The New FBC-1

[chengwudi]

What do you think about it?
http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/034b.jpg
http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc1-5.jpg
http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc3.jpg
I like this one :P
http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc4.jpg
http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc1.jpg
http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc13.jpg
http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc12.jpg

[easyand]

What do you think about it?


http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc3.jpg


A bad copy of european Tornado

[Bayonet]

Yes, i think so ,it has two wings,it must be a copy of european Tornado

[easyand]

Yes, i think so ,it has two wings,it must be a copy of european Tornado

Tornado
http://www.graffitiscuola.it/Galleria/Alessandro%20Borsetti/Foto/tornado_adv_raf_takeoff_fairford98_01.jpg

FBC-1

http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc3.jpg

[easyand]

Probably isn't a copy but is "deeply inspired"

[ZeroPositive]

nice photos :D

[Fenna]

It's got Jaguar wheels too

[Uncle Chô]

Overall looking remembers me of the Sepecat Jaguar or Mitsubishi F-1...

The nose from the Mig 29, the windshield is from the Mig 23/27 serie, the aircraft's rear is more like the genuine J-8.

p-)

[Xingbake]

The latest version JH-7A

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/6615/JH-7A-05-23-2004a.jpg
http://air.xuexue.net/pla/gfx/fbc1/jh7a_1.jpg

http://air.xuexue.net/pla/gfx/fbc1/jh7a_2.jpg

[Lysander]

http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc3.jpg

I never saw intakes like these on the FBC-1.


easyand...A bad copy of european Tornado

Not Tornado. It's a bigger version of this:


http://www.combataircraft.com/aircraft/fj22_p_01_l.jpg

http://www.combataircraft.com/aircraft/fj22_p_02_l.jpg

http://www.combataircraft.com/aircraft/fj22_p_03_l.jpg

http://www.combataircraft.com/aircraft/fj22_p_04_l.jpg

http://www.combataircraft.com/aircraft/fj22_p_05_l.jpg

pictures from: http://www.combataircraft.com/aircraft/fj22.asp

[Xingbake]

This one is photoshopped ;) ;)

http://member.netease.com/~rxj/pic/fbc3.jpg

[usa320]

definatley not a tornado copy...no swing wings.

Looks more similar to the Q-5C Fantan or the Mirage F-1C. Or even a SPECAT Jaguar.

[ShadowNeo]

It does, to me, look like a Tornado and a Jaguar combined, but thats not necessarily a bad thing :).

Is it currently in service? If so may I ask how many there in service?

[SpikeATGM]

Ye I have to agree with the Jaguar, take a look >



then you should take a better look at Japenese F1

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_01.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_02.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_03.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_04.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_05.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_06.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_07.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_08.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_09.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_10.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_11.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_12.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_13.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_14.jpg

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/f-1/gallery/f-1_15.jpg

[Ezra Coli]

Is it just me or do these still seem to maintain a lot of the features of 1950s and 60s era MiGs? I never understood some of the Chinese designs, they seem to have lots of potential for greatness but they keep legacy technology from the MiGs that are not optimal.

I like it as an aircraft, but it looks like something that should have been designed in the late 1960s.

[ZoneOne]

Ok well first off -- you all are wrong

I have been doing extensive research for the past few minutes and i have concluded with this

The plane is an exact copy of this plane

http://www.chez.com/lesovnis/pics/a17.jpg

As you can see - it's almost an exact replica

For a different angle check this picture out

http://www.kayakketchikan.com/photos/flightseeing/pic6.jpg

As you can see -- these planes are almost exactly the same

The one on the top is in flight

the other, is docked, and had just recieved a new paint job to make it clerely look like a small prop plane


WOW

:-*$[/img]

[RomanS]

nice photos.

but there is something about the Chinese planes, I don't know how to explain. Not sexy, there you go.

THey just look meh.

Like this is an example of sexy



http://www.airwar.ru/photo/su37/su-37.jpg

http://tafb.gulfcoast.edu/gccc_files/f-15.jpg

http://proft.50megs.com/f-16.jpg

http://www.flygplan.info/images/MIG-29-2.jpg

no flame here, just an opinion.

[SpikeATGM]

Every plane has two wings. A vertical stabiliser, an elavator and aileron and not forgetting the flaps.

For as long as the chinese plane has this charcteristics, it must be a case of them copying from of their western counterpart.

Funny how come no one is accussing the japs of copying the jaguar?:)

[Bayonet]

Every plane has two wings. A vertical stabiliser, an elavator and aileron and not forgetting the flaps.

For as long as the chinese plane has this charcteristics, it must be a case of them copying from of their western counterpart.

Funny how come no one is accussing the japs of copying the jaguar?:)


Fully agreed!!! Cheers..... :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

[Bayonet]

nice photos.

but there is something about the Chinese planes, I don't know how to explain. Not sexy, there you go.

THey just look meh.

Like this is an example of sexy

no flame here, just an opinion.

Good opinion..thank u ..and what do u think about J-10?

Is it sexy or sexier than former chinese planes??

[Xingbake]

nice photos.

but there is something about the Chinese planes, I don't know how to explain. Not sexy, there you go.

THey just look meh.

Like this is an example of sexy

no flame here, just an opinion.

Well.....I thinking maybe it's because most Chinese planes before were copied from Russia : ) Just kidding

J-10 looks much better:

http://mil.jschina.com.cn/JIATELIN/pla/gfx/j10/j10_8.jpg