PDA

View Full Version : Selling America



J-10
11-05-2007, 10:36 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/opinion/04sun3.html?ref=opinion
Selling America
Published: November 4, 2007

Karen Hughes brought strengths to the job of public diplomacy, a critical, often overlooked tool for advancing the national interest. She was an insider’s insider, a confidante from President Bush’s Texas inner circle who could speak for him authoritatively. Yet as she prepares to leave office, polls shows the United States is hated more than ever in the Muslim world.

President Bush originally picked Charlotte Beers, a former advertising executive who once marketed Uncle Ben’s rice, as under secretary of state for public diplomacy. But Madison Avenue slickness did not play well when promoting Mr. Bush’s go-it-alone foreign policy after 9/11, and in less than two years, she was out.

Next up was Margaret Tutwiler, formerly Secretary of State James Baker’s spokeswoman and ambassador to Morocco, who had a deft political touch. She soon moved on to a big executive job on Wall Street.

Ms. Hughes’s weaknesses quickly became apparent when she took over. She had never been to the Middle East and had no expertise in the Muslim community that was a main target of the administration’s public diplomacy efforts. Her early forays to the region were embarrassing. “I am a mom, I love kids” is one phrase reflecting the folksy approach derided by the Arab media.

Eventually, Ms. Hughes, like Ms. Tutwiler, realized the limits of her ability to win America friends when the administration’s policies — waging preventive war in Iraq, redefining torture, repudiating the Geneva Conventions, establishing illegal detention camps, refusing to grapple with the Israeli-Palestinian crisis — were creating new enemies every minute and even souring allies.

She lowered her public profile, enlisted star athletes — Michelle Kwan and Cal Ripken Jr. — as envoys to the world, and turned her attention to winning bigger budgets, creating regional hubs to respond to the Arab media, and cultural exchanges like summer camps for Arab children to learn English.

Some of those initiatives may have a beneficial effect. But it should be clear to anyone who is paying attention that the issue is not who has the job of public diplomat. The best hope of defusing anti-Americanism and restoring our country’s international standing lies in a renewed commitment to the values that make it great, including respect for civil liberties and international law. That will require a change of attitude, as well as personnel, much higher up — in the Oval Office.

RxOnco
11-05-2007, 10:54 PM
I can see that this is a typical NY Times hit-piece but I can't seem to figure out where the "selling" part comes in.

"...Yet as she prepares to leave office, polls shows the United States is hated more than ever in the Muslim world..."

Not sure I've ever seen any polls where the United States have ever had very good relations with the Muslim community as a whole.

"...That will require a change of attitude, as well as personnel, much higher up — in the Oval Office..."

I'm still wating for the "This ad payed for by the (insert Democrat) Presidential campaign" or "I'm (insert Democrat) and I approve of this message."

2Sheds_Jackson
11-06-2007, 12:43 AM
waging preventive war in Iraq, redefining torture, repudiating the Geneva Conventions, establishing illegal detention camps, refusing to grapple with the Israeli-Palestinian crisis — were creating new enemies every minute and even souring allies.

rofl Oh man, and here I thought Hollywood writers were on strike.

That's good stuff - show me an illegal detention camp, show me where we have a policy to use torture - and since when does the Israeli-Palestinian crisis have our f*cking name on it? Last I looked, there were 191 other members of the UN - each of them is free to pick up the pieces and fix everything. Only Iran seems to have a plan, which involves wiping a people from the face of the planet. Oh but then to make any fuss about that would surely keep us from getting invited to any Christmas parties in the Mideast.

RECON DOC
11-06-2007, 12:49 AM
rofl Oh man, and here I thought Hollywood writers were on strike.

That's good stuff - show me an illegal detention camp, show me where we have a policy to use torture - and since when does the Israeli-Palestinian crisis have our f*cking name on it? Last I looked, there were 191 other members of the UN - each of them is free to pick up the pieces and fix everything. Only Iran seems to have a plan, which involves wiping a people from the face of the planet. Oh but then to make any fuss about that would surely keep us from getting invited to any Christmas parties in the Mideast.

Sometimes I wonder about you.:|

Mastermind
11-06-2007, 03:04 PM
WHAT!!!?? We are still hated in the ME...My God...what is the world coming to? Well, I'm off to go play slots at the Luxor here in Las Vegas...wish me luck...

cascade
11-06-2007, 03:18 PM
What's this change of attitude "they" speak of? The open arms hugs and kisses sh*t gets you blown up by a suicide bomber. "They" talk about how naive the Bush administration is on foreign policy and totally forget about Clinton with the N. Koreans.

dimasorokine
11-06-2007, 11:16 PM
rofl Oh man, and here I thought Hollywood writers were on strike.

That's good stuff - show me an illegal detention camp, show me where we have a policy to use torture - and since when does the Israeli-Palestinian crisis have our f*cking name on it? Last I looked, there were 191 other members of the UN - each of them is free to pick up the pieces and fix everything. Only Iran seems to have a plan, which involves wiping a people from the face of the planet. Oh but then to make any fuss about that would surely keep us from getting invited to any Christmas parties in the Mideast.

“Oh man, and here I thought Hollywood writers were on strike.”

I’ve got to agree with you, the NY Times can come up with some entertaining stories, not sure if this is one of them though…

”That's good stuff - show me an illegal detention camp, show me where we have a policy to use torture”

C’mon, do you seriously believe the US is NOT doing any one of those things themselves, or even through a third party? And what do you expect, a giant building with an “Illegal Detention Camp” sign on it, with rooms labeled “Torture Room” inside? And an actual policy to use torture? You mean like a, official document that states it? I don’t think these documents can just be downloaded from the internet, or even exist.

"- and since when does the Israeli-Palestinian crisis have our f*cking name on it?"

Since you wrote "your" name on it in giant letters…

"Last I looked, there were 191 other members of the UN - each of them is free to pick up the pieces and fix everything."

Last time I looked it wasn’t in the best interest of the US (or at least those in power) for the other countries go around “fixing” stuff and spreading their influence.

"Only Iran seems to have a plan, which involves wiping a people from the face of the planet. Oh but then to make any fuss about that would surely keep us from getting invited to any Christmas parties in the Mideast."

Lol, do you want to go to Christmas parties in the ME…I’m sure you’ll type up a good response as usual. But honestly, your post make me crave weed, so thanks, I’m gonna go smoke some ;)

-Dima