PDA

View Full Version : ACLU:700.000 on terror watch list.



khukuri
03-14-2008, 05:36 PM
http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/watchlistcounter.html?=main




ACLU Watch List Counter

Why are there so many names on the U.S. government's terrorist list?

In September 2007, the Inspector General of the Justice Department reported that the Terrorist Screening Center (the FBI-administered organization that consolidates terrorist watch list information in the United States) had over 700,000 names in its database as of April 2007 - and that the list was growing by an average of over 20,000 records per month.1

At that rate, our list will have a million names on it by July. If there were really that many terrorists running around, we'd all be dead.

Terrorist watch lists must be tightly focused on true terrorists who pose a genuine threat. Bloated lists are bad because

* they ensnare many innocent travelers as suspected terrorists, and
* because they waste screeners' time and divert their energies from looking for true terrorists.

Small, focused watch lists are better for civil liberties and for security.

The uncontroversial contention that Osama Bin Laden and a handful of other known terrorists should not be allowed on an aircraft is being used to create a monster that goes far beyond what ordinary Americans think of when they think about a "terrorist watch list."

This is not just a problem of numbers. The numbers are merely a symptom. What's needed is fairness. If the government is going to rely on these kinds of lists, they need checks and balances to ensure that innocent people are protected. (See ACLU Backgrounder on Watch Lists for more)

Unlikely Suspects

Many innocent individuals have already been caught up by our government's bloated watch lists. Here is a sampling:



Robert Johnson - 60 Minutes interviewed 12 men named Robert Johnson, all of whom reported being pulled aside and interrogated, sometimes for hours, nearly every time they go to the airport.


Alexandra Hay, a college student with a double major in French and English at Middlebury College in Vermont in 2004, when she joined an ACLU lawsuit due to problems she was having with the airline watch list.


Sarosh Syed, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Pakistan working for the ACLU of Washington in Seattle also had problems flying. (Syed was also a plaintiff in the ACLU suit in 2004.)


9/11 Hijackers. While certainly these were individuals we all wish had been watched out for, they are, in fact, dead. Yet, the names of 14 of the 19 hijackers from 9/11 were on a copy of the list obtained by 60 Minutes . More evidence that the list is poorly maintained and full of junk names that will only serve to ensnare the innocent.


Evo Morales, president of Bolivia. Name found on list obtained by 60 Minutes .


Saddam Hussein. Although he was imprisoned in Baghdad and in U.S. custody at the time, his name was also found in the database obtained by 60 Minutes. Again, this accomplishes nothing except ensnaring the innocent, diluting the list, and wasting the time of security workers.


Gary Smith. Another name that is extremely common in the United States, found on the no-fly list by 60 Minutes.


John Williams. Yet another common name found on the airline watch list by 60 Minutes.


U.S. Senator Edward Kennedy (D, Mass.) After repeated delays at airport security, the senator had trouble getting removed from the airline watch list despite calls to Homeland Security and eventually a personal conversation with the Secretary of DHS.


Representative John Lewis (D, Georgia). Being a hero of the Civil Rights Movement isn't enough to keep off the aviation watch lists, apparently.


Akif Rahman, founder of a computer consulting company from suburban Chicago, was detained and questioned for more than two hours by U.S. customs officials on four separate occasions when crossing the Canadian border. On one occasion he was held for 5 ½ hours, shackled to a chair, and physically searched. He was also separated from his wife and children (who were forced to wait in a small dirty public area without food or telephones). A U.S. citizen born in Springfield Illinois, Rahman is being represented by the ACLU of Illinois in a lawsuit over this treatment.


Marine Staff Sgt. Daniel Brown was blocked from flying while on his way home from an 8-month deployment in Iraq. He was listed as a suspected terrorist due to a previous incident in which gunpowder was detected on his boots, most likely a residue of a previous tour in Iraq.


Asif Iqbal, a Rochester, NY, management consultant and University of Texas graduate who flies weekly to Syracuse for business, has been weekly detained and interrogated by local law enforcement because his name is shared by a former Guantánamo detainee (who was himself released from the extrajudicial detainment, presumably because of lack of evidence of terror involvement).


