PDA

View Full Version : Annan to Sudan: You Have 48 Hours



2Sheds_Jackson
07-01-2004, 03:29 PM
From AP


Annan to Sudan: You Have 48 Hours
Thursday, July 01, 2004

KHARTOUM, Sudan — U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan told Sudan's government that he wants to see progress within 48 hours resolving a bitter conflict in the Darfur region, which his officials say has led to the world's worst humanitarian crisis.

As Annan joined Secretary of State Colin Powell on an unusually high-powered visit Wednesday, the United States called on the United Nations to impose an arms embargo and travel ban on Arab militias blamed for attacks on African villagers in Darfur (search).

The U.S. draft would put the U.N. Security Council on record expressing "its determination to do everything possible to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe, including by taking further action if required."

Annan has raised the possibility of sending in international troops if Sudan's government can't protect its people in the vast and desolate western region. Humanitarian workers have likened the attacks to ethnic cleansing.

"I think we all have a responsibility to act urgently to deal with the situation in Darfur," Annan told Sudanese Cabinet ministers Wednesday.

"We have worked together for a long time, and I hope this time we are going to take such measures that we don't have people in camps for years to come," Annan said. "I think we should be able to make some real progress in the next 24 to 48 hours."


Powell said he had given Sudanese leaders a timetable to implement its commitments to disarm the militias, known as the Janjaweed (search), as well as lift restrictions on relief workers and seek a resolution to the crisis. While he did not specify any deadlines, he said: "We are talking within days and weeks."

Powell briefed Annan about the steps the United States wants Sudan to take during a meeting upon his return from a trip to Darfur. Annan in turn informed Powell about his meeting with Cabinet ministers, U.N. associate spokesman Stephane Dujarric said at U.N. headquarters in New York.

The 16-month-old conflict has killed up to 30,000 people, driven more than 1 million people from their homes and left more than 2 million in desperate need of aid. Through their visit, the two leaders hoped to draw international attention to the crisis and ensure it is not ignored, like the Rwandan genocide was a decade ago.

Thousands of displaced Sudanese emerged from makeshift shelters at the Abu Shouk Camp on Wednesday to give Powell a raucous welcome. The camp is one of the temporary shelters in Darfur that house people uprooted over the last 16 months.

Powell, the first U.S. Secretary of State to visit the region in 26 years, avoided politically charged terms such as "ethnic cleansing" and "genocide" at a news briefing after the trip. He said the situation in Darfur was above all a security crisis.

"People are in camps because of the violence in their villages and countryside," he said. "We came to a common understanding that the Janjaweed must be controlled, they must be broken."

In an interview with National Public Radio, Powell said the situation "doesn't meet the tests of the definition of genocide."

"I can assure you that if all the indicators lined up and said this meets what the treaty test of genocide is, I would have no reluctance to call it that," Powell said.

Sudanese Foreign Minister Mustafa Osman Ismail (search), who accompanied Powell into Darfur, told reporters his government plans to send more police to secure the region and work swiftly toward a political settlement between the rival factions in the province.

"Hopefully in a very short time, we will reach agreement with the rebels," Ismail said.

Human rights groups have accused the Sudanese government of backing militias drawn from Arab herders in a campaign to forcibly remove African farming communities from the region, where they have coexisted for centuries.

Claiming that atrocities were being carried out with the "full cooperation" of the government, student protesters clashed with riot police Wednesday in the Sudanese capital.

The government had said it would tolerate no demonstrations during the visits by Annan and Powell. Witnesses said police fired tear gas and charged a few dozen protesters as they emerged from the campus of Khartoum University chanting anti-government slogans and hurling stones.

The government denies any complicity in the militia attacks and says the warring sides are clashing over land and scarce water resources.

The Justice and Equality Movement (search) and the Sudan Liberation Army (search), two groups drawn from the region's African tribes, took up arms in February 2003 over what they regard as unjust treatment by the government in their struggle over land and resources with Arab countrymen

You have 48 hours...or what? What's the UN gonna do? Saddam made fools of them for years. Why should this be any different?

After all, like in Iraq - all parties on the Security Council are in agreement - something must be done. They must not continue to violate UN mandates.

