PDA

View Full Version : Human Wave Flees Violence in Zimbabwe



The Dane
04-22-2008, 08:29 AM
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/04/20/world/zimb.600.jpgA Zimbabwean woman with her child on her back flees across the border into South Africa at Beitbridge Border Post.

ALONG THE SOUTH AFRICA (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/southafrica/index.html?inline=nyt-geo)-ZIMBABWE (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/zimbabwe/index.html?inline=nyt-geo) BORDER — Sarah Ngewerume was driven to the river by despair.
She said she had seen gangs loyal to Zimbabwe’s longtime president, Robert Mugabe (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/robert_mugabe/index.html?inline=nyt-per), beating people — some to death — in the dusty roads of her village. She said Mugabe loyalists were sweeping the countryside with chunks of wood in their hands, demanding to see party identification cards and methodically hunting down opposition supporters.
“It was terrifying,” said Ms. Ngewerume, a 49-year-old former shopkeeper.
Last week she waded across the Limpopo River, bribed a man fixing a border fence on the other side and slipped into a nearby South African farm.
She was among the latest desperate arrivals in what South Africa’s biggest daily newspaper is calling “Mugabe’s Tsunami,” a wave of more than 1,000 people every day who are fleeing Zimbabwe across the Limpopo to escape into South Africa.
When a shallow, glassy river and a few coils of razor wire are the only things separating one of Africa’s most developed countries from one of its most miserable, the inevitable result is millions of illegal border jumpers. But South African and Zimbabwean human rights groups say that the flow of people into South Africa has been surging in the three weeks since Zimbabwe’s disputed election and during the violent crackdown that followed. One Zimbabwean named Washington, who goes back and forth across the border ferrying Super Sure cake flour and Blazing Beef potato snacks, said the government was now using food as a weapon and channeling much of the United Nations (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/united_nations/index.html?inline=nyt-org)-donated grain to supporters of the ruling party.“As we speak,” he said, “people are starving.”
He seemed more defeated than anything else. “People hate the government,” he said. “But they are too scared to fight it.”
Commercials are now running on Zimbabwean TV showing grainy images of captives from the liberation war in the 1970s and reminding citizens not to disobey their leaders, recent arrivals said.
In the past, countless Zimbabwean men escaped to South Africa to drive cabs or work on construction sites and send money home. But these days, many of the Zimbabweans fleeing are women and children willing to take considerable risks to get out for good.
“We were hoping for change and waiting to see what would happen in the election,” said Faithi Mano, one of more than a dozen Zimbabweans interviewed after they had crossed the border last week. “Now, I have decided to quit that place.”
It does not look as if Mr. Mugabe, an 84-year-old liberation hero who has ruled Zimbabwe for 28 years, will leave office without a fight. After early election results from the March 29 vote indicated he was losing to the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/morgan_tsvangirai/index.html?inline=nyt-per), the election commission put the brakes on announcing results. The presidential results still have not been released, and a recount begun Saturday in 23 Parliament races is now threatening to drag things out further — the opposition has deemed it “illegal.”
If there is a runoff between Mr. Mugabe and Mr. Tsvangirai, many fear it could get even bloodier. Human Rights Watch (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/h/human_rights_watch/index.html?inline=nyt-org) issued a report on Saturday saying members of Mr. Mugabe’s party were running “torture camps” where they took opposition supporters for nightly beatings.
On Sunday, the leading opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change, said more than 400 supporters had been arrested, 500 attacked, 10 killed and 3,000 families displaced. The party released a detailed, day-by-day chronicle of violence that listed huts being burned, people getting cracked in the head with bottles and farms being invaded. The party blamed Mugabe supporters and sometimes government soldiers.
The government has denied any wrongdoing and accused opposition leaders of treason. Mr. Tsvangirai has said it is too dangerous for him to stay in Zimbabwe and has been spending time in South Africa.
The border between South Africa and Zimbabwe stretches about 150 miles, and it is headache-hot out here. “Beware of crocodile” signs shimmer in the sun, the grass is yellow and crisp, and at night, the trees churn with clouds of heat-crazed insects.
For the people who make it through, there is a pipeline of sympathy waiting on the other side. Fellow Zimbabweans living in South Africa — often perfect strangers — have taken in border jumpers, giving them a safe house and a warm cup of porridge, and helping them along their way to Messina, about 10 miles south, and then onward to the bigger cities of Johannesburg and Cape Town.
Joyce Dube, director of the Southern African Women’s Institute for Migration Affairs, which tracks the border issue, said the only reason more people were not crossing was the recently beefed-up security on the South African side. “It’s getting tougher to get through,” she said.
South African military helicopters thunder over the Limpopo and soldiers prowl the border roads, searching car trunks for human cargo. Crews of men in red jumpsuits drip with sweat as they fix the fences. But it is a cat-and-mouse game. No sooner have they patched a hole than it is punched through again.
The fence runs for miles, a shining metal snake going up and down the tawny hills. It used to be deadly, electrified by a high-voltage current. That was in the 1980s, when South Africa and newly independent Zimbabwe were practically at war. Back then, many people were going the other way, fleeing South Africa’s repressive apartheid government to escape to Zimbabwe.
At the time, Zimbabwe was one of Africa’s stars. Mr. Mugabe had turned a relatively small, landlocked country into an economic powerhouse that produced beef, grain and tobacco.
“Bob Mugabe was my hero,” said a white Zimbabwean farmer who drove into Messina the other day for supplies. He did not want to give his name because he went on to criticize Mr. Mugabe’s more recent policies and said he was afraid he could be evicted from his farm for doing so. “I know it sounds funny, but it’s true. You have no idea how beautiful Zim was.” Zim is the affectionate nickname for Zimbabwe.
But in the late 1990s, Mr. Mugabe felt he needed to deliver on long-promised land reforms, and Britain, the former colonial ruler, was stalling on paying for them. Mr. Mugabe then encouraged blacks to seize white-owned farms. Whites fled, industrialized agriculture crashed, and today the inflation rate is more than 150,000 percent. Supermarkets often have no food, and 80 percent of the people have no jobs.
The Movement for Democratic Change ran on these woes, and in 2002 it nearly won power, though the elections were marred by violence and intimidation.
This time there was hope that things would be different. Recent arrivals say that a few weeks before the vote, the bullying suddenly seemed to let up — perhaps, some thought, because the ruling party was sure it would win. But when the first results showed Mr. Mugabe losing badly, the government went silent. There were some talks about Mr. Mugabe stepping aside. Then the crackdown began.
Ms. Ngewerume, the escaped former shopkeeper, said opposition supporters in her village in central Zimbabwe became easy targets because they had danced and sung in the streets after early results were tacked up on polling station doors. When the final results did not come, they went into hiding. But the thugs found them anyway, she said.
“I can’t see how Mugabe could win again after all this,” she said.
But, she added, many opposition supporters probably would not take the chance again to cross “the old man,” as Mr. Mugabe is often called.
Ms. Ngewerume was visibly pained just talking politics as she stood under a tree on a farm near the border. “I just want to go there,” she said, stabbing her finger vaguely south, in the direction of Johannesburg. “I’m just struggling to go forward to get something better.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/world/africa/21zimbabwe.html?ex=1366516800&en=0378560da461b30a&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

