Richard Dawkins debating with a muslim

[TheEvian100]

Interesting religious and even political points. Apparently "man-made laws" do not count as law for him lol. We need to fix our women, we dress our women.. What the hell!?!?! women are equivalent to cars or something, at least for this person.

http://es.youtube.com/v/IHRkMcVrt2w

[Invisigoth]

Change title to: richard dawkins debates with a creepy zealot muslim in dire need need of a barber

[Lazy Lob]

An old documentary. "The Root of all Evil". Part 2 The Virus of Faith

It wasn't bad but it could have been better. Faith is a virus.

[TheEvian100]

Change title to: richard dawkins debates with a creepy zealot muslim in dire need need of a barber

I added the term "radical", but in the end I think it's more of a relatively geographical & financial issue, rather than a matter of a radical person or not. In certain countries what he said is usually a belief throughout a huge social base.

[Elemental666]

This retard is not much worse than the Christian idiot Ted Haggard:

http://www.youtube.com/v/wO-g8FsmvGA

[TheEvian100]

This retard is not much worse than the Christian idiot Ted Haggard:

http://www.youtube.com/v/wO-g8FsmvGA

Video not available? :roll:

[Elemental666]

Video not available? :roll:

http://www.youtube.com/v/fibl2A3Ai7o

Now?...

[hsh2]

This retard is not much worse than the Christian idiot Ted Haggard

Ha! I remember watching this video in November 2006.
Quite frankly I found it offensive...and I usually don't view evangelicals as offensive...but Haggard :roll:

To my pleasure he was PWNED 2-3 weeks later when it was revealed that he had an affair with a callboy somewhere in Colorado haharofl

[IronFinn]

After watching this short clip I get the strange feeling like someone would be talking with a log of wood, or an alien. This muslim has just memorized his strange hate mantra and is not able to do any reasonable debate. I´m right, your wrong. Made me feel really weird.

[Eoin666]

I've met Richard Dawkins....nice bloke

[Kilgor]

Ha! I remember watching this video in November 2006.
Quite frankly I found it offensive...and I usually don't view evangelicals as offensive...but Haggard :roll:

To my pleasure he was PWNED 2-3 weeks later when it was revealed that he had an affair with a callboy somewhere in Colorado haharofl

Typical religious nut, total hypocrite.

He even was doing meth.

[hsh2]

Typical religious nut, total hypocrite.

He even was doing meth.

Yes indeed. I forgot about that detail. Even better LOLrofl

[tea drinker]

Typical religious nut, total hypocrite.

He even was doing meth.
Indeed,
I have seen this trend many times.
some people seem to use religion as a counter agent to their "badness". Perhaps it gives them some form of self vindication or manner to believe the people they hurt deserve it.

Dawkins fails as he intends to portray religion as the cause of all strife, when it is natural to have strife! In as much as it natural to have mainstream people, you will have headbangers at oppossite ends too, and the further one end diverges, the further the other will go too.
When we evolve into some higher being maybe we will cast off our violent tendencies, but to blame religion for all mans ills evokes a belief system where WE are infallible, only for the damned religion - ironic failure.

No no, even if we had no religion, we would be at each others throats.
Cave men or monkeys had no religion yet they hammered seven kinds of sh!te out of each other. Shortages and stress will provoke responses from animals, the appeal to differences based on:
1 Race
2 Skin colour
3 Religion
4 Geography
5 class
etc etc
is used to direct the tribal response to stimuli.

Claiming religion will remove the initial animalistic response to stress or hunger or whatever is stupid, as it does not remove other factors we use to differentiate among each other.

Pretending we are some altruistic species and would be ok without religion is very "teenager".

I don't say we have no choice in how we react, we do, to a large extent. The struggle to better ourselves is the one which will lead to more peaceful people - but only after generations of breeding!
Religion can be a factor which leads to better understanding of ourselves and usually is used to promote the "love thy negbour attitude" not the "kill that black/gay/muslim/paddy/skinhead dude"
Atheists are equally capable of madness.

[hsh2]

No no, even if we had no religion, we would be at each others throats.
Cave men or monkeys had no religion yet they hammered seven kinds of sh!te out of each other. Shortages and stress will provoke responses from animals, the appeal to differences based on:
1 Race
2 Skin colour
3 Religion
4 Geography
5 class
etc etc
is used to direct the tribal response to stimuli.

Claiming religion will remove the initial animalistic response to stress or hunger or whatever is stupid, as it does not remove other factors we use to differentiate among each other.

Pretending we are some altruistic species and would be ok without religion is very "teenager".


Very true. One could even argue that religion trumps to an extent class/skin colour etc.
Fe. if one goes to a Church in Basel CH one will see African asylum seekers sitting next to rich old Swiss sitting next to christian restaurant owners from Kerala sitting next to French expats sitting next to jobless alcoholics sitting next to elder Spanish/Italian workers etc. Afterwards they will be standing together outside church discussing the sermons and how Jesus loves us all bla bla, some in perfect Swiss German, many in broken High German.
However that only goes for people of the same religion (or even same church) I guess.

I'm myself not religious (anymore) but to say that religion does ONLY harm and divisions is a bit over the top.

[Kilgor]

Mankind (womankind) has grown up enough to stop believing in story books.

[BAF]

Mankind (womankind) has grown up enough to stop believing in story books.


yeah you would think so, but then you see **** like this. and it makes you wonder ...