View Full Version : What would of happen if the US and NATO let BiH Civil war go on for 3 more weeks?
The One and Only
04-17-2008, 01:15 AM
What would of happen if the US and NATO let BiH Civil war go on for 3 more weeks ?
After Croatia Liberated its entire country from VSK or SAO Krajina, they met up with the 5 Corp (5 Korpus) ARBiH in Glina Una Dvor August of 1995 and started to help them start there offensive called Sana 95' which took a toll on VRS and turned to tabels around, Sanski Most was libirated on October the 12th 1995, the city was fully captured within 9 to 10 hours and were only 60 km away from Capital of Republika Srpska Banja Luka, but they had to stop there advance and signed the Daytona Peace Agreemant. I think if the US and NATO gave ARBiH and HVO 2-3 more weeks, there wouldn't of been a Republika Srpska at all...
Annihilator9112
04-17-2008, 03:22 AM
u mean "wouldn't"?
The One and Only
04-17-2008, 04:34 AM
u mean "wouldn't"?
sorrey about that, i meant wouldn't thanks for that one, didnt see it coming haha
Snoshi
04-17-2008, 05:13 AM
Same thing that will happen to this thread if moderators wont close it in time
AN_TPS_63A
04-17-2008, 05:25 AM
What would of happen if the US and NATO let BiH Civil war go on for 3 more weeks ?
After Croatia Liberated its entire country from VSK or SAO Krajina, they met up with the 5 Corp (5 Korpus) ARBiH in Glina Una Dvor August of 1995 and started to help them start there offensive called Sana 95' which took a toll on VRS and turned to tabels around, Sanski Most was libirated on October the 12th 1995, the city was fully captured within 9 to 10 hours and were only 60 km away from Capital of Republika Srpska Banja Luka, but they had to stop there advance and signed the Daytona Peace Agreemant. I think if the US and NATO gave ARBiH and HVO 2-3 more weeks, there wouldn't of been a Republika Srpska at all...
Muslims in Bosnia are not Chinese..their lines were very thin, which maked them vulnerable for counter attack.
The One and Only
04-17-2008, 05:31 AM
Muslims in Bosnia are not Chinese..their lines were very thin, which maked them vulnerable for counter attack.
But which Frontline are you talking about thou ?
AN_TPS_63A
04-17-2008, 05:34 AM
But which Frontline are you talking about thou ?
I was talking about scenario of "destroying" RS, how the heck will they hold
eastern Bosnia? :)
equilibrium37
04-17-2008, 05:42 AM
oh dude; another 'what if' thread. Good luck with that.
Arent you banned ? How are you able to start a thread and post ?
AN_TPS_63A
04-17-2008, 06:07 AM
oh dude; another 'what if' thread. Good luck with that.
Arent you banned ? How are you able to start a thread and post ?
Why a ban?
equilibrium37
04-17-2008, 06:13 AM
I simply asked how is he able to post since it says that he is a 'banned user' on his title.
killerkai2
04-17-2008, 07:00 AM
I think it's interesting question. from what i have been able to research, without NATO airpower, the Serbs were able to regroup and stabilise their defensive positions around Banja Luka. It reveals that the VRS were still fighting hard and with intelligence at this very late stage. In reality the VRS should have been looking to have ended the war around the start of 1995 end of 94 bu they were stubborn and did not listen to Milosevic. They did not have enough manpower to defend the land they had taken leaving their high command in the position of not focusing on key areas of value to them and Forces overstretched. Poor stratgety. Maybe the Croatians could have taken that land.
heintzX
04-20-2008, 03:13 PM
And what would happened is that the Serbian army(not vrs) would got involved and then.....well you can imagine it.Srpska was and it still is a reality.There was no other possibility.And never will be.IMO it would be very hard to keep Bosnia together even at present day ....despite all the efforts.....
V.I.D.
04-20-2008, 03:55 PM
To original poster:
please correct that "would of" (into "would've") part in your title. I am not a native English speaker myself, but it is painful watching this language butchering all over this forum. Secondly, I am assuming you meant "Dayton Peace Agreement", not "Daytona" (albeit this sounds kind of funny). Thirdly, Heintz-X already brought up the point I was going to make: if you (A-Bih, HVO) barely managed to win some battles against VRS late in the war, what makes you think that the fully manned/equipped Serbian army would not get involved and resort to a "blitzkrieg" of its own (to defend Serbs in Bosnia or Eastern Slavonia)?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.