PDA

View Full Version : PLA's rapid reaction capability in Tibet



Adux
08-13-2008, 03:44 PM
PLA's rapid reaction capability in Tibet



By Andrei Chang

Published: June 27, 2008

Hong Kong, China — The eruption of riots in Tibet in March reflected an increasingly complicated political situation there, involving both internal and external factors.

Internally, the peaceful and nonviolent approach of the Dalai Lama toward China has encountered greater resistance from the young generation of Tibetans, and the Dalai Lama’s political relevance has been gradually marginalized as a result.

Externally, India’s China policy is now at a critical point, and India-China relations are likely to slip backward if they fail to quickly progress. India is adjusting the deployment of its armed forces along its border with China to guard against a Chinese intrusion.

Meanwhile, as the Beijing Olympic Games approach, the faction in Tibet that favors a showdown with the Chinese leadership views the present time as the best opportunity to put greater pressure on Beijing.

Under these circumstances, the Tibet issue is likely to remain the focus of attention by various parties before the Olympic Games, and constant protests by the Tibetans can be expected.

China’s handling of the Tibet riots was very similar to the way it dealt with the 1989 demonstrations in Tiananmen Square. In the early phase, a large number of regular troops from the People’s Liberation Army were sent to the scene to deter the protesters.

Within 48 hours of the start of the riots in Lhasa, T-90/89 armored personnel carriers and T-92 wheeled infantry fighting vehicles appeared on the streets as the 149th Division of the No. 13 Group Army under the Chengdu Military Region was dispatched to Lhasa.

This rapid troop deployment indicates that with the completion of the Qinghai-Tibet railroad in 2006, the rapid reaction capability of the Chinese armed forces in the Tibet region, particularly the ability to quickly maneuver heavy equipment, has been greatly enhanced.

This is indicated by the fact that the PLA soldiers on the T-90/89 vehicles on the streets of Lhasa were all wearing the “leopard” camouflage uniforms specifically designed for mountain warfare operations. These uniforms have appeared in video footage of the 149th Division during exercises.

When unrest occurred in Tibet in 1989 and a curfew was imposed in Lhasa, the 149th Division was also the first PLA combat unit to arrive on the scene. At that time, the army troops entered Tibet via the Sichuan-Tibet highway.

The 149th Division is based at Leshan in Sichuan province. As for the T-92 armored vehicles that appeared in Lhasa, the No. 52 Mountain Brigade of the Tibet Military Region received the vehicles around 2000.

The military value of the Qinghai-Tibet railway has thus been demonstrated in the rapid reaction of the PLA armed forces to the Lhasa riots.

Should China-India relations deteriorate to the verge of military confrontation and the riots in Tibet spread extensively, the first combat units of the PLA to be called to action would be the No. 52 and No. 53 Mountain Brigades under the Tibet Military Region.

The No. 52 Brigade, stationed at Linzhi, is highly mechanized and armed with T-92 wheeled armored vehicles and HJ-8/9 anti-tank missiles. National highway 318 directly connects Linzhi and Lhasa; thus it is logical to conclude that the T-92 wheeled armored vehicles on the streets of Lhasa were from this brigade. The No. 52 Mountain Brigade is stationed at Milin and is also the PLA combat unit stationed closest to the city of Lhasa.

National highway 318 is in fact the southern route of the Sichuan-Tibet highway. In the event of war or future large-scale riots in Tibet, the highway will be the key passageway for combat troops from the Chengdu Military Region to enter Tibet.

However, this key highway runs across the Minjiang River and the Daduhe River in a region with an average altitude of 4,250 meters (around 14,000 feet) above sea level, and thus is very susceptible to attack by the Indian Air Force or assault by organized rioters. Most of the highways within the Tibet region will be within striking range of the Su-30MKI fighters soon to be deployed in the No. 30 Squadron of the Indian Air Force at Tezpur.

