PDA

View Full Version : Patients forced to live in agony after NHS refuses to pay for painkilling injections



Geezah
08-02-2009, 08:41 PM
Tens of thousands with chronic back pain will be forced to live in agony after a decision to slash the number of painkilling injections issued on the NHS, doctors have warned.

The Government's drug rationing watchdog says "therapeutic" injections of steroids, such as cortisone, which are used to reduce inflammation, should no longer be offered to patients suffering from persistent lower back pain when the cause is not known.

Instead the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) is ordering doctors to offer patients remedies like acupuncture and osteopathy.

Specialists fear tens of thousands of people, mainly the elderly and frail, will be left to suffer excruciating levels of pain or pay as much as £500 each for private treatment.

The NHS currently issues more than 60,000 treatments of steroid injections every year. NICE said in its guidance it wants to cut this to just 3,000 treatments a year, a move which would save the NHS £33 million.

But the British Pain Society, which represents specialists in the field, has written to NICE calling for the guidelines to be withdrawn after its members warned that they would lead to many patients having to undergo unnecessary and high-risk spinal surgery.

Dr Christopher Wells, a leading specialist in pain relief medicine and the founder of the NHS' first specialist pain clinic, said it was "entirely unacceptable" that conventional treatments used by thousands of patients would be stopped.

"I don't mind whether some people want to try acupuncture, or osteopathy. What concerns me is that to pay for these treatments, specialist clinics which offer vital services are going to be forced to close, leaving patients in significant pain, with nowhere to go,"

The NICE guidelines admit that evidence was limited for many back pain treatments, including those it recommended. Where scientific proof was lacking, advice was instead taken from its expert group. But specialists are furious that while the group included practitioners of alternative therapies, there was no one with expertise in conventional pain relief medicine to argue against a decision to significantly restrict its use.

Dr Jonathan Richardson, a consultant pain specialist from Bradford Hospitals Trust, is among more than 50 medics who have written to NICE urging the body to reconsider its decision, which was taken in May.

He said: "The consequences of the NICE decision will be devastating for thousands of patients. It will mean more people on opiates, which are addictive, and kill 2,000 a year. It will mean more people having spinal surgery, which is incredibly risky, and has a 50 per cent failure rate."

One in three people are estimated to suffer from lower back pain every year, while one in 15 consult their GP about it. Specialists say therapeutic injections using steroids to reduce inflammation and other injections which can deaden nerve endings, can provide months or even years of respite from pain.

Experts said that if funding was stopped for the injections, many clinics would also struggle to offer other vital services, such as pain management programmes and psychotherapy which is used to manage chronic pain.

Anger among medics has reached such levels that Dr Paul Watson, a physiotherapist who helped draft the guidelines, was last week forced to resign as President of the British Pain Society.

Doctors said he had failed to represent their views when the guidelines were drawn up and refused to support the letter by more than 50 of the group's members which called for the guidelines to be withdrawn.

In response, NICE chairman Professor Sir Michael Rawlins expressed outrage over the vote that forced Dr Watson from his position, describing the actions of the society as "shameful". He accused pain specialists of refusing to accept that there was insufficient scientific evidence to support their practices.

A spokesman for NICE said its guidance did not recommend that injections were stopped for all patients, but only for those who had been in pain for less than a year, where the cause was not known.

Iris Watkins, 80 from Appleton, in Cheshire said her life had been "transformed" by the use of therapeutic injections every two years. The pensioner began to suffer back pain in her 70s. Four years ago, despite physiotherapy treatment and the use of medication, she had reached a stage where she could barely walk.

"It was horrendous, I was spending hours lying on the sofa, or in bed, I couldn't spend a whole evening out. I was referred to a specialist, who decided to give me a set of injections. The difference was tremendous",

Within days, she was able to return to her old life, gardening, caring for her husband Herbert, and enjoying social occasions.

"I just felt fabulous – almost immediately, there was not a twinge. I only had an injection every two years, but it really has transformed my life; if I couldn't have them I would be in despair".


Link (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5955840/Patients-forced-to-live-in-agony-after-NHS-refuses-to-pay-for-painkilling-injections.html)

The source is the Telegraph, is that on the list of news media outlets that must be ignored?


Let the excuses begin..........

Power_serj
08-02-2009, 08:48 PM
British complainters COMMENCE!

California Joe
08-02-2009, 08:50 PM
When I was in college we had a punk band named British Pain Society...

Stainless Steel Rat
08-02-2009, 10:43 PM
To the OP's question, The Daily Telegraph is a longstanding and highly respected newspaper in London. However, it never has quite accepted the end of the British Empire and the rise of the European Union and Labour coming into power and it's news reporting is definitely in line with Conservative (Tory) views. I don't have a problem with that, BTW, they are honest and upfront about it and do a good job reporting (within their mindset).

As for the article, it does sound like the woos (those who recommend 'alternative' therapies like acupuncture, etc.) have taken over the committee, and the real doctors are objecting strongly.

Still, looking at it from an American (anti-socialized medicine) viewpoint, it is reducing costs and getting government to offer other, less expensive treatments to say taxpayer money....*tongue firmly in cheek on the previous*

We shall see. My guess is that it gets overruled in the next 3 weeks or less and steroid treatments will be resumed...

wotsnext
08-03-2009, 05:54 AM
This does not ring true to me, my wife has pain killing jabs as and when she needs them for her back, plus a lot of other treatment ???

Wahnsinn
08-03-2009, 06:21 AM
The NHS will pay for all the costs involved with getting an Alcoholic a new liver but not injections for people with severe back pain? Saving £33 million isn't exactly a lot, I'm sure there are other areas where they can cut back.

Connaught Ranger
08-03-2009, 06:40 AM
The NHS will pay for all the costs involved with getting an Alcoholic a new liver but not injections for people with severe back pain? Saving £33 million isn't exactly a lot, I'm sure there are other areas where they can cut back.

A start would be to reduce all the health-care paper pushing department managers that clog up the system.

Mordoror
08-03-2009, 07:23 AM
lol
again an good idea of some paper scratchers behind a desk
yep sure let's save 33 millions pounds by not giving appropriate drugs

did they ask themselves how much it will cost to the whole society in term of job day off due to pain/morbidity, lost of productivity, medical wandering (seeing several Dr.) and accident with un-appropriate medications...

my bet is more than 33 millions

fortunately some medics still beleive in solemn promise of Hippocrate and will do what they can to stop that insanity

tea drinker
08-03-2009, 05:15 PM
A start would be to reduce all the health-care paper pushing department managers that clog up the system.
Reduce the paper - full stop. Patient records and processing should be electronic. Billing, admittance etc would be streamlined.
I'm sure some stuff would need to be on paper for legal reasons but a lot of benefits could be realised by fully embracing electronic measures.
Handheld devices to perform the rounds, manage it like a Fedex or UPS scanning parcels. All the patient x-rays results etc should be reachable from one terminal, and tied straight to billing according to the already entered insurance details.
And outsource the whole lot to a large IT company.

Look at what we did in Ireland, they brought in the HSE to replace the health boards, then ended running both in parallel. One look at "Sumo" Mary Harney tells you all you need to know.:roll:

TallGuy
08-03-2009, 05:45 PM
The NHS doesn't have electronic records? We've had electronic records here for at least a decade. We don't even get a written prescription anymore, unless you ask for one. The doctors send it directly to the pharmacy of your choice...