PDA

View Full Version : CIA Operation "Pliers" Uncovered in Venezuela



lider_r
11-29-2007, 06:28 AM
CIA Operation "Pliers" Uncovered in Venezuela (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7475)
Psyop aims to destabilize Venezuela and overthrow President Chavez
by Eva Golinger
Global Research (http://www.globalresearch.ca/), November 28, 2007
venezuelanalysis.com (http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/site_images/emailfriend.gif Email this article to a friend (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:sendarticle%28%27sendEmailLink%27,%20%27CIA%20Operation%20%60Pliers%60%20Uncovered%20in%20Venezuela%27%29;)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/site_images/printfriendly.gif Print this article (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:printarticle%287475%29;)


http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/chvezcnn_portada.jpeg


Last night CNN en Español aired the above image, which captions at the bottom "Who Killed him?" by "accident". The image of President Chavez with the caption about killing him below, which some could say subliminally incites to assassination, was a "production error" mistakenly made in the CNN en Español newsroom. The news anchor had been narrarating a story about the situation between Colombia and Venezuela and then switched to a story about an unsolved homicide but - oops - someone forgot to change the screen image and President Chavez was left with the killing statement below. Today they apologized and admitted it was a rather "unfortunate" and "regrettable" mistake. Yes, it was.

On a scarier note, an internal CIA memorandum has been obtained by Venezuelan counterintelligence from the US Embassy in Caracas that reveals a very sinister - almost fantastical, were it not true - plan to destabilize Venezuela during the coming days. The plan, titled "OPERATION PLIERS" was authored by CIA Officer Michael Middleton Steere and was addressed to CIA Director General Michael Hayden in Washington. Steere is stationed at the US Embassy in Caracas under the guise of a Regional Affairs Officer. The internal memorandum, dated November 20, 2007, references the "Advances of the Final Stage of Operation Pliers", and confirms that the operation is coordinated by the team of Human Intelligence (HUMINT) in Venezuela. The memo summarizes the different scenarios that the CIA has been working on in Venezuela for the upcoming referendum vote on December 2nd. The Electoral Scenario, as it's phrased, confirms that the voting tendencies will not change substantially before Sunday, December 2nd, and that the SI (YES) vote in favor of the constitutional reform has an advantage of about 10-13 points over the NO vote. The CIA estimates abstention around 60% and states in the memo that this voting tendency is irreversible before the elections.

Officer Steere emphasizes the importance and success of the public relations and propaganda campaign that the CIA has been funding with more than $8 million during the past month - funds that the CIA confirms are transfered through the USAID contracted company, Development Alternatives, Inc., which set up operations in June 2002 to run the USAID Office for Transition Initiatives that funds and advises opposition NGOs and political parties in Venezuela. The CIA memo specifically refers to these propaganda initiatives as "psychological operations" (PSYOPS), that include contracting polling companies to create fraudulent polls that show the NO vote with an advantage over the SI vote, which is false. The CIA also confirms in the memo that it is working with international press agencies to distort the data and information about the referendum, and that it coordinates in Venezuela with a team of journalists and media organized and directed by the President of Globovision, Alberto Federico Ravell.

CIA Officer Michael Steere recommends to General Michael Hayden two different strategies to work simultaneously: Impede the referendum and refuse to recognize the results once the SI vote wins. Though these strategies appear contradictory, Steere claims that they must be implemented together precisely to encourage activities that aim toward impeding the referendum and at the same time prepare the conditions for a rejection of the results.

How is this to be done?

