PDA

View Full Version : Thatcher told Gorbachev Britain did not want German reunification



Afro-European
09-11-2009, 04:22 AM
Two months before the fall of the Berlin Wall, Margaret Thatcher told President Gorbachev that neither Britain nor Western Europe wanted the reunification of Germany and made clear that she wanted the Soviet leader to do what he could to stop it.
In an extraordinary frank meeting with Mr Gorbachev in Moscow in 1989 — never before fully reported — Mrs Thatcher said the destabilisation of Eastern Europe and the breakdown of the Warsaw Pact were also not in the West’s interests. She noted the huge changes happening across Eastern Europe, but she insisted that the West would not push for its decommunisation. Nor would it do anything to risk the security of the Soviet Union.
Even 20 years later, her remarks are likely to cause uproar. They are all the more explosive as she admitted that what she said was quite different from the West’s public ****ouncements and official Nato communiqués. She told Mr Gorbachev that he should pay no attention to these.
“We do not want a united Germany,” she said. “This would lead to a change to postwar borders, and we cannot allow that because such a development would undermine the stability of the whole international situation and could endanger our security.”
Her hardline views emerge from a remarkable cache of official Kremlin records smuggled out of Moscow. After Mr Gorbachev left office in 1991, copies of the state archives went to his personal foundation in Moscow. A few years ago Pavel Stroilov, a young writer doing research at the foundation, understood the huge historical significance of what they recorded. He copied more than 1,000 transcripts of all the Politburo discussions and brought them with him when he moved to London to continue his research.
His copies were made just in time, as all the transcripts of Politburo meetings and talks with foreign leaders have now been sealed. The records detail how the Russians reacted to the tumultuous events of 1989 and reveal the frantic attempts by Britain and France to halt moves to German unification by manoeuvring the Soviet Union into opposing it.
They also show the complete bemusement in the Kremlin in the face of riots across Eastern Europe and the flight of thousands of East Germans to Hungary and Czechoslovakia. And they make vividly clear Mr Gorbachev’s hatred of the old East European Communist leaders — he referred once to East Germany’s Erich Honecker as an “arsehole”,and his naive belief that if they were removed from office, East Europeans would be grateful to the Russians for promoting perestroika.
Mrs Thatcher knew full well that her remarks would cause a row if revealed. She was already courting controversy — especially among Solidarity supporters in Poland and the West — by telling Mr Gorbachev that she was “deeply impressed” by the courage and patriotism of General Wojciech Jaruzelski, the Polish Communist leader. She noted, approvingly, that Mr Gorbachev had reacted “calmly” to the results of the Polish elections, in which the Communists were defeated for the first time in an open vote in Eastern Europe, and to the other changes in Eastern Europe.
“My understanding of your position is the following: you welcome each country developing in its own way, on condition that the Warsaw Pact remains in place. I understand this position perfectly.”
Then she launched her bombshell. She asked that her next remarks should not be recorded. Mr Gorbachev agreed — but the Kremlin transcript included them anyway, noting laconically: “The following part of the conversation is reproduced from memory.” She spoke of her deep “concern” at what was going on in East Germany. She said “big changes” could be afoot.
And this led to her fear that it would all eventually lead to German reunification — an official goal of Western policy for more than a generation.
She assured Mr Gorbachev that President Bush also wanted to do nothing that would be seen by the Russians as a threat to their security. The same assurance was later spelt out in person to Mr Gorbachev at the Soviet- American summit off Malta.
The Kremlin records are an extraordinary snapshot of the confusion that accompanied the collapse of communism across Eastern Europe. The Russians knew that East Germany was vital to their interests, but they could no longer afford to prop it up. And Mr Gorbachev was determined not to send in troops in yet another bloody Soviet crackdown.
Amazingly, the Russians even discussed pulling down the Berlin Wall themselves, as revealed in Kremlin notes of a Poliburo discussion on November 3, 1989 — six days before the wall was opened:
[Vladimir] Kryuchkov [head of the KGB]: Tomorrow 500,000 people will come out on the streets of Berlin and other cities . . .
Gorbachev: Are you hoping that Krenz [Honecker’s replacement as party boss] will stay? We won’t be able to explain it to our people if we lose the GDR. However, we won’t be able to keep it afloat without the FRG [West Germany].
[Eduard] Shevardnadze [Foreign Minister]: We’d better take down the wall ourselves.
Kryuchkov: It will be difficult for them if we take it down.
Gorbachev: They [East Germany] will be bought up whole . . . And when they reach world prices, living standards will fall immediately. The West doesn’t want German reunification but wants to use us to prevent it, to cause a clash between us and the FRG so as to rule out the possibility of a future “conspiracy” between the USSR and Germany.
