PDA

View Full Version : M-113 Super Gavin



dynamicpara
10-01-2009, 07:50 PM
I propose that a varient of the M-113 Gavin callled the Super Gavin should be produced to solve tactical problems in Afghanistan.


The Super Gavin or SG for short should come with a turret mounted 90mm main gun and a TOW launcher in addition to a standard M-240 Bravo GPMG.

The SG should have a crew of 4 and be able to transport 9 men to the battle and provide fire support.

The SG should take priority in Afghanistan but a few can be sent to Iraq to replace the faulty stryker trucks.


Also the SG should be painted in mulicam to match future US Army uniforms

Laworkerbee
10-01-2009, 07:51 PM
I appreciate your attempt to get Hellfish to post here.

Carry on,

Fintin
10-01-2009, 07:53 PM
I propose that a varient of the M-113 Gavin callled the Super Gavin should be produced to solve tactical problems in Afghanistan.


The Super Gavin or SG for short should come with a turret mounted 90mm main gun and a TOW launcher in addition to a standard M-240 Bravo GPMG.

The SG should have a crew of 4 and be able to transport 9 men to the battle and provide fire support.

The SG should take priority in Afghanistan but a few can be sent to Iraq to replace the faulty stryker trucks.


Also the SG should be painted in mulicam to match future US Army uniforms


We thank you for your proposal and will take it under consideration. Please, feel free to forward your ideas on to us as we see your opinion as valuable.

Alpheus
10-01-2009, 07:54 PM
Fake troll is fake.

OR

I am intrigued. How can I subscribe to your newsletter?

dynamicpara
10-01-2009, 07:57 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4Cu49ChoHU&feature=channel_page


heres a video I put on youtube of what the SG should look like

Alpheus
10-01-2009, 08:01 PM
Why don't you post that video where you turn an Iowa-class BB into an abortion of an aircraft carrier? Or that retarded video of sending troops into battle in shipping containers?

This thread has great potential.

dynamicpara
10-01-2009, 08:03 PM
Ok. For those who dont know me I am 1ST LT Mike Sparks of the NC Army National Guard SF unit,I am also the founder and chairman of the 1ST Tactical Studies Group(Airborne).

I have served in GW1,Somalia,Bosnia,Kosovo,Afghanistan,Iraq and Iran.

Laworkerbee
10-01-2009, 08:04 PM
heres a video I put on youtube of what the SG should look like

I saw a clip of a stationary and very top heavy looking abortion of an M113 shooting at stationary targets.


Ok. For those who dont know me I am 1ST LT Mike Sparks of the NC Army National Guard SF unit,I am also the founder and chairman of the 1ST Tactical Studies Group(Airborne).

I have served in GW1,Somalia,Bosnia,Kosovo,Afghanistan,Iraq and Iran.

Tell me more

dynamicpara
10-01-2009, 08:04 PM
Why don't you post that video where you turn an Iowa-class BB into an abortion of an aircraft carrier? Or that retarded video of sending troops into battle in shipping containers?

This thread has great potential.

The battle boxes have great potential indeed and they can be towed by the M-113 Gavin.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qdHqBKbaAI&feature=channel_page

dynamicpara
10-01-2009, 08:05 PM
I saw a clip of a stationary and very top heavy looking abortion of an M113 shooting at stationary targets.



Tell me more


That information is CLASSIFIED

Yarrick2
10-01-2009, 08:07 PM
That information is CLASSIFIED
so complete and utter bull****?

Laworkerbee
10-01-2009, 08:08 PM
That information is CLASSIFIED

If it's indeed classified then why would you mention it on a public forum in any way shape or form?

ronnieraygun
10-01-2009, 08:09 PM
That information is CLASSIFIED

http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/4915/2007nocountryforoldman0.jpg

dynamicpara
10-01-2009, 08:09 PM
so complete and utter bull****?


The only thing that I can tell is that my team was chasing a insurgent group and they crossed over into Iran. The reason I can admit this is because those idiots at fox news stated that USSOCOM forces were operating in Iran

Straker
10-01-2009, 08:10 PM
This has got to be a really poor attempt at a WAH.

Even ol' Sparky himself can't be this stupid!

Alpheus
10-01-2009, 08:10 PM
NC Army National Guard SF unit,

I am intrigued. What unit do you speak of?

dynamicpara
10-01-2009, 08:11 PM
i am intrigued. What unit do you speak of?

special forces oda 786

Zarak
10-01-2009, 08:12 PM
Eh, I'd say it was the worst thread ever, but he's forcing it a bit much.

