PDA

View Full Version : Hamas prefers war as an alternative to progress



bbsh
01-27-2009, 05:28 PM
Hamas prefers war as an alternative to progress

"The occupation of Iraq and the rise of Islamism have provided Arab regimes with new opportunities to defer socio-political reforms"

By Sami Alrabaa

Once again some of us Arabs are as usual in a big mess. The Islamist extremist group Hamas, which came to power in 2006 through an un-Islamic political process, namely democratic election, has since hijacked Gaza, established its rocket factories in residential areas, in bunkers under mosques, schools and hospitals. Over the past three years, the Hamas jihadis and their affiliates have frequently targeted their Kassam rockets at residential areas in Israel. Even during the ceasefire brokered by Egypt in 2008, Hamas shot their rockets at Israel. On top of all these, Hamas, like the PLO before the Oslo Accords, rejects the existence of Israel, a UN member state. Its ultimate aim is liberating all Palestine, which includes Israel, by wiping out the Jewish state from the world map and possibly by genocidal massacre or deportation of all Jewish people.

The “struggle” of Hamas is backed by Islamists across the globe, by state-controlled media of the Arab world, and by one-eyed anti-war campaigners in the West. Ban Ki-Moon, the Secretary General of the UN, has condemned the latest Israeli military operations in Gaza as “disproportionate”.

All these organizations and groups have voraciously consumed the Hamas propaganda; they allege that the Israeli blockade has caused abject misery in Gaza, people there are starving. Some compare Gaza to a huge prison, to Holocaust. But who is to blame for all this calamity?
Israeli politicians have repeatedly stated that once Hamas stops its terrorist activities and launching of missiles, the blockade would be lifted. The Israeli cabinet even approved aid convoys into Gaza despite Hamas’ continued shooting rockets. The Hamas leadership ignored such conciliatory Israeli gestures and carried on the rocket-attacks on residential areas in Israel.

We Arabs are very good at twisting facts and exaggerating them, when it suits us. Mustafa Barghouthi, a Fatah activist, told CNN that “It was Israel which broke the ceasefire with Hamas.” Buthaina Sha’ban, a Syrian cabinet minister, called the recent Israeli attacks on Hamas’ military targets “the most atrocious Holocaust in the history of mankind”
We Arabs also prefer to be mystical, wishful rather than realistic. Waleed Al Tabtaba’i, an Islamist member of the Kuwaiti parliament, hoped that Allah would come to rescue the Gazans as he did with his prophet Muhammad in all his raids against the infidels.

Yusuf Al Qaradhawi, the renowned radical Islamic cleric, told the Al Jazeera TV that “We Muslims, we are a bunch of donkeys if we do not stand up and fight the Israelis and their supporters wherever they are.”
Hamas and its affiliates are feeding on wishful thinking. They believe that an escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will bring them closer to their aim: Arabs and Muslims will take to the street and urge their governments to take action against Israel. Islamists in Iran and Indonesia have registered themselves to fight Jihad against the Jews.

We Arabs have learned nothing from the two major disastrous wars against Israel. Some of us still believe that the Israelis understand only the language of defiance and violence. Violence is the only “argument” we possess. Rational, realistic thinking has never been a part of our discourse and action.

Especially Islamists, they rejoice at the on-going maiming and killing in Gaza, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq. None of those Hamas-sympathizers has ever condemned the atrocities inflicted upon innocent people, arbitrarily killed in these countries by suicide bombers in the name Islam.
In Arabic we say, Ja’ja’a bila taheen” (It is all noise without flour). We Arabs are most boisterous, shrill people, but less effective or inclined to seeking pragmatic, workable solutions.

According to a clandestine survey by Bielefeld University conducted in Syria and Egypt (2006), over 70% of the population in these countries want peace with Israel. They are “sick and tired”, as many put it, of the belligerent discourse of the Islamists and the biased and instigatory propaganda of their national media. They, of course, don’t dare say that openly.

Khaled, who wants to be identified by his first name only, told me, “Our leaders and their affiliates suffer from some kind of personality disorder. They keep us busy with Israel to distract from their failure to establish democracy and remove poverty. They also support radical organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah as tools to keep that distraction alive.”
Fatima said, “Israel left South Lebanon and Gaza. Yet, for Hezbollah and Hamas this is not enough. What do these people want? They are making the life of their people and ours miserable. We feel hijacked by these murderers. We want peace.”

Hamas and its affiliates are among the bloodiest in the history of mankind. They do not value human life. They deliberately provoked the Israeli offensive and were aware that that would cause death to hundreds of civilians living in areas where Hamas had stored its rockets. Hamas leadership has been banking on images of death and destruction as a means to rally support in Arab, Muslim, and Western streets.

According to a recent opinion poll, conducted by Emnid Institute in Germany, more than 80% of the German population blame Hamas for the high toll of deaths among civilians in Gaza. One interviewee put it this way, “Hamas is acting like armed criminals who have barricaded themselves among innocent civilians and arbitrarily fire at people around them. As the criminals adamantly refused to stop shooting, the police had no other choice but to storm the area to catch the criminals, or kill them.