Mrs Thatcher was not the only one worried by events in Germany. A month after the Berlin Wall came down, Jacques Attali, the personal adviser to President Mitterrand, met Vadim Zagladin, a senior Gorbachev aide, in Kiev.
Mr Attali said that Moscow’s refusal to intervene in East Germany had “puzzled the French leadership” and questioned whether “the USSR has made peace with the prospect of a united Germany and will not take any steps to prevent it. This has caused a fear approaching panic.”
He then stated bluntly, echoing Mrs Thatcher: “France by no means wants German reunification, although it realises that in the end it is inevitable.”
In April 1990, five months after the wall came down, Mr Attali said that the spectre of reunification was causing nightmares among France’s politicians. The documents quote him telling Mr Mitterrand that he would “fly off to live on Mars” if this happened.
Mr Gorbachev’s most difficult meetings were with the old guard in the Warsaw Pact. They were all deeply suspicion of his attempts to reform Communism. The fiercest opposition came from East Berlin.
Honecker was aged, unwell and unbending. The East German leadership feared that he was losing control and wanted to dump him. Mr Gorbachev insisted they had to sort things out themselves. Egon Krenz, Honecker’s deputy, thinking that he needed the Kremlin’s permission, had already suggested to Mr Gorbachev a coup. Three weeks later, Honecker was ousted.
Mr Gorbachev saw the chaos for himself when he went to East Berlin for the fortieth anniversary celebrations of East Germany. The entry for October 9 in the diary of Anatoli Chernayev, the Kremlin aide responsible for links with fellow Communist parties, records the tumultuous situation.
“As M.S. [Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev] and Honecker walked together, a continuous roar in the air: ‘Gorby! Gorby!’ emanated from the thousands of people. Nobody paid attention to Erich . . . There were around 20 various leaders in attendance (Zhivkov, Ceaucescu, Nicaraguan Ortega etc) but nobody gave them much heed. All festivities concentrated on Gorbachev’s presence in Berlin.
“On October 10, the Socialist Unity Party of Germany will have a plenum . . . They might overthrow Erich. Otherwise it will soon come to a storm on the wall.”
Mr Chernayev noted that “all of Europe” was raving about Mr Gorbachev in Berlin. “And everybody is whispering in our ear, ‘It is good that the USSR has delicately expressed its stance against German reunification’.”
Politicians who met Mr Gorbachev’s advisers around Europe “say in unison that nobody wants a unified Germany”. Astonishingly, he noted, in France Mr Mitterrand was even thinking of a military alliance with Russia to stop it, “camouflaged as a joint use of armies to fight natural disasters”.
Mr Chernayev recorded Mr Gorbachev’s loathing of Honecker. “M.S. called him an arsehole. He said, ‘He could have said to his people that he has had four operations, he is 78, he does not have the strength to fill his position, so could they please let him go as he has done his duty. Then, maybe, he would have remained an esteemed figure in history.’ ”
If he had left two or three years earlier, he would have had a place in history, Mr Gorbachev said. Instead, Honecker was “cursed by the people”.
After the wall fell, Mr Gorbachev’s relaxed attitude to reunification hardened. At his summit with Mr Bush, he insisted that this should happen only as part of a general rapprochement in Europe. He accused the West of trying to “impose” Western values on Eastern Europe.
He also launched a ferocious attack on Helmut Kohl,the German Chancellor, for hurrying along discussion of unification. The next day, in Moscow, he accused Mr Kohl of issuing an ultimatum, of pushing unification for electoral reasons and of betraying agreements already made with Moscow.
Even in 1990 Mrs Thatcher was still trying to slow things down. “I am convinced that reunification needs a long transition period,” she told Mr Gorbachev. “All Europe is watching this not without a degree of fear, remembering very well who started the two world wars.”
It took another year of tough negotiations involving both Germanies and the four victorious wartime allies before a deal was done on unification.
Translation of the documents and additional research by Sergei Cristo.
Steps to unity
June 12, 1987 President Reagan, in a speech in front of Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate, demands: “Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”
July 17, 1989 Border controls lifted between Hungary and Austria. GDR citizens flee to the West
October 7 During a visit to the GDR, Gorbachev urges reform
October 18 Erich Honecker, East Germany’s head of state, resigns. A new Government prepares a law to lift travel restrictions for East Germans going to the West
November 4 More than 500,000 people demonstrate in East Berlin, demanding reform
November 9 The Politburo announces that East Germans are allowed to move freely into West Germany. Tens of thousands flock to the Berlin Wall. Border guards with no clear orders stand aside and East Germans stream through
November 10 The Brandenburg Gate is opened
May 18, 1990 The two German states sign a treaty on monetary, economic and social union, which comes into force on July 1
October 3 East Germany joins the Federal Republic of Germany Source: German Embassy and Times database