James Moore, author of a book critical of the Bush Administration, Bush's Brain ; problems flying.


Catherine ("Cat") Stevens, wife of Senator Ted Stevens (R, Alaska). Problems flying.


Yusuf Islam, a singer and pop star formerly known as Cat Stevens. Author of song "Peace Train." His flight from London was diverted and forced to land in Maine once the government realized he was aboard, and he was barred from entering United States.


Major General Vernon Lewis (Ret.); a recipient of the Army's highest medal for service, the Distinguished Service Medal who served in the Korean and Vietnam wars, Lewis had problems flying.


Captain Robert Campbell, US Navy-retired, Comercial Airline pilot of 22 years; problems flying.


David Nelson. Attorney David C. Nelson (right) is one of many men named David Nelson around the U.S. who have been caught up on the list, including a former star of the television show "Ozzie and Harriet." (Nelson was also a plaintiff in the ACLU suit in 2004).


John William Anderson, age 6; problems flying.

Among those caught up by the no-fly list are many infants and small children.



Rep. Don Young, (R, AK); problems flying.


Sister Glenn Anne McPhee, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops' secretary for education. Sister McPhee sought redress and removal from the watch list for nine months in 2004 and 2005 and it wasn't until she was able to elicit help from White House connections (Karl Rove) that DHS addressed her problem.


Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, D-CA; problems flying.


Michelle Green, Master Sergeant, U.S. Air Force . (Green was also a plaintiff in the ACLU suit in 2004.)


I dont know how reliable ACLU is but if this is true its over the top. A lot of the info is from cbs 60 minutes.

Bongopete
03-14-2008, 05:37 PM
And apparently members of some group called mp.net are on the list.

Nano
03-14-2008, 06:10 PM
And apparently members of some group called mp.net are on the list.

LoL! Yeah some of us are probably under surveillancerofl
Not sure why though we spend so much time here I doubt there be much time to strap bombs to our bodies and go out for 72 virgins. Yeah read the FBI cover up thread article quite amusing. If I did not know any better I'd say the US has turned into an Al Qaeda stronghold by the number of Americans under surveillance. Maybe we should call our troops back from Iraq to retake our fallen homeland.p-)

nullterm
03-14-2008, 09:26 PM
Isn't a list that big and growing that fast essentially useless?

Nano
03-14-2008, 09:50 PM
Isn't a list that big and growing that fast essentially useless?

That or perhaps we need to recall our troops from Iraq and liberate us here at home. p-)

LaoSexMachine
03-14-2008, 09:53 PM
700,000 out of a population of 300 mil? Bunch of cry babies.

maw
03-15-2008, 12:30 AM
i have two friends on the list. one's a liberal professor and the other's an avid anti war activist. draw your own conclusions.

hank
03-15-2008, 07:56 AM
Isn't a list that big and growing that fast essentially useless?


Yes, and that is the point. A "list" needs to be small enough to work with and obviously 700,000 (assuming this article is right) is too big for airport systems to work with.

I don't have a problem with the list, but when guys with names like John Lewis are getting detained for 4 hours at an airport I think its time to admit that something is wrong. You'll need a little more than John Lewis to know who to detain and who not to detain.

hank

Herrmannek
03-15-2008, 08:00 AM
i have two friends on the list. one's a liberal professor and the other's an avid anti war activist. draw your own conclusions.

Exactly the people I would suspect to get on the list...

Violet Fashion by Mindy
03-15-2008, 08:32 AM
700,000 out of a population of 300 mil? Bunch of cry babies.

Not if you turn up to an airport with an hour to spare, get detained for 2 hours, miss your flight, business meeting, lose money on booking fees, accommodation and so forth

T3ngu
03-15-2008, 08:38 AM
Its strange, I had a indian engineer from our company fly within Australia with me the other month. He was surprised that when he flew with me he didn't get hassled, in fact, they didnt even ask for ID. But when he flys by himself, he always gets double checked.