There an video-report on the link as well.

The Dane
04-22-2008, 08:43 AM
Zimbabwe: ZANU-PF Sets Up ‘Torture Camps’

Opposition Voters Tell of Beatings, Intimidation

(Johannesburg, April 19, 2008) – Zimbabwe’s ZANU-PF party is using a network of informal detention centers to beat, torture, and intimidate opposition activists and ordinary Zimbabweans, Human Rights Watch said today.
Victims and eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that ZANU-PF has set up detention centers in the opposition constituencies of Mutoko North, Mutoko South, Mudzi (all in the province of Mashonaland East), and in Bikita West (in the province of Masvingo) to round up and instill fear in suspected political opponents.

“Torture and violence are surging in Zimbabwe,” said Georgette Gagnon, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “ZANU-PF members are setting up torture camps to systematically target, beat, and torture people suspected of having voted for the MDC in last month’s elections.”

During the day, ZANU-PF and their allies (so-called “war veterans,” youth militias and some armed men in military uniform) gather at these camps to decide on their targets, generally those known or thought to support the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). According to witnesses, the targets are then rounded up and brought to the camps at night, where they are beaten for hours with thick wooden sticks and army batons. Human Rights Watch has interviewed more than 30 people in the last two days who have sustained serious injuries, including broken limbs, as a result of these beatings.

Zimbabwe’s parliamentary elections on March 29, 2008 delivered a decisive defeat for the ruling ZANU-PF led by Robert Mugabe. Yet, nearly three weeks later, the ZANU-PF-appointed Election Commission has failed to announce the results of the presidential poll that took place at the same time.

