PDA

View Full Version : Vietnam War Myths



hist2004
06-26-2004, 05:31 PM
Myth:
The average age of an infantryman fighting in Vietnam was 19.
Assuming KIAs accurately represented age groups serving in Vietnam, the average age of an infantryman serving in Vietnam to be 19 years old is a myth, it is actually 22.8. None of the enlisted grades have an average age of less than 20.
The average man who fought in World War II was 26 years of age.

Myth:
The domino theory was proved false.
The domino theory was accurate. The ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) countries, Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand stayed free of Communism because of the U.S. commitment to Vietnam. The Indonesians threw the Soviets out in 1966 because of America's commitment in Vietnam. Without that commitment, Communism would have swept all the way to the Malacca Straits that is south of Singapore and of great strategic importance to the free world. If you ask people who live in these countries that won the war in Vietnam, they have a different opinion from the American news media. The Vietnam War was the turning point for Communism.

Myth:
The fighting in Vietnam was not as intense as in World War II.
The average infantryman in the South Pacific during World War II saw about 40 days of combat in four years. The average infantryman in Vietnam saw about 240 days of combat in one year thanks to the mobility of the helicopter.
One out of every 10 Americans who served in Vietnam was a casualty. 58,169 were killed and 304,000 wounded out of 2.59 million who served. Although the percent who died is similar to other wars, amputations or crippling wounds were 300 percent higher than in World War II. 75,000 Vietnam veterans are severely disabled.
MEDEVAC helicopters flew nearly 500,000 missions. Over 900,000 patients were airlifted (nearly half were American). The average time lapse between wounding to hospitalization was less than one hour. As a result, less than one percent of all Americans wounded who survived the first 24 hours died.
The helicopter provided unprecedented mobility. Without the helicopter it would have taken three times as many troops to secure the 800 mile border with Cambodia and Laos (the politicians thought the Geneva Conventions of 1954 and the Geneva Accords or 1962 would secure the border)
The 1990 unsuccessful movie "Air America" helped to establish the myth of a connection between Air America, the CIA, and the Laotian drug trade. The movie and a book the movie was based on contend that the CIA condoned a drug trade conducted by a Laotian client; both agree that Air America provided the essential transportation for the trade; and both view the pilots with sympathetic understanding. American-owned airlines never knowingly transported opium in or out of Laos, nor did their American pilots ever profit from its transport. Yet undoubtedly every plane in Laos carried opium at some time, unknown to the pilot and his superiors.

Myth:
Most Vietnam veterans were drafted.
2/3 of the men who served in Vietnam were volunteers. 2/3 of the men who served in World War II were drafted. Approximately 70% of those killed were volunteers.

Myth:
The media have reported that suicides among Vietnam veterans range from 50,000 to 100,000 - 6 to 11 times the non-Vietnam veteran population.
Mortality studies show that 9,000 is a better estimate. "The CDC Vietnam Experience Study Mortality Assessment showed that during the first 5 years after discharge, deaths from suicide were 1.7 times more likely among Vietnam veterans than non-Vietnam veterans. After that initial post-service period, Vietnam veterans were no more likely to die from suicide than non-Vietnam veterans. In fact, after the 5-year post-service period, the rate of suicides is less in the Vietnam veterans' group."

Myth:
A disproportionate number of blacks were killed in the Vietnam War.
86% of the men who died in Vietnam were Caucasians, 12.5% were black, 1.2% were other races.
Sociologists Charles C. Moskos and John Sibley Butler, in their recently published book "All That We Can Be," said they analyzed the claim that blacks were used like cannon fodder during Vietnam "and can report definitely that this charge is untrue.
Black fatalities amounted to 12 percent of all Americans killed in Southeast Asia - a figure proportional to the number of blacks in the U.S. population at the time and slightly lower than the proportion of blacks in the Army at the close of the war."

Myth:
The war was fought largely by the poor and uneducated.
Servicemen who went to Vietnam from well-to-do areas had a slightly elevated risk of dying because they were more likely to be pilots or infantry officers.

Myth:
The United States lost the war in Vietnam.
The American military was not defeated in Vietnam. The American military did not lose a battle of any consequence. From a military standpoint, it was almost an unprecedented performance. (Westmoreland quoting Douglas Pike, a professor at the University of California, Berkley a renowned expert on the Vietnam War) [Westmoreland] This included Tet 68, which was a major military defeat for the VC and NVA.