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6829735.ece

Mikhail Gorbachev:Freedom Angel? Is it safe to say that the Soviet Union itself(its liberal leaders at least) brought freedom to East-Europeans?

JRT
09-11-2009, 04:32 AM
Mikhail Gorbachev:Freedom Angel? Is it safe to say that the Soviet Union itself(its liberal leaders at least) brought freedom to East-Europeans?

I'd say it is safe to say that the people yearning for freedom brought it to themselfs. Luckily for many, those in power did not stand in the way.

Afro-European
09-11-2009, 04:35 AM
I'd say it is safe to say that the people yearning for freedom brought it to themselfs. Luckily for many, those in power did not stand in the way.
So you're disregarding Gorby's role in that?

Breerman
09-11-2009, 05:00 AM
Gorby was more in the situation that he had set things in motion that he couldn't reverse even if he had wanted to.

I don't think Thatcher's and Mitterand's stances are new, not new in the sense that their stances were known before, and not new in the way that they didn't suddenly make a policy turn. In a way their attitudes can be seen as a mere continuation of the Anglo-Franco approach towards Germany during the entire 20th century. A clash for dominance over the continent and in world affairs.

JCR
09-11-2009, 06:47 AM
What a b...h, thanks for nothink, UK.
Sometimes I wonder why Russia manages to have cordial relations with Germany after 20 million death and so on while the UK seems to relish hatred of everything german just for principle.

On the other hand, the UK now reaps what Thatcher has sowed, over reliance on finance industry, deindustrialization and Rupert Murdoch...

Lov3ll
09-11-2009, 06:51 AM
while the UK seems to relish hatred of everything german just for principle.


We don't hate Germans we just like winding you up :)

JRT
09-11-2009, 07:04 AM
So you're disregarding Gorby's role in that?

I'm saying the movement would have occurred in Eastern Europe regardless of who was leading the Soviet Politburo. It might have happened years later though, if there was a hard-liner in charge. Gorby certainly had the sense not to order to shoot the people wanting freedom, so I'll definately give him credit for that. In any case the people was the decisive driving force, not politicians in either side of the iron curtain. Of course when influential individuals are pointed, Gorby is there with Kohl.

Zook
09-11-2009, 07:29 AM
Different world, different times. I don't see why anyone could be angry at these comments, it was smart policy to be very careful about the consequences of the collapse of the East, it could have been much worse than it turned out to be.

