PDA

View Full Version : The Role of the 3rd SFG in Operation Desert Storm



2RHPZ
06-08-2004, 07:07 PM
The Role of the 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) in Operation Desert Storm

By MSG Wm. A. "Congo" Easterling

I decided to write an article on the accomplishments of the men who were
assigned to the 3rd SFG(A) to enlighten the new soldiers and help the older ones
still around to remember what was actually conducted by a brand new unit that
was ordered into combat. I had the honor and privilege of being a young Team
Sergeant on an Operational Detachment-Alpha (ODA) during the campaign. I was
assigned to Charlie Company of the 1st Battalion.

On the second of August 1990, the Iraqi military invaded Kuwait. The drive swept
through Kuwait City and pushed the Kuwaiti Army all the way into Saudi Arabia.
The United States started deploying units into Saudi Arabia on what was called
Operation Desert Shield.

3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) had three teams deploy almost immediately,
along with the 5th SFG(A), into Saudi Arabia to work primarily as liaison
between the US VII Corps units and the Special Operations Central Command
(SOCCENT).

3rd SFG(A) was still being filled as a new Special Forces Group and at the time
consisted of a group headquarters and one battalion, the 1st BN. Our unit was
first notified that the remainder we would deploy to Saudi around September, 90.
5th SFG(A), which was on the ground and working with SOCCENT had determined the
Special Operations element could use another battalion of SF-ODAs and another
headquarters element for missions and planning.

This first notification was soon followed by the message that the rest of 3rd
Group would not deploy, at least not yet. This on-again, off-again notification
continued and switched about every 2 to 3 weeks. Our BN had many other peacetime
operations that were being conducted and demanded the concentration of our
people, so these training missions were given priority over the possibility

of deploying to Saudi anytime soon. It was our opinion that the training we were
conducting, no matter what it was, would help prepare us, as a unit, for any
combat mission we might get if we did deploy.

We were a new group, but the majority of the personnel at the team level and in
command were experienced Special Forces soldiers. Also most of us had been
together as a unit for a long time already as members of the 3d BN, 5th SFG(A).
It was that unit which was used as the nucleus when 3rd SFG(A) was brought on
line in June of 1990. Because of this, the majority of the personnel were highly
trained in various combat and survival operations in a desert environment.

As the Christmas season approached, we were fairly confident that we would not
be leaving soon, if at all. The commander authorized most of the BN to take
Christmas holiday vacation. That's when the rumors started that we were to
deploy right away. A few of the key personnel returned early and began planning
for a deployment to Saudi with the exact nature of the mission still being an
unknown part of the equation.

As we entered the new year, everyone now was sure we were going and bags were
being packed.

On January 17 1991, we were in the company having a Team Sergeants and Team
leaders meeting with the Company Commander. During the meeting someone called
and said to turn on the TV or radio. When we did we saw pictures of Baghdad,
Iraq getting bombed by the coalition Air Forces. No more guessing games,
Operation Desert Storm had begun.

The next few days passed in a maddening bustle of activity while everyone
finished getting the final things done. Then on 20 January 91, we were
officially alerted that we were to deploy to Saudi Arabia in support of Desert
Storm. The advance party left Fort Bragg on 24 January and the main body
departed Ft. Bragg on the 27th of January.

Once we arrived in Saudi, we stayed at the King Fahd International Airport
(KFIA). It was still under construction and had the runways and some of the
buildings completed. The main terminal had not been completed but 5th SFG(A) was
living and working out of the basement portion.

3rd SFG(A) moved into the second level of an adjoining parking garage. This is
where we lived, trained and planned our operations for the next 3 weeks. The
training continually changed focus as our missions were adjusted and narrowed by
the higher headquarters.

3rd SFG(A) began the operation with a dual tasking. Our missions were tied into
two main portions of the conflict. First was the mission within Iraq itself.
This was broken down into two sub-missions. The first being to conduct
reconnaissance missions of the enemy in the US VII Corps sector of Iraq to
determine the Iraqi's intent and provide an early warning to the VII Corps. The
second submission was to conduct additional reconnaissance missions into
southeastern Iraq to determine whether the terrain would support movement of the
armored vehicles in the projected area of operations for VII Corps.

The second proposed mission was for inside the country of Kuwait. This mission
statement basically directed 3rd SFG(A) to prepare to coordinate with the
Kuwaiti Army General Headquarters and establish a combined Special Operations
Headquarters to provide a connection between units of the Special Operation
Forces, Kuwaiti resistance forces and allied conventional forces. Also to assist
in the clearing and securing of Kuwait City.

The purpose of the dual missions was to support the coalition forces Desert
Storm plan for the defense of Saudi Arabia and for the recapture and
restructuring of Kuwait and Kuwait City.

Operation Desert Storm had an annex, or sub-operation plan that was titled
"Operation Urban Freedom". This OPLAN began implementing actions that were to be
conducted around Kuwait City to ensure the orderly forward deployment of the
Special Operations Central Command forces. Also this plan would allow a smooth
flow of the coalition forces, which were primarily U.S. Marines and Kuwaiti
forces into the area to assist in the liberation of Kuwait City.

