PDA

View Full Version : ‘Fairness’ for Kerry: A liberal lock on the airwaves



hist2004
06-29-2007, 10:20 AM
‘Fairness’ for Kerry: A liberal lock on the airwaves

By Howie Carr

Boston Herald Columnist

Friday, June 29, 2007

So now Sen. John Kerry wants the Fairness Doctrine reinstated for broadcasters because the media “have been able to squeeze down and squeeze out opinion of opposing views.”
I agree, Liveshot. It’s just terrible the way some pompous, blue-blooded PC politicians are able to get an absolute free ride in the press from their fellow pompous blue-blood media barons for 30-plus years.

As a matter of fact, Sen. Kerry, if I were drafting an indictment of the unfairness of political coverage in the media, you’d be Count One.

Remember 2004? Talk about lack of fairness - that phony Dan Rather “60 Minutes” story about George Bush in the Texas Air National Guard.

Utterly false, debunked within hours, but because it was supposed to help Kerry, it was picked up and splashed across the front page for days by The New York Times [NYT] and the Boston Globe. In fact, days after this latest Jayson Blair-like outburst was debunked as total falsity, the Globe still ran a headline on the front page screaming that it was true, even though the copy below the headline admitted that it was nothing more than another dirty trick from the mainstream media.

How about when Kerry was between heiresses, practically living in his car, and his lame-o media buddies described his travails as “the wandering years.”

A more accurate description: the Kevin Federline years. There’s nothing sadder than a gigolo who has yet to track down his next aged ex-golddigger.

“These are the people,” Kerry said of the talk-show hosts, “that wiped out one of the most profound changes in the balance of the media.”
He neglects to mention that his team had a network, too, Air America, which failed because nobody wanted to listen to it.

But Air America’s crash-and-burn was understandable, because liberals already had their own radio network. It’s called NPR.

Here’s how it works. If you don’t like “talk radio,” you don’t have to listen, and you don’t have to pay for it. If you don’t like NPR, you don’t have to listen, but you do have to pay for it. How’s that for fairness, Sen. Kerry?

How come no one outside Massachusetts ever heard about the “16-point buck” he claimed to have had between the crosshairs on the Cape? How about how he claimed to have run the Boston Marathon but couldn’t recall the year?

What about the condo flipping? What about the Bob Brest Buick? Or the fact that George Bush actually got higher grades at Yale than Kerry? What about all his free rides on the Florida S&L bandido’s private jet back in the early ’90s., pre-Mama T? How come most voters still don’t know any of these stories?

Where’s the Fairness Doctrine when you really need it?

Yeah, we need the Fairness Doctrine all right. The liberals are so outgunned, after all. The conservatives have Fox, and the liberals’ only recourse is on CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, AP, NPR, PBS and *******.

Fairness? The Senate grandees shut down their phone system on Capitol Hill yesterday so they wouldn’t have to endure the pleas of the plebeians not to let 30 or 40 million more illegals swarm across the border. So much for those “conflicting views of public importance” that Kerry claims to care so much about. No, Kerry et al. only care about radio. In a way, it would be great if they succeeded - at least if you own stock in one of the satellite-radio companies. The return of the Fairness Doctrine could save both XM and Sirius. And then there’s Internet radio. Did you know that Wi-Fi is now available in some rental cars?

It’ll be tough extending the Fairness Doctrine to the Internet, Sen. Kerry. Because the talk-radio yahoos are going to demand the same freedom of speech as, say, ****ographers.

Source: (http://news.bostonherald.com/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1008800)

Hist2004

2Sheds_Jackson
06-29-2007, 11:44 AM
Well the article is ah, a bit "spirited" shall we say. But I do agree with it. The last thing that those entrenched in power want is an uncooperative, unsupervised media that's not managed by their old college roommate. New media shown an uncanny ability to move on it's feet much faster than the MSM - and it has a habit of filling in those annoying little lies of omission that the MSM is so good at creating. All hail the progressives! Shut up and get on board the correctthink express.

orionhawk
06-29-2007, 04:00 PM
Yeah, we need the Fairness Doctrine all right. The liberals are so outgunned, after all. The conservatives have Fox, and the liberals’ only recourse is on CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, AP, NPR, PBS and *******.
Source: (http://news.bostonherald.com/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1008800)

Hist2004 roflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflrofl

Hilbert
06-29-2007, 08:19 PM
I'm not sure whether to shake my head, crack up laughing, or both. But I guess ignoring the facts and making up your own as you go when deems it necessary comes along with the job description - especially for Mr. War Hero Kerry.

There's an old proverb:
How do you tell when a politician is lying? Simple: when his lips move.

While I wouldn't take it to that far of an extreme, I think it suits this situation quite well.

- Hildebert

nyarlathotep
06-30-2007, 04:55 AM
Resurrecting the fairness doctrine was killed, appropriately.

Fairness is needed though, only in the opposite direction.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113455/
Some of the replies from the journalists are really funny. I believe the ratio was 90% dem.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19113485/

Lt-Col A. Tack
06-30-2007, 03:19 PM
IIRC, something similar was proposed during the 90s, back when Rush Limbaugh was going after Clinton.

Geezah
06-30-2007, 06:52 PM
I'm all for the fairness doctrine, so long as we can expand it to cover schools, colleges, and any other area that the Libs seems to get a free ride..........frucking sore losers.

Just in case anyone missed it I was being sarcastic.