PDA

View Full Version : Cnn plants Democrat activist in the Republican debate



Jeremiah
11-29-2007, 05:11 PM
http://www.youtube.com/v/81jhxLtqmVM&eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/28/video-debate-questioner-is-affiliated-with-hillarys-and-kerrys-campaigns/


[Update: Keith Kerr was known to CNN as a gay activist as far back as December 2003, when he was featured in this CNN article.]

CNN, as part of its Republican debate with YouTube, failed to mention that retired general Keith Kerr, who announced he was gay after his retirement from the Army, is a member of Hillary Clinton’s "LGBT Americans For Hillary Steering Committee." Not only did General Kerr ask the question via a YouTube video, but he was also present in the audience, and got to ask the candidates for a "straight answer" (pardon the pun).

General Kerr’s, whose question came 47 minutes into the 9 pm Eastern hour the debate, is also part of the Servicemembers’ Legal Defense Network's advisory council, an organization "dedicated to ending discrimination against and harassment of military personnel affected by 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' and related forms of intolerance"

[See updates below: Bill Bennett mentioned Kerr's possible Hillary connection on CNN 30 minutes after the debate, and Anderson Cooper confirms this at the close of the 10 pm Eastern hour.]

Host Anderson Cooper first directed Kerr’s question to California Congressman Duncan Hunter, followed by responses from Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney. Cooper then asked Kerr if he was satisfied by those who had answered his question, and was given a minute to address the candidates. Senator McCain then replied to Kerr’s question.

A full transcript of the exchange between Kerr, Cooper, and the candidates:

BRIG. GEN. KEITH KERR, U.S. ARMY (RET.): My name is Keith Kerr, Santa Rosa, California. I'm a retired brigadier general with 43 years of service, and I'm a graduate of the Special Forces Officer Corps, the Command and General Staff Course, and the Army War College. And I'm an openly gay man. I want to know why you think that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians?

ANDERSON COOPER: I want to point out the Brigadier General Keith Kerr is here with us tonight. I'm glad you're here. I give the question to Congressman Hunter.

CONGRESSMAN DUNCAN HUNTER: Yeah. General, thanks for your service. But I believe in what Colin Powell said, when he said that having openly-homo****** people serving in the ranks would be bad for unit cohesion. And the reason for that, even though people point to the Israelis, and point to the Brits, and point to other people having homo******s serve, is that most Americans -- most kids who leave that breakfast table and go out and serve in the military and make that corporate decision with their family -- most of them are conservatives, and they have conservative values, and they have Judeo-Christian values. And to force those people to work in a small, tight unit with somebody who is openly-homo******, who goes against what they believe to be their principles -- and it is their principles -- is I think a disservice to them. And I agree with Colin Powell, that it would be bad for unit cohesion.

(APPLAUSE)

COOPER: I want to direct this to Governor Huckabee. 30 seconds.

GOVERNOR MIKE HUCKABEE: The Uniform Code of Military Justice is probably the best rule, and it has to do with conduct. People have a right to have whatever feelings, whatever attitudes they wish. But when their conduct could put at risk the morale, or put at risk even the cohesion that Duncan Hunter spoke of -- I think that's what is at issue, and that's why our policy is what it is.

COOPER: Governor Romney, you said in 1994 that you looked forward to the day when gays and lesbians could serve, and I quote, 'openly and honestly' in our nation's military. Do you stand by that?

ROMNEY: This isn't that time. That is not that time. We're in the middle of a war. The people who have watched...

COOPER: Do you look forward to that time, though, one day?

ROMNEY: I can listen to the people who run the military to see what the circumstances are like. And my view is that at this stage, this is not the time for us to make that kind of a decision.

(CROSSTALK)

COOPER: Is that a change in your position from when the time...

ROMNEY: I didn't think it would work. I didn't 'don't ask, don't tell' would work. That was my -- I didn't think it work. I thought that was a policy -- when I heard about it, I laughed. I said that doesn't make any sense to me. And you know what? It's been there now, for what, 15 years? It seems to have worked.

COOPER: So, just so I am clear, at this point, do you still look forward to a day when gays can serve openly in the military or no longer?

