PDA

View Full Version : PetroChina takes C$1.9 billion stake in Canada oil sands



vinny_121_ND
08-31-2009, 11:57 PM
PetroChina takes C$1.9 billion stake in Canada oil sands


CALGARY, Alberta (*******) - PetroChina is set to pay C$1.9 billion ($1.7 billion) for a 60 percent stake in two planned Canadian oil sands projects, China's biggest investment yet in one of the world's largest untapped oil regions.
PetroChina, the world's most valuable oil company, has signed an initial agreement to take majority control of the proposed MacKay River and Dover oil sands projects owned by Canada's closely held Athabasca Oil Sands Corp (AOSC), properties that could eventually produce as much as 500,000 barrels per day, the Canadian company said on Monday.

"They obviously see a lot of upside," Sveinung Svarte. ASOC's chief executive, said in an interview.
PetroChina's international arm will also provide some financing for AOSC, which controls about 1.3 million acres of oil sands properties in the Canadian province of Alberta.
"PetroChina is probably looking to lock in a sizable position in the oil sands," said Chris Feltin, an analyst at Tristone Capital. "But it's going to take a long time to develop Athabasca's projects."
The oil sands in northern Alberta have the largest crude reserves outside the Middle East. But while China's state-controlled oil companies have been aggressively acquiring conventional oil reserves around the world to power a growing economy, they have so far made only very small investments in the oil sands.
Sinopec owns a 10 percent stake in a planned Total SA project while CNOOC owns just under 17 percent of a small privately held oil sands project.

PetroChina is the first major player to invest in the oil sands region since oil prices plunged last year and billions of dollars worth of projects were canceled.
The recent dearth of investment may help smooth approvals for the deal from the Canadian government, which has recently been making an effort to improve relations with China.
"The Canadian government is looking for investment and injections of capital," said William Lacey, an analyst at FirstEnergy Capital. "I don't see why this wouldn't be viewed as a positive."
Athabasca said it had notified Ottawa of its pending deal with the Chinese firm.

"We've been in contact with the Canadian government and the Alberta government to make sure they were aware this transaction was coming," Bill Gallacher, AOSC's chairman, said on a conference call. "We are going to obviously follow the required regulatory approvals pathway that's needed in order to make sure this transaction moves forward."

Athabasca and PetroChina plan to exploit the properties, which contain an estimated 5 billion barrels, using thermal techniques, in which the tarry-bitumen reserves are heated so they flow to the surface.
Athabasca Oil Sands has already filed for regulatory approval in Alberta to build two pilot projects to test production at the properties and expects to seek further approval for a 35,000 barrel per day project at the MacKay River site, which could be operating within five years.
Future expansions could take output from the two sites to between 300,000 and 500,000 barrels per day, Gallacher said, though no schedule for those additional phases has been set.
Svarte said the company would likely ship its initial output to U.S. refiners, but would consider other export routes if they open up.

PetroChina was an early backer of Enbridge Inc's Northern Gateway pipeline, in 2005 signing a memorandum to consider taking up to half the space on what was then seen as a 400,000 bpd pipeline to take oil sands crude to an export port on Canada's West Coast.
PetroChina has never moved to cement that agreement, though Jennifer Varey, a spokeswoman for Enbridge, said the memorandum of understanding the two companies signed remains in effect.
Enbridge plans to apply for a permit to build the line later this year. If approved the now 525,000 bpd line could offer PetroChina a way to move its share of oil sands production to its home market.

The deal is PetroChina's second this year for a Canadian company. It's trying to buy Verenex Energy Inc so it can get the Canadian company's Libyan oil properties, but the North African country's government has said it would like to acquire Verenex itself and has so far refused to approve the acquisition.
PetroChina's American Depository Receipts fell $3.44 to $109.75 on Monday on the New York Stock Exchange.
($1=$1.10 Canadian)
(Editing by Frank McGurty and Peter Galloway)
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/*******/cbusiness_us_petrochina_aosc

I hope it was worth it. Extracting oil from bitumen is not a easy task. A few Canadians aren't too happy about selling their assets to the Chinese.

Panchito12
09-01-2009, 12:09 AM
So I wonder who's going to get stuck with the nightmare expense of the environmental clean-up? 'Cause everyone knows the Chicom don't clean the environment!

vinny_121_ND
09-01-2009, 12:16 AM
So I wonder who's going to get stuck with the nightmare expense of the environmental clean-up? 'Cause everyone knows the Chicom don't clean the environment!

Seriously, you have no idea how strict our laws are in terms of environmental safety.


http://oilsandstruth.org/quotalberta-serious-about-tar-sands-clean-upquot

I assure you, just because it was sold to PetroChina doesn't mean there will be no canadian government oversight.

We've had our own share of environmental problems when there was no government oversight on Canadian mining industries that led to environmental problems, and still do to this day which goes largely unreported in the news of course.

It's also interesting that this sale comes at a convenient time as natural gas prices is so low, and with the alberta's deficit at an all time high of 7 billion dollars.

CanadianStormtrooper
09-01-2009, 01:45 AM
Clean that **** first yoooo
wtf!
my air fags

CanadianStormtrooper
09-01-2009, 01:46 AM
s**t
........

Ordie
09-01-2009, 01:55 AM
It's up to the Athabasca Oil Sands Corp stockholders.

If the deal falls through, I would recommend that Athabasca representatives in China leave quick before being arrested on some trumped up charges.

It's interesting that China would first seek securing resources from stable democratic countries with the rule of law than from despotic countries.

Panchito12
09-01-2009, 10:30 AM
Seriously, you have no idea how strict our laws are in terms of environmental safety.


Canada: Second largest producer of asbestos (after Russia).

Any "strict environmental laws" towards reducing that market, or is there too much dough involved to even discuss that?

vinny_121_ND
09-01-2009, 10:35 AM
It's up to the Athabasca Oil Sands Corp stockholders.

If the deal falls through, I would recommend that Athabasca representatives in China leave quick before being arrested on some trumped up charges.

It's interesting that China would first seek securing resources from stable democratic countries with the rule of law than from despotic countries.

China has always been seeking to buy oil lands in Canada. I don't think it's a good idea to sell 60% of it, since it is our source of energy, and it is also the number 1 foreign buyer from the US.

Rossdobby
09-01-2009, 10:44 AM
Canada: Second largest producer of asbestos (after Russia).

Any "strict environmental laws" towards reducing that market, or is there too much dough involved to even discuss that?

Well first Russia is not the largest producer Brazil is. Also laws and regulations have been put into place to safeguard the us of it. Production of asbestos in Canada has fallen by hald in the last 7 years. Also when you live in a nation with permafrost that wreaks havoc on our piping systems you need something like asbestos to protect them.

BTW Canada has some of the most strict and progressive enviromental laws and regulations so please don't talk about my country if you dont actually know.

vinny_121_ND
09-01-2009, 10:46 AM
Canada: Second largest producer of asbestos (after Russia).

Any "strict environmental laws" towards reducing that market, or is there too much dough involved to even discuss that?

Canada's mining companies make asbestos, but only exports it. Of course, it's been criticized and deservedly so. It's just too bad people still buy it.

Canada's strict environmental laws are designed so that companies have a blueprint of what to do with tailings during the mining process without any of the heavy metals leaching into the ground water. The government has to approve everything, hence a lot of mining companies have to do a assessment if it's economically feasible to excavate, then restore anything that was destroyed.

Shuimo
09-01-2009, 10:48 AM
It's interesting that China would first seek securing resources from stable democratic countries with the rule of law than from despotic countries.

It just makes perfect sense in the pragmatic eyes of the Chinese!
Doing business with despotic countries always involves a great deal of unpredictable risks!

Hongjian
09-01-2009, 11:17 AM
It's up to the Athabasca Oil Sands Corp stockholders.

If the deal falls through, I would recommend that Athabasca representatives in China leave quick before being arrested on some trumped up charges.

It's interesting that China would first seek securing resources from stable democratic countries with the rule of law than from despotic countries.


Actually, it's a pretty straightforward explanation for it.

Working western democracies are unflexible, naiive and stupid enough to believe in fainess and law <--- easy prey for the witty dictatorship China to play dirty tricks on them, since they know how bot-like the law-abiting westerners would react.

Despotic dictatorships are harder to come by for China, since they are as down-and-dirty as them.

Another proof that the western system will die because it has lost their natural abilities to 60 years of luxury and wealth.

Universal_Soldier
09-01-2009, 05:15 PM
The Canadians didn't cry "National Security" to prevent the acquisition?