PDA

View Full Version : Will Portugal Be a Headache for Europe?


Ria
07-17-2007, 12:15 AM
http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=371177&rel_no=1

Will Portugal Be a Headache for Europe?
[Opinion] Assessing Lisbon's proposals on acceding the rotating EU presidency

Portugal formally launched its six-month rotating presidency of the European Union last week by detailing proposals that are considered to be both difficult and complex. Reaching an agreement on the European Union's reform treaty is at the top of Portugal's list of priorities. Ironically, other member states such as the U.K. and Poland have already expressed their worries, calling for said treaty to either be watered down or forgotten altogether.

Other issues on the Portuguese agenda includes energy innovation, migration and development as well as the strengthening of relations with areas of the world such as Africa and Brazil, with the first EU-African submit in seven years scheduled in December this year -- but not without controversy.

Lisbon has definitely angered many of its EU allies by indicating that the Zimbabwean leader Robert Mugabe will in fact be on the guest list for the conference, despite a travel ban to the EU on him and members of his government, because of his poor human rights record.

Turkey

To say the least, there is a feeling in Europe that the Portuguese presidency may cause quite a few headaches on the continent, not only because of its memo, but also as a result of the contentious problems it's inheriting from the presidency of its predecessor -- Germany. There is still a heated debate over Turkey's aspiration to join the EU club.

The new French president Nicolas Sarkozy, for example, who openly opposes Turkish membership has even suggested that it would be more proper for Turkey to ally with North African states to form a Mediterranean Union rather than seek to join the EU. In fact, there is still some debate as to whether Turkey can be genuinely included as part of Europe. Portugal, which has on her part endorsed Turkish membership, will be expected to use its new position to push its position on board.

Strengthening Relations With New Areas of the World

As mentioned, Portugal is set on using its position to strengthen relations with areas of the world such as Africa and Brazil. Already thanks to lobbying by Portugal during last week's EU summit with its former colony Brazil, the latter is set to become the continent's new strategic partner.

But it's the issue of relations with Africa that has sparked one of the biggest controversies when Portugal revealed its intention to invite Zimbabwean leader Robert Mugabe to the proposed EU African summit later in December, the first in seven years. The first-ever such summit between the two continents was hosted in 2000 by Portugal, with a follow-up summit scheduled for 2003, but that was postponed indefinitely after a row between leaders of both continents on the question of Mugabe's attendance.

African leaders, many of whom were themselves dictators, insisted that all must be invited to the summit, hence upon consideration, the EU -- not wanting to make such compromises -- decided to call it off.

The paradox is that the same Mugabe question has come once again, seven years later, to haunt the two continents on the eve of the long-awaited summit. This time around, the same Portugal that hosted the pioneering event was smart to exploit a major loophole in the ban on Mugabe -- which does not extend to conferences to discuss human rights.

A summit with all the African leaders is particularly crucial given the wave of illegal migration to the EU, an issue which both sides would be expected to work out some solution together. The EU will be expected to persuade African countries to take back their deported nationals in exchange for assistance in the form of security training, economic development aid, schools, etc.

Human Rights

There are many within European circles -- including Amnesty International -- who fear that judging from Portugal's usual soft stance, she may fail to put the issue of human rights on its agenda when dealing with countries outside the European Union. Many EU members would like the club to send a clear message to Russia of its disapproval over its poor human rights record.

But like in the past, many countries who accede to the EU presidency rather prefer to shy away from the issue than confront it. Portugal is not expected to do any better on the issue.


Anyone's thoughts on this? I would love insight as to why Portugal wants to stress these issues and are making decisions like Turkey's EU citizenship, and this Mugabe thing. Do they think it's only fair if he has a say in this? Don't want to hurt his feelings? Trying to be very objective? Even though the issues being discussed aren't very neutral or objective.

Hellfish
07-17-2007, 12:18 AM
I think the Mugabe move is a bad decision, but the Brazil one is a good one. Brazil is the powerhouse of Latin America and it would do the EU good to strengthen ties. I don't see Portugal influencing many people on Zimbabwe - but maybe their intention is to browbeat Mugabe.

Loki77
07-17-2007, 01:03 AM
http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?no=371177&rel_no=1




Anyone's thoughts on this? I would love insight as to why Portugal wants to stress these issues and are making decisions like Turkey's EU citizenship.

Economically Turkey can join to EU, but politically, I doubt...The EU has never been about equality or fair representation. Just look at the power and representation the smaller France has over the larger more productive Germany. It is a political alliance and Turkey would be treated no better in the process to join. Turkey has far more to gain economically than the EU has to gain diplomatically.

Pandy
07-17-2007, 01:10 AM
Sounds to me that Portugal is trying to make a name for itself,

Hey Ria, what's up... by the way, your myspace profile picture is banging!

