PDA

View Full Version : S&B CQB Short Dot Scope



Sand Man
07-02-2009, 09:09 AM
S&B CQB Short Dot Scope

This article is intended to fill in the blanks on the history and development of the Schmidt & Bender CQB Short Dot 1.1 - 4 x 20mm scope. I hope this answers some questions about the details of this optic.

A need for a milspec low powered variable optic came up after Somalia in 1993. Bad guys mixed with civilians were sticking their heads around corners 100 meters or farther down an alley or street in order to gain situational awareness on the whereabouts of US forces operating in that area. The Aimpoint setup being used at that time did not provide any ability for target discrimination. This was a real problem for those GI’s posted outside for external security.

A market search was done and at that time the closest thing that could be found was a scope called a Microdot; a 1.5 - 4 powered optic that had a red dot like a reflex sight. These were used for quite a while and served well considering they were made for civilian non milspec activities like sport shooting, hunting, etc. Shortly after these were fielded a major US scope company was approached about making a more milspec 1 - 3 or 1 - 4 powered optic with a red dot capability. This particular company makes milspec scopes but was (and still is) primarily a hunting/sporting scope company that has historically put little effort into the military/LE side of things - and was way behind the power curve on illuminated reticles or dots in scopes. After a couple years a prototype was seen that had allot of promise but still no red dot. It had other features also that were not applicable and after some T&E it went back to the factory with a list of things to change/enhance.

A few more years pass with no sign of a Gen II version when a phone call is received saying the scope is ready with good news and bad news; they are in production and can be received ASAP but you take what you get - no changes. This was not received well as the concept of this scope was brought to the attention of this company by a particular spec ops organization and it was finalized with no further input except for a T&E prototype years before. Once the final production sample showed up and was virtually the same as the prototype, flaws and all, except with a poorly executed illuminated reticle/dot, the die was cast - other vendors were going to be solicited for product. To say there was disappointment in this scope would be an understatement.

All the major scope makers were approached with none being interested in helping except for Schmidt & Bender. I had a S&B scope, knew of their reputation, and had heard they were very responsive to user needs. I also knew they made a hunting scope called a 1.25 - 4 x 20mm flashdot. After meeting with the CEO Hans Bender we decided the best approach was to modify the existing flashdot to suit our needs. A list of specs was draw up by me and presented to Hans. They were:

1.) 1 - 4 x 20
2.) External adjustments in 1/2 moa elevation and windage
3.) BDC cams for 5.56mm green tip, 75 gr Hornady, and 7.62mm M118LR for 16 and 20 inch barrel SR 25’s
4.) Detents between the red dot brightness adjustments to allow the user to turn the dot off between settings
5.) Make the first few brightness settings for NVG use then day light use for the settings after that
6.) Shorten the scope as much as possible
7.) Install the then new Zenith short throw variable power ring
8.) Keep the dot size of the flashdot - approx 5.5 moa

In a little over one month S&B had a prototype ready for me that was approx 80% of the Gen I Short Dot we know today. Additional testing and refinement occurred and approx one year after my initial contact with S&B a contract was let for several hundred Gen I CQB Short Dot scopes as it was now called. The final specs were as above with the following tweaks:

1.) The first 6 settings are for NVG use
2.) An 8 hour automatic battery shut off
3.) A ’skeletonized’ mil dot reticle which means on 4 power it can be used as a mildot reticle for ranging but on 1.1 power it will virtually disappear allowing the eye to pick up the dot quicker. The downside to this is with no red dot on it can be hard to see on 1.1 power.