If the T-90/89 armored personnel carriers used in Lhasa were indeed from the 149th Mechanized Rapid Reaction Division of the Chengdu Military Region, they were most likely transported first from Chongqing to Xining, then to Golmud to connect to the Qinghai-Tibet railway and continue on to Lhasa. The whole journey would take about 48 hours.

Such troop movements would be much faster and cheaper than before. Calculated on the basis of being able to transport most of the heavy equipment of a whole mechanized division within 48 hours – it is unlikely that all the division’s equipment would be moved – the PLA would be able to transport approximately 10 light mechanized divisions and some heavy mechanized divisions through the railroad to Tibet from the Lanzhou and Chengdu Military Regions within 30 days.

Of course, should there be a military conflict between China and India, the Qinghai-Tibet railway would be a prime target for air strikes by the Su-30MKI fighters of the Indian Air Force’s No. 30 Fighter Squadron, the MiG-27 fighters of the No. 22 Squadron at Hashimara and the “Jaguar” attackers of the No. 5 Squadron at Ambala.

The only obstacle to this mass movement of regular armed troops and equipment would be the capacity of Qinghai-Tibet railway and the number of available trains. China once claimed that the annual transport capacity of the railway was 5 million tons, an average of 13,888 tons per day.

The average load capacity of one Chinese train car is normally 60 tons, with about 20 cars in each cargo train. This would mean that each train could transport 1,200 tons, and thus 11 trains traveling both ways would be enough for each day. In time of war, the actual number of trains running on the railroad could double to roughly 20 trains both ways each day.

Suppose the total weight of the equipment and combat material needed for one rapid reaction division of the Chinese army was around 15,000 tons, the Qinghai-Tibet railway could transport a whole rapid reaction division on one average day. In other words, within every one-and-a-half to two days, China could move one rapid reaction division from the Chengdu Military Region or one rapid reaction division from the Lanzhou Military Region to Tibet.

China’s air transport capability also needs to be taken into consideration. Additional airborne troops, rapid reaction troops and armed police could be directly delivered to Lhasa from the air. Since airdrop operations would take place in the Tibet region, there would be no need for ground-based air defense firepower. Thus, the No. 15 Airborne Division could be airdropped to Tibet, and equipment such as airborne fighting vehicles could be put to use.

In recent years, China has made great effort to revamp the Qinghai-Tibet highway and the Sichuan-Tibet highway. National highways 214, 317 and 109 – the shortest routes into Tibet by land – are now all asphalted. If China were to have a military confrontation with India, highway transport could be more reliable should the Qinghai-Tibet railway be damaged.

The railway would allow the 61st Plateau Rapid Reaction Motorized Division of No. 21 Group Army under the Lanzhou Military Region and the 149th Rapid Reaction Motorized Division of the Chengdu Military Region to quickly enter Tibet.

Because of the presence of U.S. military troops in Afghanistan and the escalating independence activities in the southern part of Xinjiang – northwest China’s primarily Muslim Uyghur ethnic region – the Xinjiang Military Region and the Lanzhou Military Region are now the key forces to guard against internal riots in that part of the country. This is why the forces of the Chengdu Military Region were the first to be deployed in Tibet.

In addition, the riots in Tibet quickly spread to Gansu province, which borders Xinjiang; therefore the Xinjiang and Lanzhou Military Regions may face the new mission of cracking down on Tibetan independence movements as well as Muslim riots and the traditional Uyghur independence activities.

Once the Uyghur separatist movement in Xinjiang and the independence activities in Gansu and Tibet intensify, the 61st Rapid Reaction Division stationed at Tianshui in Gansu province will be the first one to be called upon in the crackdown. In addition, the No. 12 Armored Division stationed at Zhangye in Gansu province may also be mobilized.

The 4th Motorized Infantry Division of Xinjiang Military Region was the first local combat unit to receive new equipment in the region, including the T-92 100-mm wheeled assault cannons. Obviously, this division is now transforming into a rapid reaction unit and will probably be used to deal with any riots in southern Xinjiang. Besides, this division is also quite close to the Afghanistan border.

