PDA

View Full Version : Secessionists in downtown Chattanooga



shocker1
10-06-2007, 08:37 AM
OH lawdy, here we go y'alls.:)

Secessionists share views, find unlikely similarities in downtown Chattanooga Thursday, October 04, 2007

Download MP3 (http://www.timesfreepress.com/MEDIA/audio/metro/2007/oct/Kirkpatrick_Sale_1004.mp3)- By Lori Yount
Staff Writer
At first glance, it may seem liberal Northeasterners who believe in doing away with the use of fossil fuels would have little to agree on with conservative Southerners who think their states should've been left to stand alone from the rest of the United States since 1861. But one thing has urged them to put aside their differences and even unite them -- a passionate belief that the United States federal government is a tyranny.

"There's a lot we share in common," said former New Hampshire legislator Burt Cohen, who had scribbled "sympathetic" over the "Observer" title on his name tag.
For one thing, Mr. Cohen, who describes himself on the left side of the political spectrum, said he always believed the North was wrong in its actions during the Civil War.
"It's a pleasure to be able to recognize this is not a Southern thing," said David Jones, chairman of the Tennessee chapter of the League of the South. "It's a desire for liberty that goes beyond Dixie, goes beyond a Scot-Irish heritage."
And they're uniting in Chattanooga today as the New York-based Middlebury Institute, along with the League of the South, hosts the second annual North American Secessionist Convention at the Marriott downtown.
Since the League of the South was co-hosting the event, leaders said they chose Chattanooga so the secessionist convention could be held back-to-back with the League of the South's annual conference, which starts Friday at the Marriott. To have both conventions is characteristic and an honor for Tennessee, Mr. Jones said.
"Tennessee has a long history of being in the forefront of history of (secessionist movements)," Mr. Jones said, referencing Tennessee troops who helped bring the final blow to the British in the American Revolution and those who fought for Texas' independence from Mexico, including Sam Houston and Davy Crockett.
Tennesee was the last state to secede from the Union and join the Confederacy during the Civil War, or as Mr. Jones called it, "The War for Southern Independence."
About 40 observers lined the walls of a Marriott conference room this morning to listen to about 15 representatives at a table take turns briefly reporting their groups' efforts toward secessionism.
William D. Kennedy spoke about his attempts to be included on the ballot as a presidential candidate who supports states' rights. A Christian Exodus member told the gathering his group had determined South Carolina, the first state to secede from the United States in 1860, would be one of the states most likely to secede again, and they have had other members move there to influence and infiltrate county governments.
The convention has grown from its first year to include delegates from about 18 states and two European nations -- Belgium and Ireland, Middlebury Institute director Kirkpatrick Sale said. He said he wasn't sure if this year's convention would produce any resolutions or amend "The Burlington Declaration" that came out of last year's meeting.
He said the Middlebury Institute, which studies separatism, secession and self-determination, doesn't have any political affiliation and dismisses the raised eyebrows in allying with the League of the South, which has been named a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

http://www.timesfreepress.com/absolutenm/articlefiles/22689-Secession.jpg

Walter D. Kennedy presents his presidential exploratory committee to a representatives of secessionist groups today at the second annual North American Secessionist Convention at the Marriott in downtown Chattanooga. Kennedy calls himself a "messenger candidate" for states' rights.


"The League has been unfairly accused of being racist, but even if it had racism in it, that would not deter the institute from allying with it," he said. "There are racists in any organization."
At the moment, the idea of secessionism may seem to be "radical," but League of the South President Michael Hill believes environment is right for society to move back toward smaller, decentralized governments. For now, he said they're trying to spread the message what they think liberty is and the secessionism it may take to get there.
"When it happens, God only knows, literally," said Dr. Hill, a former history professor. "I'd never thought I'd see the fall of the Berlin Wall.... These things, once they get started, it escalates quickly."
http://www.timesfreepress.com/absolutenm/templates/local.aspx?articleid=22689&zoneid=77

szr
10-06-2007, 09:04 AM
Well I'm no secessionist but I'm huge supporter of states' rights and devolved government, with state and local governments being the primary administrative and legislative authorities that citizens interact with. The Federal government should be predominantly outward facing, in my view, being the body through which the 50 united States interact with the rest of the world. Domestically, the Federal government's role should be to help states facilitate their own interstate relationships, and provide national resources and assistance where something may be beyond the means of a state or states.

And, unlike secession, it wouldn't take much more than a change in thinking in Washington and in our state capitals about the Federal-state-local relationship to make meaningful changes. Easier said than done, though. Especially when the citizenry has been conditioned to expect that the Federal government play an integral and overt part in their everyday lives. And, as such, they automatically look to the Federal government for intervention in matters that they'd really be better served, turning to local and state government instead.

John Crighton
10-06-2007, 09:12 AM
While I think secession is way to harsh for any of the problems facing us now, I do think that a few more states and/or Districts should be created to help with proper taxation and distribution of taxes.

dangerclose
10-06-2007, 12:54 PM
Hey if Vermont (http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2007/06/03/in_vermont_nascent_secession_movement_gains_traction) can secede why not other states and/or communities? Cities like Berkeley or San Francisco can form their own socialist states modeled after say ... North Korea. Then we can bomb those tie-died, pot smoking, communist hippies out of the 60's ... as well as those maple syrup-loving bastards in Vermont.

dangerclose
10-06-2007, 02:07 PM
Domestically, the Federal government's role should be to help states facilitate their own interstate relationships, and provide national resources and assistance where something may be beyond the means of a state or states.



And $5000 for every baby born.

John Crighton
10-06-2007, 03:24 PM
Hey if Vermont (http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2007/06/03/in_vermont_nascent_secession_movement_gains_traction) can secede why not other states and/or communities? Cities like Berkeley or San Francisco can form their own socialist states modeled after say ... North Korea. Then we can bomb those tie-died, pot smoking, communist hippies out of the 60's ... as well as those maple syrup-loving bastards in Vermont.

Got nothing against Vermont, but you will have plenty of people in line to help you with the rest. :)

vryhpyammoadded
10-06-2007, 03:31 PM
I predict that we will be hearing a lot more about this in a few years what with the projected demographic migrations to the South/South East due to tax, cost of living and socialist meddling flight north, the potential for immigrant votes south unhinging traditional northern power blocks and the Fed’s thinly veiled push to take more states rights with its insane push for more of the expensive socialized nanny state that we cannot afford.

Can you imagine the hissy fit the limousine liberals of New England will have when their house voting power bleeds there slice of the federal revenue pie away south? They’ll probably install crushing virtual slavery on their productive classes just to pay the entitlements to keep the poor population up to keep house seats. No wait, they already do that. That’s the reason productive people are leaving. Maybe this is why the elite are fighting so hard to increase illegal immigration? Anyway…

I find it so ironic the parallels we see to the last civil war and even the revolution. Slavery, states’ rights, taxation without representation, etc… are all going to come back and bite the Feds if they don’t get their act together, stand down with the meddling power grab and get to running this nation properly hands off but we all know they’re like the monkey with its hand gripping the banana in the revenue jar.

Desk Jockey
10-06-2007, 03:40 PM
Can you imagine the hissy fit the limousine liberals of New England will have when their house voting power bleeds there slice of the federal revenue pie away south? They’ll probably install crushing virtual slavery on their productive classes just to pay the entitlements to keep the poor population up to keep house seats. No wait, they already do that.


Too true
rofl

Speaker of the House Tip O'neil of Massachusetts "vote early and vote often."

New England always finds a way to keep up their house seats, even if the dead vote and are counted on the district census.