PDA

View Full Version : Respected child psychiatrist arrested on molestation charges



PPSH41
04-06-2007, 09:10 PM
A highly regarded child psychiatrist from San Mateo who once headed the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry was arrested Thursday on 14 felony counts of child molestation, police said.
Dr. William Ayres, 75, was arrested at his San Mateo home at about 6 p.m. after a four-year investigation into allegations he molested boy patients dating back to the late 1960s.
"The real tragedy here is that parents entrusted their children to this doctor for help and they were victimized while in his care," San Mateo police Capt. Mike Callagy said after the arrest. "That's so tragic."
For decades, the psychiatrist with the ruddy face and reddish beard was a fixture in San Mateo County mental health and political circles.
He served with San Mateo County District Attorney Jim Fox and Supervisor Richard Gordon on the county's Children and Families First Commission, and in 2002, he was honored by the county board of supervisors with a lifetime achievement award for "his tireless effort to improve the lives of children and adolescents."
During his long and distinguished career as a local child psychiatrist, he received patient referrals from the San Mateo County juvenile justice system.
From 1993 to 1995, he served as president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the leading professional medical association for child psychiatrists with more than 7,500 members nationwide.
Callagy said the doctor did not resist arrest and was "very stoic" when officers arrived at his home Thursday night.
Prosecutors Thursday filed 14 counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14 years old against Ayres, Callagy said. He said the charges involved multiple victims, but he declined to give a specific number.
Ayres is being held in San Mateo County jail on $1.5 million bail and is expected to be arraigned today in a Redwood City courtroom.
The arrest follows years of accusations against the doctor that raised red flags but never amounted to a criminal case. It was only after San Mateo police received a complaint in 2002 that authorities obtained a search warrant in March 2006 for Ayers' medical records, police said.
The records produced a list of 800 names of former patients whose contact with Ayres could fall within current statutes of limitations, police said. Police interviewed the patients and identified alleged victims that led to the current prosecution, Callagy said.
Among some of the other accusations that are documented in public records but never led to criminal charges are the following:
-- At least five men -- none of them the alleged victims in the criminal case -- claim in police reports, civil depositions and a Child Protective Services report that Ayres molested them in their youth.
-- One of those former patients sued Ayres in December 2003, accusing the psychiatrist of masturbating him under the guise of a medical exam on multiple occasions in the late 1970s when the patient was 13 years old. The case was settled confidentially in 2005.
-- Police investigated at least two other molestation reports against Ayres before the 2003 lawsuit, records and deposition transcripts show. One was determined to be "unfounded" in 1987, and the alleged victim in the other didn't cooperate with police, according to those records and statements.
-- At least two other men came forward separately in 2005 saying Ayres had also molested them as teens in the 1960s and 1970s, but the cases could not be prosecuted because the statute of limitations had expired, police reports show.
One of those former patients, whose name was redacted from the report, told police he arrived early for an appointment one day and saw another teenage boy emerge from Ayres' office.
"The victim said the look on the other boy's face was like, 'He's going to do it to you too,' " the report read.
In the 2003 lawsuit, filed against Ayres and his medical group, Peninsula Psychiatric Associates, attorneys for the former patient accused the psychiatrist of exploiting his position of power and trust to prey upon young boys who were patients.
The lawsuit contended the alleged victim, referred to in court documents as James Doe, was not Ayres' first molestation victim. The lawsuit alleged "there were at least four others, and possibly more."
The two sides reached a confidential settlement in July 2005, after which Ayres' attorney said the psychiatrist did not concede any wrongdoing.
Ayres said under oath he didn't remember the alleged victim and denied molesting him, according to a transcript of his deposition in the lawsuit.
"It is very common that I'll be having lunch and a person in their 30s will come up to me and say, 'Aren't you Dr. Ayres? I wanted to thank you again for the help,' " Ayres said in his deposition. "I'll look at them, and I won't know who the hell they are. It turns out I saw them when they were in seventh grade."
Ayres also acknowledged he sometimes conducted physical examinations of juvenile patients, according to the transcript.
"I do not think there is any standard of care that says it's inappropriate for a physician who is a child psychiatrist, that they should not do physical examinations," Ayres said, according to the transcript.
He said the county's juvenile justice system, its court-appointed attorney program, pediatricians and social workers all referred patients to him for years, and he estimated in 2004 that he had seen about 2,000 patients in 40 years of practice in the county. He evaluated a patient referred by juvenile court Judge Marta Diaz as recently as March 2003, even though San Mateo police or the county social services department had received at least three complaints of molestation by that time, records show.



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/06/MNGJOP45RF1.DTL

I shudder to think that he was trusted with the care of children.

Aerosoul
04-06-2007, 09:16 PM
A lot of pedophiles go into fields of work so that they are around children. The way it is.

Hollis
04-06-2007, 09:19 PM
A lot of pedophiles go into fields of work so that they are around children. The way it is.


Yes, it is predation for a reason. Predators go where their prey is.

Azreal La Mort
04-06-2007, 09:31 PM
i can think of many many things to do to people like this to were they would be begging for death.....but one quick and gruesome death that they deserve is to be draw and quarted by four horse all facing four different directions and made to runn off at the same time...They should terminate these sick wastes of genetic material. and do it on tv and publicly....:fork: :bash: :slap: :-*$

Lt. James Anderson
04-06-2007, 09:57 PM
Wow, what a surprise ... not!

