PDA

View Full Version : 10 banks get OK to repay bailout funds



Soldat_Américain
06-09-2009, 12:06 PM
10 big banks get OK to repay $68 billion in bailout money



The banks, including Bank of America and Wells Fargo, have submitted acceptable capital-raising plans. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner calls the repayments 'an encouraging sign.'
By Jim Puzzanghera
8:29 AM PDT, June 9, 2009
Reporting from Washington -- The Obama administration today announced it has given approval to 10 of the nation's largest banks to repay $68 billion in government bailout money they have received to stabilize the financial system.

"These repayments are an encouraging sign of financial repair, but we still have work to do," Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said.
The Treasury Department, which administers the $700 billion bailout fund, did not name the banks. And it was unclear whether all the banks that have received approval to repay the money will actually do so.

But several large financial institutions, including Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, have been pushing to repay the bailout money, which many of them said they were forced to take last fall by then Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. Large banks have chafed at executive compensation restrictions and other strings attached to the bailout money.

More than 600 banks have received about $199 billion from the bailout fund, which was initially called the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. The Obama administration has changed the name to the Capital Purchase Program. The government received preferred stock in the institutions and warrants to purchase additional stock as part of the investments. The banks also were required to pay dividends on the preferred stock, and so far the government has received $4.5 billion in such payments.


Several smaller banks already have been allowed to repay their bailout money, totaling about $1.9 billion so far. But the Obama administration has been concerned about the implications of some of the nation's largest banks repaying their bailout money, fearing that a rush to return the money could prevent the banks from having enough capital to continue lending.

The Treasury Department, in conjunction with the Federal Reserve and other bank regulators, conducted stress tests of the 19 largest banks this spring to see if they had enough capital to withstand worse-than-expected economic conditions. Nine of the banks passed the test, but 10 others were required to raise a total of $75 billion in capital as a cushion against potential future losses on bad mortgage loans and other investments if the recession worsened.

Those banks have been working on plans to raise the money in recent weeks and faced a Monday deadline to submit those plans to the government. The Federal Reserve said Monday that the 10 banks, including Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co., had submitted acceptable capital-raising plans.

The Treasury Department said today that banks that repay their bailout money will have the right to repurchase the government warrants "at fair market value."

The Financial Services Roundtable, which represents large banks, said the announcement by Geithner today showed the industry is strong.

"The financial services industry is well-capitalized," said Steve Bartlett, the group's president. "This is a positive sign for the industry and the economy."
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-tarp10-2009jun10,0,1405965.story

See of course it's getting better.

CMNot
06-09-2009, 12:52 PM
That's nuts. You've got a load of banks receiving a good bit less than our 4/5 banks, one of which is about to repay $3bn...and we think of that over here as good lol.

NineLine
06-09-2009, 03:35 PM
Hmmm, I wonder where all of this "new" cash came from. Hard assets sold and turned over into cash or liquid earnings from investors? Me thinks the latter, which is not really great but not that bad either. Just some people probably lost their jobs.

Arsenal
06-09-2009, 03:51 PM
Hmmm, I wonder where all of this "new" cash came from. Hard assets sold and turned over into cash or liquid earnings from investors? Me thinks the latter, which is not really great but not that bad either. Just some people probably lost their jobs.

Probably from the decrease in competition from smaller banks taken over by the FDIC. The Fed steps in and sells the small bank's loan assets for pennies on the dollar to private investors, who interestingly enough, get loans through the TARP funded powerhouses. Suddenly, a devalued commercial venture in cash flowing, when in market rate times, it was floundering.

I'm glad that these banks are getting the government out of their pocket, but it is wreaking havok on commercial asset prices.

sinophile
06-09-2009, 05:24 PM
Banks like Northern Trust never needed the TARP money and had the cash in the bank to pay it off on day one. Others, like JP Morgan, didn't need the money and had a balance sheet that made it easy payoff TARP.

The others went into the markets and raised the money by new stock offerings. Investors bought and even oversubscribed to those sales I might add.

Asset sales really have nothing to do with the payback at this point. If you're in pain because of declining asset prices it has more to do with constrained lending and a lack of liquidity then major bank balance sheets.

NineLine
06-09-2009, 05:44 PM
^^^Good ****. I knew my business minor would coming in handy someday. 3 years ago both replies above would've sounded like something from a Dr. Seuss book to my ears.