The commander's intent was to deploy SOCCENT forces forward to the vicinity of
Kuwait City as the conventional coalition force secured Kuwait up to the 6th
ring road of Kuwait City. Kuwait City is surrounded by circular roads that
encompass the city center which is bordered by the gulf on the east and north
edges.

Once the conventional forces had cleared up to the 6th Ring Road, a joint task
force composed of Kuwaiti forces and the SOCCENT forces were to clear and secure
the city.

The U.S. task force personnel would assist and advise the Kuwaiti forces
throughout the liberation of Kuwait City and would occupy the U.S. Embassy in a
coordinated effort to occupy several embassies simultaneously, by different
country's Special Operations forces.

Specific 3rd SFG(A) missions that were proposed in support of the mission in
Iraq included:

Direct Action missions; Rear area lines of communication, Main supply routes,
command and control facilities, and mobile targets not easily destroyed by air
assets.

Strategic Reconnaissance missions; Hidden airfields, high value enemy strategic
targets, command and control nodes, and early warning.

Combat Search and Rescue missions, Primarily in southern Iraq.

Foreign Internal Defense missions, In Saudi Arabia.

Specific 3rd SFG(A) missions in support of the mission in Kuwait and Kuwait City
included:

On order, forward deploy forces to Kuwait International Airport and establish a
forward operational base.

Be prepared to link up with resistance forces to conduct combined operations.

Be prepared to assist resistance in utilization of Close Air Support, (CAS).

Be prepared to support link up of resistance forces with coalition forces.

Be prepared to secure designated key facilities in Kuwait City in coordination
with Coalition and/or U.S. forces.

Be prepared to assist in the conduct of Civil Affairs and Psychological
Operations beyond the capabilities of other forces.

Be prepared to conduct Combat Search and Rescue.

Be prepared to accept operational control of a Kuwaiti Special Forces Battalion.

On order, secure and occupy the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait City.

And, on order, assume command, less OPCON, of 4/17 Cavalry.

These were all the scenarios and missions the commander of Special Operations
Central Command had envisioned could be given to the 3rd SFG(A). This is what we
began to prepare and plan for during the initial few days after arriving in
Saudi.

The highlights are now covered on what the 3rd SFG(A) actually conducted once
the missions began:

The 3rd SFG(A) conducted the initial two missions, however the focus was
narrowed quite a bit. First the Reconnaissance teams went deep behind enemy
lines inside Iraq. This was in support of the US VII Corps. The Reconnaissance
teams' missions were two-fold. First they were to find the Iraqi Republican
Guard Army and their respective divisions. Secondly, when the attack kicked off
in February, they were to determine whether the Republican Guards Divisions were
going to come south and meet the VII Corps attack, if they were going to head
west to Baghdad, or whether they were going to remain in position.

The second mission, inside Kuwait, was also narrowed considerably. This mission
was restated directing 3rd SFG(A) to seize, clear, and hold the U.S. Embassy
until relieved.

To accomplish the first mission, several teams began to experiment with
different types of desert hide sites and techniques to remain hidden. Due to the
variance of terrain many ideas were tested. Some of these included using plastic
pipe covered by various types of cloth material, sandbags, digging holes, and
hiding in whatever terrain was available.

Three teams actually went inside Iraq. Two teams stayed until their mission was
complete and one had to be extracted almost immediately due to an enemy tank
unit in the area. There was no loss of personnel or equipment on these missions.
They were infilled and exfilled by helicopters that came from either US Army or
Air Force Special Operations Assets.

The mission in Kuwait City began with the Commander, LTC Frank J. Toney
reorganizing the battalion into a special task force. He divided the three
companies of the battalion into an assault force, a security force, and a
support force. There was very little time to get ready. We had less than 1 week
from receipt of the mission to receive required intelligence, develop an assault
plan, conduct rehearsals and then, actually launch on the mission.

The rehearsals took place at King Fahd International Airport area. Then the unit
moved by helicopter to the Kuwait International Airport (KIA). When the force
landed at KIA there was little to no resistance. The force stayed at KIA for the
night, then launched for the US embassy by wheel and helicopter the next
morning. This was 28 February 1991. The US embassy was cleared, and then was
turned over to the U.S. ambassador on the next day.

During this portion of the operation, the lack of accurate and timely
intelligence was a major concern of the force. We had been told to expect to
find anything from a reinforced mechanized infantry company with chemical and
conventional munitions, to finding no threat at all. Because of this, the task
force went in wearing chemical protective suits that were very hot and could
easily have created heat injuries. The leaders were aware of this but were
trying to protect their soldiers by lowering the number of possible casualties
for any situation. Also the water, ammunition, and anti-tank weapons the men
were carrying created a rucksack that weighed more than 120 pounds or 55-60 KG
and a combat vest weighing around 70 pounds or 30 KG. Everyone was also wearing
flak jackets or body armor, helmets, and carrying protective masks. This made
the individual soldier's load very heavy and would have been very difficult to
maneuver with had the enemy chose to fight.

