PDA

View Full Version : The History Of The U.S. Tax System?



bryanleu2002
04-19-2008, 02:00 AM
How Much Do You Know About The History Of The U.S. Tax System?


Source-http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/industries/media/article/know-history-tax_568508_15.html

LOS ANGELES -- This week, the television show "Jeopardy!" featured a category titled "April 15th," filled with fun facts about the dire day. Let's see how much you know about U.S. tax history.


What was the first tax imposed upon the American Colonies? How did the U.S. pay the debts generated by the American Revolution?

a) Property taxes, based on acreage and improvements;

b) excise taxes on liquor, tobacco, sugar, auctions;

c) head taxes, levied on each person in household and servants and slaves; d) travel taxes, fees to enter and exit the country;

e) All of the above.



Why was the first personal income tax assessed in the U.S.? Which amendment to the Constitution made income taxes permanent? What was the range of the first tax rates or brackets? When was a Social Security tax first imposed? What problem was it intended to solve? When did income tax withholding become a permanent part of our lives? Why is illegal income taxed, right along with legal income? When was the Internal Revenue Service formed?



What is the Internal Revenue Service's mission statement?


The answers


1. What was the first tax imposed upon the American Colonies?


Answer, according to the Treasury Department: "The Stamp Act in 1765. England's need for revenues to pay for its wars against France led it to impose a series of taxes on the American colonies. In 1765, the English Parliament passed the Stamp Act, which was the first tax imposed directly on the American colonies, and then Parliament imposed a tax on tea."


2. How did the U.S. pay the debts generated by the American Revolution?


Answer, according to the Treasury Department: "To pay the debts of the Revolutionary War, Congress levied excise taxes on distilled spirits, tobacco and snuff, refined sugar, carriages, property sold at auctions, and various legal documents. Even in the early days of the Republic, however, social purposes influenced what was taxed.


"For example, Pennsylvania imposed an excise tax on liquor sales partly 'to restrain persons in low circumstances from an immoderate use thereof.' Additional support for such a targeted tax came from property owners, who hoped to keep their property tax rates low, providing an early example of the political tensions often underlying tax policy decisions."


3. Why was the first personal income tax assessed in the U.S.? The answer, according to the Treasury Department: "When the Civil War erupted, the Congress passed the Revenue Act of 1861, which restored earlier excises taxes and imposed a tax on personal incomes. The income tax was levied at 3% on all incomes higher than $800 a year.
"This tax on personal income was a new direction for a federal tax system based mainly on excise taxes and customs duties. Certain inadequacies of the income tax were quickly acknowledged by Congress and thus none was collected until the following year ... the income tax was abolished in 1872."


4. What amendment to the Constitution made income taxes permanent?


Answer, according to the Treasury Department: The 16th Amendment.


5. What was the range of the first tax rates or brackets? Answer, according to the Treasury Department: "Rates beginning at 1% and rising to 7% for taxpayers with income in excess of $500,000. Less than 1% of the population paid income tax at the time. Form 1040 was introduced as the standard tax reporting form and, though changed in many ways over the years, remains in use today."


6. When was a Social Security tax first imposed?


Answer, according to the Treasury Department: "The state of the economy during the Great Depression led to passage of the Social Security Act in 1935. This law provided payments known as 'unemployment compensation' to workers who lost their jobs. Other sections of the law gave public aid to the aged, the needy, the handicapped, and to certain minors.
"These programs were financed by a 2% tax, one half of which was subtracted directly from an employee's paycheck and one half collected from employers on the employee's behalf. The tax was levied on the first $3,000 of the employee's salary or wage."


7. When did income tax withholding become a permanent part of our lives?


Answer,

according to the Treasury Department: "Because of World War II, an important feature of the income tax that changed was the return to income tax withholding as had been done during the Civil War. This greatly eased the collection of the tax for both the taxpayer and the Bureau of Internal Revenue. However, it also greatly reduced the taxpayer's awareness of the amount of tax being collected, i.e. it reduced the transparency of the tax, which made it easier to raise taxes in the future."


