PDA

View Full Version : Rail system on the sa80's?


chapperjoe
07-31-2009, 11:57 AM
Who makes it?
Bisley_Bob
07-31-2009, 11:58 AM
The Q bloke
ando
07-31-2009, 12:17 PM
http://tinyurl.com/kowtjp
Arfah
07-31-2009, 12:32 PM
British Rail
deagle
07-31-2009, 12:35 PM
google makes it
Britishhawk
07-31-2009, 12:42 PM
British Rail

:):):)

On a side-note, is it true you cant grip the rails because they get too hot during firing? Also, Does the army supply handguard's if your unhappy using the vertical grip thingymobob?
welshmann
07-31-2009, 12:46 PM
Your starting to give the health & safety bloke a hardon hawk :)
ando
07-31-2009, 01:04 PM
The HSE's calling

Briiinnggg brinnggg
Bisley_Bob
07-31-2009, 01:08 PM
:):):)

On a side-note, is it true you cant grip the rails because they get too hot during firing? Also, Does the army supply handguard's if your unhappy using the vertical grip thingymobob?

You can put rail covers like this on.

http://www.soloint.co.uk/product.php?productid=685
Thumpsquid
07-31-2009, 01:21 PM
British Rail

Ah, that explains why it stops firing when it's the autumn. The wrong type of leaves on the linep-)
SMGLee
07-31-2009, 04:32 PM
Daniel Defense in United States is the official rail manufacture for the British Military SA80A2. The won the contract hands down a few years back and they have been delivering the rail for the British soldiers since last year.
big_les
07-31-2009, 04:34 PM
You can put rail covers like this on.

http://www.soloint.co.uk/product.php?productid=685

Not to mention that I've never seen an RAS-equipped SA80 without the Gripod also in place.
Lucifer008
08-01-2009, 02:38 PM
The rail system is made by Daniel Defense.
MrScruff
08-01-2009, 02:44 PM
Yes well done
Bisley_Bob
08-01-2009, 02:48 PM
The rail system is made by Daniel Defense.

I love how you obviously didn't read that someone 2 posts above has already told us this.
Eagle The Lightning
08-01-2009, 02:49 PM
http://i32.tinypic.com/2hgg5mp.jpg
Ubar
08-01-2009, 03:17 PM
The won the contract hands down

what do you mean there?
CMNot
08-01-2009, 05:19 PM
That if anyone else competed for the contract, they didn't come close on 'cost effectiveness'.
JRT
08-01-2009, 06:13 PM
I love how you obviously didn't read that someone 2 posts above has already told us this.

If he didn't bother reading the previous posts before, he sure is not going to bother to read your post the next time he visits this thread...
Bisley_Bob
08-01-2009, 06:17 PM
If he didn't bother reading the previous posts before, he sure is not going to bother to read your post the next time he visits this thread...

Ha ha, good point. Why do I bother?
Ubar
08-02-2009, 04:59 AM
That if anyone else competed for the contract, they didn't come close on 'cost effectiveness'.

Is there any sources to back that up though? I know what the phrase means, just in this context there hasn't been any evidence provided to suggest that it was such a foregone conclusion..