Due to smoke from the oil wells that were burning all around Kuwait, visibility
was extremely limited. The wind shifted after the US Embassy had been entered
and within an hour it was dark as midnight, even though it was still midday.
This made the job of securing the Embassy slightly more challenging and the
shadows created problems where there should not have been any. The embassy
compound was not defended nor had it any enemy troops inside. Reports received
about ****y traps, left from both the Iraqi's and the US personnel as they
evacuated the embassy, coupled with the urgency for speed in clearing the
facilities, created an environment that allowed some demolition and searching
operations to take place that caused significant damage to portions of the
compound. However, the commander said he needed to be sure it was safe for
embassy personnel to return. Upon completion of the securing of the embassy, our
mission shifted to embassy guard and VIP security. At the same time we began
planning for reestablishing some kind of order in Kuwait City.

As most people know, the ground war only lasted a "magic" 100 hours, or 4 days.
This was not expected or planned for and there were no plans conceived yet for
the reorganization and rebuilding of the infrastructure of Kuwait City.

We had several challenges, even though it wasn't part of our Mission Essential
Task List (METL), or part of our directed mission. Suddenly we needed to get
water and electricity back into the embassy and to help make possible the
eventual return of these products to the entire city. We maintained and helped
control food lines and attempted to ensure human rights violations didn't occur.
Several times, teams were sent to police stations to prevent or stop atrocities
that were being committed against suspected Iraqi stay behinds, sympathizers,
and Palestinians. Palestinians composed the major part of the work force in
Kuwait and many belonged to or were sympathetic with the Palestinian Liberation
Organization (PLO), but the majority of them were still loyal to Kuwait or at
least were not supportive of what the Iraqi Army had done. Many Explosive
Ordinance Disposal (EOD) missions were performed on stockpiles of ammo, ****y
traps, and land mines. This was compounded by the massive amounts of unexploded
air ordinance left from the intensive bombings prior to the ground war that was
literally scattered everywhere.

The Commander once again broke the battalion down by company and gave the
mission of guarding the embassy and providing VIP security to B Company, he gave
the Eastern area command to A Company and the Northern area command to C
Company. The Northern area command included the mission of sending one
Operational Detachment-Alpha (ODA) north of Kuwait City near the border, to work
with a Kuwaiti armor brigade. This unit was right in the middle of US VII Corps
armor units. Deconflicting the problems between the Kuwaiti unit and the US unit
was an ongoing problem for the Detachment Commander. The main problems came from
the conventional officers not being fully aware of the customs and cultural
differences. Also since the Kuwaiti Commander kept crossing into disputed
territory or would maneuver his unit into the US element's area of operations in
pursuit of Iraqis, suspected or otherwise, matters were not made any easier.

The other teams in C Company and the ones in A Company set up headquarters
elements alongside their Kuwaiti counterparts at the division level and sent
teams to Kuwaiti military and police outposts throughout the city. Once
deployed, they continued to help organize a system of control and perform
Explosive Ordinance Disposal and quick reaction force missions. As munitions
caches were found, or small attacks via sniping or drive by shootings would
occur, we responded along side our assigned Kuwaiti units. During the first week
after securing the embassy and these other operations had begun, we conducted
numerous Direct Action and information collection missions throughout the city.
Some of these missions included the following:

The Kuwaiti government experimental farm, used as a major Iraqi interrogation
and torture center. War crime evidence was gathered and preserved.

The Al Shaab Palace, Iraqi interrogation and torture center.

The Sief Palace, Iraqi interrogation and torture center. It produced major war
crime evidence.

The Muk Harbaratt HQ's, it was utilized as the Iraqi command and control HQ's
for Iraqi intelligence soldiers. It produced critical information on their
military operations and war crime evidence.

Several police stations, used by Iraqis as interrogation and torture centers.

The Kuwaiti women's prison was used as an interrogation and torture center. It
produced war crime evidence and documentation.

PLO HQ's, it provided information on command and control of terrorists and
military organizations that were loyal to the Iraqis and supported them during
the occupation of Kuwait City. It also produced plans, terrain models, names,
passports and Counter-intelligence (CI) documentation.

The ice skating rink, it was used by Iraqis as a morgue. It provided information
and bodies bearing evidence of the torture techniques the Iraqis used.

All colleges and university dormitories and classrooms were used as living and
working areas by Iraqis. They produced many documents, weapons and ammunition
caches.

Hotels and residences, used as working and living spaces by Iraqis. Many of the
hotels were burnt down. These produced some documentation, weapons and ammo.

Beach trench and bunker complexes produced many anti-aircraft and artillery
weapons, small arms and ammo. This entire area was extensively mined and
contained some ****y traps.

