PDA

View Full Version : Nuclear facilities of the former Jugoslavia



Alessandro Ceresa
07-13-2008, 05:08 AM
Nuclear facilities of the Former Yugoslavia testify how Serbia could use weapons with different atomic potential during the conflicts of the Balcans, in addition to chemical agents. The photos and the maps regard the following themes:

- An atomic plant in Belgrade (Serbia). Nearby, the Serbian radio speaks of "atomic", "uranium" and "plutonium" (the electromagnetic wave is sensible);
- The nuclear plant of Kutina (Croazia), that has a nuclear reactor;
- The central of Tuzla (Bosnia), where the Bosnian radio talks of "nuclear";
- The central of Pristina (Kosovo), that is emitting thermoelectrical energy.

Piggy
07-13-2008, 05:24 AM
You are kind a new in CBRN matters, aren´t you?!? Or just looking for a bombastic news???
Kutina/Croatia-chemical plant-in chemical terminology reactor is a vessel where synthesis(chemical) is caried out.
Belgrade, have to check the grid, nuclear facilities in Serbia are at Vinča (look at the Google)
Tuzla-chemical plant
Prishtine/Priština-thermo energetic plant(coal)

Where the H_LL is anything nuclear here??

dobrodan
07-13-2008, 05:30 AM
Do you see the smoke-stacks on the photos from "Pristina" (and several other sites) Do they look like nuclear powerplants to you?

They are BTW in a small town called Obilic, where I have spent six months of my life, and they are extremely polluting brown-coal powerplants...

What are you?

Some kind of retard, or journalist?

Alexandr
07-13-2008, 05:48 AM
Nuclear facilities of the Former Yugoslavia testify how Serbia could use weapons with different atomic potential during the conflicts of the Balcans

Whaaaaat?!!!How exactly?To explode themselfs?Even that is impossible since Chernobyl,every nuclear powered station in the world now have 5-7 levels of protection from techinal or human mistakes.

And no,nuclear power plant and nuclear bomb is not same things,sorry to dissapoint you.

ekranoplan
07-13-2008, 06:28 AM
There's no nuclear anything in Kutina. It is a fertilizer factory. We Croatians think nuclear energy is devil's work, no nuclear anything here.

You fail at research.

p.s. you actually failed to mention the only "real" and functioning nuclear power plant in ex Yu - Krsko in Slovenia.

http://www.energetika-net.hr/images/naucite_vise/krsko.jpg

Muc91
07-13-2008, 06:33 AM
- The nuclear plant of Kutina (Croazia), that has a high potential reactor

:cantbeli:

A chemical factory, not a nuclear facility...

And you forgot to mention the nuclear institute at Vinča, Serbia and the only nuclear power plant in the ex Yugoslavia at Krško, Slovenia.

Mate
07-13-2008, 06:52 AM
Do you see the smoke-stacks on the photos from "Pristina" (and several other sites) Do they look like nuclear powerplants to you?

They are BTW in a small town called Obilic, where I have spent six months of my life, and they are extremely polluting brown-coal powerplants...

What are you?

Some kind of retard, or journalist?
Your`e right.....there isn`t any nuclear plants in Kosovo,just thermo-energetic (Coal) power plants.

Alessandro Ceresa
07-13-2008, 08:15 AM
You'd better check them on the ground...

The point is that Serbia has several nuclear centres. Vinca seems to be the most relevant. When you pass near the plant of Belgrade, you may clearly feel the electromagnetic field and the radio talks of different atomic elements (uranium and plutonium). The existence of all these nuclear facilities is caused to the energetic politics of the Former Yugoslavia in Soviet times. The Croatian radio says that Serbia is now using uranium and plutonium in order to enforce its weapons.

Kutina, near Batina, in Croazia, is not only a chemical plant. It has an active reactor with a notable temperature.

Tuzla should be a thermoelectrical plant, even if the Bosnian radio talks of "nuclear" when you go nearby. It may be possible that one of the 5 reactors has been used for nuclear energy, in the past.

Pristina is a thermoelectrical plant. The same Kosovars, however, say that the Serbian troops used weapons enpowered with uranium during the war...

Reply in correct manners. Thanks.

Tokamak
07-13-2008, 08:21 AM
roflYou surely know what you are talking about.

dobrodan
07-13-2008, 08:58 AM
You'd better check them on the ground...

The point is that Serbia has several nuclear centres. Vinca seems to be the most relevant. When you pass near the plant of Belgrade, you may clearly feel the electromagnetic field and the radio talks of different atomic elements (uranium and plutonium). The existence of all these nuclear facilities is caused to the energetic politics of the Former Yugoslavia in Soviet times. The Croatian radio says that Serbia is now using uranium and plutonium in order to enforce its weapons.

Kutina, near Batina, in Croazia, is not only a chemical plant. It has an active reactor with a notable temperature.

Tuzla should be a thermoelectrical plant, even if the Bosnian radio talks of "nuclear" when you go nearby. It may be possible that one of the 5 reactors has been used for nuclear energy, in the past.

Pristina is a thermoelectrical plant. The same Kosovars, however, say that the Serbian troops used weapons enpowered with uranium during the war...

Reply in correct manners. Thanks.

Do you have any idea what you are talking about?

You want to know who used depleted uranium-projectiles during the Kosovo-war?

NATO!

ekranoplan
07-13-2008, 09:29 AM
...and how would nuclear reactor in Croatia help Serbia? We kinda had this war thingy going on 15 years ago. Croatians don't help Serbs. They just don't.

