PDA

View Full Version : Green cards will go out, background check or not



ronnieraygun
02-12-2008, 01:53 PM
Move meant to ease huge backlog of applicants, but critics warn it's a threat to security


To ease an application backlog, the federal government plans to issue green cards to about 47,000 immigrants before the FBI finishes a complete background check — a move that critics warned could compromise national security.
The policy change is designed to address a mounting backlog of green card applicants who have met other requirements for permanent residence and have passed an automated fingerprint check, yet are waiting more than six months for FBI "name check" clearance, said Chris Bentley, a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service spokesman.
The green card holders will still be expected to eventually pass the "name check" portion of the background check process, which in some cases takes the FBI more than two years to complete. If U.S. officials find serious problems after issuing a green card, the permanent resident could be deported, Bentley said.
"This maintains national security," Bentley said. "It doesn't compromise the system, but at the same time it allows us to get benefits to people who deserve them."
The decision was outlined in a Feb. 4 USCIS memo. Bentley said officials are still reviewing how to implement the new policy and could not say when they will start issuing green cards from the backlog.
Before applicants are approved for a green card, they must pass an FBI fingerprint check and be screened against a law enforcement database.
But after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Congress strengthened the requirements for the background check for green card and citizenship applicants. As part of the process, the FBI is required to do more in-depth name checks on immigrants to see if applicants have any connection with suspicious activity.
USCIS officials reported an estimated 329,160 applicants for citizenship and green cards were waiting in the FBI name check backlog as of May, the most recent data available. Of those, about 104,600 — or 32 percent — had been in the system for more than three months but less than a year. Sixteen percent, some 51,497 applicants, were pending between one and two years. About 17 percent of applicants had been waiting more than two years.

'Holy grail' of documents

Critics raised concerns about issuing green cards without completing the full name check since permanent residents are able to travel without restrictions and sponsor relatives for legal status.
"Basically a green card is the holy grail of terrorist documents," said Bryan Griffith, a spokesman with the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington D.C, which advocates for stricter immigration controls. He said the changes will create a "loophole" that could be easily exploited.
An FBI spokesman could not be reached for comment. The agency has attributed the backlog to understaffing and the large volume of requests. The FBI received about 70,000 name check requests per week from 70 agencies in 2007, with half of those coming from USCIS, according to FBI statistics.
The backlog has become so pervasive across the country that hundreds of would-be citizens and green-card holders are suing the federal government to expedite their background checks. Recent cases in Houston include doctors, researchers and oil company employees. In December, a 50-year-old native of Jordan with three U.S.-born children filed a complaint in federal court in Houston to expedite his green card application, which was filed in 1999.
"There are a lot of people who have been waiting for these green cards," said Naomi Jiyoung Bang, an attorney with the Houston immigration firm Quan Burdette & Perez. "It's very frustrating, because unlike the naturalization applicants, they have no rights. They're in limbo."
Ibrahim Abumaria, a 29-year-old from Palestine, came to Houston in 1997 on a student visa and married a U.S. citizen. He said he applied for a green card in 2001. Abumaria, a nursing student, said USCIS officials told him about two years ago the case was pending a background check.
In 2005, his mother died, and he wasn't able to go to Palestine for her funeral, he said, because his visa limits international travel. Now his father is ill, he added.
"It's restricting," he said. "And it's frustrating. I'm not a criminal."




http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5533508.html

Ordie
02-12-2008, 02:28 PM
Is there a similar backlog for FBI 'name checks' for those entering the military?

SPQR
02-12-2008, 05:26 PM
Please cast your votes for "most self destructive / suicidal"

A) Brittany Spears
B) Amy Winehouse
C) United States of America

ronnieraygun
02-12-2008, 05:30 PM
Please cast your votes for "most self destructive / suicidal"

A) Brittany Spears
B) Amy Winehouse
C) United States of America

They tried to make my government go to rehab and it said "No, no, no."

helomech
02-12-2008, 07:31 PM
They tried to make my government go to rehab and it said "No, no, no."

Hahahahaha,I thought the same thing

0rphie
02-12-2008, 09:02 PM
Most of those awaiting green cards are already in the US. Delaying the issuance of the green cards because of the background check does not help to stop potential terrorists since they are already in the country. Making sure that the terrorists will not cross a border to get inside of the US will help.

Andrew Chalmers
02-12-2008, 09:05 PM
Most of those awaiting green cards are already in the US. Delaying the issuance of the green cards because of the background check does not help to stop potential terrorists since they are already in the country. Making sure that the terrorists will not cross a border to get inside of the US will help.

In addition - those awaiting green cards have already gone through entry visa requirements. Security threats shouldn't be able to legally enter the country in the first place, making those already on permanent resident track put their lives on hold for years without explanation is just inconsiderate - but dumb as a security measure.

Firetxmi
02-17-2008, 10:38 PM
February 17, 2008
Editorial
Citizenship Blues

Three bits of news from the first two months of 2008 highlight the galling inconsistency and inadequacy of the federal government’s system for turning immigrants into citizens.

The first is that the wait for citizenship and green cards is up — way up. Citizenship and Immigration Services reported in January that the average time to process a citizenship application had risen to 18 months, from seven, and that green cards would now take a year, instead of six months or less.

It was a sorry moment for the agency, which jacked up its fees last year with a promise to use the new money to end vast paperwork backlogs. The opposite happened: the agency is drowning in applications from people who filed before the increase to avoid being gouged.

The second was the news last week that the agency had finally taken a baby step toward clearing its green-card backlogs by easing a rule on background checks by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The F.B.I. will still do full checks on every applicant, comparing fingerprints against a criminal database and names against lists of criminals and terrorists. It’s just that those who have had to wait more than six months for a green card because of one last, unfinished piece of an application — a “name check” of people who have ever been mentioned in criminal investigations, even peripherally — will get their cards.

The move is sensible, and long overdue. The understaffed agency has faced mounting pressure to act. An increasing number of immigrants, after waiting years for name checks, have sued and won, with federal judges ordering the government to do its job.

The third development is the surge in businesses using E-Verify, the federal system for checking employees’ immigration status. As more states and localities have adopted harsh campaigns to purge undocumented immigrants, E-Verify has taken on a larger role, with 52,000 employers now using it, compared with 14,000 a year ago. President Bush’s new budget includes $100 million to expand E-Verify, which the citizenship agency calls “a cornerstone” of “long-term immigration reform.”

You can tell a country’s priorities from what works and where the money goes. With billions for border and workplace enforcement, the government has been rushing to impose ever more sophisticated and intrusive means to keep immigrants out. Yet it continues to tolerate a creaky, corrosively inept system for welcoming immigrants in — an underperforming bureaucracy that takes their money and makes them wait, with a chronic indolence that is just another form of hostility.

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/17/opinion/17sun2.html?_r=1&ref=opinion&oref=slogin