US SOCOM JSOC 3rd unit ?

[socom-lv]

US SOCOM JSOC 3rd unit ?
anyone can I.D. 3rd pach ?
red arrow in black circle

[ariesranger]

AWG. Asymmetric Warfare Group

[kraut783]

yep....here's a link for more info.

http://www.awg.army.mil/

[vulpine]

Aysemmetric Warfare Group

Sorry, it took a while to open up and didn't see the replys.:cantbeli:

[Dave76]

The AWG isn't part of SOCOM/JSOC.

[MikeSierra151]

Intelligence support activity?

NM, didnt see the red arrow part of the question.

[Dave76]

To be more precise: Yes, that definitely looks like the AWG's SSI, but it's not part of SOCOM as the graphic by the OP seems to imply.

[chefjavier]

It could be Force Recon

[numquam retro]

definetly AWG

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_Warfare_Group

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=147036&highlight=asymmetric+warfare+group

[chefjavier]

What is their purposed?

[Dave76]

What is their purposed?
You might want to actually click on the two links directly above your post or you could put a request into the allmighty oracle aka Google.

Oh, and brush up your grammar.

[Alex-L]

You might want to actually click on the two links directly above your post or you could put a request into the allmighty oracle aka Google.

Oh, and brush up your grammar.

jeez ****, maybe english isnt his first language and maybe he isnt at a location that he can click the link.


What is their purposed?

the links say they create doctrine on asymmetric warfare.

Wiki says asymmetric warfare is:

Asymmetric warfare originally referred to war between two or more belligerents whose relative military power differs significantly. Contemporary military thinkers tend to broaden this to include asymmetry of strategy or tactics; today "asymmetric warfare" can describe a conflict in which the resources of two belligerents differ in essence and in the struggle, interact and attempt to exploit each other's characteristic weaknesses. Such struggles often involve strategies and tactics of unconventional warfare, the "weaker" combatants attempting to use strategy to offset deficiencies in quantity or quality.[1] Such strategies may not necessarily be militarized.[2] This is in contrast to symmetric warfare, where two powers have similar military power and resources and rely on tactics that are similar overall, differing only in details and execution.

[chefjavier]

jeez ****, maybe english isnt his first language and maybe he isnt at a location that he can click the link.



the links say they create doctrine on asymmetric warfare.

Wiki says asymmetric warfare is:

Asymmetric warfare originally referred to war between two or more belligerents whose relative military power differs significantly. Contemporary military thinkers tend to broaden this to include asymmetry of strategy or tactics; today "asymmetric warfare" can describe a conflict in which the resources of two belligerents differ in essence and in the struggle, interact and attempt to exploit each other's characteristic weaknesses. Such struggles often involve strategies and tactics of unconventional warfare, the "weaker" combatants attempting to use strategy to offset deficiencies in quantity or quality.[1] Such strategies may not necessarily be militarized.[2] This is in contrast to symmetric warfare, where two powers have similar military power and resources and rely on tactics that are similar overall, differing only in details and execution.
Thank you for your understanding!!!:) You were right on the answers.