The minimum power setting was 1.1 due to the fact that the original flashdot was designed to be a 1.25 power - when you made it a 1 power it actually had a slight ‘ghost’ image (the inside of the tube at the objective end) when your eye got closer than normal for proper eye relief. 1.1 power made this go away with very little to no difference for up close reflex work. Also it is worthy to note that the reticle is in the first focal plane which means it grows in direct proportion to the target; in the real world this means you can mil dot at any power setting. Also it means your zero cannot shift during magnification as the reticle is not moving. I once thought this was critical but with a scope such as this ranging with the mildot reticle can only realistically be achieved at 4 power so I have changed my position on this point of discussion. What has turned out to be the great advantage the Short Dot has over other low powered variable scopes is the fact it is extremely forgiving in the areas of eye relief and eye positioning compared to other magnified optics. This allows it to be used much more like a reflex sight than other scopes. Most users would agree this more than anything separates the Short Dot from any competitors.

The Gen II Short Dot came about when some users complained about accidentally turning the external adjustment knobs during vigorous activities. In hind sight I wish I would have had the Gen I prototype made with a feature S&B offers for their hunting scopes; a low profile windage adjustment cover that houses a spare battery. The external click adjustments would go away but to me they are not a must have and a spare battery would be better. This may have prevented the Gen II development also as the windage adjustment is much more ****e to accidental adjustment. Live and learn.

The Gen II Short Dot has only 2 BDC’s - green tip and M118LR. The knobs are larger also. The key difference is they are spring loaded and are locked into position when in the ‘down’ position and in order to adjust them you pull up all the way and adjust - release and they will spring back into the locked position. Very slick.

Mark Cromwell at the 2006 SHOT Show showed me a prototype Short Dot 2; not to be confused with a Gen II version (even though it shares the locking turret design). It is a second focal plane scope so the dot does not grow with the magnification (approx 5.5 moa at 1.1 power and 1.6 moa on 4 power) and a spare battery cap instead of external windage adjustment. In addition it had a German post style reticle (S&B type # 2 with flashdot) for better non red dot use on 1.1 magnification. In also had a 24mm objective instead of a 20mm of the Short Dot 1. Having received one from S&B for T&E, I think overall it is better than the first version. Reticle design remains tricky as the skeletonized reticle of the first version is still better for red dot use but the #2 style reticle of the second version is better without the dot. As of right now the verdict is out whether S&B will make the Short Dot 2 a regular production scope. I hope they will as in many ways it is a product improved Short Dot 1.

Regardless of the model the end result is a low powered variable scope that is without peer on the market today. It is rather large and heavy (particularly compared to an Aimpoint)and is admittedly very expensive but it offers features no other scope has; as far as I know the NVG intensity adjustments, the auto battery shut off and the new Gen II locking turrets are found on no other scope on the market. Another very unique feature that end users like is the intensity adjustments and the ability to turn ‘off’ the dot with one click, and turn the dot ‘on’ to your preferred intensity with one click. Despite the integration of cutting edge technology for a scope, problems have been very few (we all know about man made items) and S&B is very responsive when a problem arises. Amazingly this is being written approx three years after the introduction of the Short Dot and it still has no real competition regardless of price. I am very surprised at this unforeseen development to say the least.

What I find is if someone has the scope on their rifle, they love it; they have committed to it and have decided the features it provides are ones that appeal to them and their needs. If there is a better general purpose tactical rifle optic in the world today I don’t know what it is.

I will close this out plugging Schmidt & Bender and Larue Tactical. I now currently own a total of seven S&B scopes. In my opinion Schmidt & Bender makes the absolute best scopes that money can buy. PERIOD. No scope company is more responsive to user needs and the quality of the optics and execution is superb. They are very simply the finest. They are not cheap but the best never is; you get what you pay for. Experience has taught me there are very few exceptions to that rule; even less than most people think.

Larue Tactical mounts have become the mounts of choice in the tactical carbine market - he was the first on the market with a mount for the S&B short dot and after a couple minor tweaks his mount is THE way to go not only on the short dot but on many other combat optics. I use several Larue products and have been very pleased with their performance.

I hope this article helps clarify the development and thought process behind the excellent Schmidt & Bender Short Dot scopes. Enjoy.

Source (http://vickerstactical.com/tactical-tips/short-dot/)

Flagg
07-03-2009, 02:18 AM
My favorite scope is my one S & B.......PERFECT optics.

