PDA

View Full Version : Retired F.B.I. Agents Join Cause of 4 Sailors Convicted in ’97 Rape-Murder



ViktorNavorski
11-11-2008, 12:43 AM
Retired F.B.I. Agents Join Cause of 4 Sailors Convicted in ’97 Rape-Murder
By Ian Urbina
Published: November 10, 2008


RICHMOND, Va. — F.B.I. agents rarely comment on criminal convictions. It is even more uncommon for them to argue that someone has been wrongly convicted.

But on Monday, 30 former agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation took up the cause of four sailors, known as the Norfolk Four, who were convicted in a 1997 rape and murder.

Arguing that DNA and forensic evidence points to a prison inmate who has confessed as the sole perpetrator of the crimes, they called on Gov. Tim Kaine to pardon the sailors.

“After careful review of the evidence we have arrived at one unequivocal conclusion: The Norfolk Four are innocent,” said Jay Cochran, a former assistant director of the F.B.I. and former special agent who served at the bureau for 27 years. “We believe a tragic mistake has occurred in the case of these four Navy men, and we are calling on Governor Kaine to grant them immediate pardons.”

The former agents join a long list of unusual supporters, including four former Virginia attorneys general; 12 former state and federal judges and prosecutors; and a past president of the Virginia Bar Association, who have called for the men to be pardoned.

In January 2006, 13 jurors from two of the sailors’ trials signed letters and affidavits saying they now believed the men were innocent.

The sailors initially confessed to the crime after being threatened with the death penalty if they did not cooperate. But they quickly recanted. Three of the four — Derek Tice, Danial Williams and Joseph **** Jr. — are serving life sentences in Virginia prisons for the rape and murder. A fourth man, Eric Wilson, was released in 2005 after serving eight and a half years for the rape conviction.

After the sailors were arrested, another man, Omar Ballard, confessed that he committed the crimes. His DNA matched evidence from the scene, while none of the arrested sailors, who numbered seven at one point, had DNA that matched the evidence.

Mr. Ballard had a history of violence against women in the Norfolk neighborhood where the victim, Michelle Moore-Bosko lived. Mr. Ballard was convicted in her rape and murder, along with two other ****** assaults in her neighborhood.

The former agents, 26 of whom sent the governor a letter in July calling for a pardon for the sailors, said the forensic and crime scene evidence showed that only one person ******ly assaulted and killed the victim. Mr. Ballard knew the victim and her husband because they had opened the door to their apartment and rescued him when he was being chased by a crowd of men in reaction to an assault on a woman about two weeks before Ms. Moore-Bosko was killed.

“We are not bleeding hearts, and we don’t take this type of public action lightly,” said Mr. Cochran, who, like the other dozen agents gathered at a Richmond hotel for a news conference, was wearing a blue button that said “Free the Norfolk Four.” “However, we also believe that law enforcement has an obligation to protect the most innocent from wrongful conviction.”
Ms. Moore-Bosko’s mother, Carol Moore of Pittsburgh, could not be reached for comment.

But in a statement in January, she said: “Derek Tice and the Norfolk Four confessed to the rape and murder of our daughter. These men are guilty and we pray that our family will not have to suffer through any more appeals.”

The governor’s office declined to comment on the case except to say that it was still reviewing the clemency petition.

George H. Kendall, a lawyer helping with the pardon effort, said that in all likelihood police investigators elicited one false confession and used it and the threat of the death penalty to set off a “domino effect,” resulting in the others.

Rest of the story... (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/us/11norfolk.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss&src=ig&oref=slogin)

California Joe
11-11-2008, 08:56 AM
Sounds like the Governor should take this seriously. Not exactly the type of guys that run around pleading cases for rapists.

Laconian
11-11-2008, 05:35 PM
How did these guys all get involved in the case? If any of this was exculpatory and known before hand it should have been presented to the defense. If this was squashed by the police, then not only should the conviction be overturned, but further charges should also be brought. This sounds like a big miscarriage of justice, but I don't know enough about the case.

California Joe
11-11-2008, 08:52 PM
Good questions Laconian. It's all very interesting though.

sct1886
11-11-2008, 09:22 PM
The judge and prosecutor should be horse whipped, tarred and feathered.


"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws."-Ayn Rand

Dominique
11-12-2008, 04:04 AM
I don't remember this case, but I can do some digging. My 1SG is a vice narcotics detective on the Norfolk PD, and works closely with the Homicide guys. He should personally know most of the guys involved in that investigation. I'll have to wait until next month to find out though.

Breakfast in Vegas
11-12-2008, 04:30 AM
Why confess to a crime you didn't commit?

In any case, obviously it should be examined more closely.

Laconian
11-12-2008, 08:16 AM
I don't remember this case, but I can do some digging. My 1SG is a vice narcotics detective on the Norfolk PD, and works closely with the Homicide guys. He should personally know most of the guys involved in that investigation. I'll have to wait until next month to find out though.

Dom, I'd really like to hear their take.

Andrew Chalmers
11-12-2008, 08:21 AM
Why confess to a crime you didn't commit?

In any case, obviously it should be examined more closely.

This varies from PD to PD - but in the "good old" days and before recorded interrogations, a lot of dirty tricks occurred behind closed doors. Once the detective "smells" that you're guilty - he unleashes the full tool kit on you to extract a confession.

Laconian
11-12-2008, 08:31 AM
This varies from PD to PD - but in the "good old" days and before recorded interrogations, a lot of dirty tricks occurred behind closed doors. Once the detective "smells" that you're guilty - he unleashes the full tool kit on you to extract a confession.

Turn up the radio, grab a phonebook and let's go to work...

California Joe
11-12-2008, 08:38 AM
Hehehe. Seriously sounds like there's a lot of problems with this case. But that's based on little info. I'd be interested to hear what Doms friend says.

Sand Man
11-12-2008, 09:06 AM
X2 ... 30 agents. That's a lot of suits.

-BlackZodiac-
11-12-2008, 02:49 PM
Why confess to a crime you didn't commit?

You should take a look on the many cases out there on false confessions here are some examples:

-Jeffery Mark Deskovic.
-Robert Hubert.
-Simon Marshall.
-Stephen Marshall.
-Corethian Bell case.
-Michael Crowe.

Michael Crowe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkLHXKHb1Vc

One documentary I seen.

Sorry don't know how to embed, anyone?