As we started to bring the city under control, we were assisting the Kuwaitis
more and conducting missions less. We were prepared to stay in Kuwait City for 3
to 6 months and continue with the stabilization mission. Then abruptly on 12
April 91, to the surprise of our commander and our Kuwaiti counterparts, we were
ordered to redeploy to the United States. 5th SFG(A) then stepped in and
assisted the Kuwaitis we had been working with. The 5th SFG(A) still maintains
an element in Kuwait City to this day. On the 26th of April the main body of the
3rd SFG(A) returned to the United States.

This story has not been all-inclusive, but it contains all of the major
documented missions that were performed by the 3rd Special Forces Group
(Airborne) during Operation Desert Storm.

Thanks to General Toney and many other soldiers of the unit for information I
collected from your written interviews and after action reports. Thanks also to
the JFK historical records section where I found most of the documents I used
while preparing this report.

Supes
06-08-2004, 09:37 PM
Very cool article thanks again. I was wondering do you have any articles about the 7th SFG during Operation Desert Storm and/or Desert Shield? i know that Iraq isn't their AO but i have talked to a dude from 7th SFG ODA and he said he was in it. Any info would be great. Thanks

MEGR
06-08-2004, 11:07 PM
Yea, I haven't seen much about SOF in the GW. Are there any other stories of SOF out there to be read? I always wanted to find more info on Delta's Scud hunting, SF, and SEALs in GW1.

hist2004
06-08-2004, 11:44 PM
Yea, I haven't seen much about SOF in the GW. Are there any other stories of SOF out there to be read? I always wanted to find more info on Delta's Scud hunting, SF, and SEALs in GW1.