I vehemently disagree with Thatcher on almost everything, but she was right to be cautious on this when accounting for the historical context.

Seek
09-11-2009, 09:30 AM
you know this wasn't about the collapse of the east, but about germany...

tea drinker
09-11-2009, 11:32 AM
Ironically, it was probably on account of it going well that Germany was so gung ho about the breakup of Yugoslavia, when others urged caution.
That didn't work out so well did it?

I hate that sick b1tch anyway. Iron lady my arse.

wildcat
09-11-2009, 11:35 AM
I hate that sick b1tch anyway. Iron lady my arse.

sad thing is, there has not been a better leader for the UK since.

tea drinker
09-11-2009, 11:42 AM
sad thing is, there has not been a better leader for the UK since.
Everybody since has been better for the Northern Ireland part of UK.

Gammelpreusse
09-11-2009, 12:14 PM
Ironically, it was probably on account of it going well that Germany was so gung ho about the breakup of Yugoslavia, when others urged caution.
That didn't work out so well did it?

I hate that sick b1tch anyway. Iron lady my arse.

elaborate?

Mackie
09-11-2009, 12:27 PM
Old story. Same about France.
They feared new German nationalism and maybe they know the impact on EU politics.

tea drinker
09-11-2009, 12:47 PM
elaborate?
PM Macs
Cheers

Gammelpreusse
09-11-2009, 12:51 PM
Old story. Same about France.
They feared new German nationalism and maybe they know the impact on EU politics.

Hope that does not refer to Germany's fast recognnition of the independence of croatia. That would be one of the most grossly misinterpreted descisions of german foreign politics in international affairs.

but eh, different topic I suppose

DPM_Sheep
09-11-2009, 01:33 PM
Probably had more to do with concern over what could potentially have gone wrong. Germany might have gone right in the end, but the west german economy was knocked on it's backside for a good few years during intergration and let's not even start on how Yugoslavia turned out.

Derbedeu
09-11-2009, 02:04 PM
I never liked Thatcher. What a bitch.

kk111
09-11-2009, 02:15 PM
http://s12.directupload.net/images/090911/2brwqnne.gif
Caldwell, B., March of the Fourth Reich, in: Daily Star, 20.2.1990.

RIPTIDE
09-11-2009, 02:22 PM
No surprise coming from Thatcher.

Mackie
09-11-2009, 02:24 PM
Hope that does not refer to Germany's fast recognnition of the independence of croatia. That would be one of the most grossly misinterpreted descisions of german foreign politics in international affairs.

but eh, different topic I suppose

No, this was later IIRC. I remember some old reports about some worried French politicians.

a_very_ex_STAB
09-11-2009, 02:26 PM
We don't hate Germans we just like winding you up :)

It's so easy to do too. Calling Germans wooden would be an insult to trees :)

RIPTIDE
09-11-2009, 02:28 PM
Everybody since has been better for the Northern Ireland part of UK.
second that woot

cbiwv
09-11-2009, 02:41 PM
I think it is funny how some label Germans as a naturally aggressive people. That has not been my experience. I lived there for two years and even online the Germans seem like a very noble people.

Gammelpreusse
09-11-2009, 02:56 PM
I think it is funny how some label Germans as a naturally aggressive people. That has not been my experience. I lived there for two years and even online the Germans seem like a very noble people.


All part of an evil deception plan to take over the Wor...Europe. Let's win heart and minds!
but pshhhh, else http://www.smilies.4-user.de/include/Militaer/smilie_mil_040.gif

Derbedeu
09-11-2009, 03:00 PM
All part of an evil deception plan to take over the Wor...Europe. Let's win heart and minds!
but pshhhh, else http://www.smilies.4-user.de/include/Militaer/smilie_mil_040.gif


roflroflrofl

Afro-European
09-11-2009, 03:07 PM
West-Germany was economically the most powerful country in the West while East-Germany was militarily the second most powerful country in the East.So reuniting those 2 countries may have diminished France's and UK's influence in Europe and within Nato,Tatcher may have thought.Just my guess.

