PDA

View Full Version : In Congressional Races, Republicans Are Losing Ground



JKD
05-12-2008, 01:32 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20080512/ts_csm/agopwoes_1

In congressional races, Republicans are losing ground

By Gail Russell Chaddock Mon May 12, 4:00 AM ET

Washington - The prospect of a special-election loss in yet another seat this week is fueling calls for House Republicans to radically shift course – or face losses in November that could lock their party in the minority for a generation.

Strike one: A Democrat wins the seat vacated by former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R) of Illinois, a March 8 stunner.

Strike two: A Democrat wins a May 3 vote in a Louisiana congressional district that President Bush in 2004 carried by a 19-point margin.

Tuesday's runoff election in Mississippi's First Congressional District could be strike three. Democrat Travis Childers already nearly defeated Republican Greg Davis in an April 22 special election to replace GOP Rep. Roger Wicker, falling just 410 votes short of a majority. The idea that a Democrat could win the runoff has shocked national party leaders into overdrive.

"This seat is a very important one. It's been in conservative hands for a long time, and we'd hate to see the liberals gain control," said Vice President **** Cheney in a phone interview released by the White House. The vice president is headlining a get-out-the-vote rally for Mr. Davis in Mississippi on Monday.

Citing recent special-election losses, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich issued a "Plea to Republicans" (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26376) last week. "Without change we could face a catastrophic election this fall," he wrote in the conservative weekly Human Events. "Without change the Republican Party in the House could revert to the permanent minority status it had from 1930 to 1994."

This week House Republican leader John Boehner, who has been predicting a tough election for months, launches the long rollout of a new messaging campaign that has been dubbed by some party aides a "rebranding exercise."

For Republicans, the past 15 months have been mainly about "defining the Democrats," he says, citing their "very liberal agenda" and broken promises – especially the "Pelosi premium," a reference to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's failure to deliver on a promise to bring down high gasoline prices.

But the need now is for Republicans to get clear on their own agenda for change, says Representative Boehner. "While we'll continue to hold Democrats accountable, I think it's also time for us to define ourselves, in terms of what we would do if the American people would honor us with the majority," he said in a May 8 briefing .

Last week Boehner created a committee of House Republicans to "advise" the National Republican Congressional Committee, which is under fire within GOP ranks for the special-election losses.

"We can't just be against everything the Democrats are trying to do. We have to be for a positive agenda," says Rep. Darrell Issa (R) of California, a member of the new panel. "Bad times are a problem for those who are in charge. The 'Pelosi premium' is that the price of a barrel of oil has doubled since she said: 'Elect me and I have a plan to reduce the power of oil.' "

Even before special-election setbacks this spring, House Republicans faced a tough campaign. With nearly 1 in 8 in the GOP caucus retiring or running for higher office, Republicans are defending 25 open seats compared with Democrats' seven open seats. Analysts say Democrats stand a good shot at winning many of them.

Even with rebranding, "the fact is there's a lot that House Republicans just can't change," says David Wasserman, who analyzes House races for the Cook Political Report in Washington. "They can't do a lot about these Republicans who are retiring."

House Republicans also face shortfalls in fundraising, especially from within their own ranks. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has raised $44.3 million for the 2008 races, compared with $7.2 million for the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), the House GOP campaign arm.

Last week, House GOP leaders warned colleagues in a closed meeting that if they didn't step up fundraising for the party, losses in November could be severe.

"To be competitive, the members of the Republican conference must continue to support this institution [the NRCC] with their energy and resources," says NRCC spokesman Ken Spain.

In a May 3 memo, the NRCC said the lesson from the Louisiana special-election defeat is that last-minute ads linking Democrat Don Cazayoux with Speaker Pelosi and Sen. Barack Obama helped Davis gain "substantial ground." "This election speaks to the potential toxicity of an Obama candidacy and the possible drag he could have down-ballot this fall," the NRCC memo said.

But some Republicans say a strategy of linking Democrats to Pelosi and Obama will fail. "People are tired of President Bush and they want a change. You can see it by the turnout and fundraising for the Democrats," says retiring Rep. Ray LaHood (R) of Illinois.

"Every special election has its ... local elements to it, but when you start to lose a succession of seats that have been solidly Republican ... that's a big warning sign," says Norman Ornstein, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

I do think the party has lost it's way and could use a time out. But as disappointed as I've been with the GOP in recent years I'd hate to see any one party gain too much power in DC. The Republicans showed us recently what happens when any one party controls both the executive and legislative(even when that party is one that still pays lip service to fiscal discipline).

noname
05-13-2008, 12:15 AM
yahoo news. An unbiased source.p-)

JKD
05-13-2008, 12:40 AM
yahoo news. An unbiased source.p-)

It's from the Christian Science Monitor via Yahoo. Yahoo doesn't actually produce news of it's own

...usual thing around here I suppose. Attack the source rather than discuss the issues.

If you don't like CSM have a look at Newt Gingrich's 'Plea To Republicans' that the article referenced

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26376

JKD
05-14-2008, 09:19 PM
Third House loss shakes GOP, raises fears for fall

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON - Stunned House Republicans vowed campaign changes Wednesday and debated the wisdom of attacking Democratic presidential front-runner Barack Obama in congressional races after their third straight election defeat in once-friendly territory.

"The political atmosphere ... is the worst since Watergate and far more toxic than the fall of 2006 when we lost 30 seats," Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia wrote the leadership in a bluntly worded memo.