Kilo
07-17-2007, 01:32 PM
Portugal has very old and strong ties with Africa and Brazil

was the first and last European Empire in Africa, only left the continent in 1974

Angola, Mozambique, Cape Verde, São Tome e Principe, Guinea Bissau are all former Portuguese colonies

and Brazil was part of the Empire until 1822, today is the largest Portuguese speaking country and one of the BRIC´s

Portugal is looking to capitalize this special relation and act as privileged partner and "middle man" between Europe and Africa and Brazil


Regarding the Africa Summit, it´s truth that Mugabe is a SOB that completely destroyed and ruined is own country in the last 7 years, but it´s also true that Africa is full of dictators that don´t give a **** about human rights....Darfur is in Africa for God´s sake !.... so this obsession in refusing to invite Mugabe (in particularly by the UK) sounds very hypocritical

Ordie
07-17-2007, 03:49 PM
Inviting Mugabe is not a bad thing.
His visit may end up as an extended stay. Its not uncommon for an African leader to be overthown while away on business.

Portugal and Brazil, are competing for leadership in the Lusophone world.

Brazil is a Latin American powerhouse and are making notable contributions to the UN and trade connections with China. Brazil is noted as a canidate for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council.

Thanks to the EU, Portugal is now able to contribute development to its former colonies. Many of these Lusophone nations have tons of resources (Oil) but lack infrastructure. Portugal is views itself as the European connection for these countries. Assuming the EU presidency adds clout to its global affairs specifically in Africa.

China has alot to do with this. China is reaching out to Lusophone nations as well. Using the cultural (Language) connections in Macau, China is reaching out to Brazil, Mozambique, and Angola with university scholarships in Macau.

Sao Tome is of some imporatance the the PRC because its one of the few nations that recognizes the Republic of China on Taiwan. Being the neighbor of Equatorial Guinea, there is an on-going bidding process for offshore claims. There is no doubt that oil companies are jumping over each other for the privilage except PRC Oil companies.

Zarolho
07-18-2007, 12:50 PM
The Portuguese Government is trying to show it's people that it is not a puppet state to the Spanish and European Union. I applaud the fact they are pressing forward with tough and complex issues it shows backbone, something that has been severely lacking in the leadership of the EU.

Herrmannek
07-18-2007, 01:40 PM
Portugal leadership is pain in the ass already :) Although you know I'm against Euro constitution...

Zarolho
07-18-2007, 03:23 PM
Portugal leadership is pain in the ass already :) Although you know I'm against Euro constitution...
I'm not denying that the rest of the EU members won't be happy. All I'm saying is F them, Portugal will benefit from this and that's all that matters.

Same can be said about Polish involvement in the whole union though.:hug:

Lancero
07-18-2007, 04:45 PM
There's never been such thing as a peaceful presidency of the EU. :)


Portugal, taking EU reins, has a fight on its hands

By Dan Bilefsky

Sunday, July 1, 2007
ord = Math.random() * 10000000000000000;document.write('');if ((!document.images && navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mozilla/2.') >= 0)|| navigator.userAgent.indexOf('WebTV') >= 0){document.write('http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/europe.iht.com/article;cat=article;sz=336x280;ptile=2;ord=123456789? (http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/europe.iht.com/article;cat=article;sz=336x280;ptile=2;ord=123456789?)');} on error resume next ShockMode = (IsObject(CreateObject("ShockwaveFlash.ShockwaveFlash.5")))