Unfortunately, several innocent people were killed. You can not blame the death of innocent people on the police. It is the criminals to blame for all this.” Israel must carry on its offensive until the Hamas leaders surrender. There is no peace without sacrifice. All Israelis and decent Arabs would be grateful to the Israeli army if it rids us from those thugs. We want to live in peace.

In view of the fact that Kuwait and Lebanon allow relatively higher freedom of speech, columnists like Ahemd Al Sarraf, Ali Al Baghli, Hasssan El Essa, Fouad Al Hashem, and Khaleel Haidar in these countries have blasted Hamas and the Islamists for the calamity in Gaza.

The Arab world has never experienced any semblance of political freedom and stability. Since independence over the last half of the 20th century, the Arabs have been ruled by despots, either military or hereditary. Demonstrations are basically forbidden; calls for political reforms are ruthlessly squashed. But when people demonstrate against a foreign powers—Israel or the USA, for instance—they are then most welcome.
The Syrian regime even allowed a hand-picked group people to protest against the Egyptian embassy for not opening the border with Gaza.

The Egyptian government also allowed demonstrations against the Israeli strikes against Hamas, while the authoritarian regime of Husni Mubarak deals with demonstrators for political reforms ruthlessly. The Arab regimes have always projected the “Palestinian cause”—the “Wound of all Arabs” or the “Nakba” (calamity) as some Arabs prefer to call it—as a pretext to keep the people distracted from calls for political and economic reforms at home. The occupation of Iraq and the rise of Islamism have provided Arab regimes with new opportunities to defer socio-political reforms.

Besides, Arab regimes, such as the Egyptian, Syrian and Saudi governments, have appeased Islamists by antagonizing the same enemy, namely Israel and the USA, at least in the media. The radicals have stopped their arbitrary attacks in these countries; instead, they cross borders to wage Jihad against the foreign infidel enemy: in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

All that being said, the road to democracy, freedom and liberty in the Arab world will yet be long one; the Arabs will still have to wait for decades before they can enjoy these basic rights of man.

In the meantime, the name of the game in the Arab world remains demagogy, irrationalism, political schizophrenia, defiance and violence.
Dr. Sami Alrabaa is a professor of sociology and an Arab/Muslim culture specialist. Before moving to Germany he taught at Kuwait University, King Saud University, and Michigan State University.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/01/12/sami-alrabaa-hamas-prefers-war-as-an-alternative-to-progress.aspx

Laworkerbee
01-27-2009, 05:30 PM
Buthaina Sha’ban, a Syrian cabinet minister, called the recent Israeli attacks on Hamas’ military targets “the most atrocious Holocaust in the history of mankind”

*Cough*Hama*Cough*

Dinges
01-27-2009, 05:34 PM
Flogging a long dead horse.

Winger
01-27-2009, 11:05 PM
Flogging a long dead horse.

The last 50 years is just the start of this senseless quagmire. The horse will be much longer dead when it's still being kicked. The Arabs are outproducing the Israelis at a rate that immigration into Israel cannot compare with.

Wait about 10 years when they feel they have the numbers. If the Israeli's keep countering Hamas at the expense of the Arab/Palestinian civilians in the area and if they keep their harsh apartheid policies towards the Arabs/Palestinian civilians there will be a reckoning I'm afraid.

budgie
01-27-2009, 11:34 PM
Of course Hamas prefers conflict - they thrive on it. Without the continual siege from Israel, the people of Gaza have little reason to support them. If peoples lives improve enough they'll abandon extremism. I see Hamas' long term future as becoming a bit-player, a radical party in a future Palestinian state with a dissenting voice in whatever form of parliament they eventually have.

Gunbird
01-27-2009, 11:40 PM
The last 50 years is just the start of this senseless quagmire. The horse will be much longer dead when it's still being kicked. The Arabs are outproducing the Israelis at a rate that immigration into Israel cannot compare with.

Wait about 10 years when they feel they have the numbers. If the Israeli's keep countering Hamas at the expense of the Arab/Palestinian civilians in the area and if they keep their harsh apartheid policies towards the Arabs/Palestinian civilians there will be a reckoning I'm afraid.

10 years is too soon, but is a demographic inevitability if trends don't change. Herzl Gedj called Polygamy among Bedouins a "security threat".

Israel realizes these things, that's why they have a Demographic Council and a Population Administration as a department of such. Their purpose? Get Jewish women to have more children through government incentives and grants. You can't have much of a Jewish state if most of its citizens are non-Jews. Apartheid regimes do not last very long, so that is not an attractive solution.

The issue of demographics isn't really a surprise, most developed nations have below-replacement birth rates. That's is why they are so dependent on migrant workers, as in the case of many European nations. Israel, unfortunately, doesn't seem to be a desired living location for the majority of Jews in the world. The majority of Jews still live in the US.

bbsh
01-28-2009, 02:16 AM
So, can someone remind me again what makes Israel an apartheid state?