-peacemaker-
04-06-2007, 10:03 PM
i can think of many many things to do to people like this to were they would be begging for death.....but one quick and gruesome death that they deserve is to be draw and quarted by four horse all facing four different directions and made to runn off at the same time...They should terminate these sick wastes of genetic material. and do it on tv and publicly....:fork: :bash: :slap: :-*$

Their punishment should be to the sound of *snip**snip* down in their pants, that would be a perfect punishment but that's just me :roll:

seraosha
04-06-2007, 10:30 PM
After a fair trial, where innocence is assumed from the outset, all on the up and up...if found guilty...

Death by fire, broadcast on TV where convicted molestors in prison and on parole are forced to watch, and are informed in no uncertain terms that they are next if they re-offend.

It's time for zero tolerance with mandatory death sentences on first offence. Time to break the cycle of abuse.

Rakki
04-06-2007, 11:48 PM
Must come as a surprise. It's not like doctor-patient hanky-panky has never happened before.

8thidpathfinderpower
04-07-2007, 05:17 AM
This is very interesting, and if you take a look at the article, there are a bunch of factors that come into play..the ones I am going to adress, is the media coverage and the evilness behind these acts.

Child ****** abuse is nothing new. It has been going on since the start of civilization, and long before. What is new is the awareness that is being raised by the media coverage, and the victims coming forward.

Now it is not an embarassment to come forward and admit that ones has been molested. And, with the commonalty of victims, one often wonders about what makes a person do this type of disgusting act. There are a number of reasons...

The loss of the stigma as being socially unacceptable to report such crimes.
The media coverage of victims and the trial of offenders.
The advent of the internet, and the readily avialibility of ******ly suggestive material.

The mind set of the predator...they are loners. usually not able to communicate effectively with other adults, and have trouble dating women. They often mistake a simple act of giving someone a hug as a ****** gesture. They see children as appealing to their desires because they see the innocent as easy love and acceptance, fulfilling their need to find emotional fullfilment through physical contact because they lack the understanding of personal control of such feelings of personal need.

Does this justify the personal behavior when it comes to commiting crimes against children? No, no and no, it does not.

There are no easy anwsers when it comes to dealing with the problem of ****** abuse of children, and the resulting damage to society because of it. But, what is certain, commuity restraint must be maintained when these crimes occur, because if none is shown, we all stand to lose alot more than child hood innocence, and that is the greatest danger to all.

8thidpathfinderpower
04-07-2007, 05:30 AM
i can think of many many things to do to people like this to were they would be begging for death.....but one quick and gruesome death that they deserve is to be draw and quarted by four horse all facing four different directions and made to runn off at the same time...They should terminate these sick wastes of genetic material. and do it on tv and publicly....:fork: :bash: :slap: :-*$


This is the typical reaction of people when they hear of these horroific crimes, and the out come is very dangerous indeed.

What do we classify as a ****** predator...a Jon out on the street picking up a prostitute? A couple making out on a street corner? A person caught masturbating in a closed partioned public toilet? A peeping Tom?

Now when a person gets caught, arrested and prosecuted for the above mentioned acts, do we ruin them for life? Do we imprison them for lengthy sentances? Do we neuter them?

There is a reason why I mentioned the above mentioned acts of ****** misbehavior, and they are directly related to the topic at hand.

When we hear of these disgusting acts of human behavior, we always overreact. Often out of disgust for the offender and the crimes against the innocent. But, we need to be very careful when we want to throw the creep to the wolves....because, one, innocence must be proven in a court of law. And, were we really there when the crimes actually happend? When we overreact to these crimes, (altho they are pretty disgusting) we have a tendancy to lump all types of misbehavior into the evil catagory, and when we do that, we set a dangerous predecent to encourage lawmakers to take our rights away to protect the masses.

PPSH41
04-07-2007, 06:34 AM
I find it all the more appalling that this guy knew the effects this would have on these childrens lives. Seeing as this guy was so high up and respected in his field I would wonder if this affected his work in any way or the work of his colleges in the opinions that he gave them.

Another case comes to mind and thats the former ACLU president recently arrested for child ****ography.



Speaking for the ACLU, Mr. Rust-Tierney was a leading proponent in the late 1990s for unrestricted access to the Internet, arguing before the Loudoun County Library Board that people would "continue to behave responsibly and appropriately while in the library" and that "maximum, unrestricted access to the valuable resources of the Internet" should be allowed.
He said the Internet was "rapidly becoming an essential tool for learning and communication," and that libraries played "a vital role in assuring that the Internet is universally available to all segments of the population on an equitable basis."
Mr. Rust-Tierney also argued that parents should have the primary responsibility for setting rules for their children regarding Internet access, and that "older minors should have access to resources appropriate for their age group, even if such materials may be considered by some parents to be unsuitable for younger minors."
His arguments were in response to a ruling in a pending case by U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema in Virginia who said the Loudoun County Internet policy violated the First Amendment.
"Regardless of any future proceedings related to that litigation, the ACLU of Virginia urges the board to carefully consider a new Internet use policy that allows for maximum Internet access while providing options to parents and other users who may be concerned about unwanted content."
Mr. Rust-Tierney's wife, Diann Rust-Tierney, is executive director of the D.C.-based National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty.



http://washingtontimes.com/metro/20070223-104642-1644r.htm