PDA

View Full Version : Property Commission Gives Displaced People Hope



seruriermarshal
05-28-2004, 07:20 PM
Property Commission Gives Displaced People Hope

Source: www.irinnews.org


BAGHDAD, 25 May 2004 (IRIN) - Wheat farmer Said Baquuth, 35, and his extended family of 16 live in one room of an abandoned Iraqi army building on the eastern outskirts of Baghdad. Family members sit on simple carpets on the floor watching TV, their bed mats rolled up in one corner. They share cooking facilities with other families also living in the noisy roadside building.

Baquuth and his family have been living in these circumstances since last April when peshmerga (Kurdish guerrillas) came and forced them out of their farm in northeastern Iraq, he told IRIN. "We were scared so we left all of our things there and ran away that night."

Now Baquuth's case is just one of thousands being tackled by the Iraq Property Claims Commission (IPPC), set up in January by the US-appointed Iraqi Governing Council. The commission has hired lawyers and other administrators to take people's claims and try to help them get back their property or give them money if they had their property taken between July 1968 and 9 April 2003. It is offering hope to many, but given the weight of claims, complicated legal processes and large number of properties, progress is likely to be slow.

Up to a million Iraqis are estimated to be displaced in their own country as a result of expulsion policies that the former regime used to remove opponents and gain valuable land in the southern marshes and in the north.

"Arabisation" programmes were responsible for expelling thousands of Kurds, Turkmens and Assyrians from the fertile and oil-rich area of Kirkuk. Since the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, Kurds have been attempting to reverse the process, which in turn has led to the displacement of Arabs in the north.

Displaced people were sometimes given nominal amounts of money for their homes or sometimes nothing at all, and told to move on. The commission will deal with any property that was taken illegally by the former regime, or taken by illegal means, said Nejem Abid Hassan, head of one of four Baghdad property claims offices opened recently in the Jadriyah neighborhood, about 15 kilometres from Baquuth's temporary quarters.

While many documents in central government ministries were looted or burned immediately following the fall of Baghdad to Coalition forces, most real estate documents still exist, the lawyers say. Many families also hold some sort of document showing what belongs to them, which will help to reach a solution.

The larger challenge will be trying to work out who gets the house and who gets money when a property has been bought and sold three or four times since it was originally seized, Hassan said. Many cases may require a decision from the Ministry of Justice, he said. A three-judge panel has been set up to hear cases.

Processing of these claims might take months or years, he said, adding that the commission's work was just a first step. Almost 17,000 claims have been filed in the last two months alone.

Those who file a claim say whether they want to have their house back or if they would be willing to sell it outright or rent it to the new inhabitants, many of whom have lived in the houses for more than 10 years.

In the future, US administrators have announced plans to build numerous new housing units, especially in southern Iraq. Funds for the projects will come from oil revenues, Hassan said. But the commission has already run into a major snag. US-led administrators are scheduled to return sovereignty to Iraqis on 30 June. Decisions on the initial claims were supposed to be made within 45 days, according to a commission handbook. But now commission members are waiting to see what happens with a new government. No new governing body has been formed, although UN officials are currently in Iraq discussing the matter with a broad spectrum of Iraqis.

These things should be backed up by the court, or we will have chaos, said Haidar Ali Kaijoon, another lawyer working in the Jadriyah office. Our main job is to give a green light to the cases that are easy to solve, he added.



http://www.cjtf7.com/header-files/mnfc.jpg

seruriermarshal
05-28-2004, 07:22 PM
Americans Should Prepare to Stay in Iraq for Years

Source: www.uniraq.org

BERLIN - Despite strong opposition to the U.S. invasion of Iraq and a continued nervousness about a European presence there, few European foreign policy experts believe the United States can withdraw its troops from Iraq without creating global chaos.

Asked recently what the United States should do about Iraq,

Expert after expert repeated one assertion: Whatever the result of the U.S. presidential election in November, Americans must be prepared to stay in Iraq, perhaps for years.

Even as popular pressure mounts in ally nations Great Britain, Italy, Poland and Denmark to remove troops from Iraq, and though Spain has withdrawn its troops, the foreign policy experts said the United States can't go. Why? Because while the war has always been unpopular, the notion of a chaotic Iraq is terrifying.

"Listen, I was dead-set against intervention," said Jurg Martin Gabriel, director of the Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, a joint venture between Switzerland and Malta whose primary task is training leaders for Arab nations. "But now that they're in, they have to see it out. I hope whoever is the U.S. president next year understands they should plan on being there for a long while."

A spokesman for the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs predicted that if the U.S.-led coalition pulled out at once, "Iraq would be in civil war within 24 hours."

"As difficult as the decision was to go to Iraq, the decision to leave is more difficult," said Bart Jochem. "Can we turn our backs on the Iraqi people? I'm afraid that would be bad for the country, bad for the people, bad for the region and bad for the world. It would, however, be good for the terrorists."

How European experts feel about the United States' presence in Iraq may not boost their countries' willingness to send more troops. There is virtually no popular support for dispatching European troops to Iraq, and a U.S.-sponsored U.N. resolution that would create a U.N. force has received tepid response.

But their opinions do offer a backdrop against which to judge proposals on future U.S. actions in Iraq offered in the hothouse of the American presidential campaign. Unlike politicians in the United States, the European experts don't have to concern themselves with accusations that they are deserting the troops or undercutting the war effort.

Their solution stops far short of independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader's call for the United States to withdraw and echoes Democratic presidential aspirant John Kerry's call for a continued U.S. presence with more international support.