Petrokemija (http://www.petrokemija.hr/Default.aspx?tabid=57) in Kutina makes fertilizer. No nuclear reactors there. Croatian coalition Govt. almost fell apart few weeks ago when one partner proposed building of nuclear power plant in Croatia. No nuclear stuff in Croatia, that's official politic of Republic of Croatia.

http://www.hfp.hr/privatize/Privatize/img/PrivatizeCroatia_284_1.jpg

The fact of the matter is that coal thermo power plants radiate more radiation than nuclear power plants because of high percentage of uranium in coal. Maybe you misinterpreted some data about Bosnian thermo power plants? Do you even speak the Serbo/Croatian/Bosnian language? You cite the Tuzla radio... if you don't speak the language who told you about Tuzla radio broadcast? Native speaker?

Kosovars would probably say Serbs used nuclear warheads on them if they could somehow prove it. I wouldn't blindly believe their statements. Plus there are no nuclear "empowered" weapons. They are either nuclear weapons, or conventional rounds with depleted uranium core.

The only official Yugoslav nuclear project was reactor in Vinča and it failed. The inability to produce their own working reactor led to the hiring a Westinghouse company to build only nuclear powerplant in Yu, Krško in Slovenia.

I know from my experience that whatever I write here probably won't change whatever you think is going on with evil Serbian reactors all across ex Yu. But this is public forum and we all reserve the right to comment/deny whatever you write. If you really want to know the truth forum like this is probably the right place, but if you just have this opinion that you need to force, don't forget there are people here on MP who actually live nearby places you mention in your theory. They know better.

Last, if you browse MP somewhat, you'll find people going into great lengths citing sources for both photos and texts/info they send in. Those people are highly appreciated and respected. There are also tons of people who start their MP stay with flooding the ether with crazy conspiracies and unrealistic data, usually starting unnecessary flame wars and/or soon being sanctioned by mods.

So unless you are ready to provide some reliable sources of your claims, backed up with some real photo proofs... accept the fact that people who live in ex Yu area will consider you an idiot.

Like you might have noticed ^^ some don't have problem calling you one aloud.

Mate
07-13-2008, 09:59 AM
Do you have any idea what you are talking about?

You want to know who used depleted uranium-projectiles during the Kosovo-war?

NATO!
Yep......http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/686593.stm

Thubbard
07-13-2008, 12:53 PM
There's no nuclear anything in Kutina. It is a fertilizer factory. We Croatians think nuclear energy is devil's work, no nuclear anything here.


And yet the Krško power plant provides a fifth of Croatia's power...

shatro
07-13-2008, 01:04 PM
I guess our friend Alessandro Ceresa had one too many cerveza.

Piggy
07-13-2008, 02:33 PM
Nope, heat stroke! Definitely!!

fireinthehole
07-13-2008, 03:12 PM
References to reactors mean only one thing in some peoples minds - we had an incident at work (chemical plant where we make plastic in a "reactor") - when the first local PC plod turned up and found out we'd had "a fire in the reactor" he nearly shat himself and was away on his toes for his NBC suit until someone enlightened him.

INAT
07-13-2008, 04:08 PM
You'd better check them on the ground...

The point is that Serbia has several nuclear centres. Vinca seems to be the most relevant. When you pass near the plant of Belgrade, you may clearly feel the electromagnetic field and the radio talks of different atomic elements (uranium and plutonium). The existence of all these nuclear facilities is caused to the energetic politics of the Former Yugoslavia in Soviet times. The Croatian radio says that Serbia is now using uranium and plutonium in order to enforce its weapons.

Kutina, near Batina, in Croazia, is not only a chemical plant. It has an active reactor with a notable temperature.

Tuzla should be a thermoelectrical plant, even if the Bosnian radio talks of "nuclear" when you go nearby. It may be possible that one of the 5 reactors has been used for nuclear energy, in the past.

Pristina is a thermoelectrical plant. The same Kosovars, however, say that the Serbian troops used weapons enpowered with uranium during the war...

Reply in correct manners. Thanks.

:cantbeli:
If you are going to make such foolish claims have the foresight to post a source article or any relevant documents otherwise you look like an ass.
Especially since you are new and have no credibility to begin with and you were told by several members already that the pictures you posted were not nuclear stations.You look like a fool already.

ekranoplan
07-13-2008, 06:36 PM
And yet the Krško power plant provides a fifth of Croatia's power...

True, and that's why there was this idea to build our own. The response in media wasn't too far away from calling building nuclear power plant selling soul to the devil.

Technologically speaking, I hate this f**king country. I hate green organizations too.

brad
07-16-2008, 11:47 AM
All of you forgot nuclear reactor in Podgorica, near Ljubljana, Slovenia. Reactor TRIGA was built in 1966 by General Atomics.
Link: http://www.rcp.ijs.si/main/en/index.html
http://www.rcp.ijs.si/ric/slike/panorama1.jpg

gallery:http://www.rcp.ijs.si/ric/galerija2.html

Paya
07-16-2008, 01:26 PM
It won't be so funny when we nuke Disneyland...

ekranoplan
07-16-2008, 07:01 PM
All of you forgot nuclear reactor in Podgorica, near Ljubljana, Slovenia. Reactor TRIGA was built in 1966 by General Atomics.
Link: http://www.rcp.ijs.si/main/en/index.html


gallery:http://www.rcp.ijs.si/ric/galerija2.html

I didn't know about that. Thanx.