Atlantic Friend
09-11-2009, 03:15 PM
I think it is funny how some label Germans as a naturally aggressive people. That has not been my experience. I lived there for two years and even online the Germans seem like a very noble people.

Nobly aggressive, perhaps.

Atlantic Friend
09-11-2009, 03:17 PM
No, this was later IIRC. I remember some old reports about some worried French politicians.

It doesn't help when the French President gets mobilized in 1939. Miterrand is supposed to have said that he, as a French patriot, was opposed to the reunification of Germany, but that, were he a German patriot, he'd support it wholeheartedly.

cbiwv
09-11-2009, 03:24 PM
West-Germany was economically the most powerful country in the West while East-Germany was militarily the second most powerful country in the East.So reuniting those 2 countries may have diminished France's and UK's influence in Europe and within Nato,Tatcher may have thought.Just my guess.

I think you may have nailed it there.

gosciu555
09-11-2009, 04:26 PM
This is a surprise to anyone? Typical British/Anglo-Saxon politics.


I hate that sick b1tch anyway. Iron lady my arse.
She a frickin reactionary elitist, how can anyone like her? Because of her politics, there was a breakout of scurvy among working people. Also, she had to pull the Malvinas war stunt cause she was loosing popularity at home. Nothing like a good rally round effect.

Gammelpreusse
09-11-2009, 04:39 PM
Say, what was that fuss between Thatcher and the Unions over anyways?

Andarius-Militarius
09-11-2009, 07:39 PM
Actually, right after unification, Germany did exercise some political power. In 1991, foreign minister Genscher (also the architect of reunification) sponsored separatism in Slovenia in Croatia (Danke Deutchland), not to mention being the first to recognize them, contributing to the Yugoslav Wars (although there were certainly other causes as well).

Lov3ll
09-12-2009, 04:39 AM
This is a surprise to anyone? Typical British/Anglo-Saxon politics.

Also, she had to pull the Malvinas war stunt cause she was loosing popularity at home. Nothing like a good rally round effect.

You're an idiot, WE pulled the FALKLANDS war stunt? remind me who invaded? who was living under a military dictatorship? :roll:

RIPTIDE
09-12-2009, 06:14 AM
You're an idiot, WE pulled the FALKLANDS war stunt? remind me who invaded? who was living under a military dictatorship? :roll:
I was waiting for someone to pounce on that!:)woot

dttk0009
09-12-2009, 07:17 AM
Man, who crapped in her cereal.

a_very_ex_STAB
09-12-2009, 08:11 AM
This is a surprise to anyone? Typical British/Anglo-Saxon politics.


She a frickin reactionary elitist, how can anyone like her? Because of her politics, there was a breakout of scurvy among working people. Also, she had to pull the Malvinas war stunt cause she was loosing popularity at home. Nothing like a good rally round effect.


You're not even old enough to know about Thatcher (good or bad) :roll:

That post has probably earned you some kind of 'Knob-end of the year award' :)

a_very_ex_STAB
09-12-2009, 08:13 AM
West-Germany was economically the most powerful country in the West while East-Germany was militarily the second most powerful country in the East.So reuniting those 2 countries may have diminished France's and UK's influence in Europe and within Nato,Tatcher may have thought.Just my guess.

More to do with EU politics than anything military or NATO-specific in my opinion

I wouldn't be surprised if the French were a bit concerned about developments too - nobody really likes change. Of course the French got around it by basically buying the CDU ;-)

dttk0009
09-12-2009, 08:17 AM
You're not even old enough to know about Thatcher (good or bad) :roll:

That post has probably earned you some kind of 'Knob-end of the year award' :)

According to that statement you have no knowledge of anything prior to your birth, or are you somehow claiming that there's a magic age where one becomes all knowledgeable?

a_very_ex_STAB
09-12-2009, 08:22 AM
According to that statement you have no knowledge of anything prior to your birth, or are you somehow claiming that there's a magic age where one becomes all knowledgeable?