** Im nobody special BTW, interesting though.

I would hate, hate hate, to be detained. Time is money.

kahn267
03-15-2008, 11:10 AM
72 virgins in heaven?
why not a nice rounded off number like 70?
and while im in this train of thought....... how ugly of a chick do you have to be to die and go to heaven a virgin?

Antimatty
03-15-2008, 04:15 PM
72 virgins in heaven?
why not a nice rounded off number like 70?
and while im in this train of thought....... how ugly of a chick do you have to be to die and go to heaven a virgin?

you have a really great point. i bet if we pointed this out to people in the arab world via commercials of ugly /fat/ ugly women then suicide bombings would drop dramatically.

Limeyfellow
03-15-2008, 10:31 PM
That list has made flying a real pain in the rear for me, and I have one of the most common names of Britain. I have spent many hours being pulled aside, interviewed and called a scumbag criminal who is no better than bin Laden and searched 9 times on one flight alone. It not like I don't have a greencard and been fully vetted in the US, I am still treated as a criminal everytime. Luckly I don't fly as often as I used too anymore.

angry cow
03-16-2008, 01:22 PM
A list with 700,000 names on it is useless. If you consider how many people share more common names like John Williams, and common culturally Islamic names as well, it probably affects closer to twice that number. That means 1 out of every 200 people, (at least one per flight) will show up and divert attention from real threats facing the US. The fact that the list is growing at 20,000 per month is fairly alarming as well. It won't be long before 3-4 people on every flight are getting the 4th degree from TSA, the bravest people ever to stand around and fondle you.

I have a friend who WORKS FOR DHS, who shares a name with someone on the watch list. The fact that this person was killed by coalition forces in Iraq over 2 years ago doesn't cause him any less grief. The list is simply to big to be effective. How can a list of 700,000 be maintained? It would take a person a full working day just to verify that someone on the list was deceased. You think they have 1000 people just going over the list to make sure that the names of deceased/incorrectly spelled/improperly added (Cat Stevens? Please.) are being removed in order to keep up with the 20,000 new names they get per month? I bet they don't even have 10 people working on removing names from the list.

Like the article said, if there were really 700,000 people we absolutely could not let into the country, there would be suicide bombings every day. That would mean the Iraq insurgency, numbering approximately 00.3% of the population (a very high estimate on my part at 70,000 insurgents, most numbers indicate far less) would be about the same size as the US insurgency 00.23% of the population. And that would just be the names of the ones we know for sure want to kill us. Imagine all the other people who should belong on that list but whom we have no way of knowing their name? It would probably increase the size of the list by 10 times. Resulting in almost 10 times the number of insurgents, and thus attacks, that occur in Iraq occurring in the US daily.

Satellite Weapon
03-17-2008, 02:54 AM
i have two friends on the list. one's a liberal professor and the other's an avid anti war activist. draw your own conclusions.


unfortunately things like this happen

loganinkosovo
03-17-2008, 03:36 AM
The more important question is "Why isn't the ACLU on the list?" They are just as big a threat to democracy as Al Queada.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SLF_4R0dYA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kcnK9VvRq0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OSdOsQOMbg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z99RzsB5PcU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePclhv404gg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HiPG4t_0QA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg0IZ6gvbp4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0mP_UHuj18



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzbHV3DepJI

Ought Six
03-17-2008, 03:43 AM
Wow! I wonder if I made the cut? p-)

Seriously though.... I wonder if NICS and the terror watch list are synched up. You would think that anyone trying to pass the instant background check for a firearms purchase would be flagged in NICS if they were on the terror watch list. However, with the so frequently demonstrated astounding incompetence of our homeland security Keystone Kops, I have doubts.

angry cow
03-19-2008, 02:14 PM
I think the concern is that a national criminal database (rather than the multiple networked systems we have now) would be too vulnerable to attack and would violate privacy concerns.

In the 21st Century though, I don't see anyway to effectively fight terrorism and interstate crime without a federal database. It would have to serve the functions of terrorist watch list, criminal record, *** offender, background check, and numerous other databases that all must be checked separately at the moment.