PDA

View Full Version : Pentagon Paid $998,798 to Ship Two 19-Cent Washers



ZhukovG
08-16-2007, 01:51 PM
More making big bucks with the war
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=aY5OQ5xv9HR8



Pentagon Paid $998,798 to Ship Two 19-Cent Washers (Update2)
By Tony Capaccio
Aug. 16 (Bloomberg) -- A small South Carolina parts supplier collected about $20.5 million over six years from the Pentagon for fraudulent shipping costs, including $998,798 for sending two 19-cent washers to a Texas base, U.S. officials said.
The company also billed and was paid $455,009 to ship three machine screws costing $1.31 each to Marines in Habbaniyah, Iraq, and $293,451 to ship an 89-cent split washer to Patrick Air Force Base in Cape Canaveral, Florida, Pentagon records show.
The owners of C&D Distributors in Lexington, South Carolina -- twin sisters -- exploited a flaw in an automated Defense Department purchasing system: bills for shipping to combat areas or U.S. bases that were labeled ``priority'' were usually paid automatically, said Cynthia Stroot, a Pentagon investigator.
C&D's fraudulent billing started in 2000, Stroot, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service's chief agent in Raleigh, North Carolina, said in an interview. ``As time went on they got more aggressive in the amounts they put in.''
The price the military paid for each item shipped rarely reached $100 and totaled just $68,000 over the six years in contrast to the $20.5 million paid for shipping, she said.
``The majority, if not all of these parts, were going to high-priority, conflict areas -- that's why they got paid,'' Stroot said. If the item was earmarked ``priority,'' destined for the military in Iraq, Afghanistan or certain other locations, ``there was no oversight.''
Scheme Detected
The scheme unraveled in September after a purchasing agent noticed a bill for shipping two more 19-cent washers: $969,000. That order was rejected and a review turned up the $998,798 payment earlier that month for shipping two 19-cent washers to Fort Bliss, Texas, Stroot said.
The Pentagon Defense Logistics Agency orders millions of parts a year. Stroot said the agency and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, which pays contractors, have made major changes, including thorough evaluations of the priciest shipping charges.
Dawn Dearden, a spokeswoman for the logistics agency, said finance and procurement officials immediately examined all billing records. Stroot said the review showed that fraudulent billing is ``is not a widespread problem.''
``C&D was a rogue contractor,'' Stroot said. While other questionable billing has been uncovered, nothing came close to C&D's, she said. The next-highest contractor billed $2 million in questionable transport costs, she said.
Guilty Pleas
C&D and two of its officials were barred in December from receiving federal contracts. A federal judge in Columbia, South Carolina, today accepted the guilty plea of the company and one sister, Charlene Corley, to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to launder money, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin McDonald said.
Corley, 46, was fined $750,000. She faces a maximum prison sentence of 20 years on each count and will be sentenced in the near future, McDonald said in a telephone interview from Columbia. Stroot said her sibling died last year.
Corley didn't immediately return a phone message left on her answering machine at her office in Lexington. Her attorney, Gregory Harris, didn't immediately return a phone call placed to his office in Columbia.
Stroot said the Pentagon hopes to recoup most of the $20.5 million by auctioning homes, beach property, jewelry and ``high- end automobiles'' that the sisters spent the money on.
``They took a lot of vacations,'' she said.

vinny_121_ND
08-16-2007, 03:11 PM
I think the government needs to fire their auditors, and find new auditors. Again, your tax dollars at work here.

Laworkerbee
08-16-2007, 03:31 PM
I think the government needs to fire their auditors, and find new auditors. Again, your tax dollars at work here.

Seems the auditors did just fine, the perps were caught using a loophole meant to expedite items to troops in combat zones

GrinchWSLG
08-16-2007, 05:05 PM
Seems like your average government contractor to me.

Had a friend that worked for a company that installed sewage and drainage systems. Whenever they did work on military bases they were encouraged to screw up so they could come back to fix it and collect even more overpriced time.

vinny_121_ND
08-16-2007, 05:24 PM
The role of the auditor is not just bang in the numbers handed to them. It's to look at the numbers as well, and see if any numbers seem inflated, like 500 dollar toilets.

My mom was an auditor of this small government subsidized housing firm, and the contractor milked the canadian government thousands of dollars for toilets, screws, parking tickets, freezers etc. Problem was, the contractor was never fired because she didn't know who to call because there was no protocol in the book.

Thinking about it now, I think she should have called the rcmp, but I was just a little boy then.

vinny_121_ND
08-16-2007, 05:27 PM
The problem with contractors is that they know they are expendable assets, and no one cares about them, so why should they care about the government? It's in their best interest to look after themselves any way they can. They have no benefits aside from their contracted salary of that time frame.

JJC
08-16-2007, 05:28 PM
Can someone explain why such a waste would not happen in a private business, but always happens to governments? Why wouldn't a private business be screwd the way the government got screwed by these pricks..

Shadowstorm
08-16-2007, 05:28 PM
Like I said before, the goverment does it all the time.

[WDW]Megaraptor
08-16-2007, 06:03 PM
Can someone explain why such a waste would not happen in a private business, but always happens to governments? Why wouldn't a private business be screwd the way the government got screwed by these pricks..