In the memo, the CIA proposes the following tactics and actions:

Take the streets and protest with violent, disruptive actions across the nation
Generate a climate of ungovernability
Provoke a general uprising in a substantial part of the population
Engage in a "plan to implode" the voting centers on election day by encouraging opposition voters to "VOTE and REMAIN" in their centers to agitate others
Start to release data during the early hours of the afternoon on Sunday that favor the NO vote (in clear violation of election regulations)
Coordinate these activities with Ravell & Globovision and international press agencies
Coordinate with ex-militar officers and coupsters Pena Esclusa and Guyon Cellis - this will be done by the Military Attache for Defense and Army at the US Embassy in Caracas, Office of Defense, Attack and Operations (DAO)
To encourage rejection of the results, the CIA proposes:

Creating an acceptance in the public opinion that the NO vote will win for sure
Using polling companies contracted by the CIA
Criticize and discredit the National Elections Council
Generate a sensation of fraud
Use a team of experts from the universities that will talk about how the data from the Electoral Registry has been manipulated and will build distrust in the voting system
The CIA memo also talks about:

Isolating Chavez in the international community
Trying to achieve unity amongst the opposition
Seek an aliance between those abstentionists and those who will vote "NO"
Sustain firmly the propaganda against Chavez
Execute military actions to support the opposition mobilizations and propagandistic occupations
Finalize the operative preparations on the US military bases in Curacao and Colombia to provide support to actions in Venezuela
Control a part of the country during the next 72-120 hours
Encourage a military rebellion inside the National Guard forces and other components
Those involved in these actions as detailed in the CIA memo are:

The CIA Office in Venezuela - Office of Regional Affairs, and Officer Michael Steere
US Embassy in Venezuela, Ambassador Patrick Duddy
Office of Defense, Attack and Operations (DAO) at the US Embassy in Caracas and Military Attache Richard Nazario Venezuelan Political Parties:

Comando Nacional de la Resistencia
Accion Democratica
Primero Justicia
Bandera Roja
Media:

Alberto Federico Ravell & Globovision
Interamerican Press Society (IAPA) or SIP in Spanish
International Press Agencies
Venezuelans:

Pena Esclusa
Guyon Cellis
Dean of the Simon Bolivar University, Rudolph Benjamin Podolski
Dean of the Andres Bello Catholic University, Ugalde
Students: Yon Goicochea, Juan Mejias, Ronel Gaglio, Gabriel Gallo, Ricardo Sanchez
Operation Tenaza has the objective of encouraging an armed insurrection in Venezuela against the government of President Chavez that will justify an intervention of US forces, stationed on the military bases nearby in Curacao and Colombia. The Operation mentions two countries in code: as Blue and Green. These refer to Curacao and Colombia, where the US has operative, active and equipped bases that have been reinforced over the past year and a half in anticipation of a conflict with Venezuela.

The document confirms that psychological operations are the CIA's best and most effective weapon to date against Venezuela, and it will continue its efforts to influence international public opinion regarding President Chavez and the situation in the country.

Operation Tenaza is a very alarming plan that aims to destabilize Venezuela and overthrow (again) its legitimate and democratic (and very popularly support) president. The plan will fail, primarily because it has been discovered, but it must be denounced around the world as an unacceptable violation of Venezuela's sovereignty.

The original document in English will be available in the public sphere soon for viewing and authenticating purposes. And it also contains more information than has been revealed here.
For the full text in Spanish, see: Operación Tenaza: Informe confidencial de la CIA devela plan de saboteo al referéndum del 2 de diciembre (http://www.aporrea.org/tiburon/n105390.html)




Global Research Articles by Eva Golinger (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=listByAuthor&authorFirst=Eva&authorName=Golinger)Supposing the original document does surface, is there any way to determine weather its authentic and not just propaganda from Chavez's intelligence services?

afreu
11-29-2007, 06:33 AM
Hm, "Venezuelan counterintelligence", could be propaganda because it fits into Chavez's view of the world. But looking at history (Chile, etc.) such a CIA operation isn't utopia. It's possible.

