PDA

View Full Version : A positive Article from the BBC in Baghdad



Hollis
05-17-2007, 02:27 PM
'Can-do' spirit of US troops in Baghdad
By Mark Urban
BBC News, Baghdad

Newsnight report

As the search for three US soldiers abducted south of Baghdad continues, our correspondent - who spent three days embedded with US troops - says their comrades remain remarkably positive despite the dangers. Down in the heart of Dura market there is an old cafe where American soldiers eat, smoke and chat. It is a tiny space with five plastic tables, tiled walls and a sink that sometimes has running water. It provides a social centre to the outpost where soldiers are trying to secure this part of Baghdad. The first phase - blocking off the market so the stall holders could work in safety - was achieved earlier this year. But the second, trying to extend that success to the neighbouring blocks, has brought tough opposition.

Creative thinking

Sitting in the cafe late at night, we talked over the fight for Dura. My BBC colleague, Mark McCauley, instructed Lieutenant Jake Carlisle in the art of rolling your own cigarettes. He also told him how it had felt, as a young Catholic from Londonderry in Northern Ireland, having British troops on the streets of his city. And I shared experiences from my time with Russian troops in Afghanistan. All the time Lieutenant Carlisle and his platoon sergeant, Dorian Perez, drank up the experience and compared it with their own. I had always thought of the US army as an organisation that did not exactly ban creative thinking, but severely limited it at lower levels. And there were Lieutenant Carlisle and Sergeant Perez wondering how important waving and smiling were in Arab culture or considering the value of removing your sunglasses when speaking to Iraqis.

Sense of responsibility

Their platoon numbers 37, of whom two have been killed and several wounded since their operations started in Dura. Shot at one hour and smiling at the locals the next, it would be the easiest thing in the world to get spiteful, Sergeant Perez told me, but it would also be totally self-defeating. The sergeant is 34 and he has been in the army for nearly half of his life. I wondered how Iraq did not exhaust the positive energy or intellectual curiosity of a man like Dorian Perez. You can marvel at the Americans' can-do spirit, as some British soldiers do. You can see it in terms of America, the world's hyper power staring failure in the face and refusing to accept it. But in the sergeant's case the will to carry on comes from a sense of responsibility towards the people of Iraq. Sergeant Perez buys the so-called pottery shop analogy that seems singularly appropriate to the Dura market: if you break, it you own it.

The right balance

Lieutenant Carlisle is a 26-year-old from Wisconsin. He is a tall, lanky presence even in his body armour, loping down the dusty streets propelled by a young officer's enthusiasm or desire to do it right in front of his superiors, and, of course, us. When I ask him whether they were right to storm one house, frightening the inhabitants, he does his best to back his men while conceding they probably should have done it differently. In the end, he always has to explain the abrasive features of his patrolling in terms of the high threat they face from roadside bombs, snipers and the like. And that balance between self-protection and alienating the local people is at the heart of many a late-night conversation in the cafe.

The British army

From the odd glimpse or overheard remark, I do not doubt that the second platoon contains the odd bad apple or loud-mouth, but as my time with them went on I became aware of an uncomfortable feeling. When eventually I was able to identify it, I realised my unease concerned British soldiers, and how they compared with these Americans. Carlisle, Perez and the rest seem brighter, stronger and more committed. The British army still has many outstanding qualities but it has had great difficulty recruiting for the past decade. Many recruits who would once have been thrown out have been pushed through the training establishments. In many British infantry battalions 15% or 20% are now Fijians or other Commonwealth contract soldiers. The Americans, by contrast, may have had some recent problems staffing their army but they have been able to retain more of a sense of common purpose and drive.

American determination

If they are that good, you might ask, why are they not getting better results in Baghdad? There is history, of course, of terrible past mistakes. There are numbers: Baghdad is a city of six million. There is also ruthless intimidation by al-Qaeda of local people and the simple prejudice of those who will never like the Americans because they are unbelievers. But there is no shortage of determination or creativity and tonight Sergeant Perez and Lieutenant Carlisle will probably resume their running discourse in the Dura cafe about how they can do it better tomorrow.