8. Why is illegal income taxed, right along with legal income?



Answer, according to the Treasury Department: "One of the problems with the new income tax law was how to define 'lawful' income. Congress addressed this problem by amending the law in 1916 by deleting the word 'lawful' from the definition of income. As a result, all income became subject to tax, even if it was earned by illegal means. Several years later, the Supreme Court declared the Fifth Amendment could not be used by bootleggers and others who earned income through illegal activities to avoid paying taxes."


9. When was the Internal Revenue Service formed?



Answer, according to the Treasury Department: "In 1953, the Bureau of Internal Revenue was renamed the Internal Revenue Service (IRS (javascript:stockSearch('IRS');): 13.50, -0.01, -0.07%), following a reorganization of its function. The new name was chosen to stress the service aspect of its work. By 1959, the IRS had become the world's largest accounting, collection, and forms-processing organization."


10. What is the Internal Revenue Service's mission statement?



Answer, according to IRS.gov: "Provide America's taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all."
How did you do?


If you got nine to 10 answers correct, you're a Tax Genius. Heck, you're probably an avowed Tax Nerd!
Six to eight correct: You are Tax Smart. You're better informed than the average American.
Four to five correct: Tax Norm. You're alive and breathing and know a bit about your taxes and rights.
Zero to three correct: Tax Twit. You're probably a victim of the tax system - and it's likely you're paying too much.
Useful resources
U.S. Treasury Department's history of the tax system. (http://www.treasury.gov/education/fact-sheets/taxes/ustax.shtml)
All about the Internal Revenue Service, by the IRS. (http://www.irs.gov/irs/article/0,,id=98141,00.html)
Tax Policy Center's tax facts page. (http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/)
Tax Analysts' tax history project. (http://www.taxhistory.org/)


http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/industries/media/article/know-history-tax_568508_15.html

beNder
04-19-2008, 11:25 PM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173&q=america&ei=eakKSN3dHoqOqQKo1dGuBA&hl=en

Dominique
04-19-2008, 11:41 PM
bryanleu2002, just out of curiosity, what is it with you and taxes? I'm serious, you seem to have an issue with paying taxes, and something in particular against the IRS.

beNder
04-19-2008, 11:46 PM
Actually it is a good post.

Is there a law on the books that states the government can tax your personal income? Anyone?

Minardiau
04-19-2008, 11:56 PM
For people whining about paying taxes answer me this.

where will funding come from to pay for schools, roads, garbage collection, hospitals, veterans and other pensions, public transportation, parks, space exploration, military, police and it goes on.

Without tax none of this is possible.

Some people may argue that they don't use any of these services, pay for education in private schools and such. Then what about the people that can't afford to pay for these essential services?

Do we stop the garbage collectors children from going to school?

For every reason a person can argue against taxation there is a further 10 reasons why taxation NEEDS to exist.

beNder
04-20-2008, 12:02 AM
Hmmmm, now this is just taking from a vid two posts up min..

Property tax pays for education, gas tax pays for the road system and corporate taxes pays for the others that you listed. I know that it may be one of those conspiracy theory videos but I found some things interesting.

Shadowstorm
04-20-2008, 12:03 AM
For people whining about paying taxes answer me this.

where will funding come from to pay for schools, roads, garbage collection, hospitals, veterans and other pensions, public transportation, parks, space exploration, military, police and it goes on.

Without tax none of this is possible.

Some people may argue that they don't use any of these services, pay for education in private schools and such. Then what about the people that can't afford to pay for these essential services?

Do we stop the garbage collectors children from going to school?

For every reason a person can argue against taxation there is a further 10 reasons why taxation NEEDS to exist.
You ain't lying there. The thing that pisses me off how the government uses it for pork barrel projects like the famed "Bridge to Nowhere".

Minardiau
04-20-2008, 12:13 AM
That is a problem. Build a building, bridge, give contracts to a city ect to by votes in areas where the population is divided at the expense of areas/cities that generally only vote for one political party.