"The United States created a security vacuum when they invaded," said Michael Pohly, Berlin-based author of "Osama bin Laden and International Terrorism" who's spent decades advising on and studying the region. "It is their duty to fill it, and they should plan on filling it for another two years, at least. If they fail to do this, someone else will fill the vacuum, and the Western world will not like who that will be."

There are, of course, those who disagree. London Mayor Ken Livingstone, recently writing in The Guardian newspaper, said, "The only way forward is to transfer command of security operations to the United Nations and announce the progressive withdrawal of U.S. and British troops."

In an opinion piece this week in Die Welt, one of Germany's most pro-American newspapers, the historian Walter Laqueur said the dream of democracy in Iraq was always "make-believe" and that the United States should be wary of Iraqis who ask them to get out, "but not so fast, please, for Allah's sake."

"It would be stupid for the Americans' to listen to this advice. It would mean the agony would go on forever."

Far more common are words similar to those in a recent London Daily Mail editorial: "Signs of disarray only encourage the terrorists. They must now believe the West is losing its will. There could hardly be a surer recipe for anarchy, victory for al-Qaida and even more turmoil in the Middle East."

Many of the experts acknowledge that the task is a large one - perhaps much larger than President Bush suggested Monday when he said the United States would keep 138,000 troops in Iraq through the end of next year. The London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies suggested Tuesday that the security force should be much larger, perhaps as many as 500,000 coalition soldiers.

The experts also urged the United States not to be deterred by the outcry over prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib prison. Gabriel, the director of the joint Swiss-Malta diplomatic institute, said a strong, long-lasting reaction to the photos was a luxury not afforded to many poor nations.

"Most of the students here are aware - and are very open about the fact - that their own governments hardly have sparkling human rights records," he said. "Deficiencies in human rights and democracy are not uncommon in this world."

Margaret Scammell, an expert on political communications at The London School of Economics, agreed that while the prison photos have been damaging, they don't change the need for an American and British presence in Iraq, though she called for a greater role for the United Nations.

"Look, the torture photos were a disaster, weren't they," Scammell said, "but maybe more so for the reputations of the U.K. and U.S. worldwide than for any practical reason on the ground in Iraq. To rebuild those reputations, the United Nations becomes vital."

Without the United Nations, she adds, "the cooperation of those who've been opposed to the war all along, which is now vital, becomes almost impossible to get."

But it can all still work out, because Europeans agree with Americans that the stakes of failure are high, the experts say.

"It would be foolish to say the events of the past months have made the situation easier," said **** Leurdijk, a senior research fellow at the Clingendael Institute in The Hague, which is devoted to issues of international affairs and security. "But yes, there is a way out of the current situation."

Leurdijk said that the presence of coalition tanks and troops on Iraqi streets these days creates as many attacks as it prevents. He thinks that a less prominent, but equally strong, presence could offer most of the security benefits without the traps.

"The military element is essential, and will be for a couple more years," he said. "But the troubles are only going to increase in the coming months. The U.S. has to become invisible, go back into the barracks or, in this case, the palaces."

The reasoning is simple: History doesn't have a lot of examples of people welcoming occupiers, he said. Their current profile not only angers residents, but weakens the standing of the newly created Iraqi forces.

In addition, Pohly urged the United States to turn to former soldiers of the Saddam Hussein regime to bring security and cited events in Fallujah as an example of how that might work.

"They have to re-establish the old military, or they have no chance to re-establish the state," he said. All these men out fighting in the streets need to be back in the army, training to protect Iraq."

As the liberal Berlin newspaper Tagesspiegel noted this week, "Many Iraqis fear that chaos will break out after the GIs withdraw. The specter of civil war is looming behind every bazaar."


http://www.cjtf7.com/header-files/mnfc.jpg

seruriermarshal
05-28-2004, 07:24 PM
'USA Cares' Helps Military Families in Financial Need

By Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 27, 2004 — Deployments can put unexpected financial hardships on military families — sky-high telephone bills, unanticipated travel costs, loss of income for Guardsmen and reservists called to active duty for extended periods, among them.

USA Cares, a nonprofit organization run entirely by volunteers, is committed to helping families who've run into financial troubles while their family member serves the country.

Farrah Overman, one of the group's volunteers, said the help provided runs the gamut, from advice about where to go for assistance to outright payments for housing, food, vehicle repairs or other necessities.

For a military wife whose husband was wounded in Iraq, USA Cares paid for a round-trip plane fare so she could be by his side during surgery in Germany — something the military couldn't do because his injuries weren't life- threatening. The group paid for another military wife's hotel room while her husband was being treated for inoperable cancer diagnosed while he was on a National Guard deployment. Before USA Cares stepped in to help, the wife had spent three nights sleeping in her car in the hospital parking lot.

And for another National Guard soldier, a truck driver in civilian life, USA Cares helped to stop foreclosure on his truck after his unit was deployed in support of the war on terror.

While helping military families put food on the table and keep a roof over their head when there is seemingly nowhere else to turn, Overman said USA Cares is "basically here to give information," referring families in need to existing support networks. "We do a lot of research to find out what's out there," she said.

USA Cares helps to direct families to military and other charitable organizations or corporate sponsors looking for ways to support American troops, Overman said. Sometimes the group acts as an intermediary, getting landlords or bill collectors to agree to reduced payments during the deployment or helping the family get a loan to cover expenses. "We either help them or help them find a way to help themselves," Overman said.

USA Cares has 10 outstanding requests from needy military families that it hopes to support as funding becomes available, she said.

For more information, call (800) 773-0387 toll-free or visit the organization's Web site.