The 6th Motorized Infantry Division stationed at Kashi is the only mechanized combat unit in the Xinjiang Military Region. It is also close to Afghanistan and is located right in the heart of southern Xinjiang. Should Uyghur independence activities break out of control, the above two divisions would be the first to be dispatched.

As for the Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang, it is covered by the 11th Brigade. As is widely known, the 63rd Division of the original No. 21 Group Army and the 7th Division of the Xinjiang Military Region have been restructured into the Armed Police No. 63 and No. 7 Divisions, and are stationed at the cities of Pingliang and Ili, respectively.

Adux
08-13-2008, 03:44 PM
Ordie,


Views!

Ordie
08-13-2008, 08:59 PM
Let me preface my comments that I'm just your average, skirt chasing, binge drinking sailor with zero formal training in bullet dodging or stopping.

In the past 20 years China has been carefully studying US military doctrine and strategy. What shocked them the most was Gulf War 1 (operation Desert Shield/Strom) and the ability of a unified command able to muster a large force and deploy it half-way across the world to liberate a small tribal fiefdom located at the armpit of the Persian/Arabian (now American) Gulf.

Given the Great Leap Forward, Cultural Revolution, and China's isolationism, the PLA was still based on Mao's People's Warfare doctrine. A doctrine based on guerrilla warfare supported by people's militias backed up with nukes.

1989 was a watershed year. The PLA's ability to crush the Tiananmen Square demonstrators literally saved the Communist Party and earned its respect. In return, the CCP had given the PLA Carte blanche to not only modernize, but to protect the CCP's authority in China.

Now the big question. If you modernize, does one modernize the entire PLA at large or does one only depend on a few key mobile units with similar effectiveness? What China did was to downsize but invest on a few key highly mobile professional units. The PLA's Hong Kong Detachment and earthquake relief efforts are dividends of those investments. However, the Chinese have the tendency to solve problems by throwing people and money at it vs. careful planning or management. (But I should not complain since my US Government failed to respond to Hurricane Katrina disaster)

So the new military doctrine, borrowed from the Americans seems to work well. Now the question does China have the political will to engage India with respect of territorial disputes? Given the Russian success in Georgia, I assume that the Chinese are taking careful notes. Most notably US pre-occupation in Iraq, Afghanistan and the support it needs from Russia and China in regards to Iran, DPRK and GWOT.

If this is the case, India is on its own.

The good news is that for the Chinese is all about “face” and will only take a small portion of Indian Territory (Sikkim) to prove a point and return home. The consequences for India would be a vote of no confidence of the ruling party, finger pointing at sectarian groups, individuals and political parties.

If the opposite were true in regards with the re-taking of the Aksai Chin, you have 1.3 Billion pissed off Chinese demanding that India should be nuked, with the overthrow the CCP and replace it with an ultra-nationalist government (worst case scenario).

My advice for India:
· Invest in Mandarin language education at the primary / secondary levels Provide scholarships / fellowships / internships in East Asian & Chinese studies. (You will need as many Chinese speakers and experts to write scholarly papers and fill intelligence jobs in the future).
· Invest in basic infrastructure up north and create a web of influence with northern states, Nepal and Bhutan. This will not only ease rapid deployment, but also economically benefit the local economies, goodwill and collaboration from the locals.
· Be willing to trade land for time and keep any military incursions very low key. If it gets blown out of proportion, group think starts to take a life of its own (i.e. Cuban Missile Crisis, USN –PLAN mid-air collision)
· It’s always better to deal with the devil that you know in form of the CCP than an unknown entity. Or keep your friends close, but keep you enemies closer. Keep communications channels open between Delhi and Beijing
· Open the books, transcripts and reports from the Aksai Chin war and learn from it. Otherwise you will repeat the same mistakes.
· Read and study Chinese military actions in Korea, Vietnam and Soviet Border.

