NATO to Bush: You Broke it, You Own it

[WanderingNomad]

last one for now

http://www.latimes.com/


Paul Richter of the LA Times reports that NATO has had second thoughts about coming in to play a role in Iraq this summer. The ongoing insurgency, the overwhelming unpopularity of the American war in Iraq with the European public, and (probably) the breaking prison torture scandal, have all convinced NATO leaders to wait until after the November elections in the US before making a determination about their possible role in Iraq.

Even NATO doesn't want to play Bush's games. At least not now. So much for support...

[Romulus]

Someone keep this ass from Spamming the General Discussion boards please!

[weedman]

Someone keep this ass from Spamming the General Discussion boards please!Yeah, stop this idiot from spreading the truth and insulting us using our own media :lol:

[Kenshin]

Lock Alert!

[Romulus]

Yeah, stop this idiot from spreading the truth and insulting us using our own media

No. His whole ideal here is to start ****. Thats all.

[ArmedPacifist]

Someone keep this ass from Spamming the General Discussion boards please!

Everyone posts one sided things, stopping one group from doing it would ruin the system we have here.

[XASA]

Why is it that some of the Europeans who post here so arrogant, conceited and full of shi*? It seems they feel others who visit militaryphotos.net don't read newspapers, watch broadcast news or surf the internet for news, so the only way we can be made aware of world events is through their biased filter.

Nor do they realize that Americans are split 50-50 on Bush and the war. I'm am one of those Americans who feel we shouldn't have gone to war without world-wide support and that the current administration has mishandled the occupation. Come November, I will use my right to vote to try and affect a change. I don't need some sophomoric European computer geek who has little or no life experience to tell me how to use that vote.

This is a forum for those who enjoy reading about military-political issues; however, for the past several months it has become a forum for a few immature American haters to vent their frustrations by spamming the site with increasing amounts of anti-American rhetoric. Maybe it's because they don't have much of a life-- some are posting here 24/7-- outside of hating America. Whatever their reasons, it is obvious that their agenda is to continue to be disruptive and argumentative. Fortunately, the moderators have taken note of their hate-filled posts and are taking steps to rectify the situation. One can only hope it is sooner than later so that the forum doesn't lose any more of its hard won credibility.

[weedman]

No. His whole ideal here is to start ****. Thats all.Start arguing against the statements he/the article made and we can convert this into an interesting discussion.

[Kenshin]

Conserve bandwidth and disk space. Please dont reply to spam.

[Uncle Sam]

WanderingNomad, You're doomed

[Trident-za]

WanderingNomad, You're doomed

Whats this supposed to mean or achieve? Unfortunately, this particular article is actually relevant - even if you don't like it.

XASA, some good points there, although it might be said that articles which have a bearing on the US military should be posted. Still, the attitude of some of the posters is a bit much to take... and I'm not even american.

[scm77]

The ongoing insurgency, the overwhelming unpopularity of the American war in Iraq with the European public, and (probably) the breaking prison torture scandal, have all convinced NATO leaders to wait until after the November elections in the US before making a determination about their possible role in Iraq.

What the hell is that? NATO leaders can suck a ****. "We'd like to help stabalize Iraq, but we want to wait until a few hundred more people die so we don't effect your election." :roll: