PDA

View Full Version : The Problem



Adux
02-06-2009, 12:40 PM
I am glad quite a lot of people have start thinking along my lines in regards to the future of Pakistan and threat it has caused the world, especially the free, democratic and secular world.



The Problem

By Vijaykumar S Kasi
http://sify.com/news/imagegallery/galle ... vsv=TopHP1 (http://sify.com/news/imagegallery/galleryDetail.php?hcategory=13733686&hgallery=14851638&page=1&?vsv=TopHP1)

It is difficult to comprehend why some people resort to terrorism.

One of the main reasons put forward — economic failure — is no excuse to pursue the path of terror. There are many extremely poor nations and societies that struggle for a better future in a peaceful and non-violent way.

For decades, a significant section of Pakistanis have chosen the wrong path. Terrorism has become an institution in Pakistan, and has widespread support. Its army and intelligence services consider it a strategic weapon. After each terrorist strike, the Pakistani government cleverly dodges international pressure by temporarily clamping down on terrorism until the focus shifts away. It never completely eliminates this menace. As a consequence, this small region has now become the most dangerous place on the planet.

Pakistan was created by the British in 1947 as they hastily departed the Indian subcontinent. Its boundaries are incompletely defined and the state is largely unstable. The Durand line, Kashmir, Sir Creek and Siachen are examples of poorly demarcated borders.

From past experiences, it is clear that trusting the Pakistan Army or government to have a change of heart is simply naive. Believing that a resolution of the Palestinian or Kashmir problem will end terrorism is another utopian naiveté.

A long term solution has to be found to tackle the menace of terror, even if it means dividing Pakistan. Here is the reason why it may be our best and last option unless Pakistan rapidly dismantles the terror infrastructure. There is no other solution to this problem, irrespective of what pundits and experts may say.

Imagine how much more dangerous Pakistan would have been if it included Bangladesh. Terrorists would have complete control of entire South Asia. If India did not help in the creation of Bangladesh in 1971 it would have been really in a desperate position now — struggling for its very survival.

We have to ensure the security for our children in India and the world over. Implementing the plan for restructuring Pakistan will undoubtedly be painful and expensive in terms of precious lives lost and considerable economic damage. We should be prepared to pay this price for a better future for all our children. It will involve international cooperation and meticulous planning. Now is the time to rise to the call of duty and not vacillate.

All Maps: Courtesy Indian Defence Review Unauthorised reproduction prohibited.


http://im.sify.com/sifycmsimg/feb2009/News/14851619_1.jpg

http://im.sify.com/sifycmsimg/feb2009/News/14851622_2.jpg

http://im.sify.com/sifycmsimg/feb2009/News/14851624_3.jpg

http://im.sify.com/sifycmsimg/feb2009/News/14851626_4.jpg


http://im.sify.com/sifycmsimg/feb2009/News/14851629_5.jpg
Quote:
Resolution

Here is a brief outline of possible scenarios for the newly independent countries of Pakistan.

* Free Balochistan: Should be supported by UK and Iran. UK is known to have contacts with the Balochi nationalist movement. Balochis have their own political parties and can easily govern themselves. Iran could be appeased, and may be willing now to deal with the West. Oil and gas pipelines to India via Sindh can be considered because it is rich in gas reserves.

* Greater Afghanistan: Incorporating NWFP and Tribal Areas with Peshawar into Afghanistan will create a more economically viable country. Hamid Karzai will be seen as the father of Greater Afghanistan and may become stronger. NATO should support this region with Chinese and Russian assistance. A substantial direct border with India would reduce their dependence on Pakistan for trade routes.

* Free Sindh: India should strongly support Sindh, as the Sindhis are favourably disposed towards her.

* POK and Northern Areas: Should revert to India to unify Kashmir and provide reliable transit routes to Afghanistan and Central Asia via Skardu and Gilgit or via Kashmir and NWFP. China would resist this idea because it would cut off their strategic access to Gwadar and the Arabian Sea unless alternatives can be devised to placate China. The Kashmir issue will be finally settled.

* Punjab: The heart of Pakistan will be upset and infuriated with their loss. This will drive home the message that the world will not be held hostage to terror tactics. They will no longer have the critical strategic and depth needed to advance their terror agenda. Punjab will now be preoccupied dealing with assertive new neighbours. The US should manage this territory and ensure the dismantling of all nuclear related assets.

Conclusion: All the new countries should be taken along the path of prosperity, peace and tolerance towards the world and their neighbors.

Terror Map | know your terrorists | What can we do?

