PDA

View Full Version : Iraqi oil licensing round runs into trouble



xav
06-30-2009, 10:21 AM
Iraqi oil licensing round runs into trouble as foreign firms eye bigger cash rewards

BAGHDAD (AP) -- Iraq's long-awaited licensing round to develop some of its massive oil reserves stumbled Tuesday as oil and gas companies dug in their heals, demanding more money for their efforts than the government was willing to pay.
International oil companies were submitting bids for six oil and two gas fields more than 30 years after Saddam Hussein nationalized the oil sector and expelled foreign firms. The televised process coincided with Iraq assuming formal control over its cities -- a step toward ending the U.S. combat role in the country.

But by midday, only one field had been awarded and several others drew limited to no interest.

The government was hoping that the high-profile licensing round -- televised to prove its transparency -- would result in companies flooding in, bringing their expertise as the country looks to boost output of a resource whose sales bring in 90 percent of the government's revenues.

Some analysts have said companies may be unwilling to commit to major ventures in Iraq, opting to wait and see how the security situation develops after the U.S. pullout from urban areas.

Al-Maliki said at the start of the day's ceremony that the government would "offer security protection, offer all guarantees for their investments and offer all the facilities needed to ensure the success of this process."

Disputes over how much the companies would get for producing over a minimum output target cast a pall on a process heralded as offering Iraq the key to rebuilding an economy devastated by years of sanctions and the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. Iraq has about 115 billion barrels in crude -- among the world's largest deposits -- and the fields on offer account for roughly 43 billion barrels of those reserves.

Two consortiums submitted offers for the Rumaila oil field, which holds 17.8 billion barrels in crude reserves. British giant BP PLC and China's CNPC made up the first consortium, while U.S. giant Exxon Mobil and Malaysia's Petronas comprised the second.

Under the service contracts, the companies would be paid a per barrel fee for any crude they produce in excess of a minimum production target. The Exxon Mobil-led consortium requested $4.8 per barrel for production over the minimum and BP wanted $3.99 per barrel, Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani said. The ministry was willing to pay $2 per barrel.

BP agreed to match the ministry's price and won the contract for Rumaila, said al-Shahristani. Exxon Mobil had refused to revise its bid, he said.

No bids were offered on the second field on offer, Mansouria.

The field, located in the restive Diyala province, is an undeveloped gas field estimated to hold 3.3 trillion cubic feet of reserves with production potential of 330 million cubic feet a day. That province has weathered some of Iraq's worst violence.

Four consortiums submitted bids to develop the 4.1 billion barrel Zubair oil field. The groups were led by India's ONGC, China's CNPC, Italy's Eni and Exxon Mobil.

A consortium made up of ConocoPhillips and China's CNOOC Ltd. and Sinopec was the only bidder for the 2.4 billion barrel Bai Hassan field in the Kirkuk region in the north. But ConocoPhillips, which bid $26.7 per barrel for output over the minimum, refused to match the ministry's estimated per barrel payment of about $4, said al-Shahristani.

CNOOC led a consortium that was the only bidder for the Missan fields -- three adjacent fields offered as one bloc. But the Chinese firm, which had bid $21.4 per barrel, refused to match the government's $2 per barrel price.

The Kirkuk field, with an estimated 8 billion barrels of reserves, also drew only one bidder.

The Shell-led group -- which includes Sinopec, CNPC and Turkish Petroleum -- offered a price of $7.89 per barrel while the government said it was willing to pay only $2 per barrel.

Officials had earlier said that any fields not agreed on would be re-offered in subsequent rounds. But al-Shahristani said the offers on Bai Hassan and Missan "will be taken to the Cabinet for further instructions."

The step appeared aimed at saving a bidding round that was already under fire by some in parliament. The lawmakers had argued that al-Shahristani's insistence on having the Cabinet approve the deals, instead of the parliament, would render the deals unconstitutional.

The political wrangling was largely an effort by the country's various political blocs to secure a stake in Iraq's oil fortunes.

But analysts have said the bickering could further unsettle international oil companies already worried about Iraq's lack of a new national oil law and the government's argument that deals struck independently with the semiautonomous Kurds in the north are illegal.

Rounding out the list of worries is Iraq's perennial security worries.

Al-Shahristani has borne much of the criticism, with some pointing to Iraq's inability to even reach its prewar production levels as evidence that he has failed. The minister, however, has insisted he was working for the country's best interest.

Iraqi officials have estimated that based on crude oil at $50 per barrel, the companies could earn around $16 billion in total. Iraq, meanwhile, would get over $1.7 trillion.

As part of the contracts, the companies have to provide so-called "soft-loan" signature bonuses to the government that total about $2.6 billion.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Iraqi-oil-licensing-round-apf-2216473725.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=

tea drinker
06-30-2009, 11:28 AM
Probably due to US pullout, but the cynic in me says the Oil companies already make obscene profits, and unless the Iraqi's can match that they aint interested.
Will the Chinese companies move to fill the gap? Perhaps this is what the Iraqi's count on. ( or western fear of this)

Blue_0
06-30-2009, 01:51 PM
Probably due to US pullout, but the cynic in me says the Oil companies already make obscene profits, and unless the Iraqi's can match that they aint interested.
Will the Chinese companies move to fill the gap? Perhaps this is what the Iraqi's count on. ( or western fear of this)

Reading the articule made it look like the Chinese were reluctant to get involved at Iraqi prices also.