"Clearly, I think we've got to do a better job" going into the November elections, said the Republican leader, Rep. John Boehner, one day after Democrat Travis Childers won a Mississippi congressional victory. That seat had been in Republican hands since the 1994 landslide that swept the GOP into power.

Several lawmakers and aides said a change was possible but far from certain at the National Republican Congressional Committee, where Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole is chairman. Party leaders also said they were on the verge of distributing a campaign season manifesto to their rank and file setting out conservative positions on taxes and other issues.

Davis, a former chairman of the campaign committee who is retiring at the end of this year, noted that polls show Americans overwhelmingly believe the country is headed down the wrong track, President Bush is unpopular, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee enjoyed a cash advantage of $44 million to $7 million as of March 31.

Childers' victory came one week after Rep. Don Cazayoux won a House seat in the Baton Rouge, La., area that had been in Republican hands for three decades. Over the winter, Rep. Bill Foster won an election in Illinois to succeed former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who had been in Congress more than 20 years.

All three races were necessitated by resignations by incumbent Republicans.

Childers and Cazayoux both ran as conservatives, but Republicans and their allies sought to link them to Obama in television commercials. In both cases, some Republicans said the tactic appeared to backfire, prompting blacks to turn out in unexpectedly large numbers and vote for the Democrats.

One-third of the population in the Louisiana district and one-quarter of the population in the Mississippi district is black.

"We're not going to be able to scare people into voting Republicans by being against Barack Obama. You have to have a relevant agenda and a compelling reason to vote Republican," said Rep. Chip Pickering, R-Miss.

Yet other Republicans said Obama's record, which they describe as liberal, is fair game for the fall campaign. "It's very legitimate, parts of his vision and his agenda that the American people need to be aware of," said Rep. Adam Putnam of Florida, a member of the party leadership.

In Louisiana, Freedom's Watch, an independent group that promotes Republicans, had run an ad that said Cazayoux is "with Barack Obama for a big government scheme" for health insurance. "Their plan raises income taxes and raises taxes on small business," it said.

The NRCC broadcast an advertisement that said Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi represent "a radical agenda, very different from Louisiana's values."

In Louisiana, Cazayoux countered with recorded telephone calls by Michelle Obama that were placed into thousands of homes in black portions of the district in the final stages of the campaign.

In Mississippi, Freedom's Watch and the GOP challenger, Greg Davis, both used Obama in their television commercials.

Davis' ad was by far the more pointed.

"Obama says, 'Childers will put progress before politics,'" it said. "But, when Obama's pastor cursed America, blaming us for 9/11, Childers said nothing. When Obama ridiculed rural folks for clinging to guns and religion Childers said nothing.

"Travis Childers, he took Obama's endorsement over our conservative values."

Cole, like other Republicans mulling the results, said the voters had sent Republicans a message that said, "We want to know what you believe in, what you want to fight for."

In all three races, Republicans said the losses could be traced largely to local factors. They said the party was divided in Illinois, for example, a weak candidate was on the ballot in Louisiana and regional differences hampered Davis in Mississippi.

At the same time, the cumulative effect of the loss of three seats in special elections was a significant blow to a party that is still adjusting to its loss of power in the 2006 midterm elections.

"They are canaries in the coal mine, warning of far greater losses in the fall, if steps are not taken to remedy the current climate," Davis wrote in his memo.

Childers' victory leaves Republicans with only 199 seats, compared with 236 for the Democrats. Adding to the short-term GOP difficulties, Rep. Vito Fossella, R-N.Y., married with kids, is privately weighing his future after acknowledging recently that he fathered a child out of wedlock.

Numerous Republicans have said they hope Fossella will resign or at least retire. But given the party's financial problems, several senior GOP aides want him to remain in Congress until July 1. That would eliminate the need for yet another special election, this time in the country's most expensive media market.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080514/ap_on_el_pr/reeling_republicans;_ylt=AglocZXKQDU49kW1RI_OQLY8KbIF

Zoomie
05-14-2008, 09:53 PM
The only reason the Republicans lost the Mississippi race is because of dirty tactics (http://yallpolitics.com/index.php/yp/post/8116/) by the Dems playing the race card:
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/8210/photo11zk9.jpg

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/5852/photo1qw5.jpg

These fliers were conveniently distributed just the day before the election so that there'd be no media coverage of the fliers. And as usual, the Dems screwed up (http://missfirstdistrict.blogspot.com/2008/05/dccc-hits-greg-davis-with-kkk.html) and conveniently accused the wrong person.

JKD
05-14-2008, 10:10 PM
Dayum, that is pretty low. I don't know if it can be said that that's the "only" reason he lost though. When you've got Republicans losing other seats they've easily carried in the past and Republican senators saying things like the political atmosphere "is the worst since Watergate and far more toxic than the fall of 2006 when we lost 30 seats" there seems to be a lot more going on than just a single flier.

Zoomie
05-14-2008, 10:12 PM
Dayum, that is pretty low. I don't know if it can be said that that's the "only" reason he lost though. When you've got Republicans losing other seats they've easily carried in the past and Republican senators saying things like the political atmosphere "is the worst since Watergate and far more toxic than the fall of 2006 when we lost 30 seats" there seems to be a lot more going on than just a single flier.
Well, that race was neck and neck, I think the race was basically within the margin of error.