There is also the problem of unfair tax redistribution. Here in Australia my state (New South Wales) provides most of the tax revenues yet received less funds in return.

What I'd like to see would be a system where say half of the tax you pay for gets spent in the way you want it to be spent. We live in a society where this should be possible.

Dominique
04-20-2008, 12:32 AM
Actually it is a good post.

Is there a law on the books that states the government can tax your personal income? Anyone?

The government has the power to impose taxes as it sees fit to raise revenue. The federal taxes you pay, pay for services provided by the federal government, silly little things like paying the military, federal law enforcement (the border patrol, customs, etc.), federal student loans, VA benefits, and for little things like the FAA and federal highway system, but I'm sure none of the people crying about taxes, have ever made use of any of those.

And before you start bitching about the government wasting tax dollars, I'm right there with you, it wastes billions on BS pork barrel projects that are nothing more than a way for politicians to funnel money back to their home districts and keep themselves in office, but that has nothing to do with the fact that the government needs tax money to keep itself running.

gammbino
04-20-2008, 01:39 AM
.
.
<-------- A seriously good idea.




If you got nine to 10 answers correct, you're a Tax Genius. Heck, you're probably an avowed Tax Nerd!
Six to eight correct: You are Tax Smart. You're better informed than the average American.
Four to five correct: Tax Norm. You're alive and breathing and know a bit about your taxes and rights.
Zero to three correct: Tax Twit. You're probably a victim of the tax system - and it's likely you're paying too much.


Uh, none of those questions have anything to do with actually paying taxes. You could get 0 right and do just fine on your return.

beNder
04-20-2008, 02:17 AM
The government has the power to impose taxes as it sees fit to raise revenue. The federal taxes you pay, pay for services provided by the federal government, silly little things like paying the military, federal law enforcement (the border patrol, customs, etc.), federal student loans, VA benefits, and for little things like the FAA and federal highway system, but I'm sure none of the people crying about taxes, have ever made use of any of those.

And before you start bitching about the government wasting tax dollars, I'm right there with you, it wastes billions on BS pork barrel projects that are nothing more than a way for politicians to funnel money back to their home districts and keep themselves in office, but that has nothing to do with the fact that the government needs tax money to keep itself running.

I pay taxes every year just like 2/3 of Americans do. Are you sure that every thing you listed is paid by personal income tax?

Calanen
04-20-2008, 03:54 AM
That is a problem. Build a building, bridge, give contracts to a city ect to by votes in areas where the population is divided at the expense of areas/cities that generally only vote for one political party.

There is also the problem of unfair tax redistribution. Here in Australia my state (New South Wales) provides most of the tax revenues yet received less funds in return.

What I'd like to see would be a system where say half of the tax you pay for gets spent in the way you want it to be spent. We live in a society where this should be possible.

Also loads of money gets wasted on bs. Like a couple of 100 mil on advertising. And a huge bloated public service.

Minardiau
04-20-2008, 04:29 AM
And making fridge magnets. Don't forget the fridge magnets

Calanen
04-20-2008, 04:30 AM
And making fridge magnets. Don't forget the fridge magnets

I was alert, but never alarmed thanks to those fridge magnets. They really helped. A lot.

Minardiau
04-20-2008, 04:45 AM
Biggest wast of tax payers money I've ever seen was the old Belmont railway in Newcastle.

As late as 1992 trains were still going to Redhead and the corridor was still there down to Belmont.

Now instead of spending a few million to get the line up to speed so Newcastle could have a coastal urban rail line for commuters running the full length of the coast of Newcastle more or less they decide to spend millions on a cycle path. Where all the train stations were there is now significant urban developments where the coal mines used to be, a major technical collage on the edge of a urban CBD.

Now I'm no town planner. No sir. But where the stations were there was ample room to build updated facilities, parking spaces and such and people would of used the dam thing thus reducing traffic congestion on Newcastle's version of Parramatta Road, reduce the traffic chaos in Newcastle, reduce the need for parking and provide alternative means of transport for people/tourists on weekends.

Farking idiots. But the rich idiots wanted a bike path.

