PDA

View Full Version : Indian hegemony continues to harm relations with neighbors



GreatMaratha
10-15-2009, 05:17 PM
Nobody can deny that today's India is a power. In recent years, Indians have become more narrow-minded and intolerable of outside criticism as nationalism sentiment rises, with some of them even turning to hegemony. It can be proved by India's recent provocation on border issues with China.

Given the country's history, hegemony is a hundred-percent result of British colonialism. Dating back to the era of British India, the country covered a vast territory including present-day India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh as well as Nepal. India took it for granted that it could continue to rule the large area when Britain ended its colonialism in South Asia. A previous victim of colonialism and hegemony started to dream about developing its own hegemony. Obsessed with such mentality, India turned a blind eye to the concessions China had repeatedly made over the disputed border issues, and refused to drop the pretentious airs when dealing with neighbors like Pakistan.

Many Indians didn't know that Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, had once said that India could not play an inferior role in the world, and it should either be a superpower or disappear.

Although the pursuit of being a superpower is justifiable, the dream of being a superpower held by Indians appears impetuous. The dream of superpower is mingled with the thought of hegemony, which places the South Asian giant in an awkward situation and results in repeated failure.

Throughout the history, India has constantly been under foreign rule. The essence for the rise of India lies in how to be an independent country, to learn to solve the complicated ethnic and religious issues, to protect the country from terrorist attacks, to boost economic development as well as to put more efforts on poverty alleviation.

Additionally, the hegemony can also be harmful in terms of geopolitical environment. The expansion of India is restricted by its geographic locations. It has Himalaya Mountain to its north, a natural barrier for northward expansion; it has Pakistan to the west, a neighbor it is always at odds over the disputed border issues.

To everyone's disappointment, India pursued a foreign policy of "befriend the far and attack the near". It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.

India, which vows to be a superpower, needs to have its eyes on relations with neighbors and abandon the recklessness and arrogance as the world is undergoing earthshaking changes. For India, the ease of tension with China and Pakistan is the only way to become a superpower. At present, China is proactively engaging in negotiations with India for the early settlement of border dispute and India should give a positive response.

Source: http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90780/91343/6783357.html
:cantbeli: Another skunk output coming up

Ordie
10-15-2009, 05:22 PM
Indians have become more narrow-minded and intolerable of outside criticism as nationalism sentiment rises, with some of them even turning to hegemony. It can be proved by India's recent provocation on border issues with China

Ironically the same can be true of China.

At this point India and China deserve each other.

pg_ord
10-15-2009, 05:34 PM
To everyone's disappointment, India pursued a foreign policy of "befriend the far and attack the near". It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.
:cantbeli: worst thing one can do to people who have been colonized before is to talk down to them.

Chulo
10-15-2009, 05:35 PM
To everyone's disappointment, India pursued a foreign policy of "befriend the far and attack the near". It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.
China and Africa as compared to how they handle India, Tibet and Taiwan?

Chulo
10-15-2009, 05:37 PM
oh yea.. hey china


http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/6885/3658434386412f0c01f3261.jpg (http://img202.imageshack.us/i/3658434386412f0c01f3261.jpg/)

VAMAN
10-15-2009, 05:52 PM
What a rubbish article. Just a random whining.

plato
10-15-2009, 05:57 PM
What is up with "whining"? People whine about "whining" a lot lately. Can they just stop whining about "whining" already. hehe

GazB
10-15-2009, 07:49 PM
To everyone's disappointment, India pursued a foreign policy of "befriend the far and attack the near". It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.

So Britain is immature? Britain became a superpower, yet British relations with its neighbours left something to be desired. France, Ireland... Britains closest neighbours were not best buddies for quite some time.


For India, the ease of tension with China and Pakistan is the only way to become a superpower. At present, China is proactively engaging in negotiations with India for the early settlement of border dispute and India should give a positive response.

Yes, because that is how you become a super power. Listening to others and actively engaging in negotiations... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Rome was renowned for its negotiations... at the end of a blade. Britain used ships to impose its will, and the US uses aircraft carriers and a mobile military force.

acosta
10-15-2009, 10:06 PM
Ironically the same can be true of China.

At this point India and China deserve each other.


you do look funny, and now start trolling...

why bring china in, kid?

kurtlogan
10-15-2009, 10:51 PM
you do look funny, and now start trolling...

why bring china in, kid?

Maybe because the article is from china! Seriously you commies are really a bunch of clowns!

JBH22
10-16-2009, 08:09 AM
Source:
To everyone's disappointment, India pursued a foreign policy of "befriend the far and attack the near". It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.

:cantbeli: Another skunk output coming up

BULL**** rofl

martinexsquaddie
10-16-2009, 08:42 AM
hang on ireland at that time was a british colony so its views did'nt really count

vrb
10-16-2009, 09:34 AM
Poorly written bollocks. If you are going to attempt to push an agenda or convince anyone of anything please note that writing 95% crap doesn't help your case :backhand:

P.Koschei
10-16-2009, 10:29 AM
The author's assessment of Indian hegemoniacal attitudes is not incorrect, however they do not go far enough. Since it's establishment as an independent nation, India has been and continues to be a revanchist and irredentist state bent on territorial aggrandizement masquerading beneath half baked gandhigiri drivel. Unfortunately for them, but fortunate for her neighbors, their general level of incompetence has precluded the realization of their imperial pretensions.

Though there is a great gulf between ambitions and capability that exists, it quixotically does nothing to dampen their ardour for conquest. Quite the opposite in fact, it has only fueled their capacity for rank self-delusion to reach ever greater heights to compensate. This explains how they could with a straight face, plea for more food aid from America while simultaneously lecturing her on how to properly govern her affairs. Or to use a more recent example, shrilly scream about so-called Chinese aggression while issuing threats and boasting of her own prowress, blissfully unaware that the gap between their capabilities have never been greater and that it is further expanding.

pg_ord
10-16-2009, 11:08 AM
^^^^^
Now that is drivel. :)

vrb
10-16-2009, 11:44 AM
^^^^^
Now that is drivel. :)


Entertaining drivel p-)

kurtlogan
10-16-2009, 12:08 PM
The author's assessment of Indian hegemoniacal attitudes is not incorrect, however they do not go far enough. Since it's establishment as an independent nation, India has been and continues to be a revanchist and irredentist state bent on territorial aggrandizement masquerading beneath half baked gandhigiri drivel. Unfortunately for them, but fortunate for her neighbors, their general level of incompetence has precluded the realization of their imperial pretensions.

Though there is a great gulf between ambitions and capability that exists, it quixotically does nothing to dampen their ardour for conquest. Quite the opposite in fact, it has only fueled their capacity for rank self-delusion to reach ever greater heights to compensate. This explains how they could with a straight face, plea for more food aid from America while simultaneously lecturing her on how to properly govern her affairs. Or to use a more recent example, shrilly scream about so-called Chinese aggression while issuing threats and boasting of her own prowress, blissfully unaware that the gap between their capabilities have never been greater and that it is further expanding.


And we all know that China is a peaceful country does not attack anyone.

Let's see:

1950 China invaded Tibet

1962 China attacked India

1969 China ambushed Soviet border guards and started a conflict with the Soviet Union.

1979 China Attacked Vietnam.

Reality sucks but facts are facts. China is an aggressive country hell bent on world domination.