Scud Hunting with Delta Force and the Special Air Service (SAS)
By Thomas B. Hunter
During the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), Saddam Hussein launched approximately 350 ballistic missiles against Iran. These attacks included a large number of R-17 single-stage missiles from a stockpile of 650 purchased from the Soviet Union. The R-17, as originally designed, had a maximum range of 300 km and was capable of carrying either a 2,000 lb. conventional or 100 kiloton nuclear warhead. In time, however, Iraqi engineers were ordered to develop a weapon capable of striking deeper into Iranian territory. To this end, designers made use of cannibalized parts from other R-17s to create three longer range hybrids unique to the Iraqi military: a long-range Scud (unnamed), the al-Hussein (600-650 km) and the al-Abbas (750-900 km). Most alterations were made via a reduction in warhead weight and a corresponding increase in fuel load. Saddam also managed to acquire 36 mobile launch vehicles based on the MAZ543 (8x8) wheeled chassis, originally developed in 1965 for the Soviet Army. The TELs as designed had a road range of 550 km, a top road speed of 70 km/hr, and vehicle cab air filtration for use in an NBC environment. Of these, only the Al-Abbas could not be fired from a mobile launcher. However, these successive Iraqi modifications, while providing greater range, dramatically reduced both the structural integrity of the missile and its notoriously poor accuracy (1 km CEP).
Despite these major drawbacks, it did serve one purpose particularly well: when fired in any number against densely populated urban areas, the Scud was an effective terror weapon. This secondary use was not lost on Hussein. On 18 January, seven Scuds struck Haifa and Tel Aviv, destroying 1,587 apartments and causing nearly fifty civilian casualties. Similar attacks followed in the next few days. These terror attacks caused the desired response. Israel immediately sortied aircraft ready to strike Iraqi targets. Later, they launched a nuclear-capable missile into the Mediterranean Sea to clearly demonstrate to Iraq one of the possible responses to further Scud attacks. Only quick intervention by senior U.S. politicians and the immediate dispatch of Patriot missile batteries to Tel Aviv averted a catastrophe. Hussein's intent was clear: to divide the Coalition by prompting Israel to attack and thus become an active participant in the war. There seemed little doubt that at the very least, this action would cause Syria, Egypt and others to abandon the Coalition. At worst, Arab nations might side with Iraq and prompt an all-out Middle East war. For this reason, destruction of Scuds became the overwhelming priority for Allied war planners.
The primary focus of counterforce planning at the hme with regard to the Iraqi Scud threat revolved around the location and destruction of fixed launch sites. By August 1990, the Department of Defense had located five such sites with 28 launchers. TR-1 / U-2R reconnaissance, E-8 JSTARS radar ground surveillance aircraft, and DSP early-warning satellite imagery quickly located fixed sites, however these tools proved insufficient in monitoring the transient mobile Scud launchers. Thus, the decision was made to send special operations forces to hunt the Scuds on the ground. The U.S. Army's Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (SFOD-D), better known as Delta Force, and the British Special Air Service (SAS) were selected to perform what would become one of the largest counterterrorist operations in history.
The senior British officer in the Gulf, Lieutenant General Sir Peter de la Billiere, was the first to convince U.S. General Norman Schwarzkopf, a skeptic of the use of special operations forces, that SAS teams could be inserted behind enemy lines to conduct effective harassment and sabotage missions against the enemy. To the surprise of some, this suggestion was approved and two 'Sabre' squadrons (one half of the Regiment's fighting manpower) were deployed and began operations on 20 January 1991. On 24 January, however, the mission was changed to focus on Scud-hunting in western Iraq. The British teams were assigned a vast expanse near the H-2 airfield, from south of Highway 10 to the Saudi Arabian border. known as "Scud Alley".
One squadron from Delta arrived in Saudi Arabia by early February 1991 as part of the Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF). Following a period of concentrated planning, teams infiltrated western Iraq by a variety of methods, often working with the pilots and crews of MH-60 Black Hawks and MH-47E Chinooks from the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR) based in Ft. Campbell, Kentucky. (Heavily armed aircraft from this unit also conducted independent direct action missions against Iraqi radar sites, convoys, and other targets.) The U.S. element was assigned as its hunting ground the area northwest of Highway 10 near Al Qaim, known as "Scud Boulevard".
The primary mission for both SAS and Delta was to locate and designate targets for destruction by Coalition warplanes. To this end, most teams traveled at night, while hiding out during the day. In periods of darkness or for targets obscured by camouflage, the roving teams carried laser target designators (LTD). Using these, an attacking aircraft could employ laser-guided bombs or missiles riding the beam emitted by the LTD. Those targets that were caught out in the open during daylight hours were targeted visually by the operators on the ground who then directed in aircraft armed with unguided bombs and other munitions. The hunters were able to provide information on enemy vehicle movements, however by the time this intelligence was incorporated into the target package oftentimes the mobile launchers had left their hiding place and moved to another location.
In addition to their targeting duties, Delta undertook other direct action missions against the Scuds. These included using long-range, .50-caliber sniper rifles to disable and destroy missiles both in rearming farms and those mounted on their TELs. Other interdictions reportedly involved eliminating Scud crews as well as the use of AT4 anti-tank missiles on larger targets. One of the more interesting elements of the operation was the group based at the outpostof Al Jouf, approximately 150 miles south ofthe Iraqi border. This was a truly 'joint' team made up of SAS personnel, along with USAF A-10 Thunderbolt aircraft and AFSOC MH-53J Pave Lows. These British teams soon developed a close relationship with the USAF crews as the Pave Lows provided insertion and the 'Warthogs' were often the first aircraft to respond to reports of TEL sightings. It should be mentioned that other SAS units were also transported in their own version of the Chinook, flown by its own helicopter squadron (based in Hereford) or Royal Air Force (RAF) crews. One 30-man SAS team, reportedly deployed from Al Jouf, successfully assaulted a Scud command-and-control center, despite the presence of an estimated 300 Iraqi military personnel.
Delta and SAS adapted to the harsh terrain by making effective use of light vehicles during their operations instead of patrolling on foot. Delta operated the Fast Attack Vehicle (FAV) while the SAS drove two versions, the Longline Light Strike Vehicle (LSV) and an updated version of the long-lived "Pink Panther" Land Rover. Both vehicles were designed to carry heavy loads, including two or three fully-equipped soldiers, food, water, ammunition, extra fuel and a wide variety of weapons (up to six Milan or TOW anti-tank missiles, and a mount for a 40mm grenade launcher, 30mm cannon or .50 caliber heavy machine gun). One persistent but unverified report from the Gulf War recounted that a single LSV carried 12 SAS troopers and their gear during one such operation.
It was not long, however, before a major shortcoming in the Scud hunt operations became apparent. Upon sighting a viable target, the troopers had to communicate the intelligence over the emergency "guard" frequency. Response times averaged an unacceptably high sixty (60) minutes, during which some targets were able to escape unharmed. The C3I system that had proven so effective for the advance planning of conventional airstrikes proved insufficient for incorporating real-time intelligence being sent back by the troopers. In order to facilitate communications between the ground teams and Coalition air power, the SAS requested and was approved the posting of liaison officers to the Tactical Air Control Center (TACC) in Riyadh. As a result, improvements were made which permitted more direct communication. This was further enhanced by the practice of keeping ground attack aircraft constantly in the air, ready to respond immediately when a suitable target was located. Coalition aircraft were also warned of the presence of special forces operating in western Iraq, in an effort to prevent any "friendly fire" casualties.
These missions were not without loss to the hunters. At approximately 0300 on 21 February, four pilots and crew from the 160th SOAR and three Delta operators were killed when an MH60 helicopter crashed into a sand dune during zero-visibility weather conditions near the Ar Ar airfield. The ground team was reportedly conducting counterforce operations when one of the team was injured in a fall from a cliff and required medevac, to which the 160th responded. Similarly, one eight-man SAS team was compromised while on a reconnaissance mission. Four of these troopers died during escape-and-evasion after they were engaged by subsequent Iraqi patrols. Commandos from both groups were injured in firefights with Iraqi forces on a number of occasions in addition to casualties from exposure to unexpectedly cold nighttime weather.
The effect of the overall ground-based 'Scud Hunt' from a military perspective is skill a matter of speculation. There is no question that Coalition aircraft attacked a number of decoys and other targets that only after-action analysis revealed were not Scud-carrying TELs. One graphic incident occurred at a press briefing during the war in which General Schwarzkopf claimed video footage being displayed showed Scud launchers being destroyed when in fact later analysis indicates it was instead a group of fuel tanker trucks. At the end of the war UNSCOM found 62 complete al-Hussein missiles, six MAZ-543 TELs and four other TELs, along with parts of 88 other missiles and nine TELs. The Iraqis were also suspected of hiding other missiles from the UN inspection teams. 14 of 28 fixed sites were also destroyed. From a political perspective, however, the hunt was an unqualified success and may have provided one of the single greatest, and least known, contributions to the victory of Coalition forces in the Gulf.