LISBON: Portugal, which took over the six-month presidency of the European Union on Sunday, is heading for battle with President Nicolas Sarkozy of France over issues ranging from Europe's future economic direction to already fraught talks on admitting Turkey into the bloc.
Sarkozy and Prime Minister José Sócrates of Portugal, who will take center stage in Europe over the coming months, are both part of a new generation of politicians, leaders around the age of 50 who adore jogging, prefer jeans to bespoke tailoring and possess a similar nervous energy and authoritarian streak.
Both inherited difficult economies and restless electorates. But while Sarkozy is a rightist leader who often cleaves to protectionism, Sócrates is a man of the left who has staked his premiership on liberal economic reforms. And whereas Sarkozy does not believe Turkey belongs in Europe, Sócrates believes Ankara can be the EU's bridge between the West and the Muslim world.
The first clash between Lisbon and Paris over economic policy is expected to come next week, when Sarkozy will make a highly unusual appearance at a meeting of eurozone finance ministers in Brussels. French officials said he would defend his decision to abandon a pledge made by all EU members in April to balance their budgets by 2010 - a reversal Lisbon said it could not countenance.
Portugal's finance minister, Fernando Teixeira dos Santos, warned Saturday that Sarkozy would come under criticism by his EU partners if he sought to ignore the rules of the game for countries that use the euro, including a requirement for countries to keep their deficits under 3 percent of gross domestic product.
Sarkozy's plans to cut taxes by up to €15 billion, or $20 billion, a year have fanned fears that he may break the rules and undermine Europe's economic discipline. France's deficit is forecast to be 2.4 percent this year, perilously close to the 3 percent limit.
Asked if Portugal, which is the poorest country in Western Europe and has one of its lowest growth rates, would let France renege on its pledge, Teixeira dos Santos said: "I don't want to be particularly nice to France or to Mr. Sarkozy. I hope that the political commitment is abided by."
He added that if Sarkozy sought to reverse course, there would be "peer pressure around the table."
French finance officials have indicated that Paris may temporarily withdraw from its commitment to reduce the budget deficit to give the French economy a tax-slashing "confidence shock," which it argues will benefit the European economy, too. But Portuguese diplomats counter that this would set a bad precedent for other EU countries - no small irony, say French officials, given that Portugal's deficit of 3.9 percent is among the highest of the 13 countries using the single currency.
France and Portugal also appear set to clash over Sarkozy's opposition to Turkish membership of the EU. Sarkozy, who made his opposition to Turkish membership a key part of his presidential campaign, wants Turkey to join a Mediterranean union rather than the EU. Last week, he blocked a crucial economic chapter of Ankara's EU negotiations, throwing its future entry talks into doubt.
But Sócrates warned Saturday that a halt in the entry talks with Turkey would undermine the EU's credibility on the world stage and dent its relations with the Muslim world. Alluding to France, he said that EU member states were entitled to have their views, but added that Portugal would press to open more negotiating chapters with Turkey during the next six months.
"We should be loyal and faithful to our pledge" to Turkey, he said.
Luís Amado, the Portuguese foreign minister, added in an interview that continuation of Turkey's EU membership process was vital to ensure that Turkey undertook difficult political and economic reforms. He said Portugal was particularly mindful of the perils of halting Turkey's EU membership track because Portugal had been through a difficult transition to democracy in the 1970s and 1980s and had greatly benefited from the discipline of the EU joining process.
While parting ways with Sarkozy over Turkey, Sócrates paid tribute to the keen energy of the French president, who played a key role in brokering a hard-fought treaty agreement at a recent summit meeting in Brussels. "The election of the French president brought new impetus to Europe. I was very impressed by the energy of Mr. Sarkozy and Europe needs energy," he said.
Sócrates said he was optimistic he could get all 27 EU member states to agree on a revamped treaty to reform the bloc's creaking institutions by an October summit meeting in Lisbon. The future of the treaty, which was hammered out at a marathon summit in Brussels, was called into doubt on Friday after Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski of Poland vowed to reopen debate on the deal, including a contentious section on voting rights.
But Sócrates insisted that Warsaw would not prove an obstacle to finalizing a treaty, which aims to streamline EU decision making and is considered essential for the bloc to get over the paralysis that has gripped it since France and the Netherlands rejected a constitution two years ago. Asked whether he would allow Poland to renegotiate the hard-fought agreement, he said: "No. There must have been a misunderstanding because our agreement was clearly worded and precise and the Polish president was there."
In addition to overcoming the EU's institutional impasse, Sócrates said, Portugal planned to play host to talks with 53 African nations in December, meant to inject new dynamism into relations with Africa after seven years in which the two blocs have not held a summit meeting. However, the meeting threatens to be overshadowed by the likely attendance of Zimbabwe's authoritarian leader, Robert Mugabe, whom Portuguese officials indicated would be invited despite his being blacklisted from visiting Europe under EU sanctions.
Sócrates said it was more important to hold the summit meeting and to improve Europe's links with Africa than to allow the meeting to be hijacked by a "bilateral problem" with Mugabe. But EU officials privately expressed concern that an invitation to Mugabe would inadvertently bolster his legitimacy while potentially allowing the African leader to steal the spotlight.
Portugal said improving ties with Russia was one of the big challenges of its presidency. The EU has looked on with alarm as Russia has used its vast energy resources as a political weapon while flouting human rights.
The problems between the EU and Moscow range from Estonia's recent decision to remove a Soviet war memorial from central Tallinn, which provoked the Kremlin's fury, to Russia's failure to back an EU-supported agreement granting independence to the breakaway Serbian province of Kosovo. Russia also has refused to end an embargo on Polish farm exports, prompting Poland to retaliate against the Russian embargo by refusing to lift a veto that would allow negotiations over an EU-Russia partnership agreement governing trade, energy and human rights to continue.
Sócrates said he would not take a tough stance with President Vladimir Putin of Russia because lecturing Moscow would ultimately backfire.
"I don't agree that we should push on Russia or Russia will push on us," he said. "I will not be the guy who will contribute to tensions with Russia. We need to have relations based on détente."
Aides to the prime minister said he was well placed to try to improve relations with Putin, because the two men had developed a good working relationship.



Source (http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/01/asia/portugal.php)