ROMNEY: I look forward to hearing from the military exactly what they believe is the right way to have the right kind of cohesion and support in our troops, and I'll listen to what they have to say.

COOPER: General Kerr, as I said, is here. Please stand up, General. Thank you very much for being with us. Do you feel you got an answer to your question?

KERR: With all due respect, I did not get an answer from the candidates.

(SOME APPLAUSE)

COOPER: What do you feel you did not...

KERR: American men and women in the military are professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians. For 42 years, I wore the uniform -- Army uniform -- on active duty, in the Reserve, and also for the State of California. I revealed I was a gay man after I retired. Today, 'don't ask, don't tell' is destructive to our military policy. Every day, the Department of Defense discharges two people, not for misconduct, not for the unit cohesion...

(TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES)

COOPER: What? The mike has been lost -- you've lost the -- is the microphone not working? All right. Please just finish your...

KERR: ...what Congressman Hunter is talking about, but simply becuase they happen to be gay...

COOPER: Okay. Senator McCain...

(CROSSTALK)

KERR: ...and we're talking about doctors, nurses, pilots, and the surgeon who sews somebody up when they are taken from the battlefield.

COOPER: I appreciate your comment. Senator McCain, I want to give you 30 seconds. You served in the military.

MCCAIN: General, I thank you for your service to our nation. I respect it. All the time, I talk to our military leaders, beginning with our Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the leaders in the field, such as General Petraeus and General Odierno, and others who are designated leaders with the responsibility of the safety of the men and women under their command and their security, and protect them as best as they can. Almost unanimously, they tell me that this present policy is working, that we have the best military in history. We have the bravest, most professional, best prepared, and that this policy ought to continued, because it's working.

[h/t to the Freepers on their live thread]

[Update, 11:23 pm Eastern: During the post-debate coverage on CNN, Bill Bennett mentioned that he was receiving 'a ton of e-mails' about Kerr being on Hillary Clinton's 'gay steering committee."

A full transcript of the exchange between Bennett and host Anderson Cooper, which took place at the bottom half of the 10 pm Eastern hour:

BILL BENNETT: "On that 'don't ask, don't tell' [question], I'm getting a ton of e-mails saying that this guy who asked the question was part of Hillary Clinton's gay steering committee. I don't know if that's true or not, but if he is, that certainly should have been disclosed...."

ANDERSON COOPER: "That's interesting. I had not heard the possibility that he is on some sort of steering committee for a Democratic campaign. [If] that's true...

BENNETT: I don't know. I'm just getting the e-mails to that effect.

(CROSSTALK)

COOPER: "...it would have been disclosed. Yeah, well no, it's something we should follow up on, because certainly I had not heard that, and had no knowledge of [that], nor do I think anyone here. And if so, that should have been certainly disclosed, and we would have disclosed that. I do know that he is an activist of some sort, but I had not heard that he's actually working for a campaign. If so, that would certainly be an issue that should be addressed immediately."]

[Update, 11:40 pm Eastern: At the close of the 10 pm Eastern hour of post-debate coverage, host Anderson Cooper confirmed the tips Bennett received.

COOPER: "Bill Bennett earlier mentioned he was getting some reports from friends of his on the Internet that Brigadier General Keith Kerr, who asked a question about gays in the military during this debate, was on a steering committee for Senator Hillary Clinton. That was something certainly unknown to us, and had we known that, would have been disclosed by us. It turns out we have just looked at it. Apparently, there was a press release from some six months ago. Hillary Clinton's office saying that he had been named to some steering committee. We don't know if he's still on it. We're trying to find out that information. But certainly, had we had that information, we would have acknowledged that in using his question, if we had used it at all.]

—Matthew Balan is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2007/11/28/cnn-fails-mention-retired-gay-general-s-endorsement-hillary

Bias much?

Dasein
11-29-2007, 05:42 PM
Should the question not have been asked?

hank
11-29-2007, 06:20 PM
Anderson Cooper was quoted on NPR this morning as saying he didn't know of Kerr's affiliation with Hillary's campaign. I don't like Cooper but I doubt he would out and out lie about that knowledge. Is it a big gaff by CNN not to know? Yes. Does it indicate a bias by CNN? Maybe, but at the end of the day this is an issue that people care about, regardless of anyone's personal beliefs on this issue. Is it that big a deal in the grand scheme of things? No.

hank

Ordie
11-29-2007, 07:23 PM
The retired general asked a question, the canidates responded.