From Our Own Correspondent was broadcast on Thursday 17 May, 2007 at 1100 GMT on BBC Radio 4. Please check the programme schedules for World Service transmission times.

Mailman
05-18-2007, 04:37 AM
That is probably the first article I have ever seen from the beeb that is positive about American troops!

Must be lies aye el hombre?

Mailman

Royal
05-18-2007, 04:51 AM
I realised my unease concerned British soldiers, and how they compared with these Americans. Carlisle, Perez and the rest seem brighter, stronger and more committed.

This from a man who lasted all of nine months in the organisation...

Hollis
05-18-2007, 10:28 AM
This from a man who lasted all of nine months in the organisation...


Thanks, I did not know that. Generally, I don't expect the Beep to be as balanced.

Royal
05-18-2007, 10:53 AM
Thanks, I did not know that. Generally, I don't expect the Beep to be as balanced.

Actually I think Urban is a very good writer and not a bad reporter. He's been very sucessful in getting people who should know better to open up to him. He got stamped on a while back for playing the ex-army officer card and seems to have leaned his lesson.

Royal
05-19-2007, 03:33 AM
The man himself replies to ctiticsm of the same comments on Arrse.co.uk

as I said he can write...


Quite a few reactions and comments so far, so I'll give a general response to start with and let's see where the discussion goes.

My first 'embed', if you can call it that, was with the Soviet Army in Afghanistan in 1988. Since then I've reported a great many conflicts and leaving asside the guerrillas or warlord types have been in operational situations with Russian, US, Israeli, French and British troops. In the case of the British armed forces these include Northern Ireland, the 1991 Gulf War, Bosnia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Afghanistan and on a few occasions in Iraq. I was on Op Sinbad in October and gave a pretty positive report of it on Newsnight.
These experiences were far more important in forming my views than a short time soldiering long ago with 4 RTR. cpunk is quite right about that. The relevance of my 'gap year' commission though is that it left me with a deep affection for, and interest in, the British army. I have many friends or contacts in the organisation, and seem to pick up more all the time.

Now let's get to business - my reflections on spending time with those Americans in Dura market in Baghdad.
The British Army has had recruitment difficulties for a long time. I believe that the long term effects of lowering entry standards and pushing as many people as possible through the individual training system are now showing. A colleague, one time NCO in the Green Howards, commented to me the other day "we used to fail two third of recruits as a point of principle". We know now how difficult it is to bin people. In other arrse threads I have seen serving soldiers refer to some of the output of the training system as "chav mongs". I wouldn't use that language, but some of you do.
As regards the Commonwealth soldiers, well clearly one of them was good enough for a VC, so there's nothing intrinsically wrong with them. But let me quote two comments I've heard recently from officers: "we have over 60 Fijians in the battalion, but only one has been promoted to lance corporal. Unfortunately they are just not up to it". Another, a recently left PWRR guy commented, "they are fit lads, but often you can't understand them on the radio". I have heard enough of these views to believe they are worth reporting, which is my job. Why else is the army now trying to put quotas on the number of Commonwealth soldiers in its battalions ?

I still believe the British Army has "outstanding qualities" and said so in the dispatch being quoted here. It still produces the world's best NCOs in my view and makes something fantastic out of much of the raw material it gets. Many good guys still go in, but I believe the overall standard has fallen during the past decade.
Now what about those Americans ? By 'brighter' I did not mean more intelligent - or I would have used that word. I assume the average American is no smarter or dumber than the average Brit. I meant more keen and focussed. I find pervasive cynicism in the British army at the moment. It feeds some fantastic humour, but I don't think it helps getting the job done. ptp has flagged up a load of reasons I would agree with about why the American soldier feels better supported by his/her own society.
So to sum up, I think there is no room for the 'complacency' referred to by one previous poster. The issue is ultimately one about improving the type of people the British Army recruit and retain. Of course I see the impact of overstretch and cuts in creating the current situation.
Those who've kicked off at me - don't be so thin skinned. Any journalist who visits this site at all regularly has to get used to endless slagging of our kind, so you ought to put up with occasional criticism from outsiders with the interests of the organisation at heart.

http://www.arrse.co.uk/cpgn2/Forums/viewtopic/t=66163/postdays=0/postorder=asc/start=15.html