What's that you say...surely it won't happen again? The UN will do something this time? I agree - they will. But it may be illustrative to ask why.

How is it that in both cases, the UN is in complete agreement that something must be done - but in one case there is no action, but in another case, there is action?

The answer of course is that nobody at the UN is getting rich off the status quo in Sudan. Sudan has no money to grease UN palms. And so they will act. There will be no objections from those getting paid.

Pandy
07-01-2004, 03:59 PM
Send my guard unit, i'll take over the government and start up a new program of killing anyone who rebel against my government. Oh wait, that's what the Sudan governmetn is starting to do now.

Around from that, Peacekeepers should fix some of the problems.

He219
07-01-2004, 04:02 PM
Stop! or I will be forced to cry 'Stop' again ....

:P

2RHPZ
07-01-2004, 05:26 PM
Annan to Sudan: You Have 48 Hours


:lol: :roll: :cantbeli:


You have 48 hours...or what? What's the UN gonna do?

Then he is gonna break his pen ... and go sleep peacefully after well done job.

2RHPZ
07-01-2004, 05:27 PM
SUDAN - 15 years of 'ethnic cleansing'

By Laurie Goering
Tribune's Africa correspondent
Published May 2, 2004

The refugees tell the same horrifying stories: Men by the dozen forced to their
knees and executed, young girls raped and branded, children abducted, families
burned alive in their huts by marauding Arab horsemen.

United Nations officials charge that the government of Sudan, with the
assistance of Arab militias, is carrying out a campaign of ethnic cleansing
against black African Sudanese in the country's western Darfur region.

What's most remarkable about the atrocities in Sudan, however, is that they've
been going on for more than 15 years--and that it has taken commemorations of
the 10th anniversary of Rwanda's genocide to bring them to the world's attention.

"Everyone is looking around, saying, 'Never again,' and this [Sudan conflict] is
just flapping in their face," said John Prendergast,CQ a special Africa adviser
to the Washington-based International Crisis Group.CQ The reality, he said, is
that in war-torn Sudan, ethnic slaughter "is nothing new."

The latest conflict in Darfur began more than a year ago, when black farmers
launched a rebellion, demanding more regional autonomy and economic benefits
from the Khartoum government. After initial efforts to put down the uprising
failed, the government armed local Arab militiamen, human-rights groups say.

Since then, the militias, backed by government bombing and helicopter
reconnaissance, have driven a million people from their homes and tried to
ensure that they cannot return by burning houses, destroying crops and wells and
confiscating livestock.

Most of those displaced--about 900,000--have fled to nearby Sudanese cities,
seeking aid, human-rights groups say. About 100,000 have crossed over the desert
border with Chad on the backs of donkeys. Thousands reportedly have died, and
many more are expected to as the government resists efforts to bring
humanitarian aid to western Sudan.

"They have accomplished a large part of what they wanted to do," Prendergast
said of the Sudanese government, which has insisted it has had no role in the
attacks. "They have cleared out a million or more. They will get away with what
they can get away with."

The world has been slow to respond to the latest bloodshed, in part because
Sudan is supposed to be a country on the verge of peace. After a 21-year civil
war between the government and rebels in southern Sudan, the two sides are close
to signing a much-acclaimed peace accord that would give the south greater
autonomy and a share of the northern government's oil wealth.

Peace efforts

Accusing the government of atrocities in Darfur, some experts fear, could hurt
the internationally brokered peace efforts with the south.

"Most of the international community has been very concerned with ensuring the
north-south talks don't fall apart," said Georgette Gagnon, deputy Africa
director for Human Rights Watch. As a result, "they have been tiptoeing around
this Darfur problem to some extent."

But the government's effort to hang onto power by clearing away potential rivals
and rebellions is nothing new, Sudan analysts say. Starting in the late 1980s,
rulers in Khartoum, with the help of local militias, began clearing the Dinka
population from the Bahr al-Ghazal area of southwest Sudan, allowing slave
raiding, among other human-rights violations.

Seizing land

The Nuba Mountains area in central Sudan was next, in the early 1990s, as
militias burned huts and carried out executions to seize prime agricultural land.
In the late 1990s, residents of the upper Nile oil fields also were removed,
enabling the government to start pumping oil.

