PDA

View Full Version : Iran offers US Iraq exit Strategy



shocker1
05-09-2007, 12:37 PM
Iran offers US Iraq exit Strategy

London (http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/line-20/key-775/), May 9, IRNA
Iran (http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/line-20/key-5808/)-US (http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/line-20/key-12199/)-Iraq (http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/line-20/key-5857/)
Iranian deputy foreign minister Abbas Araghchi has offered Tehran's cooperation to the US in developing an "exit strategy " from Iraq.

Araghchi told the Financial Times that America and Iran had the "same interests" in a stable Iraq and that direct talks leading to a "face-saving withdrawal" were possible with Washington's goodwill.
He dismissed as "theatrical behaviour" the comings and goings at Sharm el-Sheikh - when Iranian foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki left a dinner when he was reportedly placed opposite Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state.
Araghchi said that Iran wanted to develop a common approach to Iraq's future with Iraq's other neighbors and "foreign forces".
"Their invasion was a disaster - let there not be a disastrous withdrawal," he said.
"Yes, immediate withdrawal could lead to chaos, civil war. No one is asking for immediate withdrawal of foreign forces. But there should be a plan."
Araghchi, a career diplomat seen as a potential interlocutor with Washington, insisted the US presence was part of Iraq's problem.
"Iraq is suffering a vicious cycle. There are foreign forces who have occupied Iraq and justify their presence under the pretext of the 'war on terror' and there are terrorists who claim they are fighting occupiers."
Araghchi welcomed the outcome of Sharm el Sheikh, identifying four principles emerging as acceptable to Iraq's neighbors: support for the elected government in Baghdad; greater authority for the government in "politics, economics and especially security"; boosting the Iraqi army and police; and help for reconstruction.
The deputy foreign minister dismissed US claims that Iran had supplied Iraqi insurgents. "They should stop blaming others for problems they have themselves created.
"In fact, the number of weapons that have come into Iran from Iraq is high, as you can see by reading the crime pages of Iranian newspapers.
Terrorist groups as well as criminals see Iraq as an opportunity." Araghchi said Washington's relationship with "terrorist" groups hostile to Iran made Tehran sceptical of its intentions.
He cited the Mujahedin-e-Khalq, the Iranian group under US "protection " in Iraq, and Pejak, an Iranian Kurdish faction linked to the Kurdistan Workers party, based in northern Iraq.
He said Iran also believed the US and Britain had links to militants responsible for killing officials and civilians in Iran's south-east province of Sistan-Baluchestan and in Khuzestan in the south-west.
Elsewhere in the interview, Araghchi said that no pressure would lead Iran to give up its nuclear program, for which it was prepared to "pay the price."
"There are two options - confrontation and cooperation. If they (the west) prefer confrontation, then let's go together.
"What has been the result of three (UN) Security Council resolutions, two introducing sanctions? Iran has quickened the pace of its peaceful activities and reduced its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. This can go on, but the result is an escalation of the crisis."
1416/1416


---> Iran-US-Iraq

http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-22/0705099128174437.htm

2Sheds_Jackson
05-09-2007, 05:50 PM
Very interesting bit there - thanks for posting it.



"What has been the result of three (UN) Security Council resolutions, two introducing sanctions? Iran has quickened the pace of its peaceful activities and reduced its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. This can go on, but the result is an escalation of the crisis."


What he says is exactly right - because Iran was watching the UNSC and Iraq - and they learned to play the system. It's the West's own damn fault for failing to uphold principles we'd all agreed on decades ago.


"Yes, immediate withdrawal could lead to chaos, civil war. No one is asking for immediate withdrawal of foreign forces. But there should be a plan."

- Well here he's just full of sh*t. His own president has been demanding immediate withdrawal of US & UK "occupiers" for years. Way to speak out of both sides of the mouth --

Probably the most interesting thing I take away from this is that there are cracks appearing in Iran's intransigence towards the West - and in America's refusal to deal with the Iranians directly. Hopefully things can move towards a resolution of some kind - but I still wouldn't trust that government any farther than I could throw it.

Cralis
05-09-2007, 06:54 PM
"There are foreign forces who have occupied Iraq and justify their presence under the pretext of the 'war on terror' and there are terrorists who claim they are fighting occupiers."

That is pure gold right there.

Chulo
05-09-2007, 06:58 PM
Yes, immediate withdrawal could lead to chaos, civil war. No one is asking for immediate withdrawal of foreign forces. But there should be a plan."

maybe the Democrats should listen to this guy

Lamer
05-10-2007, 04:36 PM
That is pure gold right there.
I dont see anything wrong with this statement.

kamaz
05-10-2007, 05:04 PM
I dont see anything wrong with this statement.



really? have you been following the news in the last oh, i dont know, 30 years?

Flyingfoot
05-10-2007, 07:47 PM
Yes, immediate withdrawal could lead to chaos, civil war.


As opposed to the state of affairs currently in Iraq.

Chulo
05-10-2007, 08:18 PM
As opposed to the state of affairs currently in Iraq.
there is no civil war as of yet, and the troubles are in certain areas not the whole country... lets put it this way.. pull out and it will get way worse

Cralis
05-11-2007, 03:01 AM
I dont see anything wrong with this statement.

You mean other than
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/04/30/america/NA-GEN-US-Terrorism-Iran.php
the fact
http://jamestown.org/terrorism/news/article.php?articleid=2369895
that Iran
http://www.voanews.com/uspolicy/archive/2003-06/a-2003-06-03-2-1.cfm
supports terrorism
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0430Iraq0430.html
in Iraq?
http://www.nysun.com/article/53314

I'm just saying that it is awefully ironic that the Iranian ambassador was condemning support of terrorism, given the above circumstances. I call him a liar, but you can call him what you want.

Personally I think consumate liars are just as evil as thieves, murderers, and rapists.