PDA

View Full Version : Not really Reagan



Ordie
09-10-2007, 01:33 AM
Thought I'd share this op-ed



Not really Reagan
Fred Thompson may resemble an early version of the former president, but he has a long way to go in a long race.
September 8, 2007
Los Angeles Times


Like Ronald Reagan, Fred D. Thompson is an actor-politician. But the former "Law & Order" TV star is hoping that Republicans will see similarities beyond membership in the Screen Actors Guild. Like Reagan, Thompson is casting himself as a conservative, a supporter of states' rights and, much less plausibly for a former senator and lobbyist, an "outsider" to the ways of Washington. (Hey, two out of three ain't bad.)

With due deference to Thompson's countrified charisma and his claim to the Reagan mantle, the buzz surrounding the Tennessean's slow-motion entrance into the 2008 presidential race -- made official this week on "The Tonight Show With Jay Leno" -- is as much a commentary on his opponents' weakness as it is on his strengths. Adjusting for the hyperacceleration of the race, Thompson is a latecomer. For months, Republicans have been courted by former presumptive nominee Sen. John McCain, "America's Mayor" Rudolph W. Giuliani and well-heeled "outsider" Mitt Romney, along with assorted dark horses.

That the Republican faithful are intrigued by Thompson is a reminder of one of the oddities of this campaign: The Not So Big Three pose problems for the social conservatives who venerate Reagan and exercise disproportionate influence in Republican primaries. Giuliani, after some awkward equivocation, has reiterated that he is pro-choice on abortion. Romney is antiabortion, but recently so, and an adherent of a faith that some evangelicals consider a cult. McCain has apostatized in the eyes of some conservatives by supporting campaign-finance reform and "amnesty" for undocumented immigrants.

By comparison, Thompson may seem like Reagan redux. But the Reagan he resembles is the one who challenged Richard M. Nixon for the GOP nomination in 1968, not the more road-tested Reagan who almost dislodged Gerald R. Ford in 1976 or the Great Communicator who humiliated Jimmy Carter in 1980. If he is nevertheless able to overtake longer-running candidates, the Reagan analogy may need to be reconsidered -- at least until the general election. Unlike the Gipper in 1980, Thompson as the 2008 Republican nominee would not be running against an unpopular incumbent; he'd be trying to run away from one.

Durandal
09-10-2007, 11:44 PM
I make this comment, not towards Republicans in specific but the voting public in general.

This is what comes to mind when I think of the issues surrounding Fred Thompson...

What is going on in the Republican Party is simply an example of what is broken in the American election system and proof that people know squat about the people they are TOLD to vote for.

No more and no less.

Sorry, I could be wrong of course, Republican COULD mean, pro-choice, atheist, pro-big government, pro-tax, pro-gun control, and pro-gay marriage.

I guess it shouldn't surprise me that this is the best Republicans and their party talking heads can come up with...this abortion of politics, this path of suicide.

Shadowstorm
09-10-2007, 11:58 PM
It's seems like the Republican Party wants somebody to be like Reagan everytime I watch the media, I just don't get it Reagan was a good president, but trying to get somebody like Reagan is slim and none, because I don't see it on any Republican presidential candidate. And I have to agree with Thompson here.

Hollis
09-11-2007, 12:00 AM
I make this comment, not towards Republicans in specific but the voting public in general.

This is what comes to mind when I think of the issues surrounding Fred Thompson...

What is going on in the Republican Party is simply an example of what is broken in the American election system and proof that people know squat about the people they are TOLD to vote for.

No more and no less.

Sorry, I could be wrong of course, Republican COULD mean, pro-choice, atheist, pro-big government, pro-tax, pro-gun control, and pro-gay marriage.

I guess it shouldn't surprise me that this is the best Republicans and their party talking heads can come up with...this abortion of politics, this path of suicide.


The National parties really have no control who registers and runs in their party. Especially on the Western parts of the US. There really are not much in the way of party controls on members.

Shellshock1918
09-11-2007, 12:12 AM
Fred is a neo-con Washington Lobbyist and isn't very conservative.


Vote Ron Paul.

Durandal
09-11-2007, 12:14 AM
The National parties really have no control who registers and runs in their party. Especially on the Western parts of the US. There really are not much in the way of party controls on members.

I think I might be missing your point here.

Ordie
09-11-2007, 12:54 AM
Until the states allows for open-primaries (Primary elections not tied to political affiliation). The canidates will continue to cater to the ideological extremist of thier own party.

At this rate, the one's who are getting the shaft are the growing numbers of independant voters who are shut out.

One thing that the op-ed missed. Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and Governor of a state. Much of his formative years in politics was spent running a state. Fred Tompson does not have that experience