PDA

View Full Version : U.S. judges admit to jailing children for money.



Connaught Ranger
02-13-2009, 03:07 AM
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20090213/tod-oukoe-uk-crime-usa-judges-b7e5c6f.html
U.S. judges admit to jailing children for money.

6 hours 56 mins ago


http://l.yimg.com/i/i/uk/ne/reute.jpg (http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/*******online/SIG=114rh0n4s/**http%3A%2F%2Fwww.*******.co.uk%2F) Jon Hurdle Two judges pleaded guilty on Thursday to accepting more than $2.6 million from a private youth detention centre in Pennsylvania in return for giving hundreds of youths and teenagers long sentences.
Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan of the Court of Common Pleas in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, entered plea agreements in federal court in Scranton admitting that they took payoffs from PA Childcare and a sister company, Western PA Childcare, between 2003 and 2006.

"Your statement that I have disgraced my judgeship is true," Ciavarella wrote in a letter to the court. "My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame."

Conahan, who along with Ciavarella faces up to seven years in prison, did not make any comment on the case.

When someone is sent to a detention centre, the company running the facility receives money from the county government to defray the cost of incarceration. So as more children were sentenced to the detention centre, PA Childcare and Western PA Childcare received more money from the government, prosecutors said.

Teenagers who came before Ciavarella in juvenile court often were sentenced to detention centres for minor offences that would typically have been classified as misdemeanours, according to the Juvenile Law Centre, a Philadelphia nonprofit group.

One 17-year-old boy was sentenced to three months' detention for being in the company of another minor caught shoplifting.

Others were given similar sentences for "simple assault" resulting from a schoolyard scuffle that would normally draw a warning, a spokeswoman for the Juvenile Law Centre said.

The Constitution guarantees the right to legal representation in U.S. courts. But many of the juveniles appeared before Ciavarella without an attorney because they were told by the probation service that their minor offences didn't require one.

Marsha Levick, chief counsel for the Juvenile Law Centre, estimated that of approximately 5,000 juveniles who came before Ciavarella from 2003 and 2006, between 1,000 and 2,000 received excessively harsh detention sentences. She said the centre will sue the judges, PA Childcare and Western PA Childcare for financial compensation for their victims.

"That judges would allow their greed to trump the rights of defendants is just obscene," Levick said.

The judges attempted to hide their income from the scheme by creating false records and routing payments through intermediaries, prosecutors said.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court removed Ciavarella and Conahan from their duties after federal prosecutors filed charges on January 26. The court has also appointed a judge to review all the cases involved.

Hope they enjoy their prison time.woot

Connaught Ranger:)

Invisigoth
02-13-2009, 04:06 AM
That's why having private companies take over prison services is a really really really bad idea.

Mr Gently Benevolent
02-13-2009, 05:16 AM
That's why having private companies take over prison services is a really really really bad idea.There has been never any hard evidence that private prison enterprise has influenced judgements until now and I don't think that this case is a one of a kind.

Invisigoth
02-13-2009, 07:28 AM
There has been never any hard evidence that private prison enterprise has influenced judgements until now and I don't think that this case is a one of a kind.

It is in the interest of the company to have a maximum of inmates for a maximum of time; combine that with the company's ability to influence the stay of their inmates, sounds disastrous.

This however is extreme. Sending kids into detention centers for a schoolyard scuffle or for being in the presence of someone who is shoplifting? That's crazy.

Mr Gently Benevolent
02-13-2009, 07:34 AM
It is in the interest of the company to have a maximum of inmates for a maximum of time; combine that with the company's ability to influence the stay of their inmates, sounds disastrous.

This however is extreme. Sending kids into detention centers for a schoolyard scuffle or for being in the presence of someone who is shoplifting? That's crazy.Yep its in the interest of these companies to influence the criminal justice system I think most of us are blind to this fact. I must admit that making a case against private prisons makes one sound like a wet drippy gangsta lovin liberal.

gaijinsamurai
02-13-2009, 07:36 AM
I hope these judges enjoy their own period of incarceration.