It has performed exceptionally well for me out to 1100+M, being the strongest link in the chain out of: my ability, my optics, my rifle, and ballistic limitations.

In a blank cheque world, I'd covet a couple or three of those S& B CQB scopes.

What I've been pondering is the law of diminishing returns.

In long range target shooting, I can quite easily SEE the extra money spent on S&B glass.

In 0-300m shooting, does the same cost/benefit relationship exist?

Does the S&B offer THAT much better "bang for buck" over Barska, IOR, and NightForce?

I know Barskas are CHEAP......and it's probably like comparing a Camry with a Mercedes S600...but how about the IOR or NightForce for a fraction of the price?

Hell, if doorkickers are trying to save my kids I'd want them firing platinum pills and 6 million dollar man bionic eyeballs......but have you seen the price on S&B glass?

I also have a soft spot for Leupold...if they made a 1.5-4.5x20mm for a fair price I'd probably be all over it like Oprah on a donut.......but that S&B price is enough to give me serious chest pains.

playtym
07-03-2009, 03:36 AM
......but have you seen the price on S&B glass?

This is exactly the dilemma I'm currently sitting with in trying to decide on which optic to put on an AR-15 for use in 3-gun competitions.

Ideally it should have a true 1x setting with an illuminated reticule for close range shooting and have some form of BDC reticule that is usable at 4x.

In this 1-4x category there's a bunch of other choices.
Burris XTR (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=488875)
Bushnell Trophy (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=826345)
Konus M30 (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=680621)
Leupold VX-II (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=118092)
Meopta Meostar (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=615481)
Millet DMS (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=186660)
Nightforce NXS (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=537000)
Nikko Stirling Diamond (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=350378)
US Optics SN-4 (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=798504)
Trijicon Accupoint TR24 (http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=935464)

And then these two which, cleverly, just offer 1x or 4x - who really uses 2x or 3x?
IOR Valdada Bulldog (http://www.valdada.com/product/6928a7e3-e3bc-48d0-9e8a-4ac78862cd81.aspx)
Elcan Spectre DR (http://dynamicarmament.com/items/mounts-optics-sights%7Escopes/elcan-optics/elcan-specter-dr-picatinny-mount-223-dfov14-detail.htm)


I doubt these optics will ever be as fast as an Aimpoint or an Eotech for the close stuff so to further add to the confusion; would it be a better option to use one of them (Aimpoint or Eotech) and have one of their magnifiers for the longer range shots?.

DeltaWhisky58
07-03-2009, 05:22 AM
I know nothing about CQB sights, but unlike Sandman I do have twenty-plus years practical experience of using S&B optics having owned four of their scopes over the years and still owning two. I have also owned/still own Zeiss and Swarovski scopes, and in my considered opinion S&B are as good as it gets.

I do wish people wouldn't start such threads when they have no experience or practical knowledge of what they post. I believe it's called staying in one's lane.

Hippo
07-03-2009, 06:26 AM
I do wish people wouldn't start such threads when they have no experience or practical knowledge of what they post. I believe it's called staying in one's lane.


THIS

A THOUSAND TIMES THIS

MERCI BEAUCOUP

/ctuisecontrol

Sand Man
07-03-2009, 06:35 AM
I know nothing about CQB sights, but unlike Sandman I do have twenty-plus years practical experience...

Why do I always get the feeling you hide your inadequacies by focusing on other members and berating them? Once again, do you earn points for derailing my threads?

Keep to the topic please. I wanted to a see a discussion about this piece of gear in here with opinions coming from the members.

DeltaWhisky58
07-03-2009, 08:24 AM
Sandman, I have added to a topic which you posted with the benefit of experience of S&B optics, something I'm guessing you only have wet dreams about. You don't fool anyone with your constant fanboy antics. Merely cutting and pasting an article you have acquired from elsewhere and hanging out on SF-related forums doesn't earn you experience or respect.