Regards,
Hist2004

hist2004
06-08-2004, 11:54 PM
To Coalition military commanders, it was increasingly obvious that their counter-Scud effort was not significantly interfering with the Iraqi mobile Scud operations. Bad weather hampered aerial reconnaissance and stopped pilots spotting targets, from high altitudes, while the passage of information to strike aircraft was too slow. There was even talk of reviving the plan to airdrop the 82nd Airborne Division into western Iraq. What was needed was men on the ground to find where the mobile Scuds really were and then talk strike aircraft on to their targets.

The SAS Deploy

Before the war started, the British Gulf Commander, Lieutenant General Sir Peter de la Billiere, had proposed sending in small teams of Special Air Service (SAS) commandos to harass Iraqi troops in western Iraq, in an effort to distract their attention from the impending main attack into Kuwait. The first SAS troops were inserted into Iraq on 20 January but they were re-tasked within three days to target the mobile Scuds. (26) At first there was no established procedure for the SAS patrols to co-operate with USAF strike aircraft patrolling the Scud boxes. SAS men had to use the emergency "guard" radio frequency to talk to the pilots. Within a short period of time the SAS teams, roving western Iraq in heavily armed truck convoys were almost daily calling down USAF aircraft against suspected Scud launchers.

The SAS patrols also attacked Iraqi troops with anti-tank missiles and mortars. SAS liaison officers were posted to the joint US/Coalition Tactical Air Control Centre (TACC) in Riyadh and radio procedures established for the ground forces to control air strikes. The TACC was the nerve centre of the Coalition air campaign and had radio links to the AWACS aircraft that co-ordinated all air activity. Coalition aircraft were also warned of SAS patrol areas to prevent 'friendly fire' incidents.

Delta Force

At the beginning of February, the US Delta Force commando unit, along with other elements of the super secret Joint Special Operations Task Force (JSOTF), arrived in Saudi Arabia and were soon operating alongside the SAS in western Iraq. The SAS operated in the southern Scud Box, nicknamed "Scud Alley", around H-2 airfield and JSOTF operated around AI Qaim, in the Northern Scud box, nicknamed "Scud Boulevard".

By 26th January, the Iraqi Scud campaign had peaked. Scud attacks from western Iraq continued against Israel for another month but they were only able to launch single missiles at a time. The Iraqis had by then retreated their mobile missile units into an area close to AI Qaim to increase their protection. Scud attacks on Saudi Arabia were only brought to a halt when Coalition troops occupied southern Iraq in the final four days of February and pushed them out of range of their targets.


As a political initiative to keep Israel out of the war, the "Great Scud Hunt" was a success. It was only part of a major American exercise, however, to apply pressure on the Israeli Government. This also included: the deployment of American-manufactured Patriot batteries to Israel, manned by American and Israeli and, in the last days of the war, Dutch, personnel; unprecedented intelligence sharing; and generous additional military and economic aid. Because the deployment of the Dutch Patriots received little publicity, it is covered in a separate document. However, this deployment set an important precedent: for the first time, a multilateral missile defence system was deployed by the US and another NATO member, the Netherlands, and by a regional ally, Israel.

These measures succeeded. The Israelis did not retaliate against Iraq and the anti-Saddam Coalition remained intact, opening the way for the liberation of Kuwait. Beneath the political rhetoric, military analysts have taken a close interest in the actual results of the "Great Scud Hunt" to determine its effectiveness.

Conflicting Claims of Success

Immediately after the war, such senior Coalition political and military leaders as US President George Bush, British Prime Minister John Major, and Generals Schwarzkopf and de la Billiere, claimed the "Great Scud Hunt" had put Iraq's mobile Scuds out of action. Accounts by USAF pilots and British and US Special Forces' soldiers who took part in the "Great Scud Hunt" record numerous claims of the destruction of mobile Scuds, often in graphic detail. The Scud kill table at the end of this memorandum gives a complete list of these claims.