Calanen
04-20-2008, 04:49 AM
Now instead of spending a few million to get the line up to speed so Newcastle could have a coastal urban rail line for commuters running the full length of the coast of Newcastle more or less they decide to spend millions on a cycle path. Where all the train stations were there is now significant urban developments where the coal mines used to be, a major technical collage on the edge of a urban CBD.


Yes they also hard rail lines that went up to the Burwood colliery in Whitebridge, that have been rusting since the 1980s.

Minardiau
04-20-2008, 04:53 AM
Burwood colliery is now a big estate. ****ing criminal. Excellent infrastructure just gone to waste.

Will938
04-20-2008, 08:44 AM
Taxes are necessary for the government to function, but they should only be collected to run necessary functions of the federal government.

It isn't the fedgov's job to solve all our problems; healthcare, education, welfare, etc...all functions of the state. If you want to live in california and pay 60% taxes, but receive "free" healthcare, education, and living assistance, then so be it. I'd rather live somewhere else, pay my state 5-10% taxes, and use my money as I see fit instead of having the government tell me what is necessary.

The federal government should only tax enough to regulate trade, keep our military strong, protect the borders, and keep itself afloat to carry out other federal powers such as enforcing civil rights. I pay about 40% taxes between the feds and my state, that's completely ****ing ridiculous. Some people pay 65-70%. The federal government wants like 3.3 trillion dollars to operate next year - about a quarter of our GDP. Is anyone going to tell me that this shouldn't be cut by about 2/3?

These scumbags steal way too much of our money to spend on useless/feelgood projects that have very little return for us, then strong arm our states into compliance by threatening to withhold the money taken from that state's citizens if they don't comply. It's bull**** and it needs to stop, very soon. People act like we have an unlimited amount of funds to fix everything, and these same people have so few problems that they start trying to regulate anything in sight. We're gonna find out that we can't live like this for long. People are gonna have to suck it up and lose some quality in life arrangements.

beNder
04-20-2008, 10:21 AM
Well, if they are using personal income tax to secure our borders then we are getting ripped off big time.

Calanen
04-20-2008, 10:57 AM
Burwood colliery is now a big estate. ****ing criminal. Excellent infrastructure just gone to waste.

We used to play in their as kids. It was enormous. They could have still built the estate, and kept the railway line.

Dominique
04-20-2008, 01:58 PM
I pay taxes every year just like 2/3 of Americans do. Are you sure that every thing you listed is paid by personal income tax?

Lets not play word games. With the exception of things like Social Security and Medicare, almost all federal taxes go into one big put to be split up amongst the various agencies. They don't say, only personal income taxes can be used to fund federal highway money, or for the defense budget.

Don't get me wrong, I have no desire to hand over my hard earned loot to either the local, state, or federal government. I, just like most Americans, bitch every time I see my paycheck, or have to fork over more cash on the 15th of April, but I'm not naive enough to think that in this day and age, the federal government could function without taxing personal revenue. And for the uninformed out there, the average citizen pays far less of their income in taxes, than the wealthy.

hank
04-24-2008, 11:55 AM
Wonder what Wesley Snipes thinks about the legality of income tax now? This argument that the income tax is illegal is complete and utter bunk. Its lost so many times that prosecutors for tax cases actually get juries to increase sentences when people argue that income tax is illegal. Read the full article about Snipes. He had a good argument: I got duped by my idiot tax guy who told me income tax was illegal.


Actor Wesley Snipes faces up to three years in prison and a fine of $5 million when he is sentenced Thursday on federal tax evasion charges.

Wesley Snipes was acquitted of the most serious charges against him.

Federal prosecutors last week urged U.S. District Judge William Hodges in Ocala, Florida, to sentence Snipes to the maximum penalty to demonstrate to taxpayers that refusal to pay income taxes carries severe penalties.

Snipes was convicted on three misdemeanor counts of failure to file federal income tax returns.

"This case presents the court with a singular opportunity to deter tax fraud nationwide," the government said in its sentencing recommendation.


http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/24/snipes.sentencing/index.html

hank