You have realised...

[Scottie]

You have realised that the coalition will have to eliminate all of the Iraq's practically since more and more and more and more will join up as rebels.... BTW doesn n e 1 know the current population of Iraqs civilians now?

[Secret Squirrel]

You have realised that the coalition will have to eliminate all of the Iraq's practically since more and more and more and more will join up as rebels.... BTW doesn n e 1 know the current population of Iraqs civilians now?

Keep the genocidal B.S out of here please. woot

[digrar]

If you're going to spout crap, is there any chance that you could remove the Australian from your avatar?

Pop about 20,000,000

[MolliG]

25,374,691 (July 2004 est.)

0-14 years: 40.3% (male 5,198,966; female 5,039,173)
15-64 years: 56.7% (male 7,280,167; female 7,094,688)
65 years and over: 3% (male 357,651; female 404,046) (2004 est.)

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/iz.html

[ChuckThunder]

You have realised that the coalition will have to eliminate all of the Iraq's practically since more and more and more and more will join up as rebels.... BTW doesn n e 1 know the current population of Iraqs civilians now?

Ah, yes. You'd know because you're there right?

[Old300]

"Iraqis back new leaders, poll says"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3433-2004Jun24.html

"Four out of every five Iraqis expected that the new government will "make things better" for Iraq after the handover, with 10 percent expecting the situation to remain the same and 7 percent anticipating a decline, the poll shows."

Yes, we'll have to kill 'em all! Jackass.

[mack pl]

Nukem all woot

/\ yeah, ideal strategy :cantbeli:


PS. seriously, we must killing only fukin terrorists, not theirs familys, neighbours etc. :|

[Scottie]

Hey guys i didnt mean to offend anyone, it was just a figure of speech...

Think about it how many terrorists are there in Iraq?

How many people dont like the coalition thats occupying Iraq..Many.

A lot of people are gonna be wanting to fight them.....just saying maybe around 1/2 the male population (I'm probably wrong) will want to fight back and thats 7,280,167 / 2 = 3,640,083 people...

It doesnt seem like any terrorists are surrendering or being caught...

Again i'm sorry if i offended anyone.

[mack pl]

Hey guys i didnt mean to offend anyone, it was just a figure of speech...

Think about it how many terrorists are there in Iraq?

How many people dont like the coalition thats occupying Iraq..Many.

A lot of people are gonna be wanting to fight them.....just saying maybe around 1/2 the male population (I'm probably wrong) will want to fight back and thats 7,280,167 / 2 = 3,640,083 people...

It doesnt seem like any terrorists are surrendering or being caught...

Again i'm sorry if i offended anyone.

well, you are too pesimistic bro ;) If half of male population of Iraqis wanna fight against coalition, it will be the biggest uprising in world history ;)

yeah, a lot of iraqis dont like coalition, but only small number are active in fight(IED, mortar attacks etc.). BTW very dangerous are fukin terrorists, who are foreigners vide fukhead Al-Zarqvi :-*$

so, Im guessing only some number of iraqis really fighting, Im sure not 50%, huh, it could be big **** If 50% of population wanna fight against coalition :cantbeli:

regards

[Deuterium]

Hey guys i didnt mean to offend anyone, it was just a figure of speech...

Think about it how many terrorists are there in Iraq?

How many people dont like the coalition thats occupying Iraq..Many.

A lot of people are gonna be wanting to fight them.....just saying maybe around 1/2 the male population (I'm probably wrong) will want to fight back and thats 7,280,167 / 2 = 3,640,083 people...

It doesnt seem like any terrorists are surrendering or being caught...

Again i'm sorry if i offended anyone.

And you know this info because????????? Let me guess:

1. You've been to Iraq.
2. You know many Iraqis personally.
3. You've been in combat yourself.
4. You have a axe to grind.

I'm guessing it's 4

[Old300]

This is easily resolved by looking at polls. And although recent polls have showed abysmal Iraqi support for the US occupation, they've revealed quite impressive support for the interim government.

The vast majority of bombings and mortar attacks over the past couple of months have been aimed at Iraqi civil and defense institutions, not coalition personnel.

And because there is such (relatively) great support of the interim government, one must conclude that the people perpetrating attacks like those of yesterday represent a very, very small minority of Iraqi public opinion.

In other words, the targets of recent attacks have been institutions that are opposed by less than 10% of the population (see my post citing the latest poll in the Washington Post above); therefore, the terrorists represent a miniscule portion of Iraqis.

[5jumpchump]

Two things could help . Martial law and closing the boarders for a few day until the transfer of power is handed over . Why aren't they closing the boarders ? Fail .

[OB Kenobi]

Hey guys i didnt mean to offend anyone, it was just a figure of speech...

Think about it how many terrorists are there in Iraq?

How many people dont like the coalition thats occupying Iraq..Many.

A lot of people are gonna be wanting to fight them.....just saying maybe around 1/2 the male population (I'm probably wrong) will want to fight back and thats 7,280,167 / 2 = 3,640,083 people...