It seems like some just like using buzzwords when discussing the israeli-arab conflict without understanding the meanings and implications of those same buzzwords..

kahn267
01-28-2009, 09:10 AM
So, can someone remind me again what makes Israel an apartheid state?

It seems like some just like using buzzwords when discussing the israeli-arab conflict without understanding the meanings and implications of those same buzzwords..


Ask Jimmy Carter
he seems to know EVERYTHING on the subject

Eztyga
01-28-2009, 09:12 AM
This is why Hamas will never have nice things...

walford
01-28-2009, 09:30 AM
“Our leaders and their affiliates suffer from some kind of personality disorder. They keep us busy with Israel to distract from their failure to establish democracy and remove poverty. They also support radical organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah as tools to keep that distraction alive.”Thus is the essence of Islamic terrorism. They are being left behind by a modernizing world and are dealing with it by lashing out rather than reforming within.

Gunbird
01-28-2009, 10:13 AM
So, can someone remind me again what makes Israel an apartheid state?

It seems like some just like using buzzwords when discussing the israeli-arab conflict without understanding the meanings and implications of those same buzzwords..

It isn't right now, but it will be a possible path in the future, given demographic realities.

Gunbird
01-28-2009, 10:18 AM
Thus is the essence of Islamic terrorism. They are being left behind by a modernizing world and are dealing with it by lashing out rather than reforming within.
That's a common trait among all leadership, deflection. In fact, it's most likely rare in Islamic terrorism, since most Islamic terrorists don't have governing roles. Hamas is a rare exception.

Read Machiavelli's The Prince, he goes into detail.

walford
01-28-2009, 10:29 AM
Thus is the essence of Islamic terrorism. They are being left behind by a modernizing world and are dealing with it by lashing out rather than reforming within....In fact, it's most likely rare in Islamic terrorism, since most Islamic terrorists don't have governing roles...
It is no coincidence that the rise of terrorism came along with what is called globalization. Prior to the increasingly integrated world, Islam could afford to stay within itself, festering in poverty and oppression. Now, it is confronted with its own inadequacies and their people cannot escape exposure to the fact that the Infidel is happier, freer and wealthier.

And so rather than come to grips as to why this is, they are resolved to destroy the West. They have a better than even chance of succeeding due to Western cowardice and self-loathing.

We have only recently come out of a Cold War with an expansionist all-or-nothing political dictatorship only to find ourselves in another inter-generational conflict with an enemy who is even more determined. Meanwhile our resolve to survive continues to wane.

Winger
01-28-2009, 02:57 PM
So, can someone remind me again what makes Israel an apartheid state?

It seems like some just like using buzzwords when discussing the israeli-arab conflict without understanding the meanings and implications of those same buzzwords..

Unequal undeserved treatment toward non-Jews who live and have lived in what is now defined as Israel. Such as taking their homes without legal regard, etc. Displacing peoples for the strict purpose of establishing new settlements that are segregated(Jewish only). Not allowing them back in once they temporarily leave the country to go visit family. Comparmentalization of the West Bank etc.

It's not a strict government problem 100% though. When rightfully abolishing illegal settlements, look at the probelms the settlers gave their own troops and police. They are crazy people with their own brand of extremism. Islam or the Arabs do not have copyright ownership on extremism.

Here is a 60 minutes viewing. Biased? Yes. But, the truth is always somewhere in the middle so much of it is fact albeit with added dramatics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYAgyv2MKyI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUaeID9Lap0

Moledet
01-28-2009, 03:30 PM
Unequal undeserved treatment toward non-Jews who live and have lived in what is now defined as Israel. Such as taking their homes without legal regard, etc. Displacing peoples for the strict purpose of establishing new settlements that are segregated(Jewish only). Not allowing them back in once they temporarily leave the country to go visit family. Comparmentalization of the West Bank etc.

Wow, I don't think they get a completely equal treatment (sometimes they get better treatment than Jewish residents and sometimes worse) but non of what you said ever happened in today's Israel.



It's not a strict government problem 100% though. When rightfully abolishing illegal settlements, look at the probelms the settlers gave their own troops and police. They are crazy people with their own brand of extremism. Islam or the Arabs do not have copyright ownership on extremism.

Settlers were 100% right and every Israeli sees it today, we were right opposing the disengagement and the peaceful resistance to the troops was a warning to the country not to do this again. Apart of a few violent protests no one thought it was extreme.

Gebirgsjäger
01-28-2009, 03:36 PM
Without conflict, the purpose of HAMAS would cease to exist, and their monopoly on power and finances would have to be diverted to actually proper management of the country and not on weaponry.

Winger
01-28-2009, 03:53 PM
Settlers were 100% right and every Israeli sees it today, we were right opposing the disengagement and the peaceful resistance to the troops was a warning to the country not to do this again. Apart of a few violent protests no one thought it was extreme.

Their reasoning for being there and settling there is extremist. To take the land and populate it with their own kind in a questionably dangerous environment. Of all the hassle free countries they could of emigrated to with cheap land aplenty they choose this place. Kind of crazy I think.