what is this smg model?

[sarg]

hi
please tell me what smgf model is this

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/pt/thumb/3/3d/Lanchester5.jpg/800px-Lanchester5.jpg

[James]

Do you see the name "Lanchester" in the link? :cantbeli:

[Hydro]

Do you see the name "Lanchester" in the link? :cantbeli:




:D :D



.............

[sarg]

no i haven´t see it.
but thanks any way

[Hollis]

Do you see the name "Lanchester" in the link? :cantbeli:


You beat me too it. LOL

[Hydro]

It's a PKM.

[Roanoke]

You sure? I thought it looked more like a PKM to me.

[Royal]

You sure? I thought it looked more like a PKM to me.


The trick is to use a smilely - or we all think that you're a **** (we know Hydro's a piss-taking ****).

[Roanoke]

Pfft. Smileys are for the weak.

[Hydro]

The trick is to use a smilely - or we all think that you're a **** (we know Hydro's a piss-taking ****).



Yo.

............

[Catch22]

On a sidenote - Hydro does that 417 on your av, suggest that someone let you play it, or you just want us to think so? ;)

[Hydro]

Someone let me play with it.

[maw]

pee kay em.

[Sabre]

Someone let me play with it.

...and the 416?



p-)

[Hydro]

Oh yes ;).....

[Catch22]

And how's the feelings towards it?

[Hydro]

I thought the 417 was absolutely brilliant. It felt solid, it was pretty light but fairly controllable in burst fire, the flip up sights were pretty good for what they were (it didn't have the HK "standard" drum rear sight). It reeked quality just holding it. The magazines are extremely light but really sturdy, and not nearly as bulky as you'd imagine. The positionable stock was excellent, I'm not a huge bloke so being able to customise the length of pull was really handy.

[Sabre]

Where, how and why?