A year after the Gulf War, however, Pentagon spokesman Pete Williams admitted that there was "no accurate count of how many mobile launchers had been destroyed". It now seems clear that Coalition aircraft attacked and destroyed numerous decoys and non-Scud related vehicles. The problem was highlighted by an incident involving General Schwarzkopf when he claimed video footage showed Scud launchers being destroyed when it in fact was a group of fuel tanker trucks.

Williams added that the counter-Scud effort had reduced Iraq's ability to launch missile attacks by severely disrupting their operations. His comments appear to have been prompted by a series of reports from UNSCOM inspectors in Iraq which indicated that the Iraqis had a significant Scud capability remaining intact after the war. UNSCOM found 62 complete AI Hussein missiles, six MAZ 543 TELs and four other TELs, along with parts of 88 other missiles and nine TELs. The Iraqis were also suspected of hiding other missiles from the UN inspection teams.

One of the inspectors who visited western Iraq found no remains of the destroyed mobile Scuds at the sites claimed by Coalition intelligence. Of the 28 fixed launchers at the sites in western Iraq, only 14 had been destroyed. In southern Iraq, advancing Coalition troops found no abandoned Scuds, indicating the southern missile units were able to escape intact.

When UNSCOM inspectors visited Iraqi missile research, however, development and manufacturing facilities after the conflict they reported major damage to these sites, indicating that Coalition air attacks on large fixed targets were effective.

It is clear that the "Great Scud Hunt", while being a political success, had a mixed fortune on the operational level. The Coalition certainly made life very difficult for the Iraqi mobile Scud units: it was very dangerous to move around western Iraq by vehicle because of the threat of air attack and ambush by the Coalition special forces. But the Coalition had neither the technology to locate and destroy every mobile Scud nor the political will to drive the Scuds physically out of range of their targets by occupying western Iraq, as was the case in the KTO.

Lessons Learnt

Throughout the "Great Scud Hunt" Coalition command, control, communications and intelligence (C3I) systems proved inadequate for the three key tasks of speedily identifying, locating and tasking assets to attack mobile Scuds. Coalition strike aircraft equipped with precision guided weapons could inflict catastrophic damage on Scud launchers only if they could find them. But the problem was to locate and identify the Scud TELs in the 29,000 square miles of desert that was western Iraq; it was a classic case of trying to "find a needle in a haystack".

Initially, the Coalition was not fully prepared to deal with the mobile Scud threat. Before the war, Coalition military commanders from General Schwarzkopf downwards had not considered the problem important enough and little effort was put into preparing to counter the mobile Scud threat beyond putting some strike aircraft on ground alert. To avoid infringing Iraqi sovereignty, the Coalition refrained from infiltrating its special forces into Iraq to watch the mobile Scuds, so they had to rely on technical surveillance devices such as satellites and photographic reconnaissance aircraft. These proved effective for locating Scud fixed launch sites and Iraq's missile manufacturing infrastructure but were inefficient at detecting mobile Scud launchers parked in hardened aircraft shelters, underground car parks or factory complexes. At the start of Operation Desert Storm the Coalition had no accurate count of how many TELs the Iraqis possessed and no idea where they were.

Schwarzkopf rightly judged his main objective to be the destruction of the Iraqi army in Kuwait and his complex air campaign plan all but ignored the mobile Scud threat. The response to the Scuds had to be improvised once the missiles started to fall on Israel, even though their political threat was well-known to Coalition military commanders.

The Coalition air offensive was a highly centralised operation involving more than 1,000 sorties a day. The command, control, communications and intelligence (C31) system of the Coalition air forces worked on a 24 hour planning cycle which was unable to respond effectively or quickly enough to new intelligence on the location of mobile Scuds. Traditional methods of planning air strikes, based on sending out aerial reconnaissance aircraft to find targets and then pre-briefing bomber aircrews on their targets, did not work when dealing with the Iraqi mobile Scuds. The Iraqis could move their Scuds quicker than Coalition intelligence could track them. By the end of the war an improvised C3I system linking the SAS and Delta Force directly to the Coalition TACC was up and running. It was able to integrate air and ground forces to allow a degree of real-time gathering of intelligence in the Scud Boxes and enable a rapid response by strike aircraft to sightings of Scud launchers. The Scud Box system enabled aircraft permanently to be in the air ready to respond to information from special forces teams on the ground.

Surveillance Sensors

A number of other USAF reconnaissance systems deployed to Saudi Arabia could detect Scuds in real-time, such as the Northrop Grumman E-8 JSTARS radar ground surveillance aircraft and the Lockheed Martin TR-1 /U-2R with its electro-optical camera down link. The JSTARS used a radar system that could detect and, to a certain degree, identify types of vehicles for controllers in the air or in a ground station. The TR-1 / U2R systems were, in effect, long range television cameras which could then feed 'live' images to a ground station.

These systems were, however, not always available to operate over western Iraq and there were major problems in linking them into Coalition communication networks. Similar problems bedevilled the passing of intelligence information from American DSP missile tracking satellites to strike aircraft operating over western Iraq. The Iraqis also proved skilful opponents. They had a good idea of the capabilities of Coalition surveillance systems and were able cleverly to hide their Scud launchers.

