PDA

View Full Version : Critique



briantk
07-21-2009, 01:35 PM
Hello, I am currently writing an article for alternate history online magazine and I would be deeply appreciated if you can critique my work:

39th Parallel

By Brian Kim (briantk@gmail.com)

Premise:

This exercise is inspired by the article which discuss how the Korean
War could have been different. (Jerry D. Morelock, "Hard Choices: Truman's
Dilemma," Armchair General Volume 5 #2 May 2008) The article discuss three
options Truman had after Inchon landing: maintain status quo at 38th Parallel,
ordering the advance up to Yalu River, or creating new DMZ north of Pyongyang
and Wonsan. This article will explore the possibility of the third option, and
probable impact of the outcome.

Background:

Korean Peninsula is orphan of the post WWII policies. Issue of Korean
independence among Allies nations was first raised during the Cairo Conference.
Chiang Kai Shek of the Nationalist China advocated immediate independence of
Korea after the cessation of hostility. [Whose patronage to Korean Provisional
Government (Korean government in exile) began when Korean terrorist attacked
Japanese delegates who were celebrating victory over the Chinese in the
immediate aftermath of Battle of Shanghai. Chiang Kai Shek praised the action
as "more effective than one million soldiers."] Churchill confess he doesn't
know where Korea is while Roosevelt recommend trusteeship. Allied leaders never
discussed the Korean issue in detail afterward. Korean policy will be dormant
until the aftermath of the Yalta Conference. Eager to involve Soviet Union into
the war against Imperial Japan, Roosevelt secured promise from Stalin that
Soviet will declare war against Japan three months after Germany surrendered.
Stalin asked three months since he needs time to redeploy his armies from
Europe to East Asia. On August 20, 1945, Soviet launched Operation August Wind
against Imperial Japanese forces in Manchuria, Korea, Sakhalin and Kurils.

As Soviet forces pressed southward down the Korean peninsula, American
leaders insist on the Soviet leaders to cease the advance at the 38th Parallel.
Americans chose the parallel as simple expedient, it is north of Seoul and
Pusan, but they are ignorant of historical implication. At the beginning of the
20th Century, then Imperial Russia suggest to Japan a compromise over issue
of colonial influence on Korea: territory north of 38th Parallel is to be under
the Russian, while territory in the south will belong to Japan. Japan refused
and waged Russo-Japanese War. To the Soviet, Americans are acquiescing the
control of Korea north of 38th to them, while Americans simply thought of as
temporary matter.

This is further complicated by American handling of dialogue with
Koreans. Many Koreans advocate immediate sovereign government. Americans insist
issue be discussed later. Worse, Americans employed Koreans who collaborated
with Japanese colonial govenrment in handling every day issue. This created
anger and hostility that leads to death of about 100,000 Koreans by the time
Korean War begin.

This is exasperated by aggressive posture by Rhee Syngman, president
of newly created Republic of Korea in 1948. Rhee threatened to invade North
Korea and encouraged RoK units near the 38th Parallel to clashed with Korean
People's Army (KPA or Inmingun). This led to curtail of number and types of
armament Americans were willing to give to South Korean army. Thus when
Korean War start, RoK Army is underequipped for war.

Another blunder is news article that stated that Secretary of State
Acheson declares South Korea is outside of American responsibility. The report
is in error since Acheson in interview stated that South Korea is under
American sphere of protection. The road to war in Korea was paved with mistakes
in fact. In the early morning of June 25, 1950, North Korean military, Korean
People's Army, or aka Inmingun, crossed the 38th Parallel.

Fork on the Road:

After Inchon Landing, President Truman and American Chief of Staff
debated whether to cross the 38th Parallel. By recapturing Seoul, American
military and UN forces are nearly fulfilling the UN mission to force North
Koreans out of South Korea. But should they cross the border? After much
discussion and consultation with MacArthur and unauthorized crossing by
South Korean military, police and militia, Truman permitted the UN forces to
cross the 38th Parallel under UN Resolution. (Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Offensive,_1950 on July 21/2009).