Myth:
Kim Phuc, the little nine year old Vietnamese girl running naked from the napalm strike near Trang Bang on 8 June 1972, was burned by Americans bombing Trang Bang.
No American had involvement in this incident near Trang Bang that burned Phan Thi Kim Phuc. The planes doing the bombing near the village were VNAF (Vietnam Air Force) and were being flown by Vietnamese pilots in support of South Vietnamese troops on the ground.
The Vietnamese pilot who dropped the napalm in error is currently living in the United States. Even the AP photographer, Nick Ut, who took the picture was Vietnamese. The incident in the photo took place on the second day of a three day battle between the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) who occupied the village of Trang Bang and the ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam) who were trying to force the NVA out of the village.
Recent reports in the news media that an American commander ordered the air strike that burned Kim Phuc are incorrect. There were no Americans involved in any capacity. "We (Americans) had nothing to do with controlling VNAF," according to Lieutenant General (Ret) James F. Hollingsworth, the Commanding General of TRAC at that time. Also, it has been incorrectly reported that two of Kim Phuc's brothers were killed in this incident. They were Kim's cousins not her brothers.

Regards,
Hist2004

DE_Six
06-26-2004, 06:41 PM
Very interesting post, hist2004. Thanks!

Some of those were debunked in many books, unfortunately they are widely ignored because myths are more attractive, I guess.

Laconian
06-26-2004, 07:19 PM
Good post. Thanks for the research hist2004

AFACadet
06-26-2004, 08:29 PM
I agree with those two :)

100_Percent_HOOAH
06-26-2004, 08:47 PM
Damn, that was one of the most informative posts I've read in awhile. Thanks for the info!

Yosy
06-26-2004, 09:49 PM
Good post, but:


The domino theory was accurate

I don't that we can say this. There is no definte proof that Vietnam was what kept all those countries from falling into Comunism. USSR was much more worried with Eastern Europe (eurcomunism, open rebellion against USSR, etc).



The United States lost the war in Vietnam.
The American military was not defeated in Vietnam

True, from a strict military view USA won. But, like Clausewitz said, "war is the continuation of politics by other means" and USA lost the war. We can say that America lost the war, but won the battles.

AFACadet
06-26-2004, 11:03 PM
For the first point, many of those DID fall to communism--just one example, Pathet Lao anyone?

For the second point, I must agree, we did lose the war. You have objectives in a war. You meet those objectives, you win, you don't meet those objectives, you lose.

In total wars, that means you will win or lose your contry. In limited wars, that means you have a set of goals. We had a set of goals in Vietnam that we didn't meet. On the military side of things, we kicked butt any way you look at it, but on the political side--in limited wars, the whole reason they are fought--we outright lost.

stuntman
06-27-2004, 12:03 AM
Wow great post! This only proves that the first casualty in war is always the truth. By the way didn't vietnam fall about 2 years after we pulled out? (I think)
So in respect we didn't simply lose we lost in a complicated way, Initiative, support and the will of the popular government.

mocking_loudly_died
06-27-2004, 02:10 AM
You can win all the battles but that doesn't mean you won the war - sorry but that was a notch on the defeat belt, re-writing it as "oh but we won all the battles, so we won the conflict" is laughable.

Christ, going by that logic, Britain won the American war of independence due to their superior military victories.

Now tone down the patriotism and learn from the past.

Ratamacue
06-27-2004, 02:13 AM
Vietnam was a military victory until politics failed it. If the US had simply committed to the war in full and neutralized North Vietnam rather than sitting there defending, the war probably would have been much shorter and would have had fewer casualties. But alas, it's done with, and it was a defeat. Sorry stuntman.

b.scheller
06-27-2004, 02:20 AM
Not all battles were won by the Americans. Sure, perhaps they may have reached their targets but with what? Hundred of young servicemen being sent in a box home? Mostly from friendly fire incidents...?

Anyway, the domino theory can not be proven. Not everyone wanted communism, thats a fact. The only reason alot of the Indo-China nations fell to the red rule was mainly because they had a weak unstable government. The communists had power and the support of the locals (not everyone). Alot of the toppling of governments was done by the Moscow educated communists, more then likely KGB lackeys. None of these nations in reality wanted communism. Thats what unfortunetly Truman failed to see, his belief was that the nations would start falling because people would be attracted to the sense of unitarianism and utopia...