It doesnt seem like any terrorists are surrendering or being caught...

Again i'm sorry if i offended anyone.

Why are you calling them all terrorists? Just because they don't like the coalition doesn't mean they're terrorists. Maybe you should remember who's country it is and who invaded it.

[American Patriot]

When will the American people realize the threat of Islamist terror and that Bush doesn't invade countries so his "oil buddies" can profit.

[Old300]

Hey guys i didnt mean to offend anyone, it was just a figure of speech...

Think about it how many terrorists are there in Iraq?

How many people dont like the coalition thats occupying Iraq..Many.

A lot of people are gonna be wanting to fight them.....just saying maybe around 1/2 the male population (I'm probably wrong) will want to fight back and thats 7,280,167 / 2 = 3,640,083 people...

It doesnt seem like any terrorists are surrendering or being caught...

Again i'm sorry if i offended anyone.

Why are you calling them all terrorists? Just because they don't like the coalition doesn't mean they're terrorists. Maybe you should remember who's country it is and who invaded it.

Remember that the vast majority of the people who these terrorists/militants/freedomfighters have killed have been Iraqis, and most of these Iraqis have been civilians. If the people setting off the bombs and launching the mortars and doing the shootings were targetting US and coalition personnel exclusively, I'd have to concede that they're not terrorists: I'd say that they're fighting occupiers and therefore represent some kind of nationalist Iraqi movement (I'd say that their "occupiers" are, in fact, liberators, but I can see how a lot of Iraqis would resent us, regardless of how noble our intentions and how costly our sacrifice on their behalf). So yes, if things were different, maybe it'd be incorrect to call them "terrorists".

But the simple fact of the matter is that these people who you're reluctant to call terrorists are blowing up not just (civil) policemen, but women, children, old men, and other innocent bystanders.

They're terrorists and I look forward to the day - a week from now, actually - when Iraqis put them in their place. Which is a big hole in the ground.

[OB Kenobi]

When will the American people realize the threat of Islamist terror and that Bush doesn't invade countries so his "oil buddies" can profit.

You're right, that's not the primary reason, but that's one of the criteria for selecting which country to attack.

Old300, they are doing this so sloppily because they have no other alternative. They don't go around trying to kill Iraqis who are not cooperating with Bush.

Lastly, keep in mind that some of the "terrorists" really are terrorists from Al Qaeda and other organizations, they've got different motivations than the Baathists.

Read this interview with two of Saddam's generals who are commanding the Baathist part of the resistance, they point out that some of the worst atrocities over there are being done by Al Qaeda/foreigners and not by them:

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=18141

[Secret Squirrel]

Two things could help . Martial law and closing the boarders for a few day until the transfer of power is handed over . Why aren't they closing the boarders ? Fail .

They patrol the borders already, but theres not enough man power. Whats martial law going to do? it's already pretty much marshal law, just without the lable.

[Midtown]

It doesnt seem like any terrorists are surrendering or being caught...

Again i'm sorry if i offended anyone.

They are being shot.

[shrek]

Hey, Germany was full of "terrorists" at one time. We didn't kill all of them and it's a pretty nice place to live now, huh?

[Secret Squirrel]

Hey, Germany was full of "terrorists" at one time. We didn't kill all of them and it's a pretty nice place to live now, huh?

Hope you're not referring to Germany after the second world war, because the male population was mostly mentally and physically damaged; giving way for the "women of the ruble" to rise. And before anyone shouts out "hey what about the werewolves!", they managed one assassination and thats pretty much it. Post-war Germany contained no note-worthy insurgent threat to the occupation.

[Ngati Tumatauenga]

secret squirrel wrote,

Hope you're not referring to Germany after the second world war, because the male population was mostly mentally and physically damaged; giving way for the "women of the ruble" to rise. And before anyone shouts out "hey what about the werewolves!", they managed one assassination and thats pretty much it. Post-war Germany contained no note-worthy insurgent threat to the occupation.

So the Red Army Faction and the Baader Meinhof gang, etc, don't count as terrorists then?.

[usa320]

contrary to what the dumb****s are saying, the insurgents appear to be losing steam.

Most iraqis, some 73% support the new government.

Zarquawi is a walking deadman.

Al-Sadr appears to have backed down.

As they continue to kill about 30 Iraqis for every one American, more and more people will realize that these people are brutal killers and certainly not doing the work of Islam, but the total opposite.

[Black Dots]

So the Red Army Faction and the Baader Meinhof gang, etc, don't count as terrorists then?.

Sure they do, but they didn't form a serious insurgent threat. Despite people fearing them, they never achieved broad support from the populace for an overthrow of the government.

[rokus2595]

You have realised that the coalition will have to eliminate all of the Iraq's practically since more and more and more and more will join up as rebels.... BTW doesn n e 1 know the current population of Iraqs civilians now?

Right....which should also make you realize another thing: for the Iraqi guerillas to enjoy such a broad support, it also means that the majority of Iraqis think they are right, and support them in their fight agains the occupiers.

The American occupiers should leave Iraq. They are not wanted there.