View Full Version : Does anyone have a picture of a FN FAL with... >>
One_A
06-30-2004, 11:04 AM
...the DSArms full-length rail interface front handguard on?
Thanks
Al
pretorian669
06-30-2004, 01:12 PM
This one?
http://img11.photobucket.com/albums/v34/pretorian669/ggashley02.jpg
http://img11.photobucket.com/albums/v34/pretorian669/dsa_sa58_14.jpg
One_A
06-30-2004, 02:26 PM
Nice. As bad as this may sound, I'd prefer pictures without the ladies...thanks anyway Pretorian669.
Also, I'd like to see the full length rail handguards on the FAL.
Mark Sman
06-30-2004, 04:28 PM
I would like to respectfully disagree with One_A's first statement.
I think this young lady is a wonderful presenter.
i guess im like one a.
i love naked women, but seeing them holding guns with a forced smile does nothing for me.
landshark
06-30-2004, 05:39 PM
I've read that they are not very accurate, is it true?
yiorgo
07-01-2004, 12:51 AM
EXTREMELY accurate.....one of the best battle rifles ......easy to operate..308....accurate as hell....and a breeze to break down and clean....i owned an M1A and traded it for my DSA STG58 FAL...and yes i have the integrated handguard as well....when you shoot this rifle felt recoil is same as 762x39 VERY smooth
DeltaWhisky58
07-01-2004, 05:59 AM
I've read that they are not very accurate, is it true?
Ask anyone who faced up to British forces from 1958 until the early 90s about that one - I think you may be mistaken.
From personal experience both in the field and on the range there was nothing wrong with accuracy - well not with our L1A1 SLR anyway.
oldsoak
07-01-2004, 06:16 AM
I've read that they are not very accurate, is it true?
Ask anyone who faced up to British forces from 1958 until the early 90s about that one - I think you may be mistaken.
From personal experience both in the field and on the range there was nothing wrong with accuracy - well not with our L1A1 SLR anyway.
Certainly good enough to knock over targets very consistently at the ranges at 500m . Beyond that I cant say because I never got to use the SLR on a range greater than 500m. Some deadeye ****s in the shooting team got to play on a long range at Bisley and were happy with the results.
gilgoul
07-01-2004, 07:46 AM
I've read that they are not very accurate, is it true?
plenly, NO
The FAL was one of the most ubiquitous and successful assault rifle in the world, and if some local production might not face the standart set by FN hertzal, the belgium one at least is one of the most accurate AR ever.
landshark
07-01-2004, 10:55 AM
Thanks guys. I had read in S.W.A.T. magazine that the American made DSA FA58 FAL was "disappointingly" inaccurate, but you guys seem to be sure that is not the case. It would not be the first time S.W.A.T. mag was wrong. :)
yiorgo
07-01-2004, 12:14 PM
S.W.A.T mag was DEAD wrong DSA makes the best FALs in the US hands down and like i said ACCURATE AS HELL......did they have some pansy shooting the rifle for the article?...its not just the gun but the person squeezing the trigger as well
landshark
07-01-2004, 12:28 PM
S.W.A.T mag was DEAD wrong DSA makes the best FALs in the US hands down and like i said ACCURATE AS HELL......did they have some pansy shooting the rifle for the article?...its not just the gun but the person squeezing the trigger as well
Honestly I think you're right. I have a feeling it was the author, not the rifle that was inaccurate.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.