, people can come up with statistics to prove anything. 14% of people know that."Comprehensive Foreign Policy" is a catch phase. Spend enough time around the Beltway and anyone will realized between the State Dept., Congress's foreign affair this and that committee and subcommittee, the think tanks, the lobbyists, etc...There is no such thing as "comprehensive." Pelosi aptly prove so doing her own thing, if there is political point to be gain, anyone in power will unhesitantly go off on their own tangent in spite of anything "comprehensive."