Because private businesses have a powerful motive to avoid this sort of thing: If it happens too often, their business will go under and they will not have jobs.

The US government will still be there tomorrow, regardless of whether they pay $1mil to ship washers or not.

onefast93z28
08-16-2007, 06:22 PM
The problem with contractors is that they know they are expendable assets, and no one cares about them, so why should they care about the government? It's in their best interest to look after themselves any way they can. They have no benefits aside from their contracted salary of that time frame.

That doesn't make it right.

Meatwad
08-16-2007, 06:32 PM
This is just a very small spec of fraud in the government in the grand scheme of things.

Hollis
08-16-2007, 06:51 PM
The problem with contractors is that they know they are expendable assets, and no one cares about them, so why should they care about the government? It's in their best interest to look after themselves any way they can. They have no benefits aside from their contracted salary of that time frame.


I think you missed the class on honesty. If your honesty is based on the other guy or how you preceive them to be..

I hope you can figure out the rest.

deagle
08-16-2007, 07:07 PM
again with ANOTHER ludicrous Pentagon purchase ? and we're supposed to trust them to defend our country ? how could they miss that ?

Hsimoorb
08-16-2007, 07:09 PM
Can someone explain why such a waste would not happen in a private business, but always happens to governments? Why wouldn't a private business be screwd the way the government got screwed by these pricks..


Who's to say that it dosen't?

There's also the factor that there are parties that stand to gain by contractors screwing up on the job when it's government work. If a contractor takes in 1mil extra from the government, that money gets spent in somebody's congressional district. So it might suck for the taxpayers in Utah, who have nothing to do with shipbuilding contracts but still have to pay taxes; At the same time, it's a million dollar windfall for the New Jersey Senator's constituents down at the shipyards. In other words, somebody wins in that equation.

Now, if the same thing were to happen in the buisness world, everyone looses. The guys who needed something built got screwed out of their money, and the contrators themselves were likely held accountable for the terms of their agreement, and lost some money too. Nobody wins, so everyone avoids it.

Laworkerbee
08-16-2007, 07:18 PM
again with ANOTHER ludicrous Pentagon purchase ? and we're supposed to trust them to defend our country ? how could they miss that ?

Did you read the article? it wasn't missed! someone just used a loop hole that is used to expedite items for troops on conflict areas
http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/6551/7180yu8.gif

vinny_121_ND
08-16-2007, 07:36 PM
I think you missed the class on honesty. If your honesty is based on the other guy or how you preceive them to be..

I hope you can figure out the rest.

Well, tell that to the our civilian contractor. He milked the government on thousands of dollars worth of a few screws and fridges and got away with it. My mom was about to break his fatty fingers open for being a fat cat.

Hollis
08-16-2007, 09:26 PM
Well, tell that to the our civilian contractor. He milked the government on thousands of dollars worth of a few screws and fridges and got away with it. My mom was about to break his fatty fingers open for being a fat cat.


There is prosecution and then send the SOB to jail. Two wrongs never made a right.

Durandal
08-16-2007, 10:03 PM
I think we should also label her a terrorist and deprive her of most her civil rights.

Then stick her in a cell and urinate on a bible in front of her.

Maybe she'll tell us what Arab Sheik she gave the money to after she killed her sister (you know she did it...made it look all natural and stuff).

rolls
08-17-2007, 03:13 AM
I hope Bubba asks them if they want there 2c asshole to go to a 10C asshole and then really deliver a $100 Assehole to them when there in prison..

melon
08-17-2007, 08:56 AM
Again, for the slow ones, :bash:

THEY WERE CAUGHT and WILL BE SPENDING SOME SERIOUS TIME IN JAIL.

Congrats on DFAS for finding the problem and fixing it.

Durandal
08-17-2007, 09:01 AM
Again, for the slow ones, :bash:

THEY WERE CAUGHT and WILL BE SPENDING SOME SERIOUS TIME IN JAIL.

Congrats on DFAS for finding the problem and fixing it.

I'm saying we need to send 'em to Gitmo for aiding the enemy.

Do it right. No better than a terrorist. No trial.

Violet Fashion by Mindy
08-17-2007, 09:08 AM
Megaraptor;2709237']Because private businesses have a powerful motive to avoid this sort of thing: If it happens too often, their business will go under and they will not have jobs.

The US government will still be there tomorrow, regardless of whether they pay $1mil to ship washers or not.

I work for the largest Telecommunications/Satellite/IT/Internet/Business Consultancy companies in Asia. I happen to work in the finance department. I can confirm that wastage in multi-nationals is just as bad.

Chulo
08-17-2007, 01:56 PM
again with ANOTHER ludicrous Pentagon purchase ? and we're supposed to trust them to defend our country ? how could they miss that ?
i think the same way you missed reading the article

shocker1
08-17-2007, 02:09 PM
I used to work for a company that was a paid with federal funds. They were paid on stages of manufacture and delivery. Management would rush new designs on line, put certain steps in the line ahead of others in order to make the next cycle. This in turn caused the contract holder to demand field engineers to be part of the final contract and we would stay on site for a long time. Well beyond what should be and completed tasks that have already been paid on. Even fixed checklist items that should have been done back at the plant. In the end it cost the end user millions of lost dollars. I was amazed by the willful ignorance.

None of this waste surprises me at all.