Regards,
Hist2004

MEGR
06-09-2004, 01:01 AM
Thanks.. I wonder why Delta was chosen to find these scuds.. You'd think that SF, or SEALs would be chosen to do this job.. Nonetheless, they are all good units, but i figured Delta would be used only for CT work..

2RHPZ
06-09-2004, 04:37 AM
The Gulf War: Secret History by William M. Arkin

http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/gulf-secret.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another documents to download (in .pdf format, need Acrobat describing:

The Strategic Environment
The Iraqi Scud Threat
Air Operations Against Scuds
Missions of Special Operations Forces
Assessing the Effectiveness of the Scud Hunt

http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1408/MR1408.ch3.pdf

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


SPECIAL*OPERATIONS

A Selected Bibliography

March 1995

Compiled by Jane E. Gibish

U.S. Army War College Library

Carlisle Barracks, PA

Preface
This bibliography identifies selected books, documents, and periodical articles which present the history, development, and current status of Special Operations. It updates the previous U.S. Army War College Library bibliography on Special Operations, dated March 1989. There is no overlapping between the two bibliographies.
All but seven of the items reflected in the bibliography are available in the U.S. Army War College Library. Entries are accompanied by our call numbers (keep in mind that call numbers may vary from library to library). The seven items not in our Library are located at the U.S. Army Military History Institute here at Carlisle Barracks. These items are appropriately identified within the bibliography.
For additional information, please contact the Research and Information Services Branch, U.S. Army War College Library, by sending an e-mail message to awcsl@awc.carlisle.army.mil, or by phoning DSN 242-3660 or Commercial (717) 245-3660.
Jane E. Gibish, compiler

http://carlisle-www.army.mil/library/bibs/special.htm

hist2004
06-09-2004, 08:23 AM
Thanks.. I wonder why Delta was chosen to find these scuds.. You'd think that SF, or SEALs would be chosen to do this job.. Nonetheless, they are all good units, but i figured Delta would be used only for CT work..

Devgru77-

Your right about that. The reason Delta was chosen is because Israel was
threatening to strike Iraq because of the Scud attacks. They only backed
down when they received assurance that America would send it's very
best to hunt the Scuds. If Israel had attacked Iraq (and they would have
had every right to) President Bush's coalition of Arab nations fighting Iraq
would have ended on the spot. After this war, Delta's pure CT work changed
into a force that would be utilized like Britain's SAS.

Regards & Thanks,
Hist2004

Supes
06-09-2004, 04:56 PM
So i guess no records of 7th SFG in OP DS? BLAST! thanks anyways good articles

MEGR
06-09-2004, 06:51 PM
Thanks.. I wonder why Delta was chosen to find these scuds.. You'd think that SF, or SEALs would be chosen to do this job.. Nonetheless, they are all good units, but i figured Delta would be used only for CT work..

Devgru77-

Your right about that. The reason Delta was chosen is because Israel was
threatening to strike Iraq because of the Scud attacks. They only backed
down when they received assurance that America would send it's very
best to hunt the Scuds. If Israel had attacked Iraq (and they would have
had every right to) President Bush's coalition of Arab nations fighting Iraq
would have ended on the spot. After this war, Delta's pure CT work changed
into a force that would be utilized like Britain's SAS.


Regards & Thanks,
Hist2004

Thanks alot!

Jedburgh
12-05-2004, 09:11 PM
When the force landed at KIA there was little to no resistance.
The Marines cleared KIA - we just occupied it for a little while. He completely left out the bit about us moving to the nearby Kuwaiti Air Defense School - which was occupied by an Iraqi Mech Inf Bde. Well, not really occuppied - what was left of'em was fast unassing the place, and it took very little effort to secure.

This made the job of securing the Embassy slightly more challenging and the shadows created problems where there should not have been any. The embassy compound was not defended nor had it any enemy troops inside.
"Clearing" the embassy was a joke. Both elements of 5th Group and the Marines had been in the embassy compound at different times before we went in. The Marines had even left a photo of themselves in the main embassy building - when it was given to Blank Frank he was so pissed he just ripped it to pieces right there.

Red
12-05-2004, 09:42 PM
When the force landed at KIA there was little to no resistance.
The Marines cleared KIA - we just occupied it for a little while. He completely left out the bit about us moving to the nearby Kuwaiti Air Defense School - which was occupied by an Iraqi Mech Inf Bde. Well, not really occuppied - what was left of'em was fast unassing the place, and it took very little effort to secure.

This made the job of securing the Embassy slightly more challenging and the shadows created problems where there should not have been any. The embassy compound was not defended nor had it any enemy troops inside.
"Clearing" the embassy was a joke. Both elements of 5th Group and the Marines had been in the embassy compound at different times before we went in. The Marines had even left a photo of themselves in the main embassy building - when it was given to Blank Frank he was so pissed he just ripped it to pieces right there.
rofl