ZANU-PF officials are calling the crackdown Operation Makavhoterapapi, or “Where did you put your cross?” There seem to be two aims to this organized violence: to punish people for having voted for the MDC and to intimidate them to vote for ZANU-PF if there is a presidential run-off. One victim told Human Rights Watch: “They told me that next time you will vote wisely, now you know what we can do.”

Several individuals told Human Rights Watch that they had been held in these camps for up to three days and interrogated about MDC leaders, MDC funding, and the location of other MDC supporters.

One eyewitness told Human Rights Watch that in Mutoko South he visited several “torture camps,” including Luckydip, Rukada, and Jani. The eyewitness said that at another camp, Chitugazuwa: “I saw a woman who could not walk she’d been so badly beaten.”

Human Rights Watch knows of only one case in which the police have arrested individuals responsible for these beatings. In all other cases, the police have refused to intervene, saying that they are instructed not to interfere in “political matters.” Several victims told Human Rights Watch that some police officers encouraged them to take the law into their own hands and “go and fight back.”

Human Rights Watch said that the camps could not operate without the complicity of senior officials in the security forces and government ministers. Should ZANU-PF force an annulment of the parliamentary vote and a presidential run-off, government bodies, the security forces and the judiciary will not have any credibility to ensure the political impasse is fairly and lawfully resolved, said Human Rights Watch.

In the capital Harare, mixed groups of military officers, riot police, and ZANU-PF militia have rendered numerous MDC supporters homeless. In the high-density suburbs of Harare such as Dzivaresekwa, Epworth, Chitungwiza, and Budiriro, at least 40 people who are real and perceived opposition sympathizers have been attacked since April 15 and driven from their homes.

To date, the intergovernmental Southern African Development Community (SADC) and South African President Thabo Mbeki, who was appointed by SADC to mediate the crisis, have done little to try to curb ZANU-PF abuses. Human Rights Watch called on the African Union to immediately step in to address the crisis.

“The SADC and President Mbeki have completely failed Zimbabweans, and are allowing ZANU-PF to commit horrific abuses,” said Gagnon. “The African Union should assume responsibility for protecting civilians from rising violence, and ending the political impasse before Zimbabwe sinks deeper into disaster.”


http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/04/19/zimbab18604.htm

Bushranger
04-22-2008, 08:53 AM
This is when u need a UN force of PMC, or some PMC company that would step up, i know it would never happen but something has to be done about this. The rest of Africa have to stop being weak f*cks & step up & say enough is enough, maybe then we will recognise that they are trying to be part of the international community & help Africa.

The Dane
04-22-2008, 09:08 AM
Yeah it's horrible!
No one seems too care much about Africa.
Zimbabwe, Somalia, Darfur, etc...:roll:

Rudolph
04-22-2008, 09:38 AM
This is when u need a UN force of PMC, or some PMC company that would step up, i know it would never happen but something has to be done about this. The rest of Africa have to stop being weak f*cks & step up & say enough is enough, maybe then we will recognise that they are trying to be part of the international community & help Africa.

They talk about the UN & Executive Outcomes here, who did much more than the UN ever could in military terms: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=129150&highlight=eeben+barlow

I've said it before, if the SADF could have been reshaped, we would have had one of the most effective African-based peacekeeping forces. They could have really stopped a lot of genocides and such, and wiped out a couple of rogue armies. But because of politics, it could never happen.

SoSo
04-23-2008, 03:53 PM
I've said it before, if the SADF could have been reshaped, we would have had one of the most effective African-based peacekeeping forces. They could have really stopped a lot of genocides and such, and wiped out a couple of rogue armies. But because of politics, it could never happen.

Apartheid was disgraceful, but the genocide in Sierra Leone, Rwanda, Sudan, Zimbabwe and other places has been much worse. Why can't the world unite to end it, like they did to bring down apartheid? The old South African armed forces actually did some good, and Executive Outcomes put down the RUF in Sierra Leone, saving many lives, until that country's authorities unwisely gave in to UN pressure and sent the contract soldiers away.
I don't believe today's South African army would ever intervene in Zimbabwe, under any circumstances. Like you said, it's because of politics. I'd wager that even if Robert Mugabe built death camps with crematoria like the Third Reich, and you could see smoke pouring from smokestacks and smell the stench all the way down in Cape Town, Thabo Mbeki still wouldn't do anything but plead for patience and restraint in dealing with his comrade Mugabe. Some statesman. He is about as useless as teats on a boar hog, as we say in Missouri.