Originally, as the UN Forces surge upward pass the 38th Parallel,
MacArthur planned to stop his forces south of Yalu: initially drawing the line
at Chonhju to Jungnam and later revised to be at Songchon-Songjin.
(D. Clayton James, "Refighting the Last War: Command and Crisis in Korea 1950 -
1953" The Free Press, NY 1993 p193) These lines has the most favorable
defensive terrain and frontline length, roughly 100 miles wide. According to
then military manual, a division should defend a front six to eight miles wide.
(Donald W. Boose Jr. "US Army Forces in the Korean War 1950-53" Osprey
Publishing, 2005 p40). These tactical advantage is recognized not only by the
American Chief of Staff but also by the British. (Roy Appleman, "Disaster in
Korea: CHinese Confront MacArthur," Texas & M University Press, 1989, p341).
British minister Bevin further propose a demilitarized Korean-Chinese border
to assure the Chinese that conflict in Korea will not spread to China. Even the
journalist advocate the stop. (Appleman, p345).

Called the "Waist" of Korea by Appleman, that part of the region is
crossed by 39th Parallel. (Appleman, p343). From coast west of Pyongyang to
Wonsan, the waist is 100 miles wide, and by road used to cross it is 140 miles
long. It was practical to stop at 39th Parallel, since nearly all the Korean
population and infrastructure are concentrated in the south of the 39th and it
is natural chokepoint for all communication network that run up and down the
Korean peninsula.

At the time of the push, six of the eight South Korean divisions were
advancing with the UN Forces: I Corps with Capital and 3rd Division, II Corps
with 6th, 7Th and 8th Divisions, and 1st Division with US I Corps.
(Nigel Thomas, etc "The Korean War 1950-53" Osprey Publishing, 1986 p11)
The III Corps with 5th and 11th Divisions were assigned to security duties.
Backing the Republic of Korea Army is the United States military, which
provides nine divisions and three corps. (ibid, p16) Hence total of
15 divisions are at MacArthur's disposal as they were advancing toward Yalu.

Had MacArthur kept to his original plan and halted his units at
Songchon-Songjin line, each division would have 6 and 2/3 mile front,
reasonably within contemporary military doctrine. Slightly longer than 10 km,
some units like the South Korean may face difficulty defending such frontage.
But with adequate fire support and lack of gap between units may have
compensated the weaknesses that forced the US led UN forces to retreat in actual
event.

Analysis

Could the UN forces, under strategic command of MacArthur and tactical
command of Walker, hold the line at the 39th Parallel? Walker had prepared
contingency plan to hold the line at 39th Parallel. (Appleman p350). Had the
American officers knew logistical weaknesses of Chinese military, and the X Corp
not mauled by the Chinese offensive as they were advancing north of 39th
Parallel in actual event, and establish line similar to Hindenburg Line north
of Pyongyang, the UN force could have hold at 39th Parallel. (Appleman, p353).
Other problems the UN forces would have if they hold the line would have been
solved in time.

The mountain region that bisect the region would have been difficult but
the Chinese and KPA had proven during actual war not impossible to cross.
(Appleman, p344). Further UN forces will have access to Wonsan and Chinnampo,
port southwest of Pyongyang, as logistical depots. Remnants of KPA are
conducting guerilla warfare behing UN line and is causing terrible havoc. But
had the UN forces stopped at 39th Parallel and held the line, these forces
would have been eventually destroyed in counterinsurgency campaign as happened
in actual war.

The Road Not Taken.

What would happened had the line held at 39th Parallel? Possibilities
are staggering. By placing DMZ at 39th Parallel instead of 38th Parallel, China
will be content since they still have buffer zone between itself and Western
forces. More importantly, Chinese will have stronger influence on Communist
Korea. During the actual Korean War, pro-Chinese faction of Korean Communist
Party were purged by Kim Il Sung. Had 39th Parallel as DMZ happened, this
faction would have stayed intact or rebuilt. This is so since nearly all the
Korean population is located south of alternate DMZ, so the Inmingun wont have
the manpower to guard the DMZ. In actual history, the KPA maintain an army of
around 300,000 until 1980s, compared to RoK military manpower of 650,000 in
late fifties and around 500,000 for past fifty years. This mean that Chinese
must maintain a permanent garrison north of DMZ. Thus Communist Korea will
suffer presence of foreign troops as the South Korea will: oversexed,
overbearing and over here.

Althought timeline of economic miracle the Republic of Korea enjoyed
will probably be the same, but they will enjoy more resources and manpower than
now. Which means RoK will more economically robust than it is now, since
technically it is an unified country in all but in name.