There are quite a few people on this board who are well aware of your posing activities elsewhere, and things you wouldn't dare to post here.

You may fool the folks on the lonely hearts site you frequent, but you don't fool me, you really are a sad little man go back to dressing your kid in military gear.

Here's a new avatar for you.

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b212/HighlandSniper58/Emoticons/Leg.gif

Sand Man
07-03-2009, 08:30 AM
rofl Didn't realize you could be such a funny guy. rofl

Get out of here.

DeltaWhisky58
07-03-2009, 08:43 AM
http://www.spurgin.net/images/etc/attention_whore.jpg

Sandman, you haven't any experience of military optics, nor are you likely to. You don't fool anyone, now STFU and get back in lane, you make me sick with you attention whoring antics. Get back to leg-humping BTDTs like you've been doing since you joined this board.

It really is time that you learnt that being on the same board as guys who have done things you only have wet dreams about, doesn't automatically give you the experience or respect that you so clearly crave - both have to be earned, you have neither, nor are you likely to get them.

Sand Man
07-03-2009, 08:54 AM
Click this for DW58's real motive... (http://www.spurgin.net/images/etc/attention_whore.jpg)

Sandman, you haven't any experience of military optics, nor are you likely to.

I never said I did.


... you make me sick

You should probably go see an eye doctor. Or throw up.


Get back to leg-humping BTDTs like you've been doing since you joined this board.

Follow your own advice. You seem amused by it.


It really is time that you learnt that being on the same board as guys who have done things you only have wet dreams about, doesn't automatically give you the experience or respect that you so clearly crave - both have to be earned, you have neither, nor are you likely to get them.

Would that be 'guys' like you? You've done 'things'..... Right?

------------------

Anyway, this thread is ruined, thanks to you.

Just to let you know, I invited the author to chime in on the 2 valid posts above but seeing as you have defaced it already, he declined.


Congratulations. Hood should probably give you a medal.

DeltaWhisky58
07-03-2009, 09:14 AM
Whatever ... ...

Sand Man
07-03-2009, 09:34 AM
http://i43.tinypic.com/1z2zkzm.gif


Whatever ... ...

... and for the record, I'm not the guy whose user name contains the word "Delta".


Stay safe, fan boy.

Roy Batty
07-03-2009, 09:37 AM
................. fan boy.

Hello Pot, this is Kettle. How do your read? Over.

DeltaWhisky58
07-03-2009, 10:18 AM
Delta is phonetic alphabet for the letter "D" - Delta Whisky are the initial letters for the two parts of my surname as those like Canadian Sig who know me will conform.

You ignorant little man - don't assume that everyone does things your way. Why on earth would I want to include any reference a certain US Army unit in my username ... ... gimme a break.

asch
07-03-2009, 01:03 PM
... and for the record, I'm not the guy whose user name contains the word "Delta".
Stay safe, fan boy.
i heard fire hydrants are perfect solution for sand in hard to reach places. use it, man, woman or whatever u are.

James
07-03-2009, 01:19 PM
Why do I always get the feeling you hide your inadequacies by focusing on other members and berating them? Once again, do you earn points for derailing my threads?

Keep to the topic please. I wanted to a see a discussion about this piece of gear in here with opinions coming from the members.

Maybe you can start new threads for every other one of Larry Vickers' tactical tips. What are your (I mean his) opinions about slings? Light? Lubrication?

:|

Hippo
07-03-2009, 02:21 PM
oh man, this thread

AWESOME

Jippo
07-03-2009, 02:43 PM
You like the strangest things, wanker.

Hippo
07-03-2009, 03:00 PM
whattcha doin tonight?

jagermeister
07-03-2009, 03:48 PM
I ran a short dot for a while. It was great except one little thing that wasnt really little. It feels like your strapping a brick to you stick! Damn things weighs a ton.

kuttless
07-03-2009, 09:36 PM
So Short dots are CQC sigths?

Man I wish DW was a mod rigth now.