Yeah I know but it needed to be said irt Thatcher etc ;-)

Eztyga
09-12-2009, 08:25 AM
Fair enough too, those Teutons have restless feet, nobody keeps an eye on them they are off across borders.

Seek
09-12-2009, 09:03 AM
Probably had more to do with concern over what could potentially have gone wrong. Germany might have gone right in the end, but the west german economy was knocked on it's backside for a good few years during intergration and let's not even start on how Yugoslavia turned out.

I fail to see the connection between the reunification of Germany and the breakup in Yugoslavia. Care to elaborate?

Lazy Lob
09-12-2009, 09:42 AM
.... Also, she had to pull the Malvinas war stunt cause she was loosing popularity at home........



http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/4940/biglebowskiy.jpg

Oh dear. Award for "quote of the year" so far.

Eagle The Lightning
09-12-2009, 10:47 AM
Also, she had to pull the Malvinas war stunt cause she was loosing popularity at home.
http://i36.tinypic.com/nnuxhg.jpg

Arfah
09-12-2009, 01:59 PM
This is a surprise to anyone? Typical British/Anglo-Saxon politics.


She a frickin reactionary elitist, how can anyone like her? Because of her politics, there was a breakout of scurvy among working people. Also, she had to pull the Malvinas war stunt cause she was loosing popularity at home. Nothing like a good rally round effect.

FLAMEBAIT :cantbeli:

RIPTIDE
09-12-2009, 02:04 PM
FLAMEBAIT :cantbeli:

About gosciu555
BiographyPro science, anti psychopathy.
LocationIn the closet, hiding from adminz
InterestsTrying to not get banned
OccupationFlame-baitwoot:)

123456789

gosciu555
09-12-2009, 04:45 PM
You're an idiot, WE pulled the FALKLANDS war stunt? remind me who invaded? who was living under a military dictatorship? :roll:

What did the Argentians have to gain by invading, what value did some islands with some sheep on the have? None other than political gains.

Say you're loosing popularity at home. You call them up and say "you are collapsing, we are collapsing. We can prop each other up using this stunt." And war begins. Thats politics but I see many of you have been swept up by the hysteria. Its the same thing they did late in the cold war when Thatcher was in contact with the USSR and Gorby. They knew if they continued the conflict they could prop up both of their regimes. Yeah so before you call me a know make sure you know what you're talking about.

Eagle The Lightning
09-12-2009, 04:51 PM
What did the Argentians have to gain by invading, what value did some islands with some sheep on the have? None other than political gains.

Say you're loosing popularity at home. You call them up and say "you are collapsing, we are collapsing. We can prop each other up using this stunt." And war begins. Thats politics but I see many of you have been swept up by the hysteria. Its the same thing they did late in the cold war when Thatcher was in contact with the USSR and Gorby. They knew if they continued the conflict they could prop up both of their regimes. Yeah so before you call me a know make sure you know what you're talking about.
http://www.youtube.com/v/eEhDZN0RFjw

DPM_Sheep
09-12-2009, 05:01 PM
I fail to see the connection between the reunification of Germany and the breakup in Yugoslavia. Care to elaborate?

Break up of the old soviet block, maybe? :roll:

Soldat_Américain
09-12-2009, 05:35 PM
What did the Argentians have to gain by invading, what value did some islands with some sheep on the have? None other than political gains.

Say you're loosing popularity at home. You call them up and say "you are collapsing, we are collapsing. We can prop each other up using this stunt." And war begins. Thats politics but I see many of you have been swept up by the hysteria. Its the same thing they did late in the cold war when Thatcher was in contact with the USSR and Gorby. They knew if they continued the conflict they could prop up both of their regimes. Yeah so before you call me a know make sure you know what you're talking about.

Yur a farking idiot.

Atlantic Friend
09-12-2009, 05:51 PM
What did the Argentians have to gain by invading, what value did some islands with some sheep on the have? None other than political gains.