I've always been against for-profit penal/correctional institutions, of any kind.

Fvck those companies too. I hope the parents of the kids sue them for every dime they've got, and then some.

seraosha
02-13-2009, 10:45 AM
I'd have to agree ganjin...this is ridiculous.

JJC
02-13-2009, 11:01 AM
Our criminal "justice" system is already decaying for decades, and something like this is very scary and should be alarming.

One Man Gang
02-13-2009, 11:17 AM
Yes, gentle readers, this is another of those "guess which party" articles. Nowhere in the ******* version (or in most others, for that matter) are we told the political party that claims these judges' affliation.

After searching through eight or ten versions of this story we find that, you guessed it, they both have the (D) after their names. About 3/4 of the way down is this:

http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/articles/2009/01/27/news/doc497eea6415f88653841483.prt


The appointment sparked a heated rivalry between Musto and Conahan and led to a brutal primary campaign, which included mutual charges of nepotism and campaign finance violations.

Conahan accused Democratic Party leaders of attempting to "strong arm" him out of the race, suggested he acquiesce to Musto and wait until 1995 to run for the seat that was being vacated by the retiring Judge Gifford S. Cappellini — a position that eventually went to Ciavarella.

Conahan charged "back-room politics" and "collusion" led to Casey's appointment of Musto and requested attorney Joseph A. Quinn resign from the Trial Court Nominating Commission, the panel that had recommended candidates for the Luzerne County vacancy. Quinn could not be impartial, Conahan said, because he hosted a party for Musto and solicited campaign contributions on his behalf.

Conahan announced his candidacy at the Ramada Hotel in Wilkes-Barre on Feb. 27, 1993, pledging to refuse contributions from attorneys or their spouses, so he could be a judge "with no strings attached."

If one of these vermin had been an (R) the "Today" show would have done all four hours on him this morning.

Hollis
02-13-2009, 11:18 AM
I hope these judges enjoy their own period of incarceration.

I've always been against for-profit penal/correctional institutions, of any kind.

Fvck those companies too. I hope the parents of the kids sue them for every dime they've got, and then some.


Exactly... Some cost saving ideas just don't work.

Irons
02-13-2009, 11:24 AM
Like my Daddy always taught me: "The only way to beat the system, is to stay out of it boy. Once you give them an excuse, they've got you, and once caught in that gravity...you're not likely to ever escape it." Trust that they system is always corrupt, and keep your head down, and nose clean; as good as it gets.

timetraveller
02-13-2009, 01:14 PM
Corruption is rife but it shows how much that company is making from the Goverment in which they had funds to have Judges in there back pockets ..

That Company is on par with the Mafia ..

khukuri
02-13-2009, 02:02 PM
both companies shoud be shutdown and their contracts be given to someone else

Laworkerbee
02-13-2009, 02:42 PM
How can a person sink so low?

Connaught Ranger
02-13-2009, 02:45 PM
How can a person sink so low?

"Money is the root of all evil!"p-)

Flagg
02-13-2009, 05:30 PM
As a parent myself, I cannot fathom the level of raging fury something like this would generate for a parent who's child was incarcerated for profit.

Horribly corrupt "public servants" like this combined with those guilty of detonating "weapons of mass financial destruction" need to receive punishments matching their crimes.

"Crimes against society" of this scale seem deserving of capital punishment.

Supe
02-14-2009, 02:49 AM
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20090213/tod-oukoe-uk-crime-usa-judges-b7e5c6f.htmlHope they enjoy their prison time.woot

Connaught Ranger:)

Sometimes you gotta believe in karma. What these judges did was absolutely disgraceful. They got off lightly considering the harm committed to children and undermining the criminal justice system.

deagle
02-14-2009, 09:45 PM
trust your govt right ?

its just a revenue trap.

i wonder what their punishments will be, and if they get any extra....like they gave those kids as they dropped the gavel with consciousness and no remorse, but only greed in their eyes.

Will Clark
02-15-2009, 03:57 AM
Corrupting the justice system should be punishable by death.