PDA

View Full Version : AP: The DNC will no longer take money from lobbyists



duhblow7
06-05-2008, 01:11 PM
NEW YORK - Acting swiftly as his party's presumed presidential nominee, Barack Obama is keeping Howard Dean at the helm of the Democratic National Committee, while bringing in one of his top strategists to oversee the party's operations.The campaign also announced that the DNC will no longer accept donations from lobbyists and political action committees, to comply with Obama's campaign policy. Party officials say they expect the DNC's staff to quickly expand to run an aggressive general election campaign.
Campaign adviser Paul Tewes was dispatched to help lead the changes Thursday.
"Senator Obama appreciates the hard work that Chairman Dean has done to grow our party at the grass-roots level and looks forward to working with him as the chairman of the Democratic Party as we go forward," Obama spokesman Bill Burton said.
By keeping Dean as party chairman, Obama ended up taking sides in a long-running dispute between Washington-based Democratic Party leaders and state party officials. Although Obama campaign officials have expressed concern in the past that the party did not have enough money, Obama shares Dean's goal of building the party from the ground up, even in states where Republicans dominate.
The fundraising changes will make the party and the candidate have a consistent position. Obama often says banning the donations is one way to help keep him free of the influence of Washington insiders.
An Obama spokesman announced the change Thursday as the candidate prepared to fly from New York, where he had been raising money, to campaign in Virginia.
Obama himself planned to discuss the change at a town hall meeting in Bristol, Virginia.
The move indicates Obama will press his case that Republican rival John McCain is under the influence of special interests because of his advisers' lobbying ties.
McCain's senior advisers are former lobbyists, including campaign manager Rick Davis. McCain was stung last month by the disclosure that two advisers worked for a firm that had represented Myanmar's military junta, which has restricted foreign assistance for cyclone victims.
The Arizona senator instituted a new lobbying policy that says no campaign staffer can be a registered lobbyist, resulting in three more departures from his campaign, including a top fundraiser, former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler.
Obama's ban on lobbyists money is not ironclad. He does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. He has had unpaid advisers with federal lobbying clients, and some campaign officials also previously had lobbying jobs.
Obama took a congratulatory call from McCain around 7 p.m. Wednesday night that lasted several minutes, aides to the Democratic candidate said. "They talked about how they wanted to have a cordial campaign going forward," said Obama spokesman Tommy Vietor.
The new policy will eliminate one source of contributions to the DNC, which has significantly trailed its Republican counterpart in fundraising. So far this election cycle, the DNC has raised $77.6 million and had $4.4 million cash on had at the end of April. The RNC, however, had raised nearly twice as much and had $40.6 in the bank.
The Democratic National Committee received more than $3 million in PAC contributions in this election cycle - a period covering all of 2007 and so far this year, according to its latest report with the Federal Election Commission.
Both parties also rely on lobbyists for money, but their biggest sources of money tend to be donors in the securities and investment industries or in real estate. The DNC raised more than $3 million so far this election cycle from lawyers and lobbyists, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. That was the narrowest category analyzed, meaning much of that money did not come from federally registered lobbyists.
The Republican National Committee raised $1.1 million this election cycle from lawyers and lobbyists, according to the center.
While the DNC has been the least successful fundraising operation in the Democratic Party, its takeover by the Obama camp means it will likely see a dramatic jump in fundraising. Obama has been the leader in the presidential money race, raising a record $264 million.
As DNC chairman, Dean set up a joint fundraising committee earlier to amass money for the eventual nominee. Acceding to Obama's wishes, that committee already was not accepting money from federal lobbyists.

I would think the RNC would love to do the same, but the DNC is just in more of a position to do so. They have found revenue through the internet in lots of smaller donations and are capable of cutting off the lobbyists.

AGE-Ranger
06-05-2008, 01:48 PM
Is this their way of sugar-coating the Rezko conviction?

noname
06-05-2008, 01:49 PM
That is bullshiite. They still get money through lobbyists that is filtered through other non-lobbyist in nature. Why was berry speaking in front of the AIPAC lobby? Did he do that for free?:roll:

Zoomie
06-05-2008, 02:10 PM
I'll believe it when I see it. But then again, this is coming from the most ethical Congress ever!

duhblow7
06-05-2008, 02:11 PM
That is bullshiite. They still get money through lobbyists that is filtered through other non-lobbyist in nature. :roll:

Why won't the RNC then do the same?

noname
06-05-2008, 02:37 PM
Why won't the RNC then do the same?

In the end what does it matter? When a lobbyist has his family members donate various amounts in their names, what is the difference? Does obama receive campaign funds from moveon.org? If so what do you call that organization? p-)

duhblow7
06-05-2008, 02:57 PM
In the end what does it matter? When a lobbyist has his family members donate various amounts in their names, what is the difference? Does obama receive campaign funds from moveon.org? If so what do you call that organization? p-)

IMO, it's a great step forward. There's loopholes. You mentioned one, but there's more. Also remember the likes of Norman Hsu. What it does stop though is a lobby group gathering 1,000 companies together to all donate the max 2300 each for a total of 2.3 mil and situations similar. It's not perfect, but it's a big step forward. I don't see the DNC quietly rolling this policy back.

Obama does NOT receive campaign funds from moveon.org, although he may receive funds from some of the moveon members. That organization is the 50x (forgot the number), but it's the same as the swift boaters.

ed316
06-05-2008, 03:13 PM
They can't keep track of all the money.

Laworkerbee
06-05-2008, 05:11 PM
Why won't the RNC then do the same?

Political parties will end up taking lobbyist money no matter what they might say, regardless of the slant.

Don't be naive man.

philbob
06-05-2008, 05:13 PM
bravo zulu if they really do it...they wont but it makes them look good in the media (dont forget they cannot be trusted)

duhblow7
06-05-2008, 06:41 PM
Political parties will end up taking lobbyist money no matter what they might say, regardless of the slant.

Don't be naive man.

There's a lot more eye's and availability of information than there was 10-20-30 years ago. Of course they'll take money. The article has this paragraph (which i'm surprised nobody here has mentioned):


Obama's ban on lobbyists money is not ironclad. He does accept money from lobbyists who do not do business with the federal government and he also accepts money from spouses and family members of lobbyists. He has had unpaid advisers with federal lobbying clients, and some campaign officials also previously had lobbying jobs.One helluva loophole, no?

So i agree with you, they will always take lobby money. But doesn't this set a good standard? A good starting point. Is this a bad thing? Why won't the RNC follow suit (and use the loopholes too)? Is it not the type of change we want regardless of party affil?

noname
06-05-2008, 10:35 PM
http://hillbuzz.blogspot.com/2008/06/whats-on-michelle-obama-rant-tape.html

Zoomie
06-10-2008, 04:31 PM
Back pedal alert! Obama says no, I didn't really mean I was going to follow through with the finance reforms! rofl


Mr. Obama’s campaign now claims that his earlier promise was not to stay within the public financing system if his opponent agreed to do the same, as Mr. McCain has done, but merely to pursue such an agreement.
Source (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/08/AR2008060801677.html)Hope and chaaaaaaaaange! The only change Obama seems to be bringing is his stance on issues.

Laworkerbee
06-10-2008, 04:54 PM
So i agree with you, they will always take lobby money. But doesn't this set a good standard? A good starting point. Is this a bad thing? Why won't the RNC follow suit (and use the loopholes too)? Is it not the type of change we want regardless of party affil?

I agree that it has the potential to be a start in a good direction.