As China goes into transformation under Deng Xiaopeng, the Chinese will
force Communist Korea to do same. And the Communist Korea, because of presence
and need of Chinese military in Korea, will acquiescened. This mean Korea
peninsula may united under Taegukki by mid to late 1990s, a possibility, under
a condition favorable to China of course.

T3ngu
07-21-2009, 06:59 PM
Hello, I am currently writing an article for alternate history online magazine and I would be deeply appreciated if you can critique my work:

39th Parallel

By Brian Kim (briantk@gmail.com)

Premise:

This exercise is inspired by the article which discusses how the Korean
War could have been different. (Jerry D. Morelock, "Hard Choices: Truman's
Dilemma," Armchair General Volume 5 #2 May 2008) The article discusses the three options that Truman had after the Inchon landing namely:
1. maintain status quo at the 38th Parallel;
2. ordering an advance up to Yalu river; or
3. creating a new DMZ north of Pyongyang and Wonsan.

This article will explore the possibility of the third option, and the possible impact on the outcome of the war.


I got that far and had to reword it. I would suggest cleaning the text up grammatically before asking people to review it. Also check your tense.

A good editor is going to cut you up so make sure you get at least the grammar correct to ensure that the content is well received.

Adding to what James said below (as i have now read further) your quotes such as
Issue of Korean independence among Allies nations was first raised during the Cairo Conference. Chiang Kai Shek of the Nationalist China advocated immediate independence of Korea after the cessation of hostility. appear to have been taken from the literature as this certainly is not your style of writing. You need to reference all documents. (Thanks James)

James
07-21-2009, 07:00 PM
I stopped reading after you quoted wiki - that isn't an academically accepted resource. What's your background?

Laworkerbee
07-21-2009, 07:04 PM
How was any of this Truman's choice? he delegated the war to Macarthur.

Macarthur asked Walker if he could hold Pyongyang and the answer he recieved was a big fat negative.

You propose these choices like there wasn't en enemy influencing these events.

BearInBunnySuit
07-21-2009, 08:06 PM
Hello, I am currently writing an article for alternate history online magazine and I would be deeply appreciated if you can critique my work:

39th Parallel

By Brian Kim (briantk@gmail.com)

Premise:

This exercise is inspired by the article which discuss how the Korean
War could have been different. (Jerry D. Morelock, "Hard Choices: Truman's
Dilemma," Armchair General Volume 5 #2 May 2008) The article discuss three options Truman had after Inchon landing: maintain status quo at 38th Parallel, ordering the advance up to Yalu River, or creating new DMZ north of Pyongyang and Wonsan. This article will explore the possibility of the third option, and probable impact of the outcome.

I checked out the globe in our living room and suffice to say the North Koreans would not have agreed to an armistice if the DMZ was drawn at the 39th parallel. Had the proposal been made to draw the line above Pyongyang, the war would have dragged on until N. Korea was decimated or the Reds somehow captured more territory to the south. Kim Il-Sung would have never agreed to such a deal.


Had 39th Parallel as DMZ happened, this faction would have stayed intact or rebuilt. This is so since nearly all the Korean population is located south of alternate DMZ, so the Inmingun wont have the manpower to guard the DMZ.

I don't understand the logic here. The ROK always have had more manpower (population) than N. Korea but that has not stopped the Norks from building up its military.


This mean that Chinese must maintain a permanent garrison north of DMZ. Thus Communist Korea will suffer presence of foreign troops as the South Korea will: oversexed, overbearing and over here. I'm not sure if I agree. From what I read about Kim Il-Sung, I don't think he would have ever allowed the Chinese to maintain a military presence inside the country. It would not only weaken his philosophy of juche but at any moment could turn into a threat against his grip on power if Beijing so chooses to remove him.


As China goes into transformation under Deng Xiaopeng, the Chinese will force Communist Korea to do same.

I also find this highly unlikely. There was no reason why N. Korea couldn't emulate China's model of development had it so desired. But rather than choosing the path to greater economic stability, the regime chose to isolate itself and turn belligerent because of its own insecurities and its desire to keep its country sealed off.

In conclusion, while the premise is interesting, I don't think it's very realistic. Perhaps a better alternative would be to explore what would have happend if MacArthur was not fired by Truman and he decided to use the bomb against the China. The possibilities and the scenarios are definitely worth discussing as it would have a direct impact on a country that is emerging as an important player today.

T3ngu
07-29-2009, 05:20 AM
So Brian, have we helped you?