-- Bluelight

Mu-Meson
06-30-2009, 03:14 PM
Under the service contracts, the companies would be paid a per barrel fee for any crude they produce in excess of a minimum production target. The Exxon Mobil-led consortium requested $4.8 per barrel for production over the minimum and BP wanted $3.99 per barrel, Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani said. The ministry was willing to pay $2 per barrel.Can someone explain to me why the oil companies want to be paid by the Iraqi govt per barrel over minimum production targets? Who sells the oil? Would the oil companies pay royalties or do they sell it to the govt?
Sure, I could understand it being an incentive to have higher production, but I would have thought GIANT ****iNG PROFITS was incentive enough.

LMH
06-30-2009, 03:39 PM
It service agreements - like fruit pickers - to Iraqi government controlled consortiums.

The multinational companies and consortiums are to develop and run the fields and related infrastructure.

seraosha
06-30-2009, 04:38 PM
Can someone explain to me why the oil companies want to be paid by the Iraqi govt per barrel over minimum production targets? Who sells the oil? Would the oil companies pay royalties or do they sell it to the govt?
Sure, I could understand it being an incentive to have higher production, but I would have thought GIANT ****iNG PROFITS was incentive enough.

It's money up front to recoup development, infrastructure, and secure an incentive to go into a dangerous area. The oil companies are getting oil out of the ground for the Iraqi's, it's not like they are moving in, taking over, and stealing. Transportation, piping the oil, shipping it, etc...not to mention refining it...none of that is free.

You are aware that there are oil tankers all over the world, filled to the top with oil, just chilling, waiting for more competitive prices...right? Not saying there is a glut, but OPEC is certainly playing the game on production, with reductions creating the "scarcity" that we are seeing at the pump...which speculators are pushing up again.

There is a lot more going on in the oil fields than dropping some pipe and counting money.

tea drinker
06-30-2009, 06:26 PM
Reading the articule made it look like the Chinese were reluctant to get involved at Iraqi prices also.

-- Bluelight
The way I read it they were reluctant to go with those consortiums - but they might be looking for door number 2 to open and they can go in alone.

LordKitchener
06-30-2009, 08:56 PM
Can someone explain to me why the oil companies want to be paid by the Iraqi govt per barrel over minimum production targets? Who sells the oil? Would the oil companies pay royalties or do they sell it to the govt?
Sure, I could understand it being an incentive to have higher production, but I would have thought GIANT ****iNG PROFITS was incentive enough.

From what I know, the Middle East has traditionally run on 'production-sharing agreements' whereby the oil companies are granted license to explore the country's land by the government at the company's own expense. The profits from the oil (after the oil company has covered its costs) are shared between the government and oil company at a pre-determined ratio. This ratio has varied widely since the start of the 20th Century but since the ME countries have wised up, the goverment gets around 80% of profits and the oil company gets the other 20%. Although this agreement doesn't follow this traditional model at all.

mas-36
07-01-2009, 08:56 AM
What is the decision process like? I heard a radio report about this yesterday and the report mentioned that the Iraqi parliament had no say or vote in the oil bidding process at all. Any truth to this?

seraosha
07-01-2009, 09:46 AM
Here (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/oil-rush-scramble-for-iraqs-wealth-1711570.html) is an article that covers the topic.

Narvaresearch
07-01-2009, 10:49 AM
International oil companies were submitting bids for six oil and two gas fields more than 30 years after Saddam Hussein nationalized the oil sector and expelled foreign firms.

Interesting.

Lt-Col A. Tack
08-13-2009, 07:13 PM
45 firms qualified for 2nd Iraqi oil bid round

Thursday, 13 Aug 2009

******* reported that 45 of the world's major energy companies have qualified to compete in Iraq's next bidding round for contracts to develop its vast oil fields, the second such auction since the US led invasion in 2003.

The auction for some of Iraq's largest undeveloped oilfields is scheduled for November. Iraq sits on the world's third largest oil reserves. Not all the qualified companies competed in the first round.

Baghdad awarded only one of 8 contracts offered in the first round in June.

BP and China's CNPC won a deal to develop Rumaila, one of the world's largest producing fields.

The following is a list supplied by Iraq's contracts and licensing directorate of the 45 companies qualified for the second round

1. Anadarko
2. BG Group
3. BHP Billiton
4. BP
5. Cairn Energy
6. Chevron
7. CNOOC
8. CNPC
9. ConocoPhillips
10. Edison
11. ENI
12. Exxon Mobil
13. Gazprom
14. Hess
15. Inpex
16. Japex
17. JOGMEC
18. JSC KazMunaiGas
19. Kogas
20. Lukoil
21. Maersk
22. Marathon
23. Mitsubishi
24. Mitsui Oil Exploration Company
25. Nexen
26. Nippon Oil Corporation
27. Tatneft
28. Occidental
29. Oil India
30. ONGC
31. Pakistan Petroleum
32. Pertamina
33. Petrovietnam
34. Petronas
35. Repsol
36. Rosneft
37. Royal Dutch Shell
38. Sinochem
39. Sinopec
40. Sonangol
41. StatoilHydro
42. Total
43. Turkish Petroleum
44. Wintershall BASF Group
45. Woodside.

(Sourced from *******)

Link (http://www.steelguru.com/news/index/2009/08/13/MTA2ODU1/45_firms_qualified_for_2nd_Iraqi_oil_bid_round.html)

timetraveller
08-13-2009, 07:38 PM
The question that has to be asked is how much in rent is Iraqi goverment making per week from those Companies ?
I would say 10 million per week is reasonable figure .....anything less is amounts nothing more than daylight robbery