Which is exactly what you are saying the British were after. So, political gains good enough for Thatcher, not good enough for Videla and co? :|

RIPTIDE
09-12-2009, 06:01 PM
Which is exactly what you are saying the British were after. So, political gains good enough for Thatcher, not good enough for Videla and co? :|
For the love of the Gods, stop engaging him.

Seek
09-13-2009, 07:34 AM
Break up of the old soviet block, maybe? :roll:

Yugoslavia was never part of that... They weren't even in the WP.

lostlamb
09-13-2009, 12:10 PM
recently I have seen the BBC‘s comedy 《yes,minister》。one words of SIR Hamphrey is very intresting
“minister,Britan has the same foreign diplomacy objective for at least last 500 years:to create a disunited Europe”

a_very_ex_STAB
09-14-2009, 01:47 PM
recently I have seen the BBC‘s comedy 《yes,minister》。one words of SIR Hamphrey is very intresting
“minister,Britan has the same foreign diplomacy objective for at least last 500 years:to create a disunited Europe”

Well given that all external threats to the British Isles have come from the European continent why should anyone find that surprising.

Oh wait it was a comedy.
Maybe ;-)

Atlantic Friend
09-14-2009, 01:51 PM
For the love of the Gods, stop engaging him.

But, for the love of God, why?

Atlantic Friend
09-14-2009, 01:53 PM
Well given that all external threats to the British Isles have come from the European continent why should anyone find that surprising.

Resistance is useless. You and your room-temperature beer shall be assimilated. p-)

INAT
09-14-2009, 02:04 PM
Actually, right after unification, Germany did exercise some political power. In 1991, foreign minister Genscher (also the architect of reunification) sponsored separatism in Slovenia in Croatia (Danke Deutchland), not to mention being the first to recognize them, contributing to the Yugoslav Wars (although there were certainly other causes as well).

Germany,for a long time tried to bring Slovenia and Croatia into its sphere of influence. This gave Germany more power over the Rhine/Danube transit route for ships passing from the North Sea to the Black Sea. Germany openly exerted great pressure on the increasingly seperatist republics, openly encouraging secession and gave Croatia a $2 billion interest-free loan which was never reported to the central government as required by law.This is not to discuss the Balkans but rather to show the first direct affect German unification had on Eastern Europe.

Eye
09-14-2009, 02:06 PM
Two months before the fall of the Berlin Wall, Margaret Thatcher told President Gorbachev that neither Britain nor Western Europe wanted the reunification of Germany and made clear that she wanted the Soviet leader to do what he could to stop it.
I'm not surprised. United Germany were always the best ally for Russia and the worst threat for rest of the Europe.

Lazy Lob
09-14-2009, 02:06 PM
Resistance is useless. You and your room-temperature beer shall be assimilated. p-)

NEVER!!!!! Nothing like a pint of bitter to make one's eyes water. Froggy bastard.

ren0312
09-15-2009, 02:45 AM
You're an idiot, WE pulled the FALKLANDS war stunt? remind me who invaded? who was living under a military dictatorship? :roll:

The Viceroyalty of the River Plate did have a claim on the Flaklands.

Mackie
09-15-2009, 03:05 AM
Well given that all external threats to the British Isles have come from the European continent why should anyone find that surprising.

Oh wait it was a comedy.
Maybe ;-)

Thousands of Luftwaffe fighters, Spanish Ships or Roman Legions weren't successful. But now we know it could be so easy - Just wait for Gordon Brown. p-)

Vandervahn
09-15-2009, 09:29 AM
It was no secret that the Thatcherites missed to wake up and smell the coffee that the Reunification would happen, quick, inevitably and primarily to german conditions.

I am however surprised at these apparent attempts from France to make deals with the Soviets to keep Germany down. Then again, both the British and French knew a reunified Germany would put a lid on their european power duopoly.



We don't hate Germans we just like winding you up :)

Funny, it took one stupid Malvinas comment and look whos all up in arms p-)