So what's the big deal?

California Joe
11-29-2007, 07:36 PM
Frankly, this is a bullsh*t issue. Oh yeah, but normally bullsh*t issues work in this kinda debate....From what I can see, McCain is busy slapping that Trent Lott hair having, dink Mitt Romney around because he apparently has never heard of waterboarding when everyone knows that even Brigham Young did it, Mike Huckabee is now a media darling even though he thinks Stephen Colbert actually supports him and he doesn't believe in that newfangled "e-vo-lution theory thingie" and that makes him mildly retarded and probably a liposuction patient, and Rudy was busy charging his nearly 6 figure security costs for "cheating on current wife and banging future wife in the Hamptons" to sh*t NYC programs like "Downtown Loft Committee" and "Convincing the Homos not to march on St Paddys Day test group".

Are they trying to let Hillary be President?

2Sheds_Jackson
11-29-2007, 07:43 PM
Isn't a gay General who retires out of the military when he's darn good and ready - proof that the current policy works?

WarriorMonk
11-29-2007, 07:49 PM
It's my understanding that these debates have questions coming from unaligned people, not people who are aligned with a candidate or party and have a conflict of interest, so I guess the big deal is why the frick did CNN let this one slip through...I think.

Ordie
11-29-2007, 08:01 PM
Are they trying to let Hillary be President?

They are trying hard appeal to specific voter demographics (i.e. social conservatives, CEO conservatives, NRA, neo-conservatives, baby boomers, NASCAR Dads, left handed soccer moms who drive pick ups etc....).

But not Americans.

KillerBD
11-29-2007, 08:19 PM
My 2 cents on the issue: The current don't ask don't tell policy is fine. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

evanfitz
11-29-2007, 08:36 PM
I was so disappointed with the debate. Many of the questions were not touching on real issues.

budgie
11-29-2007, 09:09 PM
Isn't the title a little misleading? CNN plants activist in the debate? He was invited and asked to speak - it's not like he was skulking in the shadows and heckling from the stands...

Morboute
11-29-2007, 10:40 PM
Isn't the title a little misleading? CNN plants activist in the debate? He was invited and asked to speak - it's not like he was skulking in the shadows and heckling from the stands...

Misleading titles about political topics? Thats unpossible!! :lol:

ElHombre
11-29-2007, 11:30 PM
I was so disappointed with the debate. Many of the questions were not touching on real issues.

You mean you don't need umpteen million questions detailing the candidate's belief in God? :lol:

TheSteve
11-29-2007, 11:43 PM
First off, its CNN and its a bunch of Republicans, what did you expect? If the democrats were on FOX, which they declined to do, you would have the same type of bull****. But onto the real issue.


My 2 cents on the issue: The current don't ask don't tell policy is fine. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

If you look at the general progression of things in the world, gays will eventually be able to serve openly in our military. (By progression I mean: Slavery going away, women having rights/voting, gays having rights, ect. . .) The policy hasn't broke, its just always been wrong. People who are gay have the same rights as people that are not, so they should be allowed to serve, openly. If it seriously ****s with the ability of the military to function, why the hell would other countries allow it? Also, I seriously doubt most soildiers in the US armed forces would care if the guy watching his back is gay or not, as long as he or she does what they are suppose to do.

NuclearHead
11-29-2007, 11:47 PM
Should the question not have been asked?

Should Democrat activists be asking questions at a Republican debate? Don't think so.

ElHombre
11-29-2007, 11:49 PM
Should Democrat activists be asking questions at a Republican debate? Don't think so.

Courtesy of Keith Olberman: If the Republicans can’t handle the Democrats, how can they handle Al Qaeda?

:lol:

NuclearHead
11-30-2007, 12:03 AM
Courtesy of Kieth Olberman: If the Republicans can’t handle the Democrats, how can they handle Al Qaeda?

:lol:

If they'd let Republican activists at their debates as well, then I wouldn't have a problem.

ElHombre
11-30-2007, 12:47 AM
If they'd let Republican activists at their debates as well, then I wouldn't have a problem.

