View Full Version : Iraq's wmds
Bongopete
03-24-2008, 10:27 AM
We know that Iraq had chemical weapons in the past (and used them) but I have a few questions that some may have the answers to;
1. Who actually manufactured them? (were they imported or made locally?)
2. Were they all expended against the Kurds?
3. If they werent all expended, what happened to them?
4. If they were dumped at sea or burned back in the 90's, wouldnt there be a paper trail or someone who could say where dumped or where burned?
Dispatcher
03-24-2008, 11:29 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
I googled it. The amount of pages will keep you reading for a while.
a_very_ex_STAB
03-24-2008, 11:40 AM
We know that Iraq had chemical weapons in the past (and used them) but I have a few questions that some may have the answers to;
1. Who actually manufactured them? (were they imported or made locally?)
2. Were they all expended against the Kurds?
3. If they werent all expended, what happened to them?
4. If they were dumped at sea or burned back in the 90's, wouldnt there be a paper trail or someone who could say where dumped or where burned?
ROFLMAOPIMProflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflroflrofl
Mordoror
03-24-2008, 11:47 AM
What a strange question......... They are still plenty in Irak, (that's why the country deserved its invasion in 2003) under CIA and BlackWater supervision, hidden from wandering newspapers men and women who searched for them during 5 years. And they just expect the US presidential vote to be uncovered in order to make the republicans win .....joke and cheers ........
2. Were they all expended against the Kurds?
No they were used against Iranians as well (even though Kurds pr. definition are Iranians) during the 8 year war.
Bongopete
03-24-2008, 11:54 AM
Well my question was regarding the fact that there obviously WERE weapons or chemicals that were being produced in the mid 90s.
If these things were destroyed or dumped...shouldnt there be some sort of paper trail? Shipment orders or similar to have trucks mustered to dumps or plants and then to take them somewhere?
You cant just blow them up without contamination.
If they are supposed to have just 'aged' into being benign as some reports suggest, what is all the hubbabubba about disposing of US chemical stocks and shipping them to disposal at a chemical burning facility in the pacific and elsewhere?
a_very_ex_STAB
03-24-2008, 11:58 AM
Well my question was regarding the fact that there obviously WERE weapons or chemicals that were being produced in the mid 90s.
If these things were destroyed or dumped...shouldnt there be some sort of paper trail? Shipment orders or similar to have trucks mustered to dumps or plants and then to take them somewhere?
You cant just blow them up without contamination.
If they are supposed to have just 'aged' into being benign as some reports suggest, what is all the hubbabubba about disposing of US chemical stocks and shipping them to disposal at a chemical burning facility in the pacific and elsewhere?
Seriously - you never heard of UNSCOM?:roll:
Bongopete
03-24-2008, 11:59 AM
Seriously, yes. I am just suspicious. Something stinks in Denmark.
Hollis
03-24-2008, 12:28 PM
Search function is your friend.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.