Pakistan has been divided before and should be divided again to make for a safer world if it does not mend its ways. This plan may be the only solution to the chaos British left behind in 1947, unless Pakistan quickly reverses the course.

External link: Pervez Hoodbhoy on the Saudi-isation of Pakistan

Vijaykumar S. Kasi is an Interventional cardiologist with a keen interest in South Asia and India-Pakistan relations.

Atlantic Friend
02-06-2009, 12:45 PM
The "solution" to "The Problem" is to split Pakistan ?

Exactly what problem is it supposed to solve ?

Adux
02-06-2009, 12:48 PM
The "solution" to "The Problem" is to split Pakistan ?

Exactly what problem is it supposed to solve ?

A nuclear umberella , as well as breaking the back of the biggest promoters of terrorism ISI and PA.

Adux
02-06-2009, 12:50 PM
I actually would like to have a good debate, without all the emotional tantrums if this would actually reduce our problems in South Asia or not! If a split is to be carried how is the most effective safe way of carrying it out?
As of now West is held hostage by Pakistan threatening to Shoot itself, while India is the one paying the blood.

Alexandr
02-06-2009, 12:50 PM
thats all reasonable exept green part "to Afganistan",becouse such country didnt exist more than 30 years.

http://im.sify.com/sifycmsimg/feb2009/News/14851629_5.jpg

Adux
02-06-2009, 12:52 PM
Alexander,

Afghanistan doesnt support Durrand line!
But let me put a contrary view to author, is it prudent on our part to put more Pashtuns into Afghanistan? Or is it better to carve out a Pashtunistan out of Afghanistan and Pakistan?

Alexandr
02-06-2009, 12:54 PM
what we call "Afganistan" is in chaotic feodal phase,with local control of feodal units by small tzarzs

Atlantic Friend
02-06-2009, 12:56 PM
A nuclear umberella , as well as breaking the back of the biggest promoters of terrorism ISI and PA.

The parts "given" to Afghanistan will only serve to further destabilize that country.

As for Balushistan, Sindh and Punjab, I fail to see how they'll welcome partition and suddenly will become India's friends - or how, as the article puts it, they will "be taken along the path of prosperity, peace and tolerance towards the world and their neighbors".

Now I can totally see the interest for India : a land grab in northern Pakistan, and its neighbour gets replaced with several weaker states.

How is this partition supposed to happen, exactly ?

Adux
02-06-2009, 12:58 PM
I might agree with the giving it AFghanistan is a bad idea, more pashtuns means more trouble for the already minority tajiks and uzbeks etc

Why should they be India's friends? Balochi's love India though!

Yes you right, but not only good for India.

Implosion.

Rictor
02-06-2009, 01:05 PM
Pakistan would be no more dangerous had Bangladesh not seceded. In fact, it might be significantly less dangerous.

The people of Bangladesh are, apparently, not very predisposed towards hard-line Wahhabism or supporting terrorism. So their inclusion within the state of Pakistan would not increase the number of people or resources at the disposal of the Pakistani Taliban. And by having a huge electoral block that is opposed to Pashtun militancy, Pakistan might now be ruled by someone who would have the political clout to clamp down on the militants.

Not that I'm opposed to an independent Bangladesh - I don't care either way.

Adux
02-06-2009, 01:12 PM
Rictor,

You might have to rethink that!
Wahabbism is spreading like wildfire in South Asia, Bangladesh and India included!!!

This is mostly through the large number of Indian, Bangladeshi and Pakistan expartriates. . and the billions of petro dollars mushrooming up mosques all over India!!
You can read on HuJI!!

Gleipnir
02-07-2009, 01:28 PM
In theory, not a bad idea. Why not merge the tribal areas in Pakistan (the ones labelled to go to Afghanistan) with some in Afghanistan, and make that its own entity- Pashtunistan, if you will-\
that way one can attempt to contain the more radical elements in one nation and then sanction it heavily and lay down some serious trade embargoes in an attempt to reduce terrorist activity.

Brosulus
02-07-2009, 01:43 PM
India Strong!!!11oneoneeleven

Atlantic Friend
02-07-2009, 01:44 PM
Implosion.

Implosion ? Are there ethnic/national tensions within Pakistan that would make an implosion a possibility ?

Adux
02-07-2009, 03:11 PM
Implosion ? Are there ethnic/national tensions within Pakistan that would make an implosion a possibility ?

Very much, actually far more volatile than many would think.
How do you think last week's bomb attack was targetted at. There are ethnic, religious and regional struggles in Pakistan.