Promote India, be an active global player, make many friends, send the carrier battle group to East Asia every once in a while including stops at Chinese ports. Sometimes flying the flag is just as effective in getting your point across. Better yet, send a sub to the South China Sea and intentionally surface and see what kind of reaction you will get from the region as a whole.

Terran
08-14-2008, 02:48 AM
Nice post, containing much detail.

plaser
08-15-2008, 04:50 AM
wow, very good article.
But Tibet is an internal affair of China, Not USA nor India. We want peace with our neighbor but the neibour should be friendly. :)

rajkhalsa
08-15-2008, 06:15 AM
plaser,

I know you mean well and your sentiment is nice, but your statement is like a neighbor saying "yeah, I stole your car, but its my car now so let's be friends."

Unfortunately, the Tibet issue is not that simple.

Jim Vaz
08-15-2008, 02:51 PM
China can say all they want about how well they have studied US doctrine but they still don't even close to matching the capabilities of the US and Britain as far as airlift capability and a naval armada that can deliver troops and equipment in days sometimes hours to all parts of the world. Not even the Soviets in their cold war peak did they have anything close to that matching the capabilty of the US and its allies. They had a difficult time simply stabalizing a suitable logistical operation to handle their cross border war with Afghanistan in the 1980s. Meanwhile after World War II the US has been able to put their forces in Korea, Dominican Republic, Vietnam, Grenada, Haiti, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, Bosnia and Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq, all places with large bodies separating them. Other then the Korean war where the Chinese fought very hard the Peoples army has never left the borders of China to fight a conflict.
China still has a long way to go. When they have the amphibious capabilities to put forces in say Papau New Guinea in 2 weeks as an example, and can airlft thousands of troops and their equipment in some country in Africa, then I will be impressed.

Ordie
08-15-2008, 05:15 PM
^^^^
Given the PLA response to the earthquake a few months ago, I would give them much more credit. Much quicker than the US response to Hurricane Katrina for sure.

The PLAN has improved its seaborne capabilities with new construction including an LPD.

One should not forget China's extensive civil aviation resources which could be called upon to deployed anywhere.

But as for power projection? not yet.... at least not in the same scale as Adm. Zheng He flotilla of 300 ships to East Africa 600 years ago.

plaser
08-16-2008, 02:47 AM
plaser,

I know you mean well and your sentiment is nice, but your statement is like a neighbor saying "yeah, I stole your car, but its my car now so let's be friends."

Unfortunately, the Tibet issue is not that simple.

Tibet is part of China. Dalai Lama was a spiritual leader and the biggest slave owner in Tibet. What Dalai Lama is pursuing is regaining the lost privileges he once had. He uses religion t control all Tibetan. But I gusess we may never convince each other, so..............

What PLA has done in the earthquake is outstanding! That's why their name is "people's liberation army"!

Ordie
08-16-2008, 08:13 AM
Tibet is part of China. Dalai Lama was a spiritual leader and the biggest slave owner in Tibet. What Dalai Lama is pursuing is regaining the lost privileges he once had. He uses religion t control all Tibetan. But I gusess we may never convince each other, so..............

What PLA has done in the earthquake is outstanding! That's why their name is "people's liberation army"!

I do not argue with your claims. But keep in mind that for better or worst, the Dalai Lama is the most popular, and influential Chinese citizen in the world. More so than Hu Jintao or Yao Ming.

It would be best for the Chinese Government to reach a settlement with the Dalai Lama soon. Because the next generation of Tibetian exiles and youth may be more restless and difficult to control.

China (and the world at large) has a lot of challenges to deal with within the next twenty years.(Pollution, rural poverty, corruption, urbanization, aging population, education, health, clean water etc....) The last thing we need is an open armed rebellion in Tibet.

The Dalai Lama is "the" person for China to bring harmony in Tibet and China as a whole.

The primary mission of the PLA is to serve and protect the Communist Party of China (Not China).

"The PLA is an army under the CPC's absolute leadership and a "great wall of steel" in defense of the socialist motherland and an important force in building socialism".
Source:http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90780/91342/6230437.html