In each case, the attacks had political and economic benefits for the Khartoum
government, clearing away enemies and opening up areas with economic potential.
In each case, too, the Arab-run government attacked black Sudanese--but in
Darfur, and perhaps other regions, political survival may have been as much a
motive as racial animosity.

"This is a government staying in power by whatever means necessary--and the
means are more extreme than any other place on the continent since Rwanda in
1994," Prendergast said.

The conflict in Darfur, at the edge of the rapidly expanding Sahara, is
different from earlier battles in that it pits the Muslim government in Khartoum
against black Muslims, rather than the black Christian or animist groups it has
faced in the south.

Farmers vesus herders

The dry Darfur region has suffered amid longstanding disputes between black
farmers and nomadic Arab herders over access to land and water. But the real
driving force behind the government's brutal crackdown, analysts believe, is the
Darfur rebels' ties with Hassan Turabi, a jailed Islamic leader from Darfur who
has called for an uprising against the Khartoum government.

Turabi, a former ally of President Omar el-Bashir's regime, has been repeatedly
jailed on coup-plotting charges, and the government is clearly worried.

"Some observers say the Darfur insurgency is a real threat to the government in
Khartoum," Gagnon said. But, "in any event, the putting down of rebel insurgency
absolutely cannot involve widespread attacks against civilians," as has been the
case in Darfur, she argued. "That's in violation of international law, and it's
a crime against humanity."

The Darfur rebel groups--the Sudan Liberation Army and the Justice and Equality
Movement--are supposed to begin peace talks with the Sudanese government in Chad,
but the rebels have objected to the location, saying the Chad government is too
closely allied to Khartoum.

Struggle to live

Meanwhile, about a million newly homeless people in Darfur and across the border
in Chad face a struggle for survival in coming months as the Sudanese government
resists giving humanitarian groups full access to the area.

Andrew Natsios, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development,
warned last week that if international aid groups cannot get food, medicine and
shelter to Darfur's refugees by the end of June, when the region's rainy season
begins and transport becomes difficult, "we are going to face a catastrophic
situation by fall."

Darfur's planting season begins in about a month, and if refugees aren't
returned to their land to begin sowing crops, famine is likely in the region,
Gagnon said.

"That's why this is urgent," she said. "We need the situation on the ground
reversed now."

Romulus
07-01-2004, 07:09 PM
UN ? They can solve anything rofl


Then he is gonna break his pen ... and go sleep peacefully after well done job.

rofl good one!

BlackRain
07-01-2004, 08:01 PM
Maybe Annan needs another oil-for-fraud program to line the pockets of corrupt UN members.

usa320
07-01-2004, 08:07 PM
Could the UN finally be enforcing its own resolutions?

Could the UN finally have the ********s to speak up?

probably not...but well see...


You have 48 hours...or what?

After 48 hours, Annan will desperate beg the United States to send a Marine ready group to the region...which being the good people that we are it will more than likely happen...

basically im guessing were gonna see the same thing happen here that we saw happen in Liberia, though it could just as easily go the way of Somalia too...

Sayeret
07-01-2004, 08:17 PM
Uh oh the big bad UN is getting angry at Sudan, they'd better look out if they don't want to have a resolution passed against them. rofl

scm77
07-01-2004, 08:33 PM
Annan: "I am warning you. I want to see progress in 48 hours! If I don't see any progress then I'm afraid, the only option is to give you another 48 hours. But rest assure if I don't see any progress after that, you will only be given 24 hours before your next warning. I will keep applying this intense pressure until I see some progress."

rofl :cantbeli:

scm77
07-01-2004, 08:33 PM
Uh oh the big bad UN is getting angry at Sudan, they'd better look out if they don't want to have a resolution passed against them. rofl

rofl rofl rofl woot

BlackRain
07-01-2004, 08:34 PM
Perhaps 17 UN Resolutions will do the trick?

Macs.
07-01-2004, 08:35 PM
Resolute 'em.

Romulus
07-01-2004, 09:38 PM
Uh oh the big bad UN is getting angry at Sudan, they'd better look out if they don't want to have a resolution passed against them.

Buhahahahahahhaha!!! rofl