Ratamacue
06-27-2004, 02:27 AM
Not all battles were won by the Americans. Sure, perhaps they may have reached their targets but with what? Hundred of young servicemen being sent in a box home? Mostly from friendly fire incidents...?
Most battles were won by the US, and the casualties ratio of US/NVA wasn't very close to even. Maybe you've forgotten, but when side #1 achieves their objective in a battle and has fewer casualties than side #2, it's usually considered a victory for side #1.


Anyway, the domino theory can not be proven. Not everyone wanted communism, thats a fact. The only reason alot of the Indo-China nations fell to the red rule was mainly because they had a weak unstable government. The communists had power and the support of the locals (not everyone). Alot of the toppling of governments was done by the Moscow educated communists, more then likely KGB lackeys. None of these nations in reality wanted communism. Thats what unfortunetly Truman failed to see, his belief was that the nations would start falling because people would be attracted to the sense of unitarianism and utopia...
See this (http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3376) post by ogukuo72 from awhile back. Made me look at the Vietnam War and the idea of containment a bit different when I read it

stuntman
06-27-2004, 02:45 AM
Vietnam was a military victory until politics failed it. If the US had simply committed to the war in full and neutralized North Vietnam rather than sitting there defending, the war probably would have been much shorter and would have had fewer casualties. But alas, it's done with, and it was a defeat. Sorry stuntman.

Why sorry? I actually agree with everything you mention.
As you can see I never said we won at all just stating it wasn't just simply a basic loss.
stuntman wrote

So in respect we didn't simply lose we lost in a complicated way, Initiative, support and the will of the popular government. See?


If the US had simply committed to the war in full and neutralized North Vietnam rather than sitting there defending, the war probably would have been much shorter and would have had fewer casualties

My uncle Mo was in Nam and he told me one day the same exact thing.

So I'm not being a blind patriot I just disagree when it's mentioned we simply lost! Although we simply did... lol I lost my point!

Ratamacue
06-27-2004, 02:47 AM
Alright, that works for me. ;)

b.scheller
06-27-2004, 03:21 AM
Sure the U.S casualties never amounted to the Vietnamese, but wheren't they in vain?

Communism would have eventually fallen, the domino theory wouldn't have taken all of Asia. At least I highly doubt in that. The nations with the unstable governments would either fall into a communist dictatorship or a fascist one. I mean, lets look at the facts. How many nations did the United States stop from becoming communist? Can we even put that on paper, its impossible to tell. If anything, its a personal opinion. Anyway the war in Vietnam only strengthened the communist cause. The fresh images of death, starvation, brutality, bombing. It has a great effect, in some cases people will rather support the devil then go towards the side that eventually will have benefits.

Anyway you have to remember that the unstable and corrupt governments and the collonial outposts told the subjects that they were living in a free democratic society. Surely alot of those who believed that slavery was democracy did not want to be a part of it.

Anyway, I personally think that the war was a huge mistake; made by politicians and the chiefs of staff. I'm not insulting those who had served and those who had died there, I respect them; but its m personal opinion it was pointless. Just like the Soviet Afghanistan...

hist2004
06-27-2004, 08:52 AM
Not all battles were won by the Americans. Sure, perhaps they may have reached their targets but with what? Hundred of young servicemen being sent in a box home? Mostly from friendly fire incidents...?


Provide battle data of VC/NVA victories???....mostly from friendly fire???
Again provide data. VC/NVA executed successful small unit ambushes, but
won no major battlefield victories.

Regards,
Hist2004

Herrmannek
06-27-2004, 09:11 AM
woot , I like falling myths

LongWay
06-27-2004, 10:59 AM
Well the Australians didn't lose very many battles even tho just under 500 men died.

Todd022
06-27-2004, 11:05 AM
GREAT post! Maybe someday the general public will get their heads out of their asses about Vietnam. :backhand:

gilgoul
06-27-2004, 11:57 AM
cool post, really informative and interresting, thank you woot

Bombtrack
06-27-2004, 12:46 PM
Great post for the most part


Myth:
The war was fought largely by the poor and uneducated.
Servicemen who went to Vietnam from well-to-do areas had a slightly elevated risk of dying because they were more likely to be pilots or infantry officers.

However, this doesn't really dispel the "myth" in question

WolverineBlue
06-27-2004, 01:46 PM
Remember this tune? In Vietnam nuh-nuh-nuh nineteen nineteen.

Bombtrack
06-27-2004, 02:37 PM
what is it