Perhaps the Dems would like to talk about other things than God. :lol:

At least the Rs were asked a serious question. CNN planted a question for Hillary by a citizen at a Dem debate: 'Would you rather wear diamonds or pearls?' roll Keee-Rist. The first serious female candidate in US history and CNN plants a dup**** question like that.

And the point still stands: If the Rs can't handle a Dem question, what makes anyone think they can handle AQ?

avedis
11-30-2007, 01:03 AM
if the D's cant handle fox how can handle AQ? Keith Olberman is an idiot.
I have no problem with the having openly gay men and women serve in the military. Who cares.
But enough with the touchy feel sorry for me or the "look everybody... IM GAY!!" crap.

seraosha
11-30-2007, 01:23 AM
Since when is butt *** a civil right?

Who cares, it's just ***. And the sooner homo******ity is looked upon as a *** act, and not a "life style", the sooner the whole issue can get back to where it belongs...in the bed room, and not in public.

"Don't ask, don't tell" is not "Back of the Bus", or "Whites Only" on a drinking fountain. That guy made it to General...something appears to be working right.

budgie
11-30-2007, 02:37 AM
Since when is butt *** a civil right?

Who cares, it's just ***. And the sooner homo******ity is looked upon as a *** act, and not a "life style", the sooner the whole issue can get back to where it belongs...in the bed room, and not in public.



Dare I refer to the argument put forth by Randi Rhodes here: think what you will of her as a person but she speaks the truth on this issue.

If it weren't for the rash of Republican senators sending dirty messages to teenage boys or chatting up men in airport toilets: if not for the 'conservative' preachers soliciting *** from male prostitutes and whatnot; if not for dragging 'gay marriage' onto the electoral agenda to steal attention away from far more pressing issues and so on, then perhaps the issue of homo******ity (and *** in general) wouldn't be such a big deal for the Right.

By being so ashamed of their *** in general, the Republicans have brought this debate upon themselves of late. They preach family values then get themselves caught breaking their own rules, usually in public. The very fact the 'conservatives' simply can't keep it in their own bedrooms (or motels, toilet stalls or Congressional janitor closets) has made homo******ity - their homo******ity - a public issue.

evanfitz
11-30-2007, 10:58 AM
You mean you don't need umpteen million questions detailing the candidate's belief in God? :lol:

I played the Schindler's List theme whenever Huckabee spoke, Giuliani sounds like he has braces, Fred looks like a fish and Ron Paul looks like Gandalf without the beard.

the debate wasn't my favorite but I found a way to have some fun. :)

2Sheds_Jackson
11-30-2007, 12:56 PM
And the point still stands: If the Rs can't handle a Dem question, what makes anyone think they can handle AQ?

I think that's the wrong question - this flap isn't about the Republican's ability to handle a planted question (which they did just fine), it's about the supposedly impartial media organizations solidifying their position as the 5th column.

Last election, CBS scraped the bottom of the barrel with Rathergate - their attempt along with the Kerry campaign to smear a Republican, now CNN is apparently working with the Clinton camp this time around.

As lame as these plastic haired Republicans are, at least they showed up - which is more than the Democrats could muster the courage to do.

swamper
11-30-2007, 01:04 PM
Several of the other questions are questionable as well. I think the big issue is the questions at a party debate should be coming from like party questioners.

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/29/digging-out-the-cnnyoutube-plants-abortion-questioner-is-edwards-supporter/

http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/29/surprise-muslim-youtube-questioner-was-former-cair-intern/

Peiper_76
11-30-2007, 01:12 PM
Should the question not have been asked?

The question, as asked, is -not- an honest question; it is a logical fallacy.

"I want to know why you think that American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians?"

This is known as:
Fallacy of interrogation or Fallacy of presupposition
"This is the interrogative form of Begging the Question. One example is the classic loaded question:

'Have you stopped beating your wife?'"


So the answer is 'no,' this question should not have been asked.