BlackFlag
10-01-2009, 08:12 PM
Go away forever.

Virus
10-01-2009, 08:13 PM
I propose that a varient of the M-113 Gavin callled the Super Gavin should be produced to solve tactical problems in Afghanistan.


The Super Gavin or SG for short should come with a turret mounted 90mm main gun and a TOW launcher in addition to a standard M-240 Bravo GPMG.

The SG should have a crew of 4 and be able to transport 9 men to the battle and provide fire support.

The SG should take priority in Afghanistan but a few can be sent to Iraq to replace the faulty stryker trucks.


Also the SG should be painted in mulicam to match future US Army uniforms

Hey now...strykers are awesome....And fck you're super gavin, M2A3's ftw

SMGLee
10-01-2009, 08:16 PM
You mean SFOD A? ODA 786?

I can make a quick call in to USASOCOM to get your credential. do you care to IM me off line so we can verify your status?

I think I finally got in a thread like this from the beginning. It will be fun!

HGRazorR
10-01-2009, 08:20 PM
Really 1LT Sparks? I just happened to have my AKO tabbed and there's no 1LT Sparks listed.... but, do tell us about your time with the 20th

Hollis
10-01-2009, 08:20 PM
You mean SFOD A? ODA 786?

I can make a quick call in to USASOCOM to get your credential. do you care to IM me off line so we can verify your status?

I think I finally got in a thread like this from the beginning. It will be fun!


I await an answer too. I can also run it past the SF people.

I just asked the people in SF, Guess we will know for sure.

Laworkerbee
10-01-2009, 08:20 PM
You were in 'Nam? So were we. Where?

I was in...Sang Bang...Dang Gong...I was all over the place, a lot of places.



What unit?

I was with the Green Berets,
Special Unit Battalions...

Commando Airborne Tactics...
Specialist Tactics Unit Battalion.

Yeah, it was real hush hush.

I was Agent Orange,
Special Agent Orange, that was me.

Dling
10-01-2009, 08:21 PM
Obvious troll is obvious.

Virus
10-01-2009, 08:23 PM
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l282/palatin/Untitled-2.jpg

SMGLee
10-01-2009, 08:25 PM
You were in 'Nam? So were we. Where?

I was in...Sang Bang...Dang Gong...I was all over the place, a lot of places.



What unit?

I was with the Green Berets,
Special Unit Battalions...

Commando Airborne Tactics...
Specialist Tactics Unit Battalion.

Yeah, it was real hush hush.

I was Agent Orange,
Special Agent Orange, that was me.

I told you not to post my credentials, those were classified information, now I would have to hunt you down and get you drunk again!

Laworkerbee
10-01-2009, 08:26 PM
Whiskeyboarded :|

Sneeker
10-01-2009, 08:30 PM
I love these threads!:) I'll be right back need beer.

http://www.defensetech.org/archives/002813.html

this isnt the first place mike has been too.

Chiptox
10-01-2009, 08:31 PM
His old geocities pages are amusing. Google for the "ranger" training one.

Fireball Sanchez
10-01-2009, 08:31 PM
yo sparkplug, no such thing as a gavin, holmes.... Never was, never ever, EVER will be, please get over it and get on with your life.

farmgirl
10-01-2009, 08:35 PM
I think we're done here.

Andreas
10-01-2009, 08:36 PM
I propose that a varient of the M-113 Gavin callled the Super Gavin should be produced to solve tactical problems in Afghanistan.


The Super Gavin or SG for short should come with a turret mounted 90mm main gun and a TOW launcher in addition to a standard M-240 Bravo GPMG.

The SG should have a crew of 4 and be able to transport 9 men to the battle and provide fire support.

The SG should take priority in Afghanistan but a few can be sent to Iraq to replace the faulty stryker trucks.


Also the SG should be painted in mulicam to match future US Army uniforms

Dont pay any attention to all these numbnuts trying to talk down your experience.

I really like your ideas of the tactical use of a true and tested platform like the 113, just updated for a new millennium.

Btw I have always thought that vehichle camo should match uniform camo, cant believe i finally came across someone else who understands that this has been overlooked for years..

Love to hear more of your thoughst.

Welcome to the forum

Cheers
Andreas

digrar
10-02-2009, 12:43 AM
I'll just pop this thread in here for future reference/lols.