Zorro C9
11-29-2007, 08:06 AM
Well DAO actually stands for Defence Attache Office, so I'm throwing the rest of the document into doubt.

muttbutt
11-29-2007, 08:12 AM
Well DAO actually stands for Defence Attache Office, so I'm throwing the rest of the document into doubt.
Indeed..
Office of Defense, Attack and Operations (DAO) at the US Embassy in Caracas and Military Attache Richard Nazario mmmmm conspiracy theory bull****e

theholeinthedonut
11-29-2007, 08:24 AM
First question I always ask myself who is posting?
Second question what source does the info come from?
If I do not know the source then I start surfing around the site......when I find something like this :

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5626

then I can't see any reason to discuss and to argue.

cascade
11-29-2007, 04:02 PM
Wow that is one hell of a document to have leaked or lost to Venezuelan intelligence. It's so damn detailed I'm sure it was written by Hugo Chavez himself.

Hollis
11-29-2007, 04:14 PM
First question I always ask myself who is posting?
Second question what source does the info come from?
If I do not know the source then I start surfing around the site......when I find something like this :

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5626

then I can't see any reason to discuss and to argue.

Ok re-read this sentence:

"if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon"

I am no English wiz kid but who is refer to as, "Shot down the Plane" ALSO ATTACKED the Pentagon.

His statement clearing states it was the TANGOS.

Or did I miss something?????

theholeinthedonut
11-29-2007, 04:23 PM
Ok re-read this sentence:

"if the people who bombed the mess hall in Mosul, or the people who did the bombing in Spain, or the people who attacked the United States in New York, shot down the plane over Pennsylvania and attacked the Pentagon"

I am no English wiz kid but who is refer to as, "Shot down the Plane" ALSO ATTACKED the Pentagon.

His statement clearing states it was the TANGOS.

Or did I miss something?????

I'm terribly sorry and I for sure do not want to start flaming but I really do not understand what you want to get at?
Maybe it's my bad english.

Hollis
11-29-2007, 04:32 PM
I'm terribly sorry and I for sure do not want to start flaming but I really do not understand what you want to get at?
Maybe it's my bad english.

LOL, or it is my bad english. As I read it, it seems the focus was on the Words, "Shot down". That in itself might imply the US shot down the plane. But!! As the sentence is written it was the terrorist who "shot down" the plane. There is the confusion, How can terrorist shoot down a plane? More than likely it was a mis-statement, Wrong discription on how the plane went down. NOT who did it.

theholeinthedonut
11-29-2007, 04:37 PM
I just wanted to state that the article I linked to was, imho, tin-foil hat propaganda, as they try to prove that it was the US military and the CIA who were behind 9/11.
So I was trying to propose that, by extrapolation, one could give as much credibilty to the "Operation Pliers" story. Which means none at all! Another tin foil hat story of the left. Brain fart from Hugo Chavez.

Hollis
11-29-2007, 04:41 PM
I just wanted to state that the article I linked to was, imho, tin-foil hat propaganda, as they try to prove that it was the US military and the CIA who were behind 9/11.
So I was trying to propose that, by extrapolation, one could give as much credibilty to the "Operation Pliers" story. Which means none at all! Another tin foil hat story of the left. Brain fart from Hugo Chavez.


Thanks, for the heads up. I was missing something.

RICHICOQUI
11-29-2007, 05:28 PM
this is two years ago from a site that strongly oppose chavez tell a lttle about how eva galinger work for chavez http://www.vcrisis.com/index.php?content=letters/200503250937

theholeinthedonut
11-29-2007, 05:30 PM
Thanks, for the heads up. I was missing something.

No problem.

Murph
11-29-2007, 05:41 PM
Regardless of who might have authored this, I think "Development Alternatives, Inc." is a great name for a front company involved with over-throwing governments. I loled.

PeterG
11-29-2007, 06:57 PM
Regardless of who might have authored this, I think "Development Alternatives, Inc." is a great name for a front company involved with over-throwing governments. I loled.

I like 'United fruit' better, sounds more innocent!

Rictor
11-30-2007, 08:41 AM
Time will tell. I'm not as quick as some to write off the report completely, but then again it may be BS. We'll see during the elections whether any of the anti-Chavez moves materialize.

Bitogno
11-30-2007, 09:54 AM
I can't believe that CIA would do such a thing !!!!