[ http://education.gsu.edu/spehar/FOCUS/EdPsy/misc/Fallacies.htm#interrogation ]

11 Bravo
11-30-2007, 01:14 PM
First off, = you are silly.

If you look at the general progression of things in the world, gays will eventually be able to serve openly in our military. (By progression I mean: Slavery going away, women having rights/voting, gays having rights, ect. . .) The policy hasn't broke, its just always been wrong. People who are gay have the same rights as people that are not, so they should be allowed to serve, openly. If it seriously ****s with the ability of the military to function, why the hell would other countries allow it? Also, I seriously doubt most soildiers in the US armed forces would care if the guy watching his back is gay or not, as long as he or she does what they are suppose to do.

Second off = can you tell me where/how being queer gives you any special rights over a normally oriented person ?. You infer that by being "gay" that there is some need for special rights above and beyond the common person's rights. You're very silly indeed.

2Sheds_Jackson
11-30-2007, 01:25 PM
For me, it's a question of misrepresentation, and trust. CNN billed this event as a way to bring the whole country close to the debate via YouTube - featuring questions from regular people - with questions that go past the usual knee-jerk issues specially crafted to trip candidates up. Instead, CNN evidently did exactly the opposite.

It just confirms that not only can our betters (CNN et al) not be trusted, but that they don't trust us either.

Herrmannek
11-30-2007, 01:25 PM
Guys handled this pretty well... What answer you expect from Republican when asking such question? They either will tell you that the gays in army are bad for whatever reason they believe it or they will pass the answer to some "unnamed" experts down below... Personally I'm all for no ask no tell policy... both for safety and comfort of gay and straight army people that have to cohabitate with no chance of changing environment...Oh and I suspect democrat debates have much more strict question filter :)

Zoomie
11-30-2007, 03:50 PM
For me, it's a question of misrepresentation, and trust. CNN billed this event as a way to bring the whole country close to the debate via YouTube - featuring questions from regular people - with questions that go past the usual knee-jerk issues specially crafted to trip candidates up. Instead, CNN evidently did exactly the opposite.
Well not only that, but CNN also advertised a majority of these people as "undecided voters", whereas it's completely the opposite.

cascade
11-30-2007, 04:40 PM
Undecided my ass! Why is it when the Democats pull this sh*t it's the norm? Just like the return of the draft, rendition, torture, merc armies setting wildfires and my favorite G.W. gets sued by marine mammals. All anti america media bullsh*t.

California Joe
11-30-2007, 05:28 PM
Simmah don nah! Take a deep breath.

budgie
11-30-2007, 10:08 PM
Come on guys, CNN plants an activist? The youtube questioners were not undecided? I presume they were all democraats too? This smacks of conspiracy theory. Did the Democrats never get any 'hard' questions asked in their debates? Who's wearing the tinfoil hats now?

From what I saw on the debate it wasn't 'tough' questions from the audience that threw the candidates off, it was the deep divisions among themselves and the vicious bickering over party policies. Abortion, gays, Iraq, torture, if one thing is certain these guys are further apart on most issues than the Dems are.

Zoomie
11-30-2007, 10:12 PM
Come on guys, CNN plants an activist? The youtube questioners were not undecided? I presume they were all democraats too? This smacks of conspiracy theory. Did the Democrats never get any 'hard' questions asked in their debates? Who's wearing the tinfoil hats now?
.

I'm not wearing a tin foil hat, just look at the facts (http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/29/digging-out-the-cnnyoutube-plants-abortion-questioner-is-edwards-supporter/).

I can't think of a name
11-30-2007, 10:33 PM
Yep this says it all about CNN, they could not figure out what regular people did with one Google Search.

If they treated it like any other question it would be fine, but they FLEW TH GUY TO THE DEBATE and then gave him equal amount of time to sound off. We wanted to see the canadits speak not some guy whine about DADT.

budgie
12-01-2007, 09:47 PM
I'm not wearing a tin foil hat, just look at the facts (http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/29/digging-out-the-cnnyoutube-plants-abortion-questioner-is-edwards-supporter/).

What facts? That some of the people asking questions were not republicans? Didn't know they had to be - after all a candidate should be looking to garner votes from both party's not just his own. That CNN invited a guy (invited, not "planted") to come and clarify his question and get a face to face answer from the candidates? In what part of that are they not allowed to speak? They all got their fair shake.

The pot-shots the candidates